Author: The Fix

  • Me, My Psych Meds & My 12-Step Recovery

    Me, My Psych Meds & My 12-Step Recovery

    Now that I have double-digit sobriety, I have no qualms about pulling aside people who disparage the use of psych meds in meetings.

    As I sat in my jail cell I had to question the admonition I got from an old-timer at a 12-step meeting I frequented.

    “If you trust your Higher Power enough, you don’t need psych meds.”

    Really? How well did that work for me? Prior to my psychotic break I wore my sobriety well. I had married the love of my life. My IT consulting practice was netting me a mid-six figure income. The custom house we bought and furnished was paid in full.

    Funny thing about alcoholics. When things are going well we want to fiddle with the recipe that got us there. Why do I need meds? After all, I have been symptom-free for years. I have never been manic in sobriety.

    For some reason the under-utilized abacus in my head couldn’t (or wouldn’t) do the math that me plus meds equaled sanity. That old-timer’s advice started to resonate. After all, I was a Higher-Power-trusting kind of guy. Never did it occur to me that maybe there was power and inspiration behind the development of the medications that kept me sane.

    A salesman at heart, I broached the subject of discontinuing meds with my wife—my wife who had never known me symptomatic.

    “I’m doing fine,” I said. “Just look at all these articles I found on the web about managing symptoms with vitamins and exercise.”

    I closed the deal and by August of 2009 I was med-free.

    All was well until it wasn’t. In November of that year my wife was hospitalized with COPD exacerbation. Talk about the need for a lung transplant and end-of-life-planning marked many of our conversations with physicians. Up went the anxiety level.

    As the stress level began to rise, the amount of sleep I was getting decreased proportionally. Funny thing about bipolar I disorder, nothing triggers mania like lack of sleep. Or so I learned later.

    Around January or February of 2010—the timeline gets a little distorted… a little racy—my response to my wife’s health condition was to pick up more clients, sleep less and work more. One of my clients, a large county government, went under investigation by the state’s Attorney General.

    The subject of the investigation? The contents of a database I maintained.

    The state wanted the unvarnished data. The county wanted it “scrubbed.” Stress bombs were being lobbed at my increasingly fragile state of mind.

    Somewhere in the spring of 2010 there was an audible snap. Distinguishing the seemingly real from the false got a little tricky. Paranoia replaced anxiety. Clients began pulling me into meetings to explain why I was sending late-night emails about Russian cell-phone hackers and suspicious activities on the part of my co-workers.

    Apparently, my explanations were none too satisfying. First there was a mandated two- week “vacation.” A week after I returned I guess no improvement was noted as the County Manager’s personal security detail escorted me from the premises. My monthly billing dropped by 75% at a time I was spending and gambling like, well, like someone in the midst of a full manic break. The bank accounts were drained and the credit cards began to max out.

    My wife reminded me of a promise to resume medication if she ever deemed it necessary… and she was definitely in a deeming-it-necessary mode. Funny thing about psych meds, the maintenance dose that had worked so well for years really wasn’t up to snuffing out full blown mania. I resumed my meds, but it was like trying to battle a raging forest fire with a squirt bottle.

    By May, loved ones were more than a little concerned. That came to a head in the aftermath of a pool party/cookout gone awry. For some reason I thought our guests needed to be greeted by the entire content of my garage spread across the front yard and folding tables piled high with $3,500 dollars’ worth of random magazines, toys, household goods, and an inordinate amount of Febreze from a 2 a.m. Walmart shopping spree.

    Twenty-four hours later there was a late-night visit from the local police to take me to a 72-hour psych hold my wife and daughters had arranged.

    Agnosognosia. A Greek term for lack of insight. The medical profession has reserved it to describe the phenomenon of people in the throes of mania denying that they are manic. I had it, but good. Four hours into my psych hold I pretended to be asleep and then put on a very calm front for the psychiatrist who had just come on shift to make the rounds.

    By hour six I was released, and my wife and daughter got a tongue-lashing from the doctor for wasting her time. I delighted in that, but not once did it occur to me that if I had to consciously act calm, maybe things weren’t quite right. Life at home got a little more strained.

    Five days later I agreed to be hospitalized. Then I reneged on my promise and decided to storm out of the house to underscore how healthy-minded I was.

    As I packed, among other things, a two-and-a-half-foot tall Buzz Lightyear action figure, a cloth “green screen” for shooting videos and manipulating the background, and a folded American flag. I also decided to pack an unloaded .22 pistol that was going to be the centerpiece of a yet unscripted cellphone video masterpiece.

    As I turned from my dresser to the duffle bag I was packing on my bed, my wife entered the room. The gun was pointed in her direction. She didn’t see a budding videographer; to her it was a little more “assaulty-ish.”

    A half hour later, I was cleaning the pool at an unoccupied rental house of ours where I had decided to camp out. Not five minutes into it, I noticed a helicopter directly overhead. In my paranoid and delusional state, I assumed the helicopter was there to film me in all my glory.

    Turns out, a very real S.W.A.T. team had encircled me and I wasn’t so delusional after all. My mugshot made the front page of our major online newspaper… in all my glory.

    Over the next six weeks in jail my symptoms subsided, my marriage was repaired, and I got a felony assault charge reduced to disorderly conduct. (I really couldn’t argue that I had been a little disorderly.)

    Still, I had one full year to learn how difficult it is to stay employable until that felony disorderly conduct was reduced to a misdemeanor. I am now very sympathetic towards sponsees who are trying to get back on track following incarceration.

    You guessed it. If I am still sponsoring, I am still active in 12-step recovery. It may not be for everyone, but it works very well for me.

    Now that I have double-digit sobriety, however, one thing has changed. I have no qualms about pulling aside people who disparage the use of psych meds in meetings. I share my story and explain rather firmly why they might want to reconsider that position.

    I am also not shy about sharing in meetings about an article from AA’s Grapevine magazine published in the 1970s when groups were first wrestling with the subject of psych meds. The home group in that story? Well, it arrived at a position that still holds true to this day: If advised to take psychiatric medication by a physician, you should not take one more, nor one less, than prescribed.

    Rick Bell, a bipolar alcoholic in recovery, holds a M.S.in Addiction Science and is completing a PhD in Psychology. He blogs at recoveryrules.com/blog.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • How Drugs, Alcohol & Suicide Are Affecting The Average Lifespan

    How Drugs, Alcohol & Suicide Are Affecting The Average Lifespan

    A new CDC report has revealed some alarming changes in life expectancy trends.

    A new CDC report reveals that the average life expectancy in the United States is falling for the first time since 1993.

    Drugs, alcohol, and suicide are taking the lives of young Americans at rates so high that the U.S. life expectancy is being pushed down, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

    The CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) has released a new federal report revealing that the U.S. life expectancy has dipped by about 0.3 years between 2014 and 2016.

    This breaks the pattern of steadily-rising life expectancy between 2006 and 2016, which saw growth from 77.8 years to 78.6 years. The causes for this drop in the general population, says the CDC, are rising drug overdose rates, suicide, liver disease, and Alzheimer’s.

    Drug deaths have been spiraling out of control over the past few years, killing 63,600 people in 2016.

    In 2016, liver disease surpassed HIV to take the dubious honor of being the sixth-highest cause of death for U.S. adults aged 25 to 44.

    Suicide has been on an upward trend for all demographics, including an alarming 9% increase in suicides by children from age 1 to 14 during the study period.

    While more men have died of overdose and suicide than women in the past, that gender gap is quickly closing. Drug overdose deaths jumped by about 19% for women aged 15 to 24 from 2014 to 2016. Suicide rates for young women have grown by a whopping 70% between 2010 and 2016.

    Deaths from Alzheimer’s disease have risen by 21%, and the CDC expects this number to grow larger as time goes on.

    However, the report wasn’t all bad news. Among Americans above the age of 65, deaths resulting from heart disease, cancer, and strokes have fallen.

    Drugs, alcohol, and suicide have been working to drive down life expectancy since 1993. While these increases may not seem like a big deal, Robert Anderson, chief of the mortality statistics branch at the National Center for Health Statistics, says we should be aware.

    “For any individual, that’s not a whole lot,” he told NPR. “But when you’re talking about it in terms of a population, you’re talking about a significant number of potential lives that aren’t being lived.”  

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Restaurant That Sedated Lobsters With Weed Under Investigation

    Restaurant That Sedated Lobsters With Weed Under Investigation

    “I feel bad that when lobsters come here there is no exit strategy,” said the owner of Charlotte’s Legendary Lobster Pound.

    Would you like your lobster baked or stoned?

    A beloved eatery in Maine is drawing attention—from national press as well as from state investigators—for smoking up its crustaceans with cannabis before boiling them as part of a questionably effective effort to soothe the lobsters’ last moments. 

    “I feel bad that when lobsters come here there is no exit strategy,” Charlotte Gill, owner of Charlotte’s Legendary Lobster Pound, told the Portland Press Herald. “It’s a unique place and you get to do such unique things but at the expense of this little creature. I’ve really been trying to figure out how to make it better.”

    Of course, it’s not even clear how much lobsters can feel pain or if they can actually get high, and the whole endeavor raises some nagging legal—and scientific—questions.

    “I’m not aware of any actual studies on this and haven’t done any myself, though it sounds interesting,” Robert Bayer, director of the University of Maine’s Lobster Institute, told the Maine paper. “When you put them in boiling water, the primitive nervous system that does exist is destroyed so quickly they’re unlikely to feel anything at all.”

    But, earlier this year, Switzerland banned boiling lobsters in light of studies suggesting the pinchy shellfish might feel some pain. New Zealand nixed the practice almost two decades ago. 

    Gill is a licensed marijuana grower, so she’s been cultivating the crustaceans’ cannabis at home, according to the New York Times. But that effort raised red flags with the state health department, prompting regulators to send her a notice politely pointing out that the marijuana is supposed to be grown for her, not for her lobsters.

    At the same time, the Maine Health Inspection Program has launched an investigation into the Southwest Harbor restaurant and its “high-end lobster,” but as of Friday they hadn’t issued any findings.

    Despite the catchy name and the smoky additive, Gill offered reassurances that the plant’s active ingredient wouldn’t actually make it through to human consumers, after the animals are cooked. 

    “THC breaks down completely by 392 degrees,” she said, “therefore we will use both steam as well as a heat process that will expose the meat to a 420 degree extended temperature, in order to ensure there is no possibility of carryover effect.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Backstreet Boy AJ McLean Inspired to Fight Addiction After Mac Miller’s Passing

    Backstreet Boy AJ McLean Inspired to Fight Addiction After Mac Miller’s Passing

    The pop star is throwing his weight behind a new line of home products made to help those struggling with addiction.

    The boy band singer is driven to stay sober and fight addiction with a new line of recovery products.

    Singer AJ McLean is leaning in to the fight against addiction following Mac Miller’s death. Having battled his own addictions in the past, McLean knows Miller’s struggles all too well.

    “I met him a couple of times at radio shows and he was a stand-up guy,” McLean told ET. “You would never know that he had a problem — but a lot of people had no idea that I had a problem. Addicts can hide it pretty well, so all my condolences go to his family and friends. He’s another one gone too soon.”

    McLean himself has two young daughters as motivation to stay sober, but Miller’s passing has given McLean a renewed vigor in combating addiction. He’s throwing his weight behind a new line of home products made to help those struggling with substance abuse, with a special focus on opioids.

    “With what recently happened with Mac Miller, people need to really understand how serious addiction is,” he remarked. “It’s a huge killer and you’ve just got to surround yourself with the right people, go to your meetings and get a sponsor. It’s a marathon, not a race. I’m getting involved with a pharmaceutical company that is going to be putting out some amazing products. One is an at-home opioid detox kit, non-narcotic because one of the biggest [causes of] deaths in the entire world right now is based on opioids.”

    In 2001, the Backstreet Boys stopped their Black & Blue tour to allow McLean to go to rehab for alcohol abuse treatment. He’s been open about his recovery process, fessing up to having relapsed on booze in the past during his recovery. To this day, McLean still does his best to attend at least five Alcoholics Anonymous meetings per week.

    These days McLean isn’t just staying sober for himself–he has his wife and two daughters, five-year-old Ava and one-year-old Lyric, to look after.

    “Having a family and looking my two girls in the eye every single night and every single morning —  they’re my lifeline,” he admitted. “They’re my everything. Them and my wife. So, I would never in a million years want to let them see me drunk or high or dead or in jail. I want to walk both my girls down the aisle … when they’re 35! As long as I can hold off on boys, I’m going to hold off on boys!”

    McLean’s schedule is pretty busy these days. Besides raising two daughters and backing a range of recover products, he’s also wrapping up work on a new Backstreet Boys album while also working on a solo country record.

    “I have been super busy trying to finish off my solo record, and this past week — I think, hopefully — we finished the Backstreet Boys record!” he told ET. “So, we can have it come out in October as planned, then tour around the world next year.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Bringing Harm Reduction to Haywood County

    Bringing Harm Reduction to Haywood County

    The man in the camouflage shirt who emerges from the cabin is drawn and thin with circles under his eyes. He tenses at my presence, especially once Jeremy tells him I am there to write an article.

    It is a cloudy evening and mosquitoes patrol in full force as Nancy Bauman and I pick our way gingerly over trash-strewn ground, searching for syringes. Under a creekside bridge splashed with graffiti, a pair of neatly folded jeans, a plastic bag of food items, and a pair of shoes offer evidence of a homeless encampment.

    As we search, Nancy opens up about her life as a former injection drug user. She recounts how her only brother died of a heroin overdose shortly after returning from Vietnam. Her own struggle with addiction began through recreational drug use with homecoming soldiers, and years ago she lost her husband to hepatitis C infection. Drugs ruled much of her youth, but Nancy has spunk. She entertains me with tales of how she used to run an illegal syringe exchange program with two Catholic nuns in Los Angeles. 

    As I listen to Nancy, I am not putting much effort into the search for syringes. Truth be told, I feel guilty about picking through someone’s home and also for the assumption that a homeless person must also be an injection drug user. Under the bridge, Nancy and I find nothing but an overturned shopping cart, bits of trash, and a spoon. When the time comes to return to the health department, I feel relieved.

    Nancy and I drive back to the health department to rejoin the rest of the newly formed Substance Use Task Force of Haywood County, North Carolina. The community syringe pick-up event is the inaugural event for this group, which is comprised of public health employees, harm reduction advocates, law enforcement personnel and impacted citizens who hope to address the growing incidence of drug use in Haywood County. The dozen or so members are an eager bunch, well-intentioned but so far lacking clear direction on how to tackle such a complex problem. The group finds only two discarded syringes that evening; still, enthusiasm reigns.

    We are debriefed by members of the North Carolina Harm Reduction Coalition (NCHRC), which in spring 2018 hired three staff members for the area under a grant funded by the Aetna Foundation. Haywood County, and western North Carolina in general, is relatively new territory for NCHRC, which has more established programs in eastern and central parts of the state. In one sense, this is an advantage since advocates can draw on the experience of harm reduction programs in other counties. In another sense, it is a disadvantage. Few people in Haywood County have even heard of the term “harm reduction.” Appalachian residents, often tough and resistant to change, are not easily convinced and stigma against drug users runs deep. For the three new staff members, Gariann Yochym, Virgil Hayes, and Jeremy Sharp, the task of introducing harm reduction to Haywood County is both challenge and an opportunity.

    After the task force disbands, I join Jeremy Sharp to deliver supplies to participants of the mobile syringe exchange program he has helped establish. The clouds have rolled away and the sun is just beginning to set behind the backdrop of the Blue Ridge mountains. We drive past picturesque fields of hay bales and grain silos. The town is so pretty it almost looks painted. We pull up to a log cabin with a single tire swing swaying in the breeze under a tree.

    But the beauty ends here. The man in the camouflage shirt who emerges from the cabin is drawn and thin with circles under his eyes. He tenses at my presence, especially once Jeremy tells him I am there to write an article. As a peace offering, I put away my notebook.

    Jeremy delivers syringes and naloxone to the man and his wife, who emerges from the house. The wife gives a sobering account of her recent arrest for drug possession and the agony of opioid withdrawal she endured while in jail. She asks Jeremy for help getting Suboxone treatment for opioid use and he offers to connect her to his co-worker, Gariann, who can arrange an appointment. Jeremy is quirky but likeable, and the couple’s affection for him is clear.

    When we are back in the car and I have use of my notebook again, Jeremy admits that the stories of death and despair that he encounters on a daily basis can get to him. “I walk into people’s lives for 20 minutes to do an exchange and it can be overwhelming to hear even just a description of all the things they are going through,” he says. 

    “But,” he adds, brightening. “There is nothing like that first naloxone reversal.”

    The struggle to find hope in a grim situation is one that plagues other advocates as well. NCHRC’s Gariann Yochym, who connects Haywood County program participants to social services, lives this fight every day.

    At first glance, Gariann gives off strong hippie vibes. She hails from Asheville, North Carolina’s most notoriously liberal city, but was born and raised in the hills of West Virginia. She glides easily between country twang and the Queen’s English, comfortable in both worlds but fully belonging to neither. In that way, she is well-suited to the work in Haywood County, which necessitates a level of mastery in both progressive public health policy and rural resistance to change.

    Since arriving in Haywood County, Yochym has been laying foundational work to connect drug users to services that can help them improve their health. Introducing harm reduction to an often hostile political environment is not easy. When I first ask Yochym what she thinks of her job, she offers a sunny response: She loves to help people and make a difference. But with prodding, she admits that the work can be difficult.

    “Trying to build relationships and respect, sometimes I don’t know when I should bite my tongue or hold my ground,” she says. “It can be challenging to build new partnerships, but I think we all recognize the importance of working together to address these complex problems.”

    Haywood County is a microcosm of the challenges that harm reduction faces in general. Though the harm reduction movement has existed for decades, in many ways it is still the new kid in town, pushing back against centuries of punitive and abstinence-only approaches to drug use. Long a stronghold in northern states, harm reduction has more recently begun laying foundation in southern states, where politics can be antagonistic. For advocates, the constant dilemma of when to compromise and when to hold firm is exhausting. Bringing opposite sides together often means that neither gets what it wants, and advocates are criticized both for pushing too hard and not pushing hard enough.

    Virgil Hayes, who supervises the Haywood County staff and programs, also lives under this constant pressure. “Not everyone is where you would like them to be in terms of support for harm reduction,” he says as we talk over lunch at a small diner. “We need to understand that change is inevitable, but people need time to part ways with what they have always known.”

    Hayes seems to embrace the opportunity that Haywood County presents. “It’s been an adventure,” he says, smiling and shaking his head. I sense this is an understatement.

    Hayes sees his most important task as working to create a seat at the decision-making table for active drug users. Even in other parts of the state where harm reduction is more accepted, there is still a tendency for non-impacted professionals to speak on behalf of people who use drugs. However, while in other counties stakeholders may have already marked their territory and become resistant to new voices, Haywood County has the opportunity to invite those voices from the beginning. Hayes and his co-workers are actively working to do just that.

    Ultimately, the small team is game for the challenge of bringing harm reduction to Haywood County.

    “I am inspired by the way this community has come together and opened themselves up to our program,” says Yochym. “We have been welcomed with an incredible amount of hospitality and support from unlikely partners.”

    Hayes thinks that education will be key to getting people on board with harm reduction. “People’s hearts change when they realize everything is not what it seems,” he says. He hopes to draw attention and resources to rural counties, where the effects of drug use are often swept under the rug.

    “I want to show how this problem impacts all areas across race, gender, class and geography,” he says. “I want to pull the covers back and show the issue is just as bad here [as in cities] and to present solutions for what we are going to do to change it.”

    It is not easy being dropped into a geographically isolated area and launching a harm reduction program without much precedent or guidance, relying on intuition and experience to know when to compromise and when to stand your ground. It’s an even bigger challenge to fight centuries of stigma to bring active drug users to the decision-making table. But if anyone can do it, I think Haywood County can.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Could A Skin Graft Prevent Cocaine Abuse?

    Could A Skin Graft Prevent Cocaine Abuse?

    Researchers studied whether skin gene therapy could reduce cocaine-seeking behaviors.

    The drug addiction “epidemic” claims tens of thousands of lives each year in America, but until now there has been little talk of ways to immunize people against substance use disorder.

    However, in the future that may be possible, according to new research that found that skin grafting might be used to protect people from cocaine addiction. 

    “Adapting this approach for humans could be a promising way for blocking addiction,” Qingyao Kong, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Chicago, wrote for The Conversation

    Kong was part of a team of researchers that demonstrated that skin grafting could be used in mice to reduce cocaine-seeking behaviors and make the mice less susceptible to overdose when given large amounts of cocaine. Their findings were published in the journal Nature Biomedical Engineering

    Humans naturally produce an enzyme called butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), which can break down cocaine into inactive, harmless components. BChE can be modified to metabolize cocaine even more rapidly than it naturally would, and has been identified as a possible treatment for cocaine addiction. However, it is tricky to deliver the active enzyme and keep it functioning. 

    To overcome this, Kong’s team tried using skin grafts to deliver the enzyme. 

    “So instead of giving the enzyme to the animals, we decided to engineer skin stem cells that carried the gene for the BChE enzyme,” Kong wrote. “This way the skin cells would be able to manufacture the enzyme themselves and supply the animal.”

    To trial the idea on mice, the team first used gene editing to incorporate BChE into skin stem cells from a mouse. 

    “These engineered skin cells produced consistent and high levels of the hBChE protein, which they then secreted,” Kong wrote. Then, the cells were used to grow skin tissue in a lab, which was then grafted onto mice. 

    “With the genetically engineered skin graft releasing hBChE into the blood stream of the host mice, we hypothesized that if the mouse consumed cocaine, the enzyme would rapidly chop up the drug before it could trigger the addictive pleasure response in the brain,” Kong wrote. 

    They were correct. Animals with the skin graft did not get the dopamine high when they dosed on cocaine, meaning they had no motivation to consume more. “Skin graft of the hBChE-cells efficiently blocks the cocaine-induced reward effect,” Kong explained. 

    In addition, it acted as an immunization against overdose. Half of the control mice exposed to large doses of cocaine died, but none of the mice with the graft did. 

    The team then tested whether human skin cells would also produce BChE after being modified, and found that they would. 

    “This suggests the concept of skin gene therapy may be effective for treating cocaine abuse and overdose in humans in the future,” Kong wrote. In addition, other enzymes that target alcohol and nicotine could potentially be used, allowing the skin graft technique to treat individuals with those addictions. 

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Demi Lovato's Mother On Overdose: "We Didn't Know If She Was Going to Make It"

    Demi Lovato's Mother On Overdose: "We Didn't Know If She Was Going to Make It"

    “I literally start to shake a little bit when I start to remember what happened.”

    The mother of singer Demi Lovato spoke at length about her daughter’s drug overdose and recovery in an emotional interview for Newsmax TV.

    Dianna De La Garza said that she still finds it difficult to recall the events of the July overdose, which she learned about through phone texts. Though alarmed by her daughter’s condition, she said that her faith provided her with the strength to support Lovato through her hospitalization and subsequent rehabilitation.

    “I can honestly say today that she is doing really well,” she revealed.

    As TMZ reported, paramedics arrived at Lovato’s home in the Hollywood Hills in the early hours of July 24, and found the performer unconscious from an apparent drug overdose. She was treated with the overdose reversal drug Narcan before she was transported to a Los Angeles hospital, where she remained for 12 days before being released and taken to a rehab facility outside of California. 

    In an Instagram statement posted on August 5, the pop star thanked her family and the staff at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center for getting her through the ordeal, as well as her many fans who had expressed their support during her hospitalization. “The love you have all shown me will never be forgotten and I look forward to the day where I can say I came out on the other side,” she wrote in her statement.

    In her interview with Newsmax TV, De La Garza said that she still struggles with recalling or talking about the events of July 24. “I literally start to shake a little bit when I start to remember what happened,” she said.

    She said that she found out about her daughter’s condition when texts from individuals expressing their concern began to flood her phone.

    Confused by the outpouring of support, De La Garza said that her mood quickly changed when she received a call from Lovato’s assistant.

    “She said Demi overdosed,” recalled De La Garza. “It was something I never, ever expected to hear as a parent about any of my kids. I said, ‘Is she okay?’ And she stopped for a second and said, ‘She’s conscious, but she’s not talking.’ I knew at that point that we were in trouble.”

    De La Garza said that Lovato was in “bad shape” when she saw her at the hospital, but needed her to know that her family was with her.

    “I said, ‘Demi, I’m here, I love you.’ At that point, she said back to me, ‘I love you too.’ From that point on, I never allowed myself to ever think that things were going to be okay.”

    While Lovato lingered in critical condition, De La Garza turned to her faith to help her dispel worries about Demi’s health.

    “We just didn’t know for two days if she was going to make it or not,” she recalled. But the singer pulled through with the help of the hospital staff and support from her many fans. “I just feel like the reason she is alive today is because of the millions and millions of prayers that went up every day,” said De La Garza.

    Today, as Lovato continues to work on her recovery while in rehabilitation, De La Garza said that her daughter is “doing really well. She’s happy, she’s healthy, she’s working on her sobriety, and she’s getting the help she needs.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • New York Times Op-Ed Slams "Incompetent" DEA Over Opioid Crisis

    New York Times Op-Ed Slams "Incompetent" DEA Over Opioid Crisis

    The writers of a scathing op-ed believe the federal agency “deserves much of the blame” for opioid-related deaths.

    A recent op-ed in the New York Times does not mince words in its critique of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). “Because of its incompetence, the opioid crisis has gone from bad to worse. The solution: overhauling the agency, or even getting rid of it entirely,” write Leo Beletsky and Jeremiah Goulka in the Sept. 17 opinion piece.

    Rather than pointing to pharmaceutical drug makers or drug cartels, Beletsky and Goulka—of Northeastern University’s Health in Justice Action Lab—say the DEA “deserves much of the blame” for rising opioid-related deaths. This summer, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that more than 72,000 Americans died of a drug overdose in 2017—with opioids accounting for more than 49,000 of the deaths. 

    The federal agency’s response to rising opioid abuse in the United States did little to mitigate the growing epidemic, the authors write. While the DEA has the authority to establish “non-enforcement programs aimed at reducing the availability” of illicit drugs—e.g. expanding evidence-based treatment from a public health perspective—instead, in its decades-long existence, the agency has opted to ramp up the enforcement side of its mandate.

    “Instead the agency pushed for surveillance of prescription records and electronic communication, doubled down on prosecuting prescribers and helped to tighten the screws on patients seeking pain relief,” reads the op-ed.

    The agency’s enforcement-heavy response to painkiller abuse only pushed people to seek illicit substitutes like heroin and counterfeit pills, and to encourage drug traffickers to “create more compact, potent drugs” like fentanyl.

    This resulted in more deaths as well as the spread of HIV and hepatitis (from sharing needles), while access to evidence-based treatment for drug use disorder, like methadone, saw little improvement.

    Not only is the DEA accused of employing tactics that have “fueled the opioid crisis,” in the 40-plus years since it was established under the administration of former President Richard Nixon (the man who declared drugs “Public Enemy Number 1”) the agency’s approach has had a harmful effect on community policing, and it has earned a reputation for botched operations at home and abroad in its tireless campaign to hunt down illicit drug suppliers. (The agency has the largest foreign presence of any U.S. federal law enforcement agency, according to its 2018 Budget Request.)

    “It has eroded civil liberties through the expansion of warrantless surveillance, and overseen arbitrary seizures of billions of dollars of private property without any clear connection to drug-related crimes,” write Beletsky and Goulka.

    And in the DEA’s long history, “these actions have disproportionately targeted people of color, contributing to disparities in mass incarceration, confiscated property, and collective trauma.”

    By taking Nixon’s “War on Drugs” a bit too literally, the DEA’s focus on the law enforcement side of its mandate has done nothing to reduce the amount of drugs consumed by Americans. “The agency was supposed to curb problematic drug use, but failed to do so because its tactics were never informed by public health or addiction science,” write Beletsky and Goulka.

    The authors of the op-ed offer a solution: reinvent the DEA “from the bottom up.” One way to do this is to transfer regulatory authority over the pharmaceutical supply to the Food and Drug Administration.

    Currently the DEA is in charge of how controlled substances are classified, produced and distributed. (For example, under the DEA, marijuana is classified as a Schedule I drug, which are considered the most dangerous, alongside heroin and LSD.)

    Some of its law enforcement efforts can be transferred to the FBI or local authorities, or eliminated altogether, the authors suggest.

    And a “significant portion” of the DEA’s budget should go to life-saving measures like access to high-quality treatment. The agency requested a budget of $2.16 billion for fiscal year 2018, a $77 million increase from the year prior.

    According to the authors, the agency is an emblem of the failure of Nixon’s “War on Drugs” and the failure of the federal government to make significant progress in reducing drug abuse in the United States.

    Forty-seven years after Nixon declared a “War on Drugs,” the authors say it’s time to “urgently rethink how our nation regulates drugs.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Pain Patients Rally To Have Voices Heard

    Pain Patients Rally To Have Voices Heard

    “The real message is that people in chronic pain are not drug abusers. Illicit drug use is the enemy,” said one rally participant. 

    People suffering from chronic pain gathered earlier this week in New Hampshire, hoping to share their frustrations about prescription opioid restrictions in one of the states hardest hit by the opioid epidemic. 

    “The pendulum has swung so far that now, people who have legitimate, documented, disease and illness and pain are now having their medications limited,” Bill Murphy, who helped organize the rally, told WMUR.

    Similar Don’t Punish Pain rallies were held in about 80 locations around the country. Participants say that they need pain medications—including opioids—to manage their chronic conditions. They say that long-term use of opioids can vastly improve the lives of people suffering from chronic pain, but that opioid painkillers have become misunderstood and stigmatized because of widespread misuse. 

    “Chronic pain patients are being denied their medications due to a false narrative that the drug epidemic is caused by prescription pain pills,” Kim Patty, who helped organize a rally in Springfield, Missouri, told the Springfield News-Leader. “The drug epidemic is being caused by heroin and synthetic fentanyl.”

    Participants in New Hampshire said this message gets lost. “It’s important for pain patients to have respect,” said Edie Allyn-Paige, who lives with chronic pain. “You know, every day, I have to choose whether or not to get out of bed.” 

    Bobbi Blades has had chronic pain for 30 years caused by a bone that presses on a nerve. She said that without opioids she wouldn’t have been able to complete rehabilitation, which helped her regain the ability to walk. “The real message is that people in chronic pain are not drug abusers,” she said. “Illicit drug use is the enemy.”

    Murphy said that unlike many people who abuse opioids, responsible users take low doses and are functional at home and at work. Despite that, many people have had their doctors cut back on their pain medications under pressure to reduce prescribing. “Because of that low-dose regimen, (people) are still working, raising families, and their doctors are feeling pressured to reduce that pain medication,” he said.

    Cheryl Ostrander, who rallied in Springfield, said she has used painkillers to help her cope with breast cancer, knee replacements, spinal fusions and fibromyalgia.

    “I am struggling really hard just to stay here,” Ostrander said. “I am in pain just like every day of my life. I’m a mess, but I don’t deserve to be treated like a criminal to get my pain medication.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • More Than 3,000 Open Marijuana Cases To Be Dismissed In New York

    More Than 3,000 Open Marijuana Cases To Be Dismissed In New York

    The legal move stops short of expunging the pot-related cases.

    In what’s been described as an action “in the interest of justice,” Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance has vacated more than 3,000 outstanding warrants for cannabis consumption and possession, some of which date back to 1978.

    The decision will only impact misdemeanor and violation cases where a warrant was issued because the defendant did not appear in court. Vance announced the “decline to prosecute” policy for possession and smoking cases in late July, with the goal of reducing such prosecutions to fewer than 200 per year.

    Vance dropped 3,042 open cases of marijuana possession—but as High Times noted, this stops short of expunging these cases. 

    Vance’s decision applies only to open cases where misdemeanor possession or use was the “only remaining charge,” and the defendant did not appear in court. It does not apply to sale or distribution cases, or any case in which the defendant was convicted. 

    Still, the dismissal of these cases would have several positive outcomes: it supports the implementation of new policy for the NYPD regarding misdemeanor marijuana cases, which has shifted from arrests to court summonses (or “weed tickets), which went into effect this month.

    It also seeks to address what Vance described as “decades of racial disparities behind the enforcement of marijuana in New York City.”

    According to his office, 79% of the dropped cases involve individuals of color, and nearly half of those were 25 years of age or younger at the time of their arrest.

    Additionally, it may remove some of the obstacles that individuals with open warrants may face, such as applying for jobs or housing. Background checks in both cases may reveal an open warrant and impact the individual’s chances, and may even affect applications for citizenship.

    “By vacating these warrants, we are preventing unnecessary future interactions with the criminal justice system,” said Vance at a press conference after declaring his motion. “We made the decision that it is really in the interest of justice.”

    The move is also in the interest of freeing up what Vance called the “burden” of backlogged cases that drain resources his office needs for more serious charges.

    In July, Vance said that the policy was expected to reduce marijuana prosecutions in Manhattan from approximately 5,000 per year to fewer than 200—a reduction of 96%.

    View the original article at thefix.com