Tag: harm reduction programs

  • Everything you think you know about addiction is wrong | Johann Hari

    Everything you think you know about addiction is wrong | Johann Hari

    What really causes addiction — to everything from cocaine to smart-phones? And how can we overcome it? Johann Hari has seen our current methods fail firsthand, as he has watched loved ones struggle to manage their addictions. He started to wonder why we treat addicts the way we do — and if there might be a better way. As he shares in this deeply personal talk, his questions took him around the world, and unearthed some surprising and hopeful ways of thinking about an age-old problem.

    TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world’s leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes (or less). Look for talks on Technology, Entertainment and Design — plus science, business, global issues, the arts and much more.

    View the original article at ted.com

  • Could The Nation's First Supervised Injection Sites Be Coming To Maine?

    Could The Nation's First Supervised Injection Sites Be Coming To Maine?

    Maine’s bill would allow two facilities in the state and create a half-mile “tolerance zone” around each location, where individuals cannot be arrested for using drugs.

    Maine officials held a public hearing Monday to consider a bill that could establish the first safe injection sites in the country. The bill, called “An Act to Prevent Overdose Deaths,” would certify two facilities to “provide safe and secure locations for people to self-administer drugs,” according to FOX 23.

    A number of local governments across the U.S. have considered opening “safe injection sites” or “supervised injection facilities” (SIFs) where individuals can safely use illicit substances with clean equipment and under the supervision of trained medical professionals, without the threat of arrest.

    The philosophy behind these facilities is that people will use drugs one way or another, and giving them a safe space to do so prevents overdose deaths and the spread of HIV and hepatitis C. At the same time, medical professionals on site can offer recommendations for addiction treatment and other health issues related to drug use.

    Places like Maryland, Seattle, San Diego, and Philadelphia have also considered opening safe injection sites. But the process has been slow going, not to mention the threat of legal action from the government. 

    Most recently, the Philadelphia non-profit Safehouse was sued by state prosecutors and the U.S. Department of Justice to stop the opening of the city’s first SIF.

    The legal challenge is based on a section of the federal Controlled Substances Act which intended to close “crack houses” in the ’80s. The ruling on the Philadelphia case is expected to determine the future of SIFs in the country.

    Meanwhile, the first of these sites in North America launched over 15 years ago in Vancouver, Canada. According to the BC Coroner’s Service spokesman, Andy Watson, there has not been a single death reported at any SIF in the province since they opened. At the same time, new HIV cases among people who use injection drugs have fallen by 86% since 2005.

    Maine’s bill would allow two facilities in the state to act as safe injection sites and create a half-mile “tolerance zone” around each location, where individuals cannot be arrested for using drugs. Said facilities would also gather and report demographic data and other information, which would be used to determine if additional sites should be opened.

    According to Maine Public, no one at the Monday hearing spoke against the bill, but “supporters acknowledged that safe injection sites would violate federal law.” So far, it does not appear that there are any legal challenges to this specific bill.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • US Health Chief Announces Support For Needle Exchange Programs

    US Health Chief Announces Support For Needle Exchange Programs

    The Health Secretary’s reversal on needle exchange programs may be related to a new 2030 deadline related to HIV.

    Speaking at the National HIV Prevention Conference on Tuesday, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar expressed support for needle exchange programs as a way to stop the spread of HIV.

    Republicans like Azar have largely resisted these programs, believing that they will encourage drug use—but evidence to the contrary appears to have convinced the HHS Secretary otherwise.

    “Syringe services programs aren’t necessarily the first thing that comes to mind when you think about a Republican health secretary, but we’re in a battle between sickness and health, between life and death,” Azar said during his speech according to The Hill. “The public health evidence for targeted interventions here is strong, and supporting communities when they need to use these tools means fewer infections and healthier lives for our fellow Americans.”

    Needle exchange programs have existed for years, but are as important as ever with the national opioid crisis. These programs have reduced the spread of dangerous viruses such as HIV and hepatitis C through intravenous drug use. The first such program in the U.S. was established in 1988 in Tacoma, Washington, and was rewarded with a 60% reduction in new hepatitis B and C cases.

    Studies over the decades have also consistently found that these services do not increase the number of intravenous drug users. At the same time, needle exchange programs cost significantly less than treating new cases of HIV and hepatitis.

    However, the larger Trump administration still opposes these programs as well as safe injection sites where individuals can use drugs without fear of arrest, and in the presence of medical professionals who both provide clean equipment and are ready to save lives in case of an overdose.

    In February, the Department of Justice sued Safehouse, a non-profit organization based in Philadelphia, to prevent them from opening the country’s first safe injection site.

    Azar’s reversal on needle exchange programs may be related to a new 2030 deadline related to HIV. Earlier this month, the Trump administration revealed its 2020 budget proposal, which included a request for $291 million for an ambitious plan to end the “HIV epidemic” in a decade.

    “For the first time in modern history, America has the ability to end the epidemic, with the availability of biomedical interventions such as antiretroviral therapy and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP),” the budget plan reads.

    With Azar’s statements at the National HIV Prevention Conference, it appears that needle exchange programs could become a part of these efforts. Most of the $291 million requested will be given to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which supports and helps to fund these services.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Feds Sue To Stop Safe Injection Site In Philadelphia

    Feds Sue To Stop Safe Injection Site In Philadelphia

    Federal authorities are invoking a “crack house statute” from the ’80s in their attempt to stop the opening of the site.

    Federal authorities in Philadelphia are suing to stop the opening of a safe injection site in the city. 

    “These folks have good intentions and they’re trying their best to combat the opioid epidemic,” William McSwain, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, told NPR. “But this step of opening an injection site crosses the line.”

    McSwain is suing to stop Safehouse, a nonprofit, from opening a supervised injection site. The organization has said that it has support of city officials and plans to open the site this year. However, McSwain said that the site—where people would bring drugs to inject under medical supervision—is illegal.  

    “If Safehouse or others want to open this type of site, they need to steer their efforts to get the law changed,” he said. 

    The federal authorities cite a portion of the Controlled Substances Act that was written during the 1980s when people were concerned about the crack epidemic. The so-called crack house statute makes it illegal to operate a place to make, store, distribute or use illegal drugs. The law was originally written to prosecute people operating crack houses, but authorities have used it in other circumstances, said Alex Kreit, a law professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego and a drug policy specialist. 

    However, Kreit noted that this is the first time authorities will try to use the law against a safe injection site. 

    “It is completely untested in terms of how federal law will apply to safe injection sites,” he said. “People will be watching this very closely—particularly in other cities that have expressed their intention of starting a safe injection site.”

    Although Philadelphia has been at the forefront of the supervised injection site debate, other cities from around the country are considering similar measures. There are no safe injection sites in the U.S., but data from Canada and other countries indicate that such facilities can help stop the spread of disease and reduce overdose deaths because medical professionals are on hand.

    Proponents also argue that the sites will be able to connect drug users with resources including treatment. 

    Despite this, McSwain said in a letter to Safehouse that the law “makes no exception for entities, such as Safehouse, who claim a benevolent purpose.”

    Safehouse’s vice president and attorney Ronda Goldfein said that she’s confident that a federal judge will recognize that the site is not the intended target of the statute. 

    “We have a disagreement on the analysis and intention of the law. We don’t think it was intended to prevent activities such as this, and perhaps it will take a court’s ruling to move the issue forward.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • The State Of Harm Reduction Around The Globe

    The State Of Harm Reduction Around The Globe

    A new report breaks down the status of harm reduction programs around the world. 

    Even as opioid use continues wreaking havoc on some parts of the globe, the availability of harm reduction measures worldwide are relatively stagnant, as documented in a massive new report released this month.

    The number of countries with needle exchange or opioid substitution treatment has stayed relatively stable over the past four years, and a lack of funding in middle- and low-income countries has stunted the growth of service options available in some of the places most severely impacted, according to the “Global State of Harm Reduction” 2018 report issued this month by Harm Reduction International

    But there’s a significant exception to that trend: North America. Here, as opioid overdose figures rise, the harm reduction response is blossoming. Naloxone access, fentanyl testing strips, and needle exchange programs have become more common in the US and Canada – all possible signs of forward-thinking responses to a well-documented crisis. 

    “The US now has the fastest annual percentage rise of drug-related fatal overdose ever recorded,” the report notes, “with an increase of 21.4% between 2015- 2016 alone.” 

    Currently, the United States has 335 needle exchanges – a 37% increase since the last harm reduction report. Meanwhile, Canada has taken harm reduction efforts a step further, opening a total of 26 supervised injection sites. That sort of progressive action is still barred by federal law in the US, though some communities have considered addressing it both legislatively and in local action plans.

    There are, of course, still significant gaps. The availability of harm reduction in prisons is “woefully inadequate, falling far short of meeting both international human rights and public health standards,” according to the report. 

    And, despite the response in North America, service offerings worldwide have stayed more stagnant.

    “While our coverage of harm reduction policies and services has evolved and broadened in scope, the same cannot always be said for harm reduction in practice around the world,” the report notes. “Despite [the] heavy burden of diseases, effective harm reduction interventions that can help prevent their spread are severely lacking in many countries.”

    Currently, 86 countries offer some sort of needle exchange program – down from 90 in 2016. Bulgaria, Laos and the Philippines have shuttered their exchange programs in the face of punitive drug policies, while Argentina and Brazil have stopped offering such services as the number of injection drug users falls in those nations. 

    While the number of countries that offer exchanges has fallen slightly, the number with opioid substitution drugs available has gone up a bit. Since 2016, Cote d’Ivoire, Zanzibar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Palestine, Argentina and Costa Rica have all introduced or re-introduced medication-assisted treatments. 

    Overall, methadone is still the most commonly prescribed of those treatments, with buprenorphine falling into second place. Despite research espousing the use of heroin-assisted treatment as a harm reduction option, it’s only available in seven countries: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland and the UK. Though that’s still considered a radical option in many countries, it’s just one of the solutions experts have increasingly examined as more potent drugs continue appearing in underground supply chains.

    “The rise of illicit fentanyls themselves is just about the clearest case one can make for harm reduction: despite a literally poisonous supply, millions of people are still taking street opioids in an underground market that lacks quality control,” journalist Maia Szalavitz wrote in an introduction to the report. “It’s hard to argue that anything short of providing a safer supply – both through traditional medications like methadone and buprenorphine and via prescription heroin, hydromorphone (Dilaudid) and perhaps others – will be able to end the crisis, if done to scale.”

    And, aside from the continued toll of opioid use, amphetamine use is on the rise as well – but harm reduction options for speed users “remain underdeveloped,” according to the report. Safe consumption sites – in the regions where they’re available – continue to focus largely on injection use, leaving out those who smoke or snort their drugs. And, free drug testing services are limited mostly to festivals and clubs. 

    “While this all paints a bleak picture of harm reduction worldwide, there are examples of innovation and perseverance in this report that give hope and demonstrate that progress is possible,” the report’s authors wrote. “It is important, too, to not overlook the fact that harm reduction has come a long way over the past two decades. The evidence is clearly in favour of harm reduction. It is time that more countries acknowledge this and implement the services that are proven to advance public health and uphold human rights.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Moscow's Only Harm Reduction Program Is Being Fined

    Moscow's Only Harm Reduction Program Is Being Fined

    The harm reduction program came to the attention of the Russian government due to its pamphlet providing safety advice about bath salts.

    The only harm reduction program in Moscow has been fined for what the government is calling “drug propaganda.” The small and dedicated group, The Andrey Rylkov Foundation (ARF), has been fined 800,000 roubles.

    The ARF provides the heroin-addicted population of Moscow with life-saving clean needles, HIV prevention and harm-reduction advice. Like many harm reduction programs here in America, the ARF was built on the idea that reducing the risk of disease and death for those addicted to injecting heroin keeps them alive and safe until they are ready to attempt sobriety.

    The ARF also provides condoms and naloxone – or Narcan as it is better known – for reversing a potential opioid overdose.

    The ARF came to the attention of the Russian government due to its pamphlet providing safety advice about synthetic cathinones (in slang, bath salts). The pamphlet, published in a newsletter for drug users called Hats and Bayan, advised users that if they took this dangerous drug, to begin with a small dose and to ingest water, pills and vitamin C along with it to assist in the body’s processing of the drug. The newsletter did not tell people to take the drug – it simply gave safety advice to people who had already decided to use it. 

    Vice stated that Amnesty International described the fine as “suffocating” because it will kill the organization if they cannot raise the amount of the fine by Christmas.  

    It is largely the spread of HIV that brought the ARF to life. Russia is currently the single largest heroin market in the world. Heroin from Afghanistan began to flood Russia after the fall of the Iron Curtain, and on the heels of the drug crisis was an HIV crisis brought on by the sharing of dirty needles.

    And just like here in America, the deadly drug fentanyl is dramatically increasing overdose deaths in Russia. Anya Sarang, president and co-founder of the ARF, told Vice, “Last year the number of ODs sharply went up, possibly because of fentanyl. We can’t say for sure, because there’s no official data, but the number of times someone’s called and told us they’ve had to use naloxone has doubled. So more people are overdosing.”

    In The Moscow Times, Masoud Dara, HIV specialist at the WHO, noted the importance of programs addressing the issue, “HIV starts off [in] key populations — meaning drug users, commercial sex workers and men having sex with men — but after that it [increases] exponentially… if there is no more intervention.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Seattle Not Intimidated By Threats Against Supervised Injection Facilities

    Seattle Not Intimidated By Threats Against Supervised Injection Facilities

    “We took note of what the DOJ wrote about this, but we believe strongly in a public health approach to substance abuse disorder,” Mayor Durkan said. 

    The city of Seattle will move forward with plans to open a supervised injection facility (SIF), despite the possibility that the federal government will intervene, KUOW reports.

    Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan affirmed on Sept. 20 that the city will proceed despite the Department of Justice’s promise to respond with “swift and aggressive action.”

    In a New York Times op-ed published in August, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein made clear the federal government’s opposition to SIFs, declaring that they will “only make the opioid crisis worse.”

    “Because federal law clearly prohibits injection sites, cities and counties should expect the Department of Justice to meet the opening of any injection site with swift and aggressive action,” wrote Rosenstein.

    But city officials and proponents say Seattle and greater King County need “an aggressive, comprehensive approach” to the drug crisis as drug-related deaths rise. According to a recent report by Seattle & King County Public Health, drug and alcohol-related deaths have increased for six consecutive years in King County.

    “We took note of what the Department of Justice wrote about this, we’re cognizant of it, but we believe strongly in a public health approach to substance abuse disorder,” said Mayor Durkan.

    Last Monday, Durkan released a proposed budget that would set aside $1.3 million to fund the SIF pilot program. “You’ll see in the budget that we will continue to work for safe injection sites,” said the mayor. “We want this to be part of a holistic system of treatment.” The final vote on whether to adopt the budget is set for mid-November, following budget proposal hearings in October.

    Last we heard, the plan was to establish two supervised injection facilities—one in Seattle and one elsewhere in King County. The idea came from a list of recommendations on how to best address the region’s drug problem presented by the county’s Heroin and Prescription Opiate Addiction Task Force in 2016.

    KUOW reports that Seattle officials are seeking a location “likely downtown or in Belltown” for the SIF, in addition to a mobile unit that will serve the same purpose. However, Durkan said they are still working on the “framework” with the county before they can set a location. 

    While opponents say the sites will do more harm than good, proponents say that they save lives and increase the probability of connecting people with treatment.

    “Treatment is really the main bottom line that we’re trying to promote as the most effective, you know, population-wide intervention,” said Dr. Jeff Duchin, health officer for King County. “We want people getting in long-term treatment. And this is just one doorway that we can use to get people into treatment.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Science Series NOVA Tackles US Drug Crisis in PBS' "Addiction"

    Science Series NOVA Tackles US Drug Crisis in PBS' "Addiction"

    The PBS documentary airs on October 19th.

    The opioid crisis affects entire communities across the United States—yet there is still much about opioid abuse that is poorly understood.

    A new documentary airing on PBS aims to change that by exploring the crisis from different angles.

    ADDICTION, produced by NOVA, tackles both the science of addiction and the real impact that it’s had on Americans.

    “Nearly every family in America has been affected by addiction—the biggest public health crisis facing us today—yet it remains poorly understood, largely stigmatized, and finding treatment can be a daunting process,” said Paula S. Apsell, Senior Executive Producer of NOVA. “NOVA helps cut through the confusion by presenting the latest science on what we now know is a treatable brain disorder, and not a hopeless diagnosis.”

    The documentary explores harm reduction programs across North America and the impact they’ve had—from Insite in Vancouver, Canada (the first supervised injection facility in North America) to West Virginia, which has adopted a harm reduction approach to the drug problem there.

    Under West Virginia’s public health commissioner Rahul Gupta, who will step down from his post in November, the state dispatched a free mobile unit and volunteer medical team to offer a host of harm reduction services including needle exchange, HIV and hepatitis testing, and free naloxone, (the anti-opioid overdose medication).

    A major benefit to investing in a harm reduction approach is financial. Gupta says that with every $1 spent on harm reduction, we save $7 in medical costs, in addition to being able to guide people toward treatment.

    “The costs are really unsustainable if we continue on this path, losing over half a trillion dollars a year for multiple years in our economy. We’ve got to be smart about addressing addiction,” said Gupta. “We have to find ways to prevent it from happening in the first place.”

    Dr. Laura Kehoe oversees a unique program at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston that offers medication to overdose survivors to control cravings.

    “We’re seeing people come that day and engage in care, and the vast majority of them, 75 to 80% are returning,” she said. “Tragically, evidence-based treatments are not widely available in the U.S., and patients and families have to navigate a very broken system of care.”

    View the original article at thefix.com