Tag: harm reduction

  • SAMHSA Voice Awards Honor Walter Ginter’s MARS™ Project

    SAMHSA Voice Awards Honor Walter Ginter’s MARS™ Project

    Many people on MAT feel unwelcome at meetings, and this sense of alienation and rejection often leads to relapse. That’s where MARS™ comes in. We want people on MAT to be embraced and accepted in recovery.

    Held at Royce Hall on the UCLA campus in Westwood, the 13th annual SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration) Voice Awards recognized an essential figure in the national battle against the opioid epidemic. As the founder of the Medicated Assisted Recovery Support (MARS™) Project, Walter Ginter was honored with a Special Recognition Award for his efforts in combating the opioid epidemic and helping people who use Medicated-Assisted Treatment (MAT) stick to the path of recovery. In the greater recovery community– ranging from treatment centers across the country to 12-step groups—many people have a negative view of MAT which has led to a lack of support for people trying to overcome opioid addiction. 

    SAMHSA has been at the helm of national efforts to destigmatize the medications typically used in MAT such as buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone. Beyond supporting physicians and researchers, SAMHSA has tried to reduce the negativity associated with traditional perspectives on opioid recovery. According to many loud voices in Narcotics Anonymous (NA), if a person is on medication that has been prescribed to help them overcome opioid withdrawal symptoms or to refrain from using heroin or other illicit opioids, then they are not really clean. In contrast to this judgmental perspective, the SAMHSA website states: “Medicated-Assisted Treatment (MAT) is the use of FDA- approved medications, in combination with counseling and behavioral therapies, to provide a ‘whole-patient’ approach to the treatment of substance use disorders.”

    Indeed, a “whole-patient” approach is what is needed to stem the tide of what has become the greatest drug epidemic in U.S. history. With the introduction of fentanyl and other powerful prescription narcotics to the illegal drug trade, the stakes are higher than ever before. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, “Every day, more than 115 people in the United States die after overdosing on opioids.”

    Given such a devastating statistic, Arne W. Owens hopes the SAMHSA Voice Awards can raise awareness by bringing the recovery community together with the entertainment industry. As the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Owens was the highest-ranking member of SAMHSA at the Voice Awards Show on August 8, 2018. Asked by The Fix how the Voice Awards can make an impact on the opioid epidemic, Owens said, “We hope to incentivize more positive portrayals in film and television of treatment and recovery for substance use disorders. We believe hearing positive stories about treatment and recovery helps to inspire others, shifting negative attitudes. For example, it would be good to see writers and directors positively represent MAT in film and television. Beyond raising awareness, such representation would help to reduce stigma.”

    Walter Ginter is an ideal example of someone who has dedicated his life to reducing stigma and raising positive awareness about MAT. Dedicated to improving the recovery community, Ginter has been a board member of both the National Alliance for Medication Assisted Treatment and Faces & Voices of Recovery. In collaboration with the New York Division of Substance Abuse, Yeshiva University and the National Alliance for Medication Assisted (NAMA) Recovery, Walter Ginter became the founding Project Director of the Medication Assisted Recovery Support (MARS™) Project.

    MARS™ is designed to provide peer recovery support to persons whose recovery from opioid addiction is assisted by medication. To be in a MARS™ group through the Peer Recovery Network PORTAL™, a person has to be in a MAT program. As Ginter writes on the MARS™ website, “The Peer Recovery Network was created as a way for peers in recovery to more effectively organize their community, to communicate with each other, and to have a stronger voice for advocacy efforts.”

    In 2012, Ginter helped create the Beyond MARS Training Institute at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. With a variety of models and options, Ginter created a curriculum where opioid treatment programs and recovery professionals can be trained to implement MARS™. The original MARS™ project has expanded from its beginnings to include 17 programs across the United States and two in Haiphong, Vietnam. Ginter believes this is just the beginning of the expansion, both nationally and internationally.

    On the red carpet before the Voice Awards ceremony, Walter Ginter spoke with us about the struggles he has faced as an early advocate of MAT, revealing both an innate decency and a keen sense of humor. With a smile, he mentioned how people always ask him why MARS™ uses the trademark symbol. Some of them even think that he’s trying to corner the name of the planet for profit.

    But MARS™ has a trademark for a particular reason, Ginter explains. In the vast majority of cases, the organization does not mind when people use the name. They do enforce the trademark, however, when people who are not certified as trainers try to set-up MARS™ groups and conduct MARS™ trainings. In most cases, rather than follow the protocols, they are hijacking the name to do what they want and make a profit. As an organization with a mission that envisions “the transformation of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) to medication-assisted recovery (MAR),” Ginter believes that protecting the integrity of the organization must remain a priority.

    Sitting inside, away from the hot Los Angeles sun and the red carpet, Walter Ginter went into more detail about the early struggles that MARS™ faced. “Very few people come to MAT as their first course of treatment. In the vast majority of cases, they’ve already been to 12-step meetings, particularly Narcotics Anonymous. Although they initially felt welcomed at those meetings, those feelings shift after they start to work a program that includes medication-assisted treatment. Suddenly, you no longer feel welcome at the meetings, and this sense of alienation and rejection often leads to relapse. To fill in the resulting hole, we want MARS™ to give the same type of mutual support that 12-step provides. We want people on MAT to be embraced and accepted in recovery.“

    We asked Walter Ginter to detail this rejection in context. Scratching his chin, he said, “Look, telling people that they are not in recovery is evil. People on MAT were told that they couldn’t share in NA meetings since they weren’t really clean. By not allowing people to talk in meetings, they become alienated. However, it’s worse than alienation because it undermines what they’re doing to get well. The thought process goes something like this: If taking the medication that I need means I’m not in recovery, then why should I act like I’m in recovery? What does it matter if I do a line of coke on the side or have a drink?”

    Walter Ginter saw too many people on the verge of getting well through medication-assisted treatment subvert their recovery with this line of thinking and some other thought processes as well. Not wanting to take any chances, he set up MARS™ as a viable alternative both to treatment centers hostile to MAT and non-supportive recovery support groups like many NA meetings. In the past several years, MARS™ has had remarkable success with people on MAT. It has helped them find true recovery, a fact that has left initial opponents quite frustrated.

    In fact, Ginter ended our talk with a description of one of these encounters. As he told the following story, Ginter’s smile appeared again. “One day an opioid treatment counselor from a local New York rehab burst into my office and banged her fist on my desk. She said ‘What kind of voodoo are you doing here?’ Surprised by such an accusation, I replied “Excuse me?” She went on to explain: “Well. I have a client that wouldn’t stop doing coke. She would get off the heroin, but she always tested positive for cocaine. Since she’s joined your program, now she’s not only off the heroin, she’s no longer testing positive for coke or any other drug. How did you make that happen?’”

    Ginter shook his head as if he’d gone through the same rigmarole many times before. He describes how he sat the recovery counselor down and explained to her quietly: “There’s no magic or voodoo or anything else. We simply gave her medication that worked while telling her that she was now in true recovery. We gave her a vision of medication-assisted recovery, then let her make her own choice. She realized on her own, ‘Well, now I really can be on medication and in recovery. However, I can’t be in recovery if I’m still doing other drugs on the side. Today, I like being in recovery and the future it promises, so I’m going to stop doing the coke. Indeed, I will embrace this path that is set before me.’” 

    Given the promising picture that he painted, it makes perfect sense that Walter Ginter was honored with the Special Recognition Award at the 2018 SAMHSA Voice Awards. After all, how many people are dedicating themselves in such a precise fashion to saving lives by shifting perspectives and offering a viable alternative like Medication Assisted Recovery Support (MARS™)?

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • HIV Outbreak In Massachusetts Linked To Injection Drug Use

    HIV Outbreak In Massachusetts Linked To Injection Drug Use

    Between 2015 and 2018 there were 129 new HIV cases linked to drug use in two Massachusetts cities.

    Fentanyl use in two Massachusetts cities is driving an HIV outbreak that officials say could be forecasting a national public health crisis.

    Lawrence and Lowell Massachusetts, two cities along the New Hampshire border, have seen such a sharp spike in new HIV cases that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has become involved, according to The Huffington Post.

    Between 2015 and 2018 there were 129 new HIV cases linked to drug use diagnosed in the cities. In the four years prior to that there were only 41 new cases of HIV related to injecting drugs diagnosed annually in the entire state.

    “This tells us we cannot rest on our laurels,” said Thomas Stopka, an infectious disease epidemiologist and assistant professor at Tufts University School of Medicine. “There are potentially other communities that are at great risk as well. HIV can and is raising its head again in places where risks align.”

    In 2015, opioid injecting was linked to an HIV outbreak in rural Indiana. The risk factors in the Massachusetts outbreak are similar, but in an urban setting. One risk is pervasive fentanyl use. Because the synthetic opioid has a shorter half life than heroin, users inject more often. This means they have more opportunity to be exposed to dirty needles.

    In addition, neither city had a needle exchange program before the outbreak, although both have since established exchanges. Finally, high rates of homelessness compound health risks, as does the fact that doctors don’t routinely screen for HIV, even among intravenous drug users.

    “This may be forecasting what could conceivably happen around the country,” said Amy Nunn, executive director of the Rhode Island Public Health Institute.

    This spring, epidemiologists from the CDC spent time in Lawrence and Lowell to try to establish why the outbreak was occurring. They presented their findings in a meeting on July 24.

    “The most striking finding was the sheer number of cases,” said Stopka “[It] was substantially higher than what was seen in years prior.”

    The number of new drug-related HIV cases “definitely caught a lot of folks’ attention and really spoke to the great need in terms of a response,” he said.

    Most of the new cases were among white men ages 20-39, men like Mark, a 29-year-old who injected drugs before finding out that he was HIV positive.

    “We all use,” Mark said. “We all know the other one has it. We don’t tell each other. People will lie right to your face about having it. It’s spreading around like wildfire.”

    Stigma around HIV — even among drug users — keeps them from disclosing their status even if they know if. In addition, the draw of a high can cause people to put their health on the back burner, Mark said.

    “People just don’t care,” he said. “When it comes down to it, if you’ve got a bag in your hand and somebody next to you’s got a dirty needle, you’re not going to run and find a clean one.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Toronto Health Officials Recommend Decriminalization of All Drugs

    Toronto Health Officials Recommend Decriminalization of All Drugs

    “The potential harms associated with any of these drugs is worsened when people are pushed into a position where they have to produce, obtain and consume those drugs illegally.”

    On Monday, the Toronto board of health unanimously accepted the decision to propose that Canada’s federal government decriminalize all drug use.

    The board made the decision upon reading a report by Dr. Eileen de Villa, Toronto’s chief medical officer, which made the case for treating drug use as a public health, not a criminal, issue.

    “What we are saying here is drug use has always been with us. Humans have always used drugs in one way, shape or form,” said de Villa, according to the Canadian Press.

    “The potential harms associated with any of these drugs is worsened when people are pushed into a position where they have to produce, obtain and consume those drugs illegally. That’s what we’re trying to address through this particular report and this recommendation.”

    However, a representative for Canada’s national government said it has no plans to decriminalize or legalize all drugs. “We are aware that decriminalization, as part of a comprehensive approach to substance use, seems to be working in places like Portugal, but more study would be required as the circumstances are very different in Canada,” said Health Canada spokesperson Maryse Durette.

    Durette is referring to Portugal’s decision in 2001 to decriminalize all drugs use, in response to “one of the worst drug epidemics in the world,” according to NPR.

    Since then, Portugal has been cited by drug policy reform advocates as a harm reduction experiment that has yielded positive outcomes. Since the government made the decision to approach drug use as a public health issue rather than a criminal one, reports have shown decreases in drug-related HIV and hepatitis infections, fatal overdoses, drug-related crime and incarceration rates.

    Canada may not be ready to change policies regarding “hard drugs” like heroin and cocaine, but in June it became the second country in the world (after Uruguay) to legalize cannabis.

    Still, the Toronto health officials are hopeful that the tide will someday turn. “The only way that federal laws are going to change is if we provoke that national conversation,” said board chair Coun. Joe Mihevc.

    In 2017, nearly 4,000 Canadians died of a “apparent opioid overdose” in 2017, according to a recent Health Canada report. According to de Villa, 303 of them occurred in Toronto; a 63% increase from the previous year.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Vancouver Sees Success in Peer-Supervised Injection Sites

    Vancouver Sees Success in Peer-Supervised Injection Sites

    The chief coroner of British Columbia estimates that without the safe injection sites and without opioid antidotes, the death count would be triple what it is.

    In Vancouver, Canada, individuals who wish to use injection drugs have the option of doing so in a safe environment, supervised by their peers.

    According to NPR, downtown Vancouver is home to the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users (VANDU), a place that serves as a safe space for those using injection drugs. The location is equipped with various supplies like clean needles and sanitizing pads. On the wall, there is a poster highlighting the safest places on the body to inject. The site also provides treatment materials, if someone requests them.

    Hugh Lampkin, a site supervisor and vice president of VANDU, explained that the site’s injection room is an area where an attendant watches over individuals using drugs and administers overdose antidotes if necessary.

    The idea behind such sites, which are often peer-run, is harm reduction, Lampkin says. In other words, if people are going to use drugs, Lampkin and his colleagues would rather they do so in the safest manner possible to minimize the chance of overdose.

    Lampkin himself has a history of heroin use and discovered VANDU at a point when he was really struggling. VANDU hosted support groups and meetings, which Lampkin joined.

    “I was telling a bunch of strangers my life story, and it was something I’d never done before,” he told NPR. “After that just about everybody came up and either hugged me or shook my hand.”

    He says that in his experience, peer-run sites are preferred to sites run by authorities due to having fewer rules, no paperwork, and peer supervision.

    “If you put this up against another service provider where you have a PhD or a psychologist, I would put my money on a place like this.”

    According to Mark Lysyshyn, medical health officer at Vancouver Coastal Health, these sites and the people that run them are helping authorities when it comes to the opioid crisis.

    “These community agencies and groups of peers and associations of drug users, they’re the ones who are making the innovations. They’re telling us what to do,” he said. “They showed us how to create pop-up supervised injection sites. They know the community, they know where to put these things. So they’ve been able to solve a lot of problems.”

    Vancouver officials say that no one has died at any of the medical or peer-run sites. Chief coroner of British Columbia, Lisa Lapointe, tells NPR  that without such sites and without opioid antidotes, her office estimates the death count would be triple what it is.

    Though injection drug use is illegal in Vancouver, NPR says, the police support the injection sites and do not make arrests. On the other hand, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in the U.S. maintains that the sites host illegal activity and anyone involved with operating one could face legal consequences.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • How One Rural Community Is Fighting to Save Lives from Drug Overdose

    How One Rural Community Is Fighting to Save Lives from Drug Overdose

    “I don’t want another parent to pick out a casket. I don’t want another grandparent to have to look a grandchild in the eye and say ‘your momma is gone.’”

    The Driftwood Motel on Oak Island, North Carolina, has seen better days. All around it, pastel-colored vacation homes with kitschy names like After Dune Delight reel in tourists with promises of beachfront sunsets and shaded hammocks by the pier. Though the Driftwood Motel is also painted in cheerful pastels, the paint is flaking off in dry strips and littering the ground next to cigarette butts and busted beer bottles. Rhonda C. lives on the bottom floor of the Driftwood with her bed, couch and kitchen furniture crammed into a room with dark sheets that cover the windows. She is one of the motel’s many long-term residents – people drawn in by the $100 a week price tag who end up staying far longer than they had planned. A gray-haired, matronly woman, Rhonda looks after the other residents, especially the young ones who drift in and out in various stages of inebriation. She hadn’t been able to offer them much, until she met Margaret Bordeaux.

    Margaret is a petite, African American woman, quiet and unassuming until you get to know her fiery side. As an outreach worker for the North Carolina Harm Reduction Coalition, Margaret runs a mobile harm reduction unit in Brunswick County, a sparsely populated rural community hugging North Carolina’s Southeast coast. Brunswick is also one of the counties hardest hit by drug-related deaths in the state. At least once a week Margaret drives its lonely roads, seeking out places like the Driftwood Motel that collect people who have lost every other home. Thanks to a grant from the Aetna Foundation to combat the opioid epidemic, Margaret has a van stocked with supplies to help reduce drug-related death and disease. She gives out naloxone (a medicine that reverses overdose from opioids such as heroin, fentanyl, and prescription painkillers), syringes, and other resources, and she teaches people how to prevent, recognize and respond to an overdose.

    “I make friends and develop relationships in Brunswick County,” says Margaret. “Many of the people I’ve met here thought that naloxone and clean syringes were magical things only available in [cities]. No one has been coming out here to offer these services until now.”

    Some people are wary when Margaret first pulls up because they have been treated poorly by health care workers and aren’t accustomed to a warm, non-judgmental person offering them free services. But after a few visits, Margaret wins them over.

    “My whole life I have rooted for the underdog and the underserved,” says Margaret. “I want to care for people that society doesn’t care for. People use superficial reasons to ignore each other and I want to remove those reasons and say, hey, there is a person here.”

    Kathy Williams is one of the people whose lives Margaret has touched. A middle-aged, Caucasian woman with a defiant personality, Kathy’s backstory is the stuff of nightmares. She raised two kids as a single mom, Josh and Kirby. As an adult, Josh married a wonderful woman and had two children. Kirby struggled with drug use, and whenever she hit a rough spot, Josh and his wife would take her in and help her get back on her feet. But in 2011, Josh’s car was t-boned by a school bus. He, his wife, and both their young children died in the crash. The loss hit Kirby hard. Her drug use escalated and five years later, she too died of a drug overdose.

    Kathy tells this story completely dry-eyed. It’s as though she has endured so much pain that nothing can faze her anymore. These days she is raising her 14-year-old grandson, Kirby’s child, and also caring for her own aging parents. She is also one of the founding members of B.A.C.K. O.F.F., an organization of Brunswick County families who are fed up with losing their loved ones to drugs. What started as a support group in March 2017 has morphed into an organization with a mission to educate people about the realities of drug use and to help save lives.

    “A mother is not supposed to bury her child,” says Kathy. “I don’t want another parent to pick out a casket. I don’t want another grandparent to have to look a grandchild in the eye and say ‘your momma is gone.’”

    B.A.C.K. O.F.F., which stands for Bringing Addiction Crisis Knowledge, Offering Families Focus, makes and distributes overdose prevention kits containing naloxone to families with a loved one who uses opioids. They also spread awareness about North Carolina’s 911 Good Samaritan law, which protects people from prosecution if they seek medical assistance for an overdose. B.A.C.K. O.F.F. members provide community, resources and support for families impacted by drugs and offer space for honest talk about drug use. No denial, no sugarcoating, no pithy slogans about just saying no. Real talk from real families caught in the same struggle. But not everyone is willing to speak up.

    Elsewhere in Brunswick County, Alex Murillo has been trying to convince Hispanic parents who have lost child to drug poisoning to get involved in B.A.C.K. O.F.F. It hasn’t been easy.

    “Many Hispanics here deny that drug use is happening in their families,” says Alex, who recently lost his 19-year-old nephew to overdose. “If a parent loses a child to overdose, they say they died in their sleep. No one wants to talk about it.”

    A tall, dimpled man with a perpetual smile, Alex’s cheerful demeanor hides a tragic history. Alex is originally from Mexico. When he was brutally raped at 12 years old, his parents threw him out of the house, claiming he deserved to be raped because he “acted gay.” At 15 years old, Alex married a girl, but the marriage made him so miserable that he decided to come to the United States where he hoped to be able to express himself more freely. At the border he was apprehended by a human trafficking cartel and forced into sex slavery.

    “They forced me to take drugs. They beat me and pimped me out,” he says. “I was so shocked. I didn’t think things like that happened in the U.S.”

    Alex eventually escaped. He tried to join a church community but was turned away after admitting he was gay. He attempted suicide, but his brother found him passed out from a bottle of sleeping pills and took him to the hospital. When Alex woke days later, his attitude on life had changed.

    “I was surprised to be alive,” he says. “But I realized that I was still here for a reason and I decided to dedicate my life to helping other people.”

    Today Alex owns a small Hispanic tienda in Brunswick County where he offers help to anyone who comes to his doorstep, whether they are seeking food, advice, or help paying rent. Every year he hosts a multicultural festival in his store parking lot, though other Brunswick County residents have threatened to shut it down because they are unhappy with the area’s growing diversity. He is also happily married to his husband, who works in the store and supports Alex’s outreach efforts. Alex hopes to become more involved in educating the Hispanic community about drugs.

    “We can’t just ignore this problem. The drugs are in our schools. They are everywhere,” says Alex. “We need to do more outreach to the Hispanic community to teach them how to talk about drugs with their kids. They can’t just tell kids not to do drugs. Kids see their friends doing it and they want to try too. We need to have honest conversations as a community.”

    Margaret, Kathy and Alex may be an unlikely team, but together they are working to bring resources and hope to a county that has suffered devastating loss. Little by little, their efforts are making a difference. Margaret has helped people enter drug treatment programs and reconnect with family members where ties had been severed. Alex is making headway on opening up conversations about drugs in the Hispanic community. B.A.C.K. O.F.F. provides Kathy with an outlet to teach families how to help their loved ones who use drugs.

    “I used to look at a person who uses drugs as an addict, but now I look at them as someone’s brother, son or family member,” says Kathy. “I feel that if we had had these tools like naloxone, overdose education, and a support group years ago, my daughter might still be alive today.”

    At a small Mexican diner where we meet for lunch, I ask Kathy what her message is to people in rural communities impacted by drugs. For a moment, she is quiet. Finally she says:

    “I want people to know they are not alone. You might think you are alone, but there are so many of us going through the same thing. We can hold each other up.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Using Smartwatches As Harm Reduction Is Misguided, Expert Says

    Using Smartwatches As Harm Reduction Is Misguided, Expert Says

    “If someone says, ‘Let’s do a line,’ I’ll look at my watch. If I see I’m at 150 of 160, I’ll say, ‘I’m good.’ That’s totally fine. Nobody gives you a hard time,” said one man.

    Can a Fitbit or Apple Watch keep you safe while you use drugs? That’s the idea presented by some people, according to CNBC.

    “If someone says, ‘Let’s do a line,’ I’ll look at my watch. If I see I’m at 150 of 160, I’ll say, ‘I’m good.’ That’s totally fine. Nobody gives you a hard time,” said one individual called “Owen,” a tech worker in San Francisco.

    It’s his way of being safe and not overdoing it, he tells CNBC. He’ll check his Fitbit at parties, nightclubs, even Burning Man. And if his heart rate gets too high, he’ll slow down.

    “I don’t really know what’s happening in my body when I smoke some weed or do some cocaine. I can read information online, but that’s not specific to me. Watching your heart rate change on the Fitbit while doing cocaine is super real data that you’re getting about yourself,” said Owen.

    According to CNBC, there are “dozens” of accounts of this activity across social media and Reddit forums.

    One Redditor posted snapshots of her heart rate data via her Fitbit. “Sometimes I go for 3 days straight if I have an 8-ball to myself,” she wrote, according to Mashable. “And yes, I do all that with no sleep whatsoever until all the coke is gone. I wear a Fitbit Charge HR and it’s been fascinating seeing my heart rate during these coke binges.”

    However, one medical expert was not impressed with this approach, instead painting it as misguided. “Taking drugs is always a risk, whether you’re monitoring a tracker or not,” said Ethan Weiss, a cardiologist and associate professor at the University of California, San Francisco.

    He says this use of smartwatch devices is hardly a foolproof harm reduction measure, even going so far as to suggest that “it’s possible this is leading people to do more cocaine.”

    Devices like the Fitbit and Apple Watch are only getting “smarter.” A team at the University of Rhode Island is working on developing software that would allow a person’s vital signs to be measured via a smartwatch. The idea is to make this information available to doctors, who may then adjust the patient’s medication or treatment regimen. 

    Perhaps this will catch on with “tech-savvy” drug users as well.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Harm Reduction: How to Engage Parent Advocates Effectively

    Harm Reduction: How to Engage Parent Advocates Effectively

    I’ve had to correct parents whose first line to any policymaker is “my kid was from a good family, not just some homeless person.”

    “I never thought I would end up here, but here I am. I choose to create beauty in the space left in this world that my daughter used to occupy” – Lettie Micheletto, mother of Megan McPhail, 1987-2014.

    Lettie Micheletto never thought she’d find herself on the steps of the General Assembly advocating for better treatment of people who use drugs. Neither did Shantae Owens, Tanya Smith, or Kathy Williams, all parents united by the loss of a child to drug poisoning. Stunned and grieving, these parents nevertheless possess a raw passion that makes them a force to be reckoned with. Like so many others across the country, they are mobilizing to demand change to how society treats people who use drugs and to memorialize the children they have lost.

    Undeniably, there is power behind directly impacted parents. In my years as a lobbyist for drug policy reform, I’ve seen the hardest, most tough-on-drugs legislators dissolve under the gentle tears of a mother pleading for reform. There is a connection between legislators and parents that no lobbyist or well-executed advocacy campaign could dream of forging alone. But at the same time, there are challenges to working with new, often unpredictable allies. So I thought I’d lay out, from my own experience, the top benefits and challenges of involving parents in harm reduction advocacy.

    Benefit #1: Effectiveness

    Parents who have lost a child to the drug war are a potent force for change. They have drive, motivation, and a unique ability to elicit sympathy. Nothing changes hearts and minds quite like a compelling, emotional story of personal loss. In some states, efforts to change drug policy have been led almost entirely by parent groups. In Georgia, parents rallied to pass one of the country’s most progressive 911 Good Samaritan laws. In Florida, a coalition of moms has been the driving force behind expansion of naloxone access. In Iowa and Illinois, parents are leading efforts to legalize syringe exchange programs. Everywhere, parents are standing up to declare that their children are more than just statistics.

    “If no one speaks up for our children and sheds the truth on the fact that they were bright, wonderful kids who had an illness that they simply couldn’t battle, nothing will change,” says Tanya Smith, who helped advocate for a Georgia’s 911 Medical Amnesty Law in 2014 after her daughter, Taylor, died of a reaction to methamphetamine the year prior.

    Parents can unravel the false narrative of drug users as inherently deviant or immoral and paint a true, complex portrait of people who use drugs and people who love them. They can show the devastation of loss on families and communities. Most importantly, they can help battle the number one obstacle to meaningful reform – stigma.

    Benefit #2: New Allies

    Most movements start with a small group of people with similar ideas who are passionate about reform. But in order to evoke lasting change on a macro level, movements need to expand – and that means welcoming new allies into the fold. This isn’t always easy. New allies don’t have the institutional history and knowledge of the movement. Sometimes they have more social or political power than the original group of activists, which is good for expanding influence, but can threaten to hijack the founders’ original intent. The harm reduction movement has seen a lot of this dynamic as it has grown in recent years, accruing allies such as faith leaders, recovery communities, first responders, public health professionals and impacted parents. There have been some growing pains and continued debate over the allies’ role, but the expansion has led to wider conversations about harm reduction and more advocacy wins. Parent advocates have played a large role in bringing conversations about harm reduction into homes and communities that were previously silent on drugs.

    Benefit #3 Finding an Outlet for Grief

    For many parents who have lost a child, simply getting through each day can be an enormous challenge. But pain can also be a powerful agent of change. Lettie Micheletto lost her 27-year-old daughter, Megan, to heroin poisoning in 2014. Since then, she has been part of bringing awareness about drug laws to other parents.

    “About six months after Megan’s death I crawled out from under my rock and began to work with a local coalition in my hometown to help educate and bring awareness of the opioid epidemic,” says Micheletto. “I am obsessed with spreading the message and talking to everyone I can, everywhere I go. I have many friends who have lost children, other family members or friends to overdose. It is a nightmare that many people live and many others ignore.”

    Thanks to Micheletto’s efforts, a North Carolina lawmaker recently included $100,000 in the state budget to raise awareness about the state’s 911 Good Samaritan law. For many parents, advocacy creates a much-needed opportunity to channel grief into purpose.

    Challenge #1 Working with Newbies

    Though there are many advantages to working with parent advocates, these efforts are not without challenge. Of course many parents are or have been involved with drug use themselves, but it seems the majority of parent advocates today had little knowledge of drugs, drug policy or harm reduction until it impacted their children. In many cases, they didn’t even know their child was experimenting with drugs until after his or her death. Then suddenly they are thrust into a world of grief and new concepts that seems foreign and daunting. They want to act, but they lack institutional knowledge of harm reduction, drug policy and the criminal justice system. This can create some very uncomfortable situations.

    Some of my most memorable face-palm moments have come from bringing well-meaning, but very green parents to advocate at the legislature. I’ve spent many an afternoon with parents trying to explain the problems with involuntary commitment laws or to untangle the save-the-user but kill-the-dealer narrative. I’ve had to correct parents whose first line to any policymaker is “my kid was from a good family, not just some homeless person.” Sometimes step one is just to teach the parents to stop using stigmatizing language like “addict” to describe their own child.

    It takes patience to educate a parent who has been steeped in stigmatizing attitudes towards people who use drugs until the problem hit home and to help change the way they think about drugs and drug policy. There are so many wonderful parent advocates today who understand harm reduction and how all of us – users, sellers and people who have never touched illicit drugs – are caught up in the net that has killed so many people. They didn’t all start out with that knowledge, but by meeting them where they are at, we can get them there.

    Challenge #2 White Power

    It is frequently pointed out that the rhetoric around drug policy has softened since opioids started killing children from white, affluent communities. Certainly the majority of parent advocates who appear in the news are white and middle-class. And while there is nothing wrong with parents of any race or class becoming vocal advocates for reform, the stark homogeneity of media coverage doesn’t reflect the rapidly changing demographics of drug-related deaths, especially around opioids. According to the Centers for Disease Control, from 2015 to 2016 the age-adjusted rate of drug overdose deaths involving any opioid rose by 25.9% among whites in the United States, but 32.6% among Hispanics, 36.4% among Asian/Pacific Islanders, and a whopping 56.1% among black Americans.

    Diversity is an important, and often missing component to parent advocacy. Correcting this can mean making the extra effort to pro-actively reach out to under-represented groups and create space for their voices. Out in rural Brunswick County, North Carolina, Kathy Williams and Alex Murillo are teaming up to do just that. Kathy Williams lost her 32-year-old daughter, Kirby, to an overdose in 2016. The following year she helped found B.A.C.K. O.F.F., an organization of feisty families who are fed up with losing their kids and have started to organize for change. Kathy and Alex are working to welcome Hispanic families into the group.

    “We had two recent deaths in the Hispanic community due to drugs,” says Murillo, who lost his 19-year-old nephew last year to an overdose. “I want to help get the Hispanic community involved in education around drugs, but it’s hard because parents won’t admit there is a problem. Here, if a child dies of an overdose, the parent will say they died in their sleep.”

    Overcoming cultural and even language differences to organize a diverse group of parent advocates can be difficult. Many of us, myself included, don’t do this as often as we should. But that extra effort can go a long way to showing policy-makers the true breadth and complexity of drug use.

    Shantae Owens, a parent advocate from New York, lost his 19-year-old son to heroin poisoning in 2017. “Whether it’s a white kid from Richmond or a black kid from New York, we need to put aside our differences and come together to solve a common problem,” says Owens. “The longer we keep looking at the one thing that separates us, the more people will die.”

    Shantae, Alex, Kathy, Lettie, and Tanya are among thousands of family members across the country united by tragedy, but also by strength. They may not have wanted or imagined ending up in this place, but they are here, creating beauty in the space where their loved ones used to be.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • So You Want to Write About Addicts

    So You Want to Write About Addicts

    At its best, addict lit satiates our quintessential human yearning for stories that may lead to salvation. We want warm fuzzies. We want sweet, sweet, redemption.

    We started each morning of residential treatment with burned muffins, a house meeting, and introductions.

    “My name is Tom and I’m a junkie here on vacation. My goal today is to lay in the sun and sample the delicious food in this all-inclusive resort.”

    Tom’s sarcasm made orange juice squirt out of my nose. Humor was an elixir for the boredom of early sobriety and monotony of the rehab center’s strict daily schedule.

    Our addiction counselor corrected Tom: “You need to take this more seriously. I need you to redo that and tell us your real goal for today.”

    The story that society tells about addiction is one of tragedy. When we talk about addicts, we talk about pain, drama, and heartbreak. Of course, addiction is all of these things, but it’s also a rich, multi-faceted story with humor and joy. When we let addiction define the entirety of a human being’s existence, we flatten people to one-dimensional caricatures.

    The story that society tells about my favorite tragic hero Kurt Cobain is a prime example; his sense of humor gets buried beneath his pain. The media glosses over parts of his personality, like how he wore pajamas on his wedding day and a puffy-sleeved, yellow dress to a heavy metal show on MTV. “The show is called Head Banger’s Ball, so I thought I’d wear a gown,” Cobain deadpanned. “But nobody got me a corsage.”

    Two weeks after Nirvana released Nevermind, they pranked the famous British show Top of the Pops. Wearing sunglasses and a smirk, Cobain infuriated producers and the audience when he dramatically sang “Smells Like Teen Spirit,” in a mopey style that evoked Morrissey from The Smiths.

    If you want to write about addiction, remember that two seemingly contradictory things can be true at the same time. Addicts can be both funny and tragic. Another example: Cobain’s original name for In Utero was I Hate Myself and Want To Die, but the record company opposed the title, fearing that fans wouldn’t understand the dark humor.

    While I love satire, I also understand why we don’t want to minimize the seriousness of addiction. Addicts suffer. Addicts bleed. Addicts, like Cobain, die too young.

    *

    I know a thing or two about almost dying.

    I recently discovered an old home movie of my ex Sam* and me. In the video, we were strung out like Christmas lights. Watching it made me feel like a voyeur in my own life.

    Thick tongued, I slur, “Let’s jaaammmm,” to my musician boyfriend. He pushes a tuft of blonde hair out of my face. My unruly David Bowie mullet always gets in the way.

    Sam’s strumming his acoustic guitar and singing “Needle and The Hay” by Elliot Smith, a classic junkie song.

    I’m taking the cure/ So I can be quiet whenever I want.

    He hands me a bass guitar, but I can’t hold it. My limbs go limp. Thunk. The maple-neck, cherry wood bass crashes to the floor.

    So leave me alone/ You ought to be proud that I’m getting good marks.

    The bass doesn’t break, but I do. I try to pick it up, but my body slumps into a question mark. I look like a bobble head doll, with glassy blue-green eyes. Doll eyes blinking open and shut. Opiate eyes. Open and shut. Haunting thing.

    Sam stops singing. “Are you okay? Tessa, did you take Klonopin this morning?”

    Shut. When my eyes roll in the back of my head, he grabs my shoulders and commands, “Wake up! Wake up!”

    “I’m fiiiinnnneeee,” I mumble as my pale skin turns blue.

    I wouldn’t be fine for years.

    *

    When I heard there was going to be an opioid overdose memorial, I was skeptical. When I saw that Showtime was releasing a new docuseries about the epidemic called The Trade, I was skeptical. When Andrew Sullivan christened a non-addict “Poet Laurette of the opioid epidemic,” in a New York Magazine essay, I was skeptical. But not surprised. Never surprised.

    I’m skeptical because I’ve been devouring books, essays, documentaries, and movies about the opioid epidemic for years, charting their predictable rhetoric, cliché story arcs, and stigmatizing portrayal of addicts: addicts as cautionary tales, signal fires, propellers for drama. We’re afraid to color outside these lines, to show the ways in which addicts contain multitudes.

    I wear skepticism like a shell. It feels safer than being vulnerable. My skepticism asks questions like: who has the right to tell the addict’s story? How can a writer dip their plume into the well of an addict’s pain without having been there herself? How can we do justice to addicts and the addiction story?

    If you want to write about addicts, you first need to familiarize yourself with the formula and conventions of the “addict lit” genre. The territory has been well-charted in recent books like Leslie Jamison’s The Recovering.

    Human beings are intrigued by conflict and drama. We are all complicit. I am, too. Even though I’ve been clean for multiple years and know that I shouldn’t be gawking, I do. Even though I feel like they exploit people’s pain for entertainment, I still watch shows like Intervention and Celebrity Rehab with Doctor Drew. These shows jolt us out of the doldrums of our own lives or, if we are addicts ourselves, they reassure us that we are not alone.

    We watch from a safe distance, with the luxury of returning to the comfort of our own cocoons. At its best, addict lit satiates our quintessential human yearning for stories that may lead to salvation. We want warm fuzzies. We want sweet, sweet, redemption.

    *

    If you want to write a story about the opioid epidemic, you must imagine how addicts hunger for stories that represent us, encourage empathy, and feel believable. We long for stories to be our anchors and buoys to keep us afloat. Unfortunately, some stories sink. We must study those too, as a lesson of what not to do.

    The Prescribed to Death Memorial is a dehumanizing failure. It features a wall of 22,000 faces carved on pills to pay tribute to those who overdosed in 2017. If I died of an overdose, I wouldn’t want my face carved on a pill.

    I’ve spent my whole life being carved out. Instead, I’d like to know what it feels like to be whole.

    When I heard about the docuseries The Trade, I quickly signed up for a free trial of Showtime and checked its Metacritic score: 84.

    Steve Greene of Indie Wire praises the series. The Trade “doesn’t purport to be a corrective or some magic key to unlocking the problem. But as a means for empathy and a way to understanding the human cost at each step of an international heroin trade, it does far more than hollow words and shallow promises.”

    Each episode shifts between three main story arcs: a Mexican drug cartel, law enforcement, and addicts and their families. It is technically well-made, with sharp cinematography and juxtapositions like masked members of the cartel guarding poppy fields in Mexico as children play in the street; a grieving mother and father at a memorial rally in Ohio flying signs that say, “Hope Not Dope.”

    But the series was predictable and flat. The addict’s story arc of The Trade is a simple five-part dramatic structure. In the exposition, we see white middle-class young adults are prescribed painkillers for a sports injury or surgery. As their physical dependence grows, they need more and more to manage their pain. At the climax, they switch to heroin because it’s cheaper and sometimes easier to find than painkillers. They fall deep into the well of addiction.

    Then they go to rehab or they don’t. Cut. End scene.

    Paste film critic Amy Glynn says it was “dangerous from a watchability perspective…Junkies don’t make good television because they are really, really damned boring. They are painfully uninteresting, because heroin turns most people into zombie reptiles who are deeply depressed and deeply depressing.”

    At first, I was taken aback by this quote. But Glynn has a point. If you want to write about the opioid epidemic, you might want to do more than rely on pain porn. The poetry of a needle plunging into the crook of a junkie’s arm, crimson swirling into the plunger. Junkies drifting through public streets like zombies.

    Glynn redeems herself: “Someone needs to start telling the rest of the story. Like now.”

    *

    If you want to write a story about addicts, you need to realize that it’s still a stigmatized condition. My friend had to leave a grief group because other parents said her son’s overdose death was his fault and not as sad as a child who died of cancer. It’s as though grief was some sort of competition of suffering and pain. But an entire super bowl stadium could be filled with dead bodies like her son. There were 64,000 overdose deaths in the US in 2016.

    If you want to write a story about addicts, you need to know that life-saving medication-assisted-treatments like Suboxone and methadone are still expensive and difficult to access. Unfortunately, many treatment centers are “abstinence-only,” meaning they don’t allow their patients to take Suboxone or methadone. For a more in-depth plunge into the world of harm reduction, read Tracey Helton, Tessie Castillo, or Maia Szalavitz.

    *

    In addition to these dire facts, we have to deal with our stories being appropriated and exploited. Enter the poet William Brewer, who has never used opioids or struggled with addiction himself. Brewer inhabits the voice of addicts in his poetry book, I Know Your Kind. The title derives from a Cormac McCarthy quote, but it’s very clear to me that Brewer doesn’t “know my kind.”

    I don’t want to be harsh on Brewer. Being from the polite Midwest where we’re supposed to avoid confrontation, I almost deleted this part. But Brewer’s words feel like a chisel mining people’s pain. I also feel it’s my responsibility as a recovering addict and writer to call it like I see it.

    Brewer writes lines like: “Tom’s hand on the table looked like warm bread. I crushed it with a hammer, then walked him to the E.R. to score pills” and “Who can stand another night stealing fistfuls of pills from our cancer-sick neighbors?”

    In a world where artists and writers are constantly being called out for cultural appropriation, I was surprised that nobody called Brewer out for appropriating the addict’s story for his own artistic gain. Brewer’s sole connection to the epidemic is that he was born and raised in Virginia, the state with the highest overdose death rate in the nation. In an interview with Virginia Public Radio, Brewer said when he visited over the holidays, he inquired about whereabouts of former classmates. “People replied, ‘They’re on the pills. We don’t really see them anymore.’”

    If you want to write about an addict, you should avoid infantilizing and dehumanizing addicts, along with the trope that addicts are all “lost and forsaken.” Some of the strongest, most courageous people I know are addicts. Active drug users like The People’s Harm Reduction Alliance in Seattle established needle exchanges, distributed the overdose reversal drug, naloxone, and are fighting to open supervised safe injection sites.

    *

    If you want to write a story about addiction, realize that most addicts struggle with whether or not they should publicly share this part of their identity. For a long time, I didn’t think I’d ever write about my addictions to alcohol, opiates, and benzos. I didn’t have the courage. Here in the Midwest, we keep the laundry to ourselves. We don’t air it out. When I wrote about my first struggle with alcoholism in 2011, my family warned me that it could impact my future job opportunities and dating. I knew they were just looking out for my “best interests.” But I insisted: my privacy, my mistakes, my choice. I hoped that sharing my addiction and vulnerability might be therapeutic for me and maybe even help others.

    If you ‘re going to write a story about addiction, realize how it’s affected by different identities. For example, I’m extremely lucky, because I have supportive friends and family. When I was broke and had nothing, they offered me food, shelter, and support. Also related to my privilege as a white, middle-class woman is that I don’t have a criminal record. Yes, my hospital records bother me, but they are protected by confidentiality laws.

    In a way, writing about my addiction felt like making these private records a public matter. I was hesitant. Brewer was also reluctant to write about the opioid epidemic, for different reasons. He said, “West Virginia is very rarely looked at in a positive light. And so here again is a situation where something really quite terrible is going on, but it became so clear that this thing wasn’t going to go away and was starting to seep into my daily life.”

    *

    Heroin doesn’t seep into most people’s daily lives. Heroin is a tsunami. Heroin drowns.

    *

    There may be value in writing beyond our own experience, as Brewer did. Representation is important and if we all followed the advice to only “write what we know,” things could get bland and boring. Artistic expression would suffer. But it’s a tightrope. It’s a practice in tremendous empathy, wanting to diversify representation, while also being respectful and staying in your lane.

    *

    If you want to write about addicts, you’d benefit from also depicting the humor of early recovery, a story that often falls outside the margins. When I was digging through my own videos and journals, I was of course humiliated by some of my own narcissism and self pity. But I was also surprised and heartened by the unexpected joys like my friendship with Tom at my first rehab.

    On my first day, I noticed him in the smoking tent, wearing bright red Converse, a beret, and long sleeves to hide his track marks. I noticed the way his brown eyes brimmed with both kindness and sadness as he deadpanned in meetings.

    “You guys are like The Wonder Twins of rehab,” staff said. Despite our 20-year age difference, we were inseparable.

    Tom bummed me Parliament menthols and lent me one of his ear buds, so we could listen to The Replacements, The Pixies or The Velvet Underground together. On weekends, we went to record stores, ate pizza, and he read my shitty poetry. We made beaded lizards and built crooked birdhouses bedazzled with feathers and glitter.

    One day in group, we had to watch a 1987 film called, The Cat Who Drank and Used Too Much.

    “Was I just daydreaming, or did you just say we are watching a movie starring a cat?” Tom asked.

    “Yes, it’s made for kids. Lost and Found Ministries recommended it as a good way for parents to explain addiction to their kids.”

    “Drunken cats, who knew?” I said.

    I later learned that the film was praised as an “audience favorite about a beer drinking, drug addicted cat,” when it was screened at the Oddball Film Festival in San Francisco.

    Our story begins in any town USA, a sleepy suburban neighborhood lined with rosebushes and plush green lawns. Cue sappy flute and piano elevator music with too much treble.

    The film opens as Pat the Cat is getting into a red car for his morning commute. We see Pat drinking alcohol from a pitcher and beginning to experiment with other things. A cigarette here, some prescription pills, a bit of coke there (powdered sugar).

    “He’d try anything, it was never enough. Then it was too much.” Pat crashes his car and almost loses everything, but then decides to go to rehab!

    “I’m not trying to be catty, but Pat seems to be pretty well-off to me,” Tom said.

    At the end of the movie, Pat has a cupcake to celebrate his sobriety. Ah, it seemed like only a few weeks!

    “If only it were that easy!” I said.

    “Sure, his life isn’t purr-fect, but it’s pretty close!”

    *

    What I’m trying to say is: If you want to write a story about an addict, we might not be perfect, but we can do better. Starting now.

    If you want to read stories about heroin or the opioid epidemic, I recommend starting with nonfiction. There is power in reading about people’s lived experiences.

    Of course there are also excellent and illuminating fictional books about the opioid/ heroin addiction. Check out this list by Kevin Pickard.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Cocaine Safety Tips Rolled Out As Part Of NYC Awareness Campaign

    Cocaine Safety Tips Rolled Out As Part Of NYC Awareness Campaign

    Though critics feel the safety tips are promoting drug use, the health department counters, “We can’t connect New Yorkers to treatment if they are dead.”

    New York City is trying to get the word out about cocaine laced with fentanyl with a new harm reduction effort: issuing cocaine safety tips.

    As CBS New York reports, this effort has been spearheaded by the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene because in 2016, fentanyl was found in 37% of overdose deaths involving cocaine—an 11% jump from the previous year.

    The Department of Health also told Forbes, “In New York City, someone dies of a drug overdose every seven hours. In 2017, there were 1,441 overdose deaths confirmed to date; opioids were involved in over 80% of those deaths.”

    To help make the public aware, warnings against cocaine that could be laced with fentanyl have been printed up on coasters, and health officials have been handing out them out at bars and nightclubs on the Lower East Side of Manhattan.

    The coasters being passed around the city ask in bold pink letters, “Using Cocaine?” and they warn the reader that “fentanyl, a drug stronger than heroin, is being mixed into cocaine and is causing a spike in drug overdose deaths.”

    Several of the safety tips on these coasters include using cocaine with other people so they can help you in case of an overdose. These coasters also recommend you have naloxone (Narcan) at the ready in case you’ve accidentally ingested fentanyl.

    The coasters inform the public where to access naloxone, and they recommend downloading the Stop OD NYC app, which has important information on the dangers of fentanyl. (These coasters also list the helpline 888-NYC-WELL, where you can talk to counselors and link up with a number of resources.)

    New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio told CBS New York, “When the health department tries to figure out a public health campaign, they are very mindful of not wanting to have unintended consequences. But, let’s be blunt, tragically there’s a lot of people using cocaine and thinking it’s safe… Any way to tell people it’s not safe anymore and could be laced with an extraordinarily lethal drug—that’s our obligation to get that information out.”

    Officials from the health department also told the network, “The city is not encouraging drug usage—we are encouraging safety. We can’t connect New Yorkers to treatment if they are dead.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • More Than One Way to Recover: A Guide of Pathways

    More Than One Way to Recover: A Guide of Pathways

    Regardless of how we achieved recovery, it is our responsibility as members of the recovery community to better inform ourselves (and others) of the other options out there rather than suggesting that our way is the only way.

    We live in a country where 45 million American families are affected by addiction. The statistics are frightening: over 20 million adults have substance use disorder and 17 million people have alcohol use disorder. 64,000 Americans die from drug overdoses each year and over 88,000 die from alcohol related causes. Sadly, less than 10 percent of people suffering with substance use disorder, and less than 7 percent of those with alcohol use disorder, get the help that they need.

    In spite of this public health crisis and the tragic and very preventable deaths, the recovery community is divided in its efforts. While on the one hand we are making great strides by publicly speaking up to put a face and a voice to recovery in order to fight stigma and boost efforts to gain greater resources and access to treatment, there is still some infighting within the community about the best way to recover. If we’re fighting to eliminate the stigma that marks us as “less than” to the general public, we should also be fighting the stigma within our more insular community. How can we effectively tackle this crisis if we’re not helping each other?

    There are many people in 12-step recovery who bicker in online forums and sit in church basements purporting to know the only way to recover and anyone who disagrees must be wrong. I have lost count of the times I’ve heard of someone relapsing or expressing their discomfort with the 12-step program, only to be told that the problem is actually them and their lack of willingness. As evidenced in the Big Book:

    “Rarely have we seen a person fail who has thoroughly followed our path. Those who do not recover are people who cannot or will not completely give themselves to this simple program, usually men and women who are constitutionally incapable of being honest with themselves.”

    This passage simply isn’t true. According to Zachary Dodes, who co-wrote The Sober Truth: Debunking the Bad Science Behind 12 Step Programs and the Rehab Industry, the success rate of AA is actually somewhere between five and 10 percent, with only one in every 15 people entering the rooms achieving and maintaining sobriety. This is in stark contrast to AA’s self-reported figures in 2007 of 33 percent of members having 10 or more years of sobriety. A 2012 survey revealed 24 percent of members were between one and five years sober, 13 percent of members were sober between five and ten years, 14 percent between 10 and 20 years, and 22 percent beyond 20 years sober. 

    In fact, of the people who are fortunate to recover—22.35 million—half of those do so in various mutual aid groups. A recent study was conducted to determine the difference in attendance, participation, and recovery outcomes of 12-step groups versus alternatives of SMART, Women for Sobriety, and LifeRing. The study concluded that the alternatives were just as effective, if not more so, than 12-step programs. Study author Dr Sara Zemore recommended that professionals refer patients to these 12-step alternatives—especially when patients are atheist, or when they are unsure of whether they wish to pursue complete abstinence or a method of harm reduction.

    I’m not the first person to say that 12-step groups didn’t work for me. And I did throw myself into the program for four years, completing the steps in both AA and NA. I reached a point where I could no longer ignore my feelings: I did not believe in the program—I found it positively disempowering and I found it self-limiting to refer to myself as something I used to be, a person with alcohol use disorder. And I’m not alone, there are articles published every day that echo my point of view, offering experiences of people who have successfully found recovery through alternative pathways.

    As the recovery community expands and gains traction in fighting stigma and making resources more accessible—although we still need significantly more if we’re to end the crisis—we are starting to see greater emphasis on alternative pathways. What’s more, we are seeing that these pathways are presented on an equal footing as more and more research becomes available to support their efficacy. Just this week, Facing Addiction brought out a comprehensive guide, Multiple Pathways of Recovery: A Guide for Individuals and Families. Facing Addiction’s view is that just as substance use disorders are unique, so too is recovery—it’s dynamic and evolving, utilizing a collection of resources, or recovery capital.

    The different pathways of recovery are:

    1. Inpatient or outpatient treatment
    2. Therapy
    3. Holistic therapies
    4. Natural recovery
    5. Recovery housing
    6. Recovery mutual aid groups. These include:
      1. Refuge Recovery,
      2. Celebrate Recovery,
      3. Women for Sobriety,
      4. LifeRing,
      5. Phoenix Multisport,
      6. Moderation Management,
      7. SMART Recovery,
      8. 12 Step groups.
    7. Faith-based recovery services
    8. Medication-assisted recovery, including MAT groups
    9. Peer-based recovery supports
    10. Family recovery
    11. Technology based recovery
    12. Alternative recovery supports
    13. Harm reduction.

    There are a wide variety of pathways and resources that can be used to recover in a way that suits the unique needs of the person recovering. Whether we subscribe to one or more of these methods or pathways, it is our responsibility as members of the recovery community to better inform ourselves (and others) of the other options out there rather than suggesting that our way is the only way. Just because something worked for us does not mean that it must work for everyone. If a person doesn’t find success with the 12-steps, it doesn’t mean that they are just not willing enough or “constitutionally incapable” of being honest with themselves. Perhaps if we stopped judging, became more informed, and met people where they are in their individual recovery journey, we might have a fighting chance at ending this epidemic.

    For more information on all of these pathways, click here.

    View the original article at thefix.com