Tag: new law

  • Washington Raises Legal Smoking Age To 21

    Washington Raises Legal Smoking Age To 21

    Washington joins states such as California, Hawaii, Maine and Massachusetts who have also increased the legal smoking age to 21.

    This week, Washington became the eighth state to change the legal age to purchase cigarettes to 21. 

    On Wednesday (March 27), the Washington Senate passed a bill that raised the minimum age for buying cigarettes, tobacco, and electronic smoking devices, including vapes, according to The Herald.

    “This bill is about saving lives,” said Democratic state Senator Patty Kuderer, who says that raising the smoking age not only prevents lifelong use, but will also save the state “millions of dollars in health care costs.”

    Republican state Senator Phil Fortunato said that the bill did not make sense if the legal age of adulthood is 18. “Either you are an adult and intelligent enough to make your own decisions at 18, or not,” he said. “This is a personal freedom issue.”

    People under 21 will still be able to purchase tobacco and electronic smoking devices on tribal lands in the state—something that many lawmakers, including Republican state Senator Doug Ericksen objected to.

    “Why create a two-tier system,” he said. “Let’s have one fair standard for all of Washington.”

    California, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Oregon and Virginia all have a minimum age of 21 for purchasing tobacco and smoking products. Many cities have also adopted the measure, according to the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, which advocates for increasing the smoking age. 

    “Nearly all smokers start as kids or young adults, and these age groups are heavily targeted by the tobacco industry,” the group writes. “Increasing the tobacco age to 21 will help to prevent young people from ever starting to smoke and to reduce the deaths, disease and health care costs caused by tobacco use.”

    In Hawaii, a lawmaker has presented an even more drastic proposal, trying to raise the minimum smoking age to 100 by 2034. 

    “In my view, you are taking people who are enslaved from a horrific addiction, and freeing people from horrific enslavement. We, as legislators, have a duty to do things to save people’s lives. If we don’t ban cigarettes, we are killing people,” Representative Richard Creagan told the Hawaii Tribune-Herald.

    Although rates of cigarette use are decreasing among teens, more young people are using electronic cigarettes, which pose health risks. The FDA is even considering a medication to help kids quit vaping.

    Matthew L. Myers, who is the president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, told CNN, “The FDA has concluded that the level of addiction it is seeing among youthful e-cigarette users is so disturbing and so unprecedented that it needs to at least ask whether we need a solution that goes beyond what we ever did with cigarettes.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • California Aims To Tighten Law That Diverts Suspects To Mental Health Treatment

    California Aims To Tighten Law That Diverts Suspects To Mental Health Treatment

    Prosecutors argue that a new law should restrict the type of suspects who can qualify for mental health treatment in lieu of jail.

    California prosecutors are fighting to amend a law aimed at diverting mentally ill suspects to treatment in lieu of the criminal justice system.

    The law, signed by Governor Jerry Brown in June as part of a budget bill, gives judges the option to divert a suspect to a mental health treatment program and dismiss charges if it is decided that mental illness “played a significant role” in the crime, NBC News reported.

    The diversion program was intended to reduce the backlog of suspects sent to mental hospitals, NBC News reported, because they are judged incompetent to stand trial.

    California law already allowed for the diversion of mentally ill suspects, but prosecutors argue that the new law extends the privilege to too many people, namely people charged with serious crimes.

    The new law allows the diversion of “any suspect with mental illness”—including bipolar disorder or schizophrenia, but excludes anti-social personality disorders and pedophilia, the LA Times reported.

    In response, Governor Brown submitted a proposal on Monday night to limit who can participate in the diversion program. The proposal allows judges to exclude a “much broader range of dangerous suspects,” specifically banning those charged with murder, rape and other sex crimes from participating in the program.

    Another part of the proposal prohibits suspects from owning firearms while participating in the program, and they may be required to pay restitution.

    El Dorado County District Attorney Vern Pierson said the proposal is “a significant improvement from the original language that was passed and signed into law as part of the budget,” according to the Times.

    However, not everyone agrees with the proposal. One deputy public defender said the proposed revision “guts mental health diversion and goes far beyond a reasonable compromise,” allowing California counties to “continue to do what they have done for years—send sick people to prison instead of treatment.”

    “The end result is higher incarceration rates for ill Californians, lawsuits for ill Californians, lawsuits against counties for mistreatment of the mentally ill and higher recidivism rates for untreated offenders,” said LA County deputy public defender Nick Stewart-Oaten, who is a member of the California Public Defenders Association’s legislative committee.

    View the original article at thefix.com