Tag: News

  • Could A Skin Graft Prevent Cocaine Abuse?

    Could A Skin Graft Prevent Cocaine Abuse?

    Researchers studied whether skin gene therapy could reduce cocaine-seeking behaviors.

    The drug addiction “epidemic” claims tens of thousands of lives each year in America, but until now there has been little talk of ways to immunize people against substance use disorder.

    However, in the future that may be possible, according to new research that found that skin grafting might be used to protect people from cocaine addiction. 

    “Adapting this approach for humans could be a promising way for blocking addiction,” Qingyao Kong, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Chicago, wrote for The Conversation

    Kong was part of a team of researchers that demonstrated that skin grafting could be used in mice to reduce cocaine-seeking behaviors and make the mice less susceptible to overdose when given large amounts of cocaine. Their findings were published in the journal Nature Biomedical Engineering

    Humans naturally produce an enzyme called butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), which can break down cocaine into inactive, harmless components. BChE can be modified to metabolize cocaine even more rapidly than it naturally would, and has been identified as a possible treatment for cocaine addiction. However, it is tricky to deliver the active enzyme and keep it functioning. 

    To overcome this, Kong’s team tried using skin grafts to deliver the enzyme. 

    “So instead of giving the enzyme to the animals, we decided to engineer skin stem cells that carried the gene for the BChE enzyme,” Kong wrote. “This way the skin cells would be able to manufacture the enzyme themselves and supply the animal.”

    To trial the idea on mice, the team first used gene editing to incorporate BChE into skin stem cells from a mouse. 

    “These engineered skin cells produced consistent and high levels of the hBChE protein, which they then secreted,” Kong wrote. Then, the cells were used to grow skin tissue in a lab, which was then grafted onto mice. 

    “With the genetically engineered skin graft releasing hBChE into the blood stream of the host mice, we hypothesized that if the mouse consumed cocaine, the enzyme would rapidly chop up the drug before it could trigger the addictive pleasure response in the brain,” Kong wrote. 

    They were correct. Animals with the skin graft did not get the dopamine high when they dosed on cocaine, meaning they had no motivation to consume more. “Skin graft of the hBChE-cells efficiently blocks the cocaine-induced reward effect,” Kong explained. 

    In addition, it acted as an immunization against overdose. Half of the control mice exposed to large doses of cocaine died, but none of the mice with the graft did. 

    The team then tested whether human skin cells would also produce BChE after being modified, and found that they would. 

    “This suggests the concept of skin gene therapy may be effective for treating cocaine abuse and overdose in humans in the future,” Kong wrote. In addition, other enzymes that target alcohol and nicotine could potentially be used, allowing the skin graft technique to treat individuals with those addictions. 

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Demi Lovato's Mother On Overdose: "We Didn't Know If She Was Going to Make It"

    Demi Lovato's Mother On Overdose: "We Didn't Know If She Was Going to Make It"

    “I literally start to shake a little bit when I start to remember what happened.”

    The mother of singer Demi Lovato spoke at length about her daughter’s drug overdose and recovery in an emotional interview for Newsmax TV.

    Dianna De La Garza said that she still finds it difficult to recall the events of the July overdose, which she learned about through phone texts. Though alarmed by her daughter’s condition, she said that her faith provided her with the strength to support Lovato through her hospitalization and subsequent rehabilitation.

    “I can honestly say today that she is doing really well,” she revealed.

    As TMZ reported, paramedics arrived at Lovato’s home in the Hollywood Hills in the early hours of July 24, and found the performer unconscious from an apparent drug overdose. She was treated with the overdose reversal drug Narcan before she was transported to a Los Angeles hospital, where she remained for 12 days before being released and taken to a rehab facility outside of California. 

    In an Instagram statement posted on August 5, the pop star thanked her family and the staff at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center for getting her through the ordeal, as well as her many fans who had expressed their support during her hospitalization. “The love you have all shown me will never be forgotten and I look forward to the day where I can say I came out on the other side,” she wrote in her statement.

    In her interview with Newsmax TV, De La Garza said that she still struggles with recalling or talking about the events of July 24. “I literally start to shake a little bit when I start to remember what happened,” she said.

    She said that she found out about her daughter’s condition when texts from individuals expressing their concern began to flood her phone.

    Confused by the outpouring of support, De La Garza said that her mood quickly changed when she received a call from Lovato’s assistant.

    “She said Demi overdosed,” recalled De La Garza. “It was something I never, ever expected to hear as a parent about any of my kids. I said, ‘Is she okay?’ And she stopped for a second and said, ‘She’s conscious, but she’s not talking.’ I knew at that point that we were in trouble.”

    De La Garza said that Lovato was in “bad shape” when she saw her at the hospital, but needed her to know that her family was with her.

    “I said, ‘Demi, I’m here, I love you.’ At that point, she said back to me, ‘I love you too.’ From that point on, I never allowed myself to ever think that things were going to be okay.”

    While Lovato lingered in critical condition, De La Garza turned to her faith to help her dispel worries about Demi’s health.

    “We just didn’t know for two days if she was going to make it or not,” she recalled. But the singer pulled through with the help of the hospital staff and support from her many fans. “I just feel like the reason she is alive today is because of the millions and millions of prayers that went up every day,” said De La Garza.

    Today, as Lovato continues to work on her recovery while in rehabilitation, De La Garza said that her daughter is “doing really well. She’s happy, she’s healthy, she’s working on her sobriety, and she’s getting the help she needs.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • New York Times Op-Ed Slams "Incompetent" DEA Over Opioid Crisis

    New York Times Op-Ed Slams "Incompetent" DEA Over Opioid Crisis

    The writers of a scathing op-ed believe the federal agency “deserves much of the blame” for opioid-related deaths.

    A recent op-ed in the New York Times does not mince words in its critique of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). “Because of its incompetence, the opioid crisis has gone from bad to worse. The solution: overhauling the agency, or even getting rid of it entirely,” write Leo Beletsky and Jeremiah Goulka in the Sept. 17 opinion piece.

    Rather than pointing to pharmaceutical drug makers or drug cartels, Beletsky and Goulka—of Northeastern University’s Health in Justice Action Lab—say the DEA “deserves much of the blame” for rising opioid-related deaths. This summer, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that more than 72,000 Americans died of a drug overdose in 2017—with opioids accounting for more than 49,000 of the deaths. 

    The federal agency’s response to rising opioid abuse in the United States did little to mitigate the growing epidemic, the authors write. While the DEA has the authority to establish “non-enforcement programs aimed at reducing the availability” of illicit drugs—e.g. expanding evidence-based treatment from a public health perspective—instead, in its decades-long existence, the agency has opted to ramp up the enforcement side of its mandate.

    “Instead the agency pushed for surveillance of prescription records and electronic communication, doubled down on prosecuting prescribers and helped to tighten the screws on patients seeking pain relief,” reads the op-ed.

    The agency’s enforcement-heavy response to painkiller abuse only pushed people to seek illicit substitutes like heroin and counterfeit pills, and to encourage drug traffickers to “create more compact, potent drugs” like fentanyl.

    This resulted in more deaths as well as the spread of HIV and hepatitis (from sharing needles), while access to evidence-based treatment for drug use disorder, like methadone, saw little improvement.

    Not only is the DEA accused of employing tactics that have “fueled the opioid crisis,” in the 40-plus years since it was established under the administration of former President Richard Nixon (the man who declared drugs “Public Enemy Number 1”) the agency’s approach has had a harmful effect on community policing, and it has earned a reputation for botched operations at home and abroad in its tireless campaign to hunt down illicit drug suppliers. (The agency has the largest foreign presence of any U.S. federal law enforcement agency, according to its 2018 Budget Request.)

    “It has eroded civil liberties through the expansion of warrantless surveillance, and overseen arbitrary seizures of billions of dollars of private property without any clear connection to drug-related crimes,” write Beletsky and Goulka.

    And in the DEA’s long history, “these actions have disproportionately targeted people of color, contributing to disparities in mass incarceration, confiscated property, and collective trauma.”

    By taking Nixon’s “War on Drugs” a bit too literally, the DEA’s focus on the law enforcement side of its mandate has done nothing to reduce the amount of drugs consumed by Americans. “The agency was supposed to curb problematic drug use, but failed to do so because its tactics were never informed by public health or addiction science,” write Beletsky and Goulka.

    The authors of the op-ed offer a solution: reinvent the DEA “from the bottom up.” One way to do this is to transfer regulatory authority over the pharmaceutical supply to the Food and Drug Administration.

    Currently the DEA is in charge of how controlled substances are classified, produced and distributed. (For example, under the DEA, marijuana is classified as a Schedule I drug, which are considered the most dangerous, alongside heroin and LSD.)

    Some of its law enforcement efforts can be transferred to the FBI or local authorities, or eliminated altogether, the authors suggest.

    And a “significant portion” of the DEA’s budget should go to life-saving measures like access to high-quality treatment. The agency requested a budget of $2.16 billion for fiscal year 2018, a $77 million increase from the year prior.

    According to the authors, the agency is an emblem of the failure of Nixon’s “War on Drugs” and the failure of the federal government to make significant progress in reducing drug abuse in the United States.

    Forty-seven years after Nixon declared a “War on Drugs,” the authors say it’s time to “urgently rethink how our nation regulates drugs.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Pain Patients Rally To Have Voices Heard

    Pain Patients Rally To Have Voices Heard

    “The real message is that people in chronic pain are not drug abusers. Illicit drug use is the enemy,” said one rally participant. 

    People suffering from chronic pain gathered earlier this week in New Hampshire, hoping to share their frustrations about prescription opioid restrictions in one of the states hardest hit by the opioid epidemic. 

    “The pendulum has swung so far that now, people who have legitimate, documented, disease and illness and pain are now having their medications limited,” Bill Murphy, who helped organize the rally, told WMUR.

    Similar Don’t Punish Pain rallies were held in about 80 locations around the country. Participants say that they need pain medications—including opioids—to manage their chronic conditions. They say that long-term use of opioids can vastly improve the lives of people suffering from chronic pain, but that opioid painkillers have become misunderstood and stigmatized because of widespread misuse. 

    “Chronic pain patients are being denied their medications due to a false narrative that the drug epidemic is caused by prescription pain pills,” Kim Patty, who helped organize a rally in Springfield, Missouri, told the Springfield News-Leader. “The drug epidemic is being caused by heroin and synthetic fentanyl.”

    Participants in New Hampshire said this message gets lost. “It’s important for pain patients to have respect,” said Edie Allyn-Paige, who lives with chronic pain. “You know, every day, I have to choose whether or not to get out of bed.” 

    Bobbi Blades has had chronic pain for 30 years caused by a bone that presses on a nerve. She said that without opioids she wouldn’t have been able to complete rehabilitation, which helped her regain the ability to walk. “The real message is that people in chronic pain are not drug abusers,” she said. “Illicit drug use is the enemy.”

    Murphy said that unlike many people who abuse opioids, responsible users take low doses and are functional at home and at work. Despite that, many people have had their doctors cut back on their pain medications under pressure to reduce prescribing. “Because of that low-dose regimen, (people) are still working, raising families, and their doctors are feeling pressured to reduce that pain medication,” he said.

    Cheryl Ostrander, who rallied in Springfield, said she has used painkillers to help her cope with breast cancer, knee replacements, spinal fusions and fibromyalgia.

    “I am struggling really hard just to stay here,” Ostrander said. “I am in pain just like every day of my life. I’m a mess, but I don’t deserve to be treated like a criminal to get my pain medication.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • More Than 3,000 Open Marijuana Cases To Be Dismissed In New York

    More Than 3,000 Open Marijuana Cases To Be Dismissed In New York

    The legal move stops short of expunging the pot-related cases.

    In what’s been described as an action “in the interest of justice,” Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance has vacated more than 3,000 outstanding warrants for cannabis consumption and possession, some of which date back to 1978.

    The decision will only impact misdemeanor and violation cases where a warrant was issued because the defendant did not appear in court. Vance announced the “decline to prosecute” policy for possession and smoking cases in late July, with the goal of reducing such prosecutions to fewer than 200 per year.

    Vance dropped 3,042 open cases of marijuana possession—but as High Times noted, this stops short of expunging these cases. 

    Vance’s decision applies only to open cases where misdemeanor possession or use was the “only remaining charge,” and the defendant did not appear in court. It does not apply to sale or distribution cases, or any case in which the defendant was convicted. 

    Still, the dismissal of these cases would have several positive outcomes: it supports the implementation of new policy for the NYPD regarding misdemeanor marijuana cases, which has shifted from arrests to court summonses (or “weed tickets), which went into effect this month.

    It also seeks to address what Vance described as “decades of racial disparities behind the enforcement of marijuana in New York City.”

    According to his office, 79% of the dropped cases involve individuals of color, and nearly half of those were 25 years of age or younger at the time of their arrest.

    Additionally, it may remove some of the obstacles that individuals with open warrants may face, such as applying for jobs or housing. Background checks in both cases may reveal an open warrant and impact the individual’s chances, and may even affect applications for citizenship.

    “By vacating these warrants, we are preventing unnecessary future interactions with the criminal justice system,” said Vance at a press conference after declaring his motion. “We made the decision that it is really in the interest of justice.”

    The move is also in the interest of freeing up what Vance called the “burden” of backlogged cases that drain resources his office needs for more serious charges.

    In July, Vance said that the policy was expected to reduce marijuana prosecutions in Manhattan from approximately 5,000 per year to fewer than 200—a reduction of 96%.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Senatorial Candidate Gary Johnson Reveals Cannabis Industry Connections

    Senatorial Candidate Gary Johnson Reveals Cannabis Industry Connections

    The former New Mexico governor disclosed his ties to the cannabis industry amid his run for U.S. Senate.

    Two-time Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson has revealed his personal financial ties to the marijuana industry, which have some observers concerned about a possible conflict of interest in regard to his bid for New Mexico’s Senate seat.

    Disclosing one’s financial investments is part of the campaign process, and in recent Senate filings, Johnson stated that he owns more than $250,000 in stock from the Las Vegas, Nevada-based cannabis company Kush, as well as profit shares from a cannabis industry funding group, and capital gains from stock from another cannabis company, for which he served as CEO.

    Johnson, who previously served two terms as governor of New Mexico, has dismissed concerns about the potential conflict, stating that his political interests outweigh his connections to the industry.

    Between bids for the White House on the Libertarian ticket in 2012 and 2016, Johnson earned at least $100,000 in capital gains from stock earned during his tenure as CEO of Cannabis Sativa, and participates in a profit-sharing arrangement with the investment fund CB1 Capital, which provides funding exclusively for cannabis industry entities. Johnson serves as one of the fund’s key advisers. 

    As the Albuquerque Journal noted, issues of conflict over Johnson’s connections to the cannabis industry arose in regard to his candidacy for the U.S. Senate, which he announced in August 2018. Johnson is running on the Libertarian ticket against Democratic incumbent Martin Heinrich.

    Both Johnson and Heinrich are in favor of legalizing marijuana at the federal level, while Republican candidate Mick Rich is opposed to such efforts.

    But Johnson has waved off such worries by noting that he has been in support of legalized marijuana since the 1990s, which he described as a “career-ending move” two decades ago. “The last thing that I ever dreamed of happening is that somehow I would make money off this,” he said.

    Currently, medical marijuana is legal in the state of New Mexico, but marijuana for recreational use is not. New Mexico residents consume a considerable amount of marijuana from both the legal and black markets; approximately 27,000 individuals are registered medical marijuana patients, while more than 135,000 claimed that they consume recreational marijuana on a regular basis.

    As High Times noted, if the state made marijuana legal, industry investors could stand to make a sizable profit from sales. Researchers have estimated that more than 57 metric tons would be used in the state annually, which could yield a profit of approximately $412 million, with the possibility of growing to as much as $677 million.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Brett Kavanaugh’s Classmate Detailed Drunken Behavior In Memoirs

    Brett Kavanaugh’s Classmate Detailed Drunken Behavior In Memoirs

    Kavanaugh’s prep school classmate’s 1997 memoir features a drunken character named “Bart O’Kavanaugh.”

    Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court is still under review, as the court looks into accusations of sexual assault brought against Kavanaugh by a former classmate, Christine Blasey Ford.

    Details from the memoirs of Kavanaugh’s old high school friend, Mark Judge, may give important context.

    Ford has come forward to assert that in the early ’80s at a high school party, a drunken Kavanaugh allegedly pushed her down in a bedroom, covered her mouth and attempted to pull her clothing off. Another drunken young man, Judge, “piled on” the two and knocked them over, allowing Ford to run and hide in a bathroom.

    Ford’s accusation was backed by notes from her therapist in 2012 and 2013 when Ford discussed a sexual assault she endured in high school by an elitist prep, as well as a chilling detailed account recalled by a friend of Ford’s.

    Judge has denied that he saw a sexual assault take place and that in addition, aggressive sexual behavior—as Ford described—was out of character for the young men attending Georgetown Prep at the time.

    However, Judge’s own past writings illuminate a sex-driven, misogynistic and drunken culture at the school.

    Judge has written two memoirs, both of which depicted Georgetown Prep as a sexually aggressive environment where students abused alcohol regularly and attended “masturbation class,” according to the Independent.

    In his 2005 memoir, God and Man at Georgetown Prep, Judge wrote about his senior year, when he co-published the school’s underground student newspaper with a focus on the school’s intense party scene.

    One issue co-published by Judge pictured a Georgetown music teacher at a bachelor party “chugging a beer, surrounded by a group of us with raised mugs, sitting down while being entertained by the stripper.”

    Judge’s memoir Wasted even has a drunken, vomiting character named “Bart O’Kavanaugh.” Judge is now a self-claimed conservative moralist who has written that there is no excuse for rape.

    He has also written that “social justice warriors” confuse rape with innocent demonstrations of masculinity. He continued that there is “an ambiguous middle ground, where the woman seems interested and indicates, whether verbally or not, that the man needs to prove himself to her.”

    Judge concluded, “If that man is any kind of man, he’ll allow himself to feel the awesome power, the wonderful beauty, of uncontrollable male passion.”

    This thought was linked to a scene from the 1981 film Body Heat—the same time period that Ford alleges she was attacked by Kavanaugh—in which a man shatters a large glass window and then violently throws the woman on a table, where they have sex.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • "Drug Llama" Allegedly Sold 50,000 Fentanyl Pills On Dark Web

    "Drug Llama" Allegedly Sold 50,000 Fentanyl Pills On Dark Web

    Investigators say the woman who reportedly calls herself “The Drug Llama” also sold Oxy, Percs and amphetamines through a dark web marketplace.

    A California woman known on the dark web as “The Drug Llama” is accused of shipping more than 50,000 fentanyl pills to consumers across the United States since 2016. 

    Melissa Scanlan, 31, is facing federal charges in Illinois and is also being investigated for two deaths in San Diego, where she lives, according to The San Diego Union Tribune.

    In those cases, investigators allege that she sold fentanyl that led to the deaths of a 10-month-old boy and a 41-year-old woman. The baby died after his father bought fentanyl—allegedly from Scanlan—and left it within reach of the child. The boy was found unresponsive in his parents’ bed.  

    These might be two of many deaths allegedly caused by Scanlan’s drugs. Assistant U.S. Attorney Sherri Hobson told a federal judge that Scanlan has trafficked more than 50,000 fentanyl pills, although the indictment against her only covers 400 grams of fentanyl. 

    Scanlan was the subject of a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) undercover operation in both San Diego and St. Louis. As the scope of the investigation expanded, the Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Postal Inspection Service and Department of Homeland Security also became involved. 

    Investigators say that Scanlan was selling drugs on the dark web marketplace called Dream Market, where she was known as “The Drug Llama.”

    In addition to selling fentanyl, she also offered oxycodone, amphetamines, morphine, Percocet, temazepam, flexeril, and an “opiate powder pack,” according to federal documents. Her fentanyl was pressed into blue pills that were disguised as oxycodone. The drugs arrived in leather pouches much like those sold by a company Scanlan owns. 

    Federal investigators ordered drugs from the “Llama” in July and were able to track Scanlan using the return address on the packages. The address listed was associated with an old business of Scanlan’s, and the name listed—Samantha Cooper—was later found to be the names of her two dogs. A Paypal account also linked Scanlan processed thousands of drug-related transactions. 

    In August, Scanlan was arrested on state drug charges after a search of her home. However, shortly after she was released she traveled to Mexico to arrange the shipment of more fentanyl to her house, and redirected her customers to another dark web marketplace where they could purchase the drugs. 

    She was arrested again on September 4 and admitted to buying fentanyl from a Mexican cartel. This time, federal prosecutors are arguing that she is a flight risk and a danger, noting that Scanlan is five months pregnant but continuing to engage in criminal activity. 

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • The Cannabis Industry Wants You To Ditch The Word "Stoner"

    The Cannabis Industry Wants You To Ditch The Word "Stoner"

    A new ad campaign is pushing to end marijuana-related stigma.

    The word “stoner” immediately brings to mind a specific stereotype: a low achiever clouded in smoke and looking for a snack. Now, a retail pot company in California has launched a $2 million advertising campaign trying to convince the public to let the world stoner go up in smoke.

    “That word can be used to negatively stereotype people,” Daniel Yi, senior vice president of communications at MedMen, which operates 14 retail pot stores, told The LA Times. “We want to take that stigma away. We want to make marijuana mainstream.”

    The ads feature actors dressed as police officers, nurses, teachers and other professionals. Next to the individual is the word “stoner” with a slash through it. Yi said the ads are meant to address the stigma that still exists around smoking pot, even in states like California where recreational use is legal. 

    Yi said that the recent controversy over Elon Musk smoking marijuana on a YouTube show shows that there is still a long way to go before cannabis is accepted as mainstream. 

    “The Stephen Colbert show (on CBS) does this thing where Colbert takes shots of tequila with some of his guests,” Yi said. “That doesn’t show up on the front page of the LA Times. But Musk smokes one blunt on “The Joe Rogan Experience” and it gets lots of press coverage. Alcohol is acceptable, marijuana isn’t.”

    MedMen’s ads are just one way that the marijuana industry is trying to rebrand smoking cannabis. Other retailers won’t use the term “pot.”

    “It’s legal now,” said Brooke Brun, cofounder of Kb Pure Essentials, a company that makes CBD products marketed for health and wellness. “People don’t feel so bad about asking for it, or being seen at a CBD booth.” 

    However, industry insiders said that stigma will be reduced the most as marijuana use becomes legalized with no social consequences. 

    “The negative prophecies didn’t come true,” said Dallin Young, executive director of the Assn. of Cannabis Professionals in San Diego. “California hasn’t turned into some Mad Max world.” 

    While some people took issue with the ads, other residents of San Diego — where some of the billboard are located — said the campaign is really nothing new. 

    “The alcohol industry has for eons shown advertisements of imbibers in all professions appearing to lead normal, healthy lives,” Don Paret of San Diego said. “Why (shouldn’t) the pot industry do the same? MedMen’s attempt to create a more legitimate image of pot users is no different than the alcohol industry portraying a similar image.” 

    Others weren’t sure that people would be able to stop using the word ‘stoner.’ 

    “While ‘stoner’ may conjure images of a permanently buzzed Jeff Spicoli-type [from Fast Times at Ridgemont High], I think trying to stop people from using it is a pointless and losing battle,” said California resident Gary Deacon. “Either embrace and reclaim the epithet by showing that ‘stoners’ can be productive contributors to society, or promote an alternate term for people to use.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Science Series NOVA Tackles US Drug Crisis in PBS' "Addiction"

    Science Series NOVA Tackles US Drug Crisis in PBS' "Addiction"

    The PBS documentary airs on October 19th.

    The opioid crisis affects entire communities across the United States—yet there is still much about opioid abuse that is poorly understood.

    A new documentary airing on PBS aims to change that by exploring the crisis from different angles.

    ADDICTION, produced by NOVA, tackles both the science of addiction and the real impact that it’s had on Americans.

    “Nearly every family in America has been affected by addiction—the biggest public health crisis facing us today—yet it remains poorly understood, largely stigmatized, and finding treatment can be a daunting process,” said Paula S. Apsell, Senior Executive Producer of NOVA. “NOVA helps cut through the confusion by presenting the latest science on what we now know is a treatable brain disorder, and not a hopeless diagnosis.”

    The documentary explores harm reduction programs across North America and the impact they’ve had—from Insite in Vancouver, Canada (the first supervised injection facility in North America) to West Virginia, which has adopted a harm reduction approach to the drug problem there.

    Under West Virginia’s public health commissioner Rahul Gupta, who will step down from his post in November, the state dispatched a free mobile unit and volunteer medical team to offer a host of harm reduction services including needle exchange, HIV and hepatitis testing, and free naloxone, (the anti-opioid overdose medication).

    A major benefit to investing in a harm reduction approach is financial. Gupta says that with every $1 spent on harm reduction, we save $7 in medical costs, in addition to being able to guide people toward treatment.

    “The costs are really unsustainable if we continue on this path, losing over half a trillion dollars a year for multiple years in our economy. We’ve got to be smart about addressing addiction,” said Gupta. “We have to find ways to prevent it from happening in the first place.”

    Dr. Laura Kehoe oversees a unique program at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston that offers medication to overdose survivors to control cravings.

    “We’re seeing people come that day and engage in care, and the vast majority of them, 75 to 80% are returning,” she said. “Tragically, evidence-based treatments are not widely available in the U.S., and patients and families have to navigate a very broken system of care.”

    View the original article at thefix.com