Tag: News

  • How A Ballot Measure Decreased Racial Disparity In California Drug Arrests

    How A Ballot Measure Decreased Racial Disparity In California Drug Arrests

    Prop. 47 led to a 75% reduction in felony drug arrests in California.

    Four years after California voters approved Proposition 47 in 2014—which reclassified “non-serious and non-violent property and drug crimes” from a felony to a misdemeanor—a new analysis was able to quantify the impact that the measure has had on the state of California.

    Not only did Prop. 47 lead to a 75% reduction in felony drug arrests in California, it was also associated with a reduction in the racial imbalance of drug arrests. One month after the measure was enacted, the difference between the number of Black and white felony drug arrests decreased from 81 to 44 per 100,000 population, and “continued to decline over the course of the year,” according to a statement by the UC San Francisco (UCSF).

    The findings are encouraging to those who advocate for rolling back the harmful impact of the drug war, which includes a much-researched disparity in the number of Black and Latino Americans who are arrested and incarcerated for drug-related crimes compared with the number of white Americans.

    “Our findings suggest that efforts like Prop. 47 are an effective way to decrease the disparity in drug arrests between Blacks and Whites,” said Alyssa Mooney, MPH, a UCSF doctoral student and study author.

    “The collateral consequences of felony drug convictions are severe—affecting everything from whether someone can get a job to their ability to get housing and student aid,” Mooney said. “So, alleviating these disparities could help narrow the significant disparities we see between groups in important health and social outcomes.”

    Efforts to level the playing field for communities that have been disproportionately impacted by the long-waged “War on Drugs” are being applied all across California. Nearly all of its major cities—including Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento and San Francisco—have implemented some sort of “equity program” to give a boost to certain individuals who wish to enter the booming marijuana industry.

    And in San Francisco, officials have decided to retroactively apply Proposition 64, the measure that legalized the adult use of marijuana in California, to expunge thousands of marijuana convictions dating back to 1975.

    “A criminal conviction can be a barrier to employment, housing and other benefits, so instead of waiting for the community to take action, we’re taking action for the community,” said San Francisco District Attorney George Gascón.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Chester Bennington's Widow Talks Mental Health, Suicide Prevention

    Chester Bennington's Widow Talks Mental Health, Suicide Prevention

    “If we can find good coping mechanisms, if we have people we trust that we can talk to, that helps us make better choices for ourselves. My husband didn’t have that in a lot of situations.”

    In the wake of the suicides of Anthony Bourdain and Kate Spade, Chester Bennington’s widow Talinda Bennington has continued speaking out about mental health and suicide prevention.

    It has been nearly a year since Bennington died by suicide on July 20, 2017 at the age of 41. In a recent CNN town hall with Anderson Cooper, Talinda described realizing that there were warning signs before her husband died. “I am now more educated about those signs, but they were definitely there: the hopelessness, the change of behavior, isolation.”

    Talinda was used to her husband being depressed, adding, “That was all part of our daily life. Sometimes, some signs were there more than others. Sometimes, they weren’t there at all.”

    The rocker was in good spirits in the days leading up to his death. Talinda shared, “He was [at] his best. We were on a family vacation, and he decided to go back home to do a television commercial. This was not a time where we or any of our family suspected this to happen, which is terrifying… We thought everything was OK.”

    Unlike her husband, Talinda did not suffer from depression. “Watching my husband go through it, I had no idea. I could not relate.”

    Bennington was very open in interviews about his struggles with depression, addiction, and dealing with the trauma of being sexually abused when he was young.

    In an interview that was released shortly after his death, he said, “My whole life, I’ve just felt a little off. I find myself getting into these patterns of behavior or thought—especially when I’m stuck up here [in my head]; I like to say that ‘this is like a bad neighborhood, and I should not go walking alone.”

    “If we can find good coping mechanisms, if we have people we trust that we can talk to, that helps us make better choices for ourselves,” Talinda said. “And my husband didn’t have that in a lot of situations.”

    His Linkin Park bandmate Mike Shinoda is also speaking out about mental health. Shinoda, who recently released a solo album titled Post Traumatic, told Billboard, “It was so weird being given a membership to this club that I never wanted to be a part of. One thing I’ve learned, in terms of mental health, we talk about it being like physical health. Mental health should be the same. Mental health is just health. The way we get to that point is to check in with ourselves.”

    If you or someone you know is thinking about suicide, call 1-800-273-TALK (8255) in the United States. To find a suicide helpline outside the U.S., visit IASP or Suicide.org.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Janet Jackson Opens Up About Depression Struggles

    Janet Jackson Opens Up About Depression Struggles

    The pop icon penned a personal essay about mental health and her quest to find happiness for Essence magazine.

    Janet Jackson is the latest celebrity to disclose her personal battles with depression, which she traced back to her childhood.

    A letter written by the iconic performer and youngest of the famous Jackson family is featured in the July/August issue of Essence magazine, in which she describes to readers her experience with depression and her quest to find happiness.

    “I struggled with depression. The struggle was intense… Low self-esteem might be rooted in childhood feelings of inferiority. It could relate to failing to meet impossibly high standards,” Jackson wrote. “And of course there are always the societal issues of racism and sexism. Put it all together and depression is a tenacious and scary condition. Thankfully, I found my way through it.”

    Her negative body image fed into her feelings of inferiority early in life. Jackson began performing at a young age, appearing in the variety show The Jacksons at age 10.

    “I wasn’t happy with the way I looked. For most of my life, that lack of happiness followed me. I wish someone had said, ‘You look fine. You look healthy. Being a little chubby is the least important thing in the world. Enjoy your childhood. Enjoy running and laughing and playing. Stop looking in the mirror and comparing yourself to others,’” she wrote.

    This feeling persisted through adulthood, and happiness was “elusive,” Jackson said. “In my forties: Like millions of women in the world, I still heard voices inside my head berating me, voices questioning my value,” she wrote. “A reunion with old friends might make me happy. A call from a colleague might make me happy. But because sometimes I saw my failed relationships as my fault, I easily fell into despair.”

    The “All for You” singer says she’s “no expert” when it comes to happiness. “I have only my life experience as a guide. I’ve known great happiness and great sadness. But I guess the key question is, what do I really know about happiness?”

    But the singer says she’s found peace in caring for her one-year-old son, Eissa.

    “The height of happiness is holding my baby son in my arms and hearing him coo, or when I look into his smiling eyes and watch him respond to my tenderness,” he wrote. “When I kiss him. When I sing him softly to sleep. During those sacred times, happiness is everywhere. Happiness in gratitude to God. Happiness is saying, ‘Thank you, God, for my life, my energy and my capacity to grow in love.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Healthcare Pros Talk Unintended Consequences Of Addressing Opioid Crisis

    Healthcare Pros Talk Unintended Consequences Of Addressing Opioid Crisis

    “Doctors just say, ‘That’s it, I’m done. I’m not going to lose my license over you and good luck,’ and that’s unconscionable,” said one health expert.

    The opioid epidemic has drawn more political and media attention than any other public health crisis in recent memory, but healthcare professionals say that the focus on preventing opioid-related deaths is having unintended consequences for patients dealing with other conditions including cancer, chronic pain and other forms of substance use disorder. 

    One of the biggest concerns is that patients are being taken off their opioids too quickly, which can increase physical symptoms of withdrawal and leave patients feeling overwhelmed by the idea of quitting. 

    “Some people will be tapered too quickly or in a way that is intolerable to them,” Elinore McCance-Katz, the Health and Human Services assistant secretary for mental health and substance use, told Politico

    Sally Satel, a psychiatrist and Yale University School of Medicine lecturer, said that some doctors are less understanding of slowly tapering patients because they’re concerned about their own liability. 

    “I’ve seen patients where doctors just say ‘That’s it, I’m done. I’m not going to lose my license over you and good luck,’ and that’s unconscionable,” she said.

    Although policies have shifted to focus on non-opioid pain relief, these options are still less likely to be covered by insurance, leaving patients with chronic pain with few options.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs and the Defense Department have begun paying for alternative care, but “beyond that it’s pretty much just been lip service and it’s a little challenging how to craft legislation that affects what private payers are able to offer in this arena,” said Bob Twillman, executive director of the Academy of Integrative Pain Management. 

    “It’s one thing for an insurer to cover [an opioid alternative]. It’s another thing to cover it at a co-pay that the patient can afford,” said Cindy Reilly, who recently left the Pew Charitable Trust, where she focused on issues around opioid use and access to effective pain management. “We need to stop making opioids the easy decision—in terms of writing prescriptions and patient access. Higher co-pays will stand in the way.”

    Sean Morrison, chairman of the geriatrics and palliative medicine department at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, said that he is increasingly seeing hospice patients unable to get the opioid drugs needed to make their end of life more bearable. 

    “Almost every patient I have prescribed for recently has either a) run into pharmacies that no longer carry common opioids; b) cannot receive a full supply; and c) worst of all had their mail order pharmacy refuse to fill or have had arbitrary and non-science based dose or pill limits imposed,” he said. 

    Joe Rotella, the chief medical officer for the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, agreed. 

    “Even with exemptions for hospice care, prescription limits are still having an impact,” he said. “Patients have a tougher time getting these medications and it’s a lot more hassle for providers.”

    Cancer patients are also being affected as hospitals experience a shortage of IV fentanyl and morphine. 

    Finally, the focus on funding interventions for people abusing opioids has deflected money from other drug-intervention programs. This is especially problematic in areas like the Southwest, where overdose deaths from methamphetamine are rising sharply. 

    “We treat drug epidemics like ‘whack a mole,’” said West Virginia Public Health Commissioner Rahul Gupta. “We get one under control, another pops up.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Link Between Trump Support And Opioid Use Revealed In New Study

    Link Between Trump Support And Opioid Use Revealed In New Study

    “When we look at the two maps, there was a clear overlap between counties that had high opioid use … and the vote for Donald Trump,” said the study’s author.

    There may be a geographic connection between those who supported Trump in the 2016 election and prescriptions for opioids, according to a new study published in the medical journal JAMA Network Open

    James S. Goodwin, chair of geriatrics at the University of Texas Medical Branch and the study’s lead author, along with other researchers, examined data from numerous sources which included the Census Bureau and the 2016 election, as well as data from Medicare Part D, a program for prescription drugs that helps those with disabilities and the elderly.

    “When we look at the two maps, there was a clear overlap between counties that had high opioid use… and the vote for Donald Trump,” Goodwin told NPR. “There were blogs from various people saying there was this overlap. But we had national data.”

    In order to estimate the amount of opioid use by county, Goodwin and his team utilized the number of Medicare Part D enrollees who had three months or more worth of opioid prescriptions. According to Goodwin, it was harder to estimate the amount of illegal opioid use, though prescription opioid use is strongly correlated with it.

    “There are very inexact ways of measuring illegal opioid use,” Goodwin told NPR. “All we can really measure with precision is legal opioid use.”

    In the research process, the team looked at a number of factors to determine how a county’s rate of chronic opioid prescriptions was influenced. They found that in the 2016 election, Trump support was closely tied to opioid prescriptions. In counties with higher-than-average numbers of chronic opioid prescriptions, 60% of those who voted did so for Trump whereas in counties with lower-than-average prescriptions, only 39% voted for him. 

    NPR also states that some of the correlation could have to do with social and economic factors, as many rural counties with struggling economies voted for Trump, and those are the areas where opioid use is common. 

    “As a result, opioid use and support for Trump might not be directly related, but rather two symptoms of the same problem—a lack of economic opportunity,” NPR noted. 

    Goodwin and his team also analyzed factors such as unemployment rate, median income, how rural areas were, education level and religious service attendance. They found that these factors account for about 66% of the connection between Trump voters and opioid use, but not the remaining percentage.

    “It very well may be that if you’re in a county that is dissolving because of opioids, you’re looking around and you’re seeing ruin. That can lead to a sense of despair,” Goodwin told NPR. “You want something different. You want radical change.”

    For some areas hit hard by the opioid crisis, NPR states, the Trump presidency may have seemed like a solution. 

    While the study shows a likely link, it isn’t definitive and has shortcomings, Goodwin states. 

    “We were not implying causality, that the Trump vote caused opioids or that opioids caused the Trump vote,” he cautions. “We’re talking about associations.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Smoking Rates Hit An All-Time Low

    Smoking Rates Hit An All-Time Low

    The rising popularity of e-cigarettes has helped drive down traditional smoking rates.

    Americans are lighting up less than ever, according to newly released data from the federal government.

    After yet another downtick, only about 14% of U.S. adults were still smokers last year, an all-time low that has fallen from some 42% in the 1960s when smoking was ubiquitous. 

    “Everything is pointed in the right direction,” K. Michael Cummings with the tobacco research program at Medical University of South Carolina told the Associated Press.

    Part of the change stems from a decades-long shift in smoking bans and attitudes toward lighting up. In the 1950s and 1960s, indoor smoking was the norm in offices, planes, diners and hospitals. But as the medical community gained a better understanding of the associated health risks, anti-smoking campaigns and rising cigarette taxes pushed down cigarette use. 

    In recent years, the popularity of e-cigarettes—especially among young people—has also worked to drive down smoking rates. More kids are into vaping than smoking now, and teen smoking hit a new low last year. 

    While 9% of high school students reported smoking tobacco, roughly 13% said that they use e-cigs or other vaping devices, the AP reported. The practice is more prevalent among young people, as the most recent figures from 2016 estimate that only around 3% of adults choose to vape. 

    Despite its rising popularity, the health impacts of vaping aren’t well known. Although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) admitted that e-cigs “generally contain fewer harmful chemicals” than regular smokes, they still contain potentially carcinogenic substances and flavoring chemicals that are linked to lung damage, according to TIME

    But despite the growth in e-cig use, there are still around 30 million Americans who smoke traditional cigarettes. More men than women, and adults between the ages of 45 and 64 are the most likely to light up regularly, according to an annual survey by the National Center for Health Statistics

    The latest adult smoking figures are down 2 percentage points from the year before, when 16% of the population smoked. In 2006, that figure stood around 20%. 

    The new numbers come from the CDC’s annual survey, which interviewed roughly 27,000 adults last year for the latest findings.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Are Health Insurers Driving The Opioid Crisis?

    Are Health Insurers Driving The Opioid Crisis?

    While the brunt of the negative attention has focused on drug suppliers and prescribers, experts are now examining the role that insurers have played in the epidemic.

    Health insurers could be stoking the opioid epidemic, according to a new study published Friday in the journal JAMA Network Open.

    “Our findings suggest that both public and private insurers, at least unwittingly, have contributed importantly to the epidemic,” said study senior author Dr. G. Caleb Alexander, an associate professor in the Bloomberg School’s Department of Epidemiology.

    That’s based on a 2017 analysis of 15 Medicaid plans, 15 Medicare plans and 20 private insurers, which revealed that many aren’t applying evidence-based “utilization management” rules that could cut down on opioid overuse.

    “Opioids are just one tool in the pain management tool box, and unfortunately, many of the plans that we examined didn’t have well-developed policies in place to limit their overuse,” Alexander said. 

    The study comes even as a long-term uptick in opioid-related deaths has pushed dozens of states, counties, and cities to launch lawsuits against drug companies and distributors that make and provide the addictive prescription painkillers fueling the overdose crisis. 

    For the most part, the brunt of the negative attention has focused on drug suppliers and prescribers rather than on insurers, but the new findings by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health probes what roles insurance plans could play in the epidemic.

    The researchers identified specific utilization management tools that insurers may not be relying on enough, such as restricting the quantity of drugs doctors can prescribe, requiring prior authorization or mandating that providers begin with less risky drug alternatives. 

    Quantity limits are commonly used for opioids—but those limits might still be higher than they should be, the researchers found. Generally, insurers capped scripts at a 30-day supply instead of the shorter limit recommended by the CDC

    Across all the plans studied in Medicare, Medicaid and commercial insurers, doctors typically weren’t required to start with less addictive alternatives like over-the-counter NSAIDs before doling out more powerful opioids.

    A median of just 9% of the covered opioids in Medicaid plans required doctors to start with something less risky first, the researchers found. For commercial plans, the median number was around 4%. Medicare plans typically had almost no so-called “step therapy” requirement. 

    The majority of opioid prescriptions didn’t require prior authorization, which is when the prescriber has to call the insurer for approval before writing the prescription. Some insurers, however, have begun putting such policies in place for patients with chronic, non-cancer pain. 

    “Insurers can either be part of the problem, or part of the solution,” Alexander said. “The good news is that an increasing number of health plans are recognizing their contribution to the epidemic and developing new policies to address it. The bad news is that we have a very long way to go.”

    The analysis comes on the heels of a 2017 deep-dive by the New York Times and ProPublica, which found that many insurers limited access to less addictive —but more expensive—alternatives. 

    “This is not a hypothetical problem,” Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Maryland), later wrote in a letter to insurance companies. “In my home state of Maryland, 550 people died of an overdose in the first three months of 2017 alone. Synthetic opioids like fentanyl are driving up the epidemic’s death toll, but prescription opioids contribute significantly to this crisis by fostering addiction and causing fatal overdoses.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Selma Blair Celebrates Two Years Of Sobriety

    Selma Blair Celebrates Two Years Of Sobriety

    “I prayed for a miracle at my lowest points. I am a living miracle. Thank you,” the actress wrote in an Instagram post.

    Actress Selma Blair had two reasons to celebrate this week: her 46th birthday as well as her second year of sobriety.

    Blair, who has starred in films including Hellboy and Legally Blonde, took to Instagram to announce her achievement.

    “2 years sober. 2 years feeling everything and nothing. 2 years of extreme gratitude and humility and grace,” she wrote in her post, which included a photograph of herself with a birthday cake. “I thank the lord and my friends. Thank you for the most special birthday week @fran.anania #amypines #arthursaintbleick.”

    Just last month, Blair admitted to having struggled with alcoholism, anxiety, and depression, but has been winning in her struggles as of late.

    “I prayed for a miracle at my lowest points. I am a living miracle. Thank you. Thank you. #birthdaygirl #almost46 #summersolstice #grace,” she wrote in her post.

    Blair hasn’t hid her struggles with depression and anxiety from fans. In a throwback post she wrote in May, she reflected on her career in Hollywood, including the highs and the lows.

    “For better or for worse. I want to have hope again. I want to thank you all for believing in me. I want to find the right work for me. And for me as a mom and as a woman who has come so far in personal ways,” she wrote in her May post. “I want to make us all proud. 21 years later. #heartonsleeve Opens a New Window. It’s a random Tuesday. Maybe miracles will happen.”

    The Cruel Intentions star once had a meltdown on an airplane flight, allegedly brought on by mixing medications with alcohol.

    “I made a big mistake yesterday,” said Blair after the incident. “After a lovely trip with my son and his dad, I mixed alcohol with medication, and that caused me to black out and led me to say and do things that I deeply regret.”

    A few months after the incident, Blair gained some new perspective on the incident.

    “Hopefully everyone on the plane is doing fine now too, because it was very destructive,” she said on The Talk. “I am someone who should never drink, and I rarely do, and I don’t drink anymore, but I was going through something. I had a glass of wine and someone gave me a pill that I thought was something that I’d taken before… it was something completely different… and I had a total psychotic blackout.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Korn's Jonathan Davis Talks Addiction: "Benzos Are The Devil"

    Korn's Jonathan Davis Talks Addiction: "Benzos Are The Devil"

    “I’ve dealt with anxiety for a long-ass time. I got prescribed Xanax, benzodiazepine, a long time ago. Benzos are the f—ing devil. They’re horrible drugs.”

    Jonathan Davis, the frontman of the metal band Korn, puts his struggles with drugs and anxiety front and center in a song on his debut solo album, Black Labyrinth.

    In a new interview with Forbes, he spoke frankly about how attempting to treat his anxiety with drugs like Xanax led him to a dark place.

    “I’ve dealt with anxiety for a long-ass time. I got prescribed Xanax, benzodiazepine, a long time ago. Benzos are the f—ing devil. They’re horrible drugs,” he explained. “They feel good at the moment and are a quick fix to get you out of a panic attack, but they’re not designed to be taken long-term—especially Xanax.”

    His song on the album, “Medicate,” is about kicking the benzo dependency he developed.

    “I started taking it for anxiety. I’d take a piece in the morning and a piece at night, then go to bed. You start to build up a resistance,” he recounted. “Two years later and I was trying to kick it. The song is about me dealing with common regrets, that I need this pill to be happy or stay sane.”

    Getting off it was difficult—and dangerous.

    “I started off taking 0.25 milligrams of it, and eventually I got up to 2 milligrams, that’s one bar a day. And eventually I got up to two bars a day later down the road,” he told Forbes. “But the first time I kicked it, I was doing a bar a day, and I slowly weaned down. Which, you cannot function. And if you don’t do it correctly, if you just stop cold turkey off of it, you can go into seizures and die.”

    Nowadays, Davis is living completely sober, and getting high in a different way—sensory deprivation at the center of the Ganzfield experiment.

    “It’s a drug-free hallucination,” Davis says. “You’re staring into your subconscious. To me, it proved that there’s something different out there than what we’ve been taught about God. You see colors and shapes. It’s like you’re staring at the inside of your brain.”

    He also calms himself down with video games, music, and spending time with his children. His band seems to have caught the clean-living bug, too.

    “We just all independently faced our demons. There’s not really any drinking going on in the band anymore,” Davis explained. “It happens, every band that’s been doing it this long. Eventually you need to stop, or you’re gonna die. Everybody got through it their own way.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Overprescribing Doctor Linked To Hundreds Of Deaths, Report Says

    Overprescribing Doctor Linked To Hundreds Of Deaths, Report Says

    The doctor’s “brusque and indifferent” prescribing of diamorphine led to the deaths of at least 456 patients between 1989-2000.

    A British doctor is making headlines once again, after a report released Wednesday (June 20) concluded that her policy of over-prescribing a powerful pain medication led to hundreds of patient deaths.

    Jane Barton, who is now retired, was found guilty of serious professional misconduct in 2010 by the General Medical Council (GMC) for her “excessive, inappropriate and potentially hazardous” prescribing of medication at Gosport War Memorial Hospital on the south coast of England, but was allowed to continue practicing medicine with some limitations.

    Although Barton retired the same year, families of the victims, outraged by the decision, have since fought for Barton to be held accountable for her alleged actions.

    On Wednesday, the Gosport Independent Panel released findings of a four-year investigation. While the Guardian states that “there is no suggestion that Barton intentionally took lives,” her “brusque and indifferent” prescribing of diamorphine (synthetic heroin) led to the deaths of at least 456 patients between 1989-2000, and potentially shortening the lives of another 200 patients.

    The report determined that “there was a disregard for human life and a culture of shortening the lives of a large number of patients,” and that the opioid-prescribing policy under Barton’s direction was “without medical justification.”

    “It represents a major crisis when you begin to doubt that the treatment they are being given is in their best interests,” said Rev. James Jones, chair of the independent panel. “It further shatters your confidence when you summon up the courage to complain and then sense that you are being treated as some sort of ‘troublemaker.’”

    On the day of the report’s release, British Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt apologized for the deaths “on behalf of the government and the (National Health Service).”

    The panel’s report mentions Harold Shipman, Britain’s worst serial killer, “in order to understand the context of events” in Barton’s case.

    According to CNN, Shipman was found to have killed 215 of his patients over a 23-year period. According to a review led by High Court Judge Dame Janet Smith, Shipman also administered excessive doses of diamorphine to his patients from 1975 to 1998. He was ultimately sentenced to 15 terms of life imprisonment, according to the latest report. He ultimately died by suicide in his prison cell in 2004.

    Still, Janet Barton maintains that she never meant to kill, and that her harmful prescribing was the result of the “excessive and increasing burden” of trying to care for too many patients.

    “Throughout my career I have tried to do my very best for all my patients and have had only their interests and well-being at heart,” Barton said in 2010.

    View the original article at thefix.com