Tag: opioid deaths

  • Doctor Sentenced To Life In Prison For Patient's Opioid Death

    Doctor Sentenced To Life In Prison For Patient's Opioid Death

    The judge presiding over the trial said that the doctor had an established record of unscrupulous prescribing practices. 

    A Kansas doctor will spend the rest of his life behind bars after he was found guilty of writing prescriptions that led to the death of a man in 2015. 

    “I want this case to send a message to physicians and the health care community,” U.S. Attorney Stephen McAllister said in a news release. “Unlawfully distributing opioids and other controlled substances is a federal crime that could end a medical career and send an offender to prison.”

    Steven R. Henson tried in federal court and found guilty of conspiracy to distribute prescription drugs outside the course of medical practice and unlawfully distributing oxycodone, methadone and alprazolam, the use of which resulted in the death of a victim.

    He was also found guilty of presenting false patient records to investigators, obstruction of justice and money laundering.

    According to KOAM News Now, Henson wrote prescriptions to patients who paid him. He would ask if they were in pain and they would answer “yes,” but he didn’t ask any other questions or perform an exam. 

    In July 2015, one of Henson’s patients, Nick McGovern, overdosed on alprazolam and methadone that had been prescribed by Henson. The judge presiding over the trial said that Henson had an established record of unscrupulous prescribing practices. 

    “The defendant kept no medical records, performed no physical examinations or physical tests, gave massive amounts of opioids to patients with little demonstrated need, wrote unneeded, non-controlled prescriptions in order to defeat pharmacy limits on controlled substances, and knew that patients were traveling improbably long distances to receive opioids,” U.S. District Judge J. Thomas Marten wrote. “There was ample evidence that Henson was prescribing opioid medications in amounts likely to lead to addiction, and in amounts so expensive that the patients would likely be forced by economic circumstances to support their addiction by selling some of the drugs to others.”

    McAllister said that prosecuting doctors who abuse their ability write prescriptions is an important part of confronting the opioid epidemic. 

    “The prosecution of cases involving a health professional’s misuse of medical expertise and authority is extremely important to fight the opioid epidemic,” he said. “The vast majority of health care providers are people of integrity who follow their oath to help others, abide by the law, and do all they can to protect patients from becoming addicted. The evidence showed that is not what Dr. Henson did in this case.”

    KOAM reported that there was a gasp in the courtroom when the sentence was announced. Henson maintained his innocence. 

    “I only had one goal in life as a physician and that is to take excellent care of patients and increase functionality,” he said in a statement in court. 

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Purdue Pharma Considers Bankruptcy Over OxyContin Lawsuits

    Purdue Pharma Considers Bankruptcy Over OxyContin Lawsuits

    If Purdue were to file for bankruptcy, it could “halt” the lawsuits that have been brought against the company by plaintiffs across the country.  

    Purdue Pharma, maker of the prescription opioid OxyContin, is reportedly exploring the option of bankruptcy to deal with the nearly 2,000 lawsuits brought against the company in the wake of the opioid epidemic.

    Purdue has been accused of engaging in aggressive and misleading marketing tactics to pressure doctors to prescribe far more OxyContin than was necessary, leading to a massive spike in addiction and overdose cases. The drug company has denied the allegations, but the lawsuits keep coming.

    If Purdue were to file for bankruptcy, it would “halt the lawsuits and allow Purdue to negotiate legal claims with plaintiffs under the supervision of a U.S. bankruptcy judge,” according to sources who spoke with Reuters.

    In a statement from Purdue, the company declined to comment on the likelihood of turning to bankruptcy over fighting the many lawsuits at their doorstep.

    “As a privately-held company, it has been Purdue Pharma’s longstanding policy not to comment on our financial or legal strategy,” the statement reads. “We are, however, committed to ensuring that our business remains strong and sustainable. We have ample liquidity and remain committed to meeting our obligations to the patients who benefit from our medicines, our suppliers and other business partners.”

    In response to the news, Connecticut Attorney General William Tong has vowed to continue pursuing the state’s suit against Purdue Pharma and its owners.

    “We will oppose any attempt to avoid our claims, and will continue to vigorously and aggressively pursue our claims against Purdue and the Sackler family,” he said.

    Filing for bankruptcy to help handle their legal troubles does not necessarily mean that the drug company is in financial trouble. Many other companies have chosen the same route when faced with lawsuits in the past, according to Fast Company.

    This includes the asbestos manufacturer Johns Manville and Dalkon Shield, the company that created a faulty IUD birth control implant and faced 6,000 lawsuits after thousands of women suffered infertility, ectopic pregnancies, and/or death.

    These two companies created a precedent that is now regularly used by companies faced with high profile controversies, including USA Gymnastics, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., and even the Catholic church.

    Companies that use bankruptcy in this manner can continue on with their business once everything is settled. Unfortunately, victims often receive less compensation than they would if the lawsuits had been settled by a standard civil court with a jury.

    “Corporations don’t want to risk a jury giving, say, $700 million to a cancer victim who used talcum powder every day,” writes Melissa Locker. “Settlements like that could quickly drive them into Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which is the kind where they have to liquidate their assets and potentially cease to exist. That’s why corporations cut victims off at the pass, so to speak, and file for Chapter 11, where the court will take a stoic, logical approach to paying out claims based on dollars and cents, not emotional pleas for the damage done to them.”

    View the original article at thefix.com