Tag: opioid legislation

  • Delaware Passes Opioid Prescription Tax

    Delaware Passes Opioid Prescription Tax

    New York passed a similar measure earlier this month.

    Lawmakers in Delaware have passed a measure to tax prescription opioids, a move that they expect will generate $8 million over three years to support addiction treatment in the state. 

    Democratic Sen. Stephanie Hansen, who sponsored the bill, said that it will pass on costs to the manufacturers who contributed to the opioid epidemic, according to the Associated Press.  

    “These multi-million dollar companies that have reaped record profits after flooding our doctors’ offices and getting people in pain hooked on these drugs will no longer be able to avoid responsibility for the pain and suffering caused by their products,” she said. 

    However, people who oppose the measure say that manufacturers will pass the costs on to insurance companies, which will then pass them to consumers. Others said that the tax is a misguided and unfair way to address opioid addiction. 

    “Unfortunately, what’s being proposed—taxing legitimately prescribed medicines that patients rely on for legitimate medical needs to raise revenues for the state—ignores evidence-based solutions, sets a dangerous precedent and ultimately won’t help patients and families,” said Nick McGee, a spokesperson for Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, an industry group that opposes the measure. 

    The tax rates depend on the dosage, and whether an opioid is a brand name or generic. It ranges from a few cents per pill, to up to a dollar per pill. The bill sets the tax rate of one cent for every morphine milligram equivalent, or MME, a measure of an opioid’s strength. In addition, there is a surcharge for brand-name pills. 

    For example, a 10-milligram pill of oxycodone would be taxed at 4 cents, while OxyContin, the brand-name alternative, would have a 15-cent tax. 

    Johns Hopkins University health economist Jeromie Ballreich said that these amounts would not change what people can expect to pay for their pain medication. 

    He said, “I do not expect copays to change based on this fee, just as they don’t change for drug price increases.”

    Delaware isn’t the only state that hopes to fund treatment through taxing opioids. New York passed a similar measure last week, its second attempt since 2018. Last year the measure was struck down by a federal judge because of the way that it would affect interstate commerce. 

    While New York lawmakers also insisted that patients would not be affected, an academic report on the measure found a different result. 

    “While the language of the proposed law attempts to place the burden of the tax on drug manufacturers, in practice market forces determine how the burden of the tax is shared between producers and consumers,” Lewis Davis, professor of economics at Union College, wrote in the report.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Senate Passes Sweeping Opioid Legislation, Treatment Advocates Unimpressed

    Senate Passes Sweeping Opioid Legislation, Treatment Advocates Unimpressed

    “None of the bills include providing the one thing communities hit by the opioid crisis need most: funding,” says one treatment advocate.

    A bipartisan effort to stem the opioid crisis, while impressive in scope, does not have what it takes to stem the national opioid crisis, say treatment advocates.

    On Monday (Sept. 17), the Senate passed a package of 70 bills—racking up a cost of $8.4 billion—with a 99-to-1 vote to address various aspects of the opioid crisis. The lone dissenter was Senator Mike Lee of Utah.

    The goal was to tackle the opioid crisis from multiple angles—like expanding access to treatment and thwarting shipments of illicit drugs from abroad—but not everyone is impressed with the expansive legislation.

    Joy Burwell, president and CEO of the National Council for Behavioral Health, which represents American health care organizations that deliver mental health and substance use disorder services, expressed her organization’s disappointment that “Congress missed this opportunity to make a meaningful, long-term investment in our nation’s addiction treatment system.”

    One way to accomplish this, Burwell says, would be to include the the Excellence in Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Expansion Act, a bill that would expand a current program that has shown success in improving access to addiction treatment services.

    The package of bills passed in the Senate, however, falls short of their expectations. “None of the bills include providing the one thing communities hit by the opioid crisis need most: funding,” wrote Burwell in a statement. “Nor do they offer a comprehensive solution to the country’s addiction crisis.”

    The legislation package includes various measures intended to fight substance abuse. They include expanding access to opioid-addiction medication (like buprenorphine); funding recovery centers that provide temporary housing, job training, and other support during a transition to recovery; expanding the scope of mental health professionals where they are in short supply; expanding first responder naloxone programs; and preventing illicit drugs from being shipped via the US Postal Service.

    Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio admitted that the legislation does have missing pieces. “It doesn’t include everything all of us want to see but it has important new initiatives and it’s a step in the right direction,” he said, according to the Washington Post. “Congress is committing itself to actually putting politics aside. It’s not just bipartisan—I think it’s nonpartisan.”

    According to the Post, the House passed a similar measure in June. Now the two chambers will go over the differences before sending the package off to Trump.

    View the original article at thefix.com