Tag: opioid tax

  • Delaware Passes Opioid Prescription Tax

    Delaware Passes Opioid Prescription Tax

    New York passed a similar measure earlier this month.

    Lawmakers in Delaware have passed a measure to tax prescription opioids, a move that they expect will generate $8 million over three years to support addiction treatment in the state. 

    Democratic Sen. Stephanie Hansen, who sponsored the bill, said that it will pass on costs to the manufacturers who contributed to the opioid epidemic, according to the Associated Press.  

    “These multi-million dollar companies that have reaped record profits after flooding our doctors’ offices and getting people in pain hooked on these drugs will no longer be able to avoid responsibility for the pain and suffering caused by their products,” she said. 

    However, people who oppose the measure say that manufacturers will pass the costs on to insurance companies, which will then pass them to consumers. Others said that the tax is a misguided and unfair way to address opioid addiction. 

    “Unfortunately, what’s being proposed—taxing legitimately prescribed medicines that patients rely on for legitimate medical needs to raise revenues for the state—ignores evidence-based solutions, sets a dangerous precedent and ultimately won’t help patients and families,” said Nick McGee, a spokesperson for Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, an industry group that opposes the measure. 

    The tax rates depend on the dosage, and whether an opioid is a brand name or generic. It ranges from a few cents per pill, to up to a dollar per pill. The bill sets the tax rate of one cent for every morphine milligram equivalent, or MME, a measure of an opioid’s strength. In addition, there is a surcharge for brand-name pills. 

    For example, a 10-milligram pill of oxycodone would be taxed at 4 cents, while OxyContin, the brand-name alternative, would have a 15-cent tax. 

    Johns Hopkins University health economist Jeromie Ballreich said that these amounts would not change what people can expect to pay for their pain medication. 

    He said, “I do not expect copays to change based on this fee, just as they don’t change for drug price increases.”

    Delaware isn’t the only state that hopes to fund treatment through taxing opioids. New York passed a similar measure last week, its second attempt since 2018. Last year the measure was struck down by a federal judge because of the way that it would affect interstate commerce. 

    While New York lawmakers also insisted that patients would not be affected, an academic report on the measure found a different result. 

    “While the language of the proposed law attempts to place the burden of the tax on drug manufacturers, in practice market forces determine how the burden of the tax is shared between producers and consumers,” Lewis Davis, professor of economics at Union College, wrote in the report.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • New York Tries To Tax Prescription Opioids Again

    New York Tries To Tax Prescription Opioids Again

    Some people argue that the tax could push people to use illegal alternatives if prescription opioids become more expensive.

    New York state has passed a measure to tax opioid prescriptions in an attempt to fund addiction-recovery efforts, despite the fact that a court ruled a similar measure unconstitutional last year. 

    According to WXXI, the state said that the measure, part of the state budget, is intended to raise additional funds to pay for the response to the opioid crisis by taxing manufacturers.

    However, some people argue that the tax could have unintended effects, pushing people to use illegal substances if prescription opioids become more expensive. 

    “While the language of the proposed law attempts to place the burden of the tax on drug manufacturers, in practice market forces determine how the burden of the tax is shared between producers and consumers,” Lewis Davis, professor of economics at Union College, wrote in a report.

    The report was prepared last year and paid for by a pharmaceutical lobbying group, but echoed concerns shared by other organizations including the American Cancer Society Action Network.

    Davis pointed out that the tax policy could have a number of negative side effects. 

    “Most of the tax will be paid by non-consuming NY residents in the form of higher insurance premiums and higher taxes to cover public health programs. Second, to the extent that the cost of the tax is passed on to consumers, it will have a high cost to society in terms of reduced access to medically appropriate use of opioids,” he wrote. “Third, by increasing the cost of prescription opioids, the proposed tax will encourage NY residents suffering from opioid dependence to switch to cheaper illegal opioids, including heroin and fentanyl, with increased rates of accidental overdose.”

    He continued, “Because it fails to target opioid abuse, the proposed tax is poorly designed policy for addressing the opioid crisis.”

    Last year, a federal court struck down the tax because it would violate interstate commerce laws by treating New York residents differently from consumers in other states. The 2019 version of the bill works around that and should stand up in court, according to the state. 

    Freeman Klopott, a spokesperson for the state budget office, said that New Yorkers who use prescription opioids won’t be affected by the measure, since most of the cost for the tax will be shouldered by insurance companies and drug manufacturers. 

    “We expect no significant change in the availability of these pharmaceuticals or any diversion to illicit alternatives,” said Klopott.

    View the original article at thefix.com