Author: The Fix

  • What Causes False Positives on Drug Tests?

    What Causes False Positives on Drug Tests?

    Most instant drug tests are notorious for picking up false positives from common medications like antihistamines, antidepressants, antipsychotics, antibiotics, and analgesics. Poppy seeds can give a “true” positive.

    I had a routine during my pregnancy with my elder daughter. Each morning I woke up as late as possible—which never felt late enough—took a quick shower, and waddled over to my bus stop. There, while waiting for the bus, my senses sharpened in the thin, crisp mountain air and the yellow morning sunlight stretching its way across Boulder, Colorado. Sometimes I snoozed a little more on the bus—I’ve always been a sucker for vehicular motion. On less sleepy days, I watched out the window for prairie dogs bopping across the acres and acres of lush green land.

    I was riding into town for Naropa University, where I was attending grad school in the footsteps of Allen Ginsberg, Anne Waldman, and William Burroughs. But every day I turned into downtown several hours early for my classes. It wasn’t by choice, but because I was taking methadone to treat my addiction to heroin.

    Being new to the program meant I hadn’t yet earned take-home doses, so I had to ride in every day before the clinic closed and drink down my syrupy pink dose in front of a nurse. It was annoying, but I discovered a small comfort: my bus dropped me off next to a small, vegan-friendly grocery store called Sprouts. So before I dosed, I would stop in and treat myself to piece of sticky-sweet, lemon poppy seed cake. It would not take long for me to discover the weird, unexpected consequence of my treat.

    How to Get a False Positive for Opioids

    “Your UA was positive,” the nurse said, lips pursed, about two months into the program. I wasn’t showing yet but all the staff knew about my pregnancy.

    “For what?” I asked.

    “Opiates.”

    I laughed. “Well I’m on methadone.” At the time, I didn’t know clinics could differentiate between synthetic and non-synthetic opioids.

    “No, not the methadone.”

    Now I was pissed. I hadn’t used—not since enrolling in the program. Earning a take-home would depend on my compliance with the program, which meant testing negative every time they demanded I pee for them. Worse, a positive drug test during pregnancy could mean a child services investigation down the line.

    “I didn’t relapse,” I insisted. The nurse just stared at me. Then I remembered that urban myth I’d heard—that eating poppy seeds could trigger an opiate positive on a drug test. “I’ve been eating poppy seed cake,” I told the nurse.

    “You’d have to eat a whole lot of poppy seeds for that to happen,” she said.

    But I insisted that the positive was wrong. Finally, she relented and agreed to send my sample for confirmatory testing. A few days later, she reported that the levels of morphine in my urine sample suggested it had, in fact, come from a food source. Turns out, poppy seed positives are not an urban legend at all—in fact, they are even recognized by the U.S. government, which actually raised the opioid detection cutoffs to avoid these types of false positives for military personnel and other government employees.

    The Problem with Poppy Seeds

    Poppy seeds trigger a positive for morphine. Opium and its derivatives—which means any naturally occurring opioid—come from papaver somniferum, a type of poppy plant. It is grown commercially for the development of pharmaceutical drugs and for the harvesting of food-grade poppy seeds. But because of their origin, these seeds can contain tiny amounts of opioid alkaloids, which metabolize similarly to morphine or codeine. It’s not enough to produce a euphoric effect—but it can be enough, depending on how much is consumed, to trigger a positive on a drug test. And that positive is, in fact, a “true positive,” at least in the sense that your body produced that metabolite.

    Poppy seeds will trigger a positive for opioids on a general panel, or for morphine and sometimes codeine on a more detailed test. The problem here is that other opiates—including heroin—will also trigger a morphine positive. Heroin has its own unique metabolite, 6-monoacetylmorphine, but that will only show up for about 24 hours, whereas morphine from heroin use can show for up to a week.

    When my nurse said the test confirmed my positive was the result of poppy seeds, she probably meant the levels were too low to show up in the confirmatory test. The truth is that there is no way to definitively link a morphine positive to poppy seeds, leaving the decision ultimately up to clinical judgment.

    “They do try to correct for this by establishing cutoff limits,” says Ryan Marino, an emergency medicine physician and toxicologist with the University of Pittsburgh Department of Medicine. “So the person who is running the test might see the positive but it’s below the threshold, so it gets reported as negative.”

    In the late ‘90s, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) changed the detection cutoff for morphine from 300 ng/mL to 2000 ng/mL in an attempt to prevent federal employees from losing their jobs over a bagel topping. While a bagel probably won’t trigger detection at that cutoff, something with a higher concentration of poppy seeds still might, like a poppy seed paste. And the SAMHSA cutoff is a recommendation; if you’re a government employee, your tests should follow that guideline. But other drug test administrators are under no obligation to adhere to the SAMHSA regulations. Treatment facilities or doctors’ offices might use lower cutoffs, making their tests more likely to detect the consumption of poppy seeds.

    False Positives on Instant Urinalysis Kits

    Poppy seeds aren’t the only substance that might trigger an unmerited positive on some drug tests. Immunoassay tests, the kind used in most instant urinalysis kits and as a preliminary screening tool in the lab, are notorious for picking up false positives from common medications. These include antihistamines, antidepressants, antipsychotics, antibiotics, analgesics, and other over-the-counter medicines. Specifically included on the list are ibuprofen, dextromethorphan (an ingredient commonly found in cold medicine that has its own intoxicating properties), diphenhydramine, pseudoephedrine, and ranitidine (an antacid/antihistamine). These drugs can cause positives for different substances, including THC, opioids, or benzodiazepines, but the most common false results are amphetamines.

    Positives that result from poppy seeds are tricky because they are, in a sense, genuine positives. Your body has, in fact, metabolized an opioid alkaloid; it’s just that it didn’t come from an illicit source and it wasn’t in quantities that could produce an intoxicating or euphoric effect. But when a positive for methamphetamine is triggered because you took some cold medicine, that’s a false positive—and that can be determined conclusively by further lab testing.

    Marino says that many of these substances are structurally very similar, “so it makes sense that enzyme tests can’t tell the difference… but if you send it out [to a lab] for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry testing, that would be able to pick up most of these compounds.”

    The only issue here is whether whoever is testing you is willing to send the sample for another test. If you’re being tested on-site for a job, it’s entirely possible that your employer does not have a system in place for sending your sample to be examined in a lab. So you should definitely tell your employer in advance of the test if you have taken any medications. Hopefully, if it’s one that could trigger a false positive, your employer will give you the benefit of the doubt.

    What About CBD?

    Another substance that trips people up is cannabidiol (CBD). CBD is the non-intoxicating chemical compound found in the cannabis plant, which is generally credited for many of the plant’s medicinal properties. CBD was recently approved by the FDA to treat seizures and is marketed as a medicine called Epidiolex.

    But you don’t have to be prescribed Epidiolex to get your hands on CBD. It’s sold in a variety of stores and can often be found in smoke shops, vape stores, and recreational marijuana shops. People often wonder, however, if CBD can trigger a marijuana positive on a drug test. The simple answer is no: Drug tests look for THC, the intoxicating ingredient in marijuana. They don’t test for CBD, so CBD won’t make you pop positive for THC.

    The reality is a little more complicated. Because CBD is derived from the same plant species as THC, trace amounts of THC can end up in your CBD product. In order for CBD to be (mostly) legal, it has to come from a hemp plant (and there’s some weird politics around even that). That means the plant can’t contain more than a trace amount of THC. So if your CBD is coming from a hemp source—and if you’re buying it from a non-medicinal source in a state that has not legalized recreational marijuana, it probably is—then it’s unlikely to contain more than a trace amount of THC. And that should not show up on a drug test.

    But you do need to be careful to check your sources, especially if you’re buying from a rec store. Some companies intentionally add small amounts of THC because they believe it potentiates the therapeutic effects of the CBD. Those small amounts can range from 1 percent to 15 percent—and that amount can be detected in a urine test. It’s not a false positive, either. Even if you didn’t “feel” the THC, you still consumed it. So you won’t have much ground for disputing those results. Basically, if you’re going to use CBD, check your sources and make sure the THC levels fall below 0.3 percent, which is the legal limit for a hemp product.

    Drug testing is a politically complicated practice. Many people find it degrading, or feel that it adds an unnecessary element of surveillance into their lives. Nonetheless, if you find yourself in a position in which you have to take a drug test, it’s important to understand how and why a positive could show up even when you haven’t consumed illegal drugs. Bottom line: If you know you’re going to be tested, skip the poppy seed muffin.

     

    Have you ever gotten a false positive? Give us the details in the comments.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • "Hope Stems" Campaign Spotlights How Opioids Affect The Brain Using Flowers

    "Hope Stems" Campaign Spotlights How Opioids Affect The Brain Using Flowers

    The floral exhibit coincided with the Macy’s Flower Show, and aimed to depict opioid addiction in a different light.

    While flowers are typically given on joyous occasions—births, graduations or anniversaries—florists around the nation have also found themselves preparing hundreds of thousands of bouquets for the funerals of people who have died from opioid addiction. 

    With that in mind, the addiction advocacy group Shatterproof has launched a new initiative, showing a brain made from more than 9,000 carnations, pockmarked by black poppies meant to represent the effects of opioids on the brain. 

    The exhibit, called “Hope Stems” was on display in Herald Square in New York City from Tuesday to Thursday (April 2-4). 

    The public was invited to remove a poppy from the bouquet, symbolizing the restoration that happens when someone gets treatment and is able to overcome their opioid addiction. 

    “As a father who lost his son to addiction, ‘Hope Stems’ gives me so much optimism,” Shatterproof Founder Gary Mendell, whose son died by suicide in 2011 after fighting opioid addiction, told Campaign Live. “This installation will impact how people view those suffering from addiction. It is my sincere wish that this campaign will help end the stigma and encourage those who are suffering to seek treatment. By changing how we think about addiction we can save lives.”

    The display is timed to coincide with the Macy’s Flower Show, which runs through Sunday, April 7. 

    June Laffey, who works as chief creative officer at McCann Health New York, said that the “Hope Stems” campaign is a powerful way to raise awareness and get attendees at the flower show to think about addiction and ways to provide treatment to people who need it. 

    “This campaign has the power to not only change the way people think about opioid addiction, but to save lives,” Laffey said. 

    By using the flowers to form a brain, the initiative focused on the fact that addiction is a brain disease, not simply a matter of willpower or choice. 

    “Opioid addiction is not a weakness,” Laffey said. “It is a disease that changes the brain. There’s science to prove it. With knowledge comes power. With knowledge comes compassion. With knowledge comes hope.”

    She continued, “Hope stems from reducing the stigma and speaking with compassion. So let’s all speak with one voice. The more we reduce stigma, the more people will seek treatment and the more lives will be saved.”

    After New York, the Hope Stems display will appear in Atlanta from April 22-25 (Monday through Thursday) during the Rx Drug Abuse & Heroin Summit.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Are Millennials Redefining Sobriety?

    Are Millennials Redefining Sobriety?

    Millennials may be choosing to lean into moderation more than other generations. 

    American consumers have traditionally been divided into two camps: those who drink, and those who abstain completely—often because they are in recovery. However, young Americans seem to be pushing back on that dichotomy by taking a more moderate and measured approach to drinking. 

    Sam Thonis, who operates a sober bar, told The Atlantic that he has seen a change in attitude among patrons.  

    “It feels to me like the older people are, the more they see [our bar] as a thing for sober people. They see it as black or white—you drink or you don’t drink,” Thonis said. “With younger people, there’s a lot more receptiveness to just not drinking sometimes.”

    Despite more talk about less drinking, it’s hard to measure the trend. 

    “There isn’t any great statistical evidence yet that young adults have altered their drinking habits on a grand scale,” Amanda Mull writes for The Atlantic. “Changes in habit often lag behind changes in attitude, and national survey data on drinking habits reflect only small declines in heavy alcohol use.” 

    Cassie Schoon, of Denver, said that she started to reexamine her drinking habits after a particularly bad hangover following election night 2016. 

    “I was in this meeting feeling absolutely miserable, and I was like, You know, this is not what grown-ups do,” she said. 

    Today, she still drinks, but much less than she used to. Rather than always meeting friends at a bar, she is just as likely to meet at a museum or for coffee, the 37-year-old said. 

    “[Drinking] has to be more of an occasion for me now, like someone’s birthday or a girls’ night. So it’s once every couple of weeks instead of a weekly occurrence.”

    Leanne Vanderbyl, of San Francisco, had a similar realization as she aged. “It wasn’t until I hit my 30s that I realized that alcohol was no longer my friend.”

    For others, the decision to drink less is about weighing priorities. 

    “I’ve already calculated how much I’m saving by not drinking, and I’m thinking about where I can put that money now,” said Alex Belfiori, 30. 

    Therapist Britta Stark, who works with people with addiction, said that many millennials have healthy self-care practices in place, so they’re not left reaching for the bottle after a stressful day. 

    “There does come a time when there has to be some introspection. Folks in the millennial generation have maybe a better sense of balance,” she said. “Some do yoga or meditation or are physically active, so they don’t need to find stimulation and stress reduction in substances.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Celebs Petition Trump To Commute Sentence For Rapper Loon

    Celebs Petition Trump To Commute Sentence For Rapper Loon

    Grammy-winning singer Faith Evans, rapper Baby Bash and NBA All-Star Kevin Garnett are among the signees of the petition. 

    A contingent of entertainment industry figures is rallying around an effort to have President Donald Trump free a former hip-hop artist serving a 14-year prison sentence for heroin trafficking.

    Former Bad Boy recording artist, Loon, is the subject of a letter to Trump and petition filed by former music producer turned criminal justice advocate Weldon Angelos who served 13 of a 55-year sentence for firearm possession and charges related to marijuana trafficking, and who hopes that a presidential commutation of sentence could act as a “bridge building” effort between the White House and the entertainment industry.

    Among the letter’s signees are Grammy-winning singer Faith Evans, rapper Baby Bash, and Alice Johnson, whom Trump released from prison in 2018.

    Loon, who was born Chauncey Hawkins, earned a Top 10 album with his eponymous debut release for Bad Boy in 2003, and collaborated with label chief Sean “P. Diddy” Combs, Usher and Toni Braxton before parting ways with the music industry in 2008 and converting to Islam.

    As Amir Junaid Muhadith, he worked as a motivational speaker but was arrested in 2011 for his involvement with individuals operating a drug-trafficking ring in North Carolina. Having been convicted of two prior felonies, Loon declined to go to trial and accepted the 14-year sentence to avoid, in his words, “mandatory life in prison [with] no hopes of parole.”

    In the petition, Angelos cited Trump’s own statements about prison reform, including comments issued after the commutation of Alice Johnson’s sentence, in which the president said, “Those who have paid their debt to society and worked hard to better themselves while in prison deserve a second chance.”

    Johnson had served 21 years of a life sentence for conspiracy to possess cocaine and attempted possession of cocaine before Kim Kardashian West pled her case to the White House.

    Angelos also sees the commutation as an opportunity for Trump to forge a connection to the entertainment industry, which has, in many cases, kept him at arms’ length. “His case is like a bridge builder,” said Angelos. “Now we can bring entertainers to the White House who would disagree with Trump otherwise.”

    Angelos said that he plans to deliver the letter to the White House within the next three weeks. In addition to Evans, Baby Bash and Johnson, the public figures that have added their names to the letter include producers Stevie J., Kevin McCall and Michael Goldstein, rappers Freeway and Benzino; film producers Marc Levin and Scott Budnick; Roc-A-Fella Records co-founder Damon “Dame” Dash; former Minnesota Timberwolves/Boston Celtics great Kevin Garnett; and CAN-DO founder Amy Povah.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Netflix Doc "Legend of Cocaine Island" Proves Truth Is Stranger Than Fiction

    Netflix Doc "Legend of Cocaine Island" Proves Truth Is Stranger Than Fiction

    The documentary explores one man’s search for 70 pounds of cocaine allegedly buried off the coast of Puerto Rico.

    *This article may contain spoilers*

    A tall tale about a lost fortune in illicit drugs serves as the backbone for director Theo Love’s documentary The Legend of Cocaine Island.

    The feature-length effort—a mix of interviews and off-kilter recreations—debuted on Netflix on March 29 and details the search for 70 pounds of cocaine allegedly buried off the coast of Puerto Rico by Florida native Rodney Hyden, who saw the stash as his ticket out of financial dire straits incurred by the 2008 recession. What happened to the drugs, and to Hyden, plays as “a campfire story gone wrong,” according to Love.

    The short version of the story, which has been detailed with varying degrees of incredulity in numerous publications, is that Hyden learned about the alleged lost bales of cocaine from a local eccentric named Julian, who claimed that he had come across 70 pounds of cocaine while on the island of Culebra.

    Unsure of what to do with the fortune in drugs—roughly valued at more than $2 million—Julian allegedly buried the stash on the island and retreated to Archer, Florida, where he repeated the story to anyone who’d listen, preferably over beers around a campfire.

    Hyden, who had relocated to Archer after the collapse of his construction company, saw dollar signs in Julian’s story, and with the help of Andy, a young man with a history of drug dependency, decided to investigate Julian’s claims and hopefully set on the path to financial security.

    What actually happened—and again, here’s where the spoilers can be found—is that Hyden located the cocaine but was unable to retrieve it, and reached out to who he believed were traffickers to help him not only dig up the cocaine—approximately 13 kilo-sized packages—but sell it. The traffickers turned out to be federal agents, who arrested Hyden on charges of intent to distribute. 

    Like so many others who had heard the story of Hyden’s scheme, director Love was both astonished and captivated.

    “There was something about Rodney’s story that just seemed so absurd,” he said. And while a documentary project would encapsulate the nuts and bolts of the story, Love wanted to also focus on the reasons why Hyden pursued such an outlandish scheme.

    To that end, he asked Hyden if he would play himself in recreations of certain events. According to Love, Hyden said he’d been waiting for someone from Hollywood to contact him about a movie, and agreed to appear in the film.

    Love also corralled Andy, as well as Hyden’s daughter and the drug dealer entrusted with making connections with the Florida underworld, to appear in Legendwhich has received positive reviews since its debut on Netflix.

    However, Love was unable to reel in one of the story’s key players—the mysterious Julian, whom they happened to encounter by the side of a road. When asked to retell his story for the cameras, Julian replied, in typically cryptic fashion, “It’s not my story.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Are Law Enforcement Efforts Making Cocaine Trafficking Worse?

    Are Law Enforcement Efforts Making Cocaine Trafficking Worse?

    Researchers examined the effects of law enforcement’s counter-drug strategies on drug trafficking. 

    New research led by the University of Alabama is showing that cocaine traffickers through Central America are continuously adapting to law enforcement efforts in ways that may be making the problem worse rather than better.

    Dr. Nicholas Magliocca, lead author of the paper showing these findings, developed a model of the “cat-and-mouse game” of cocaine smuggling vs. government efforts to seize and prevent the movement of the drug.

    “This work demonstrates that supply-side counterdrug strategies alone are, at best, ineffective and, at worst, intensifying the trafficking problem,” said Magliocca according to PHYS.org. “These networks have demonstrated their ability to adapt to interdiction efforts, identifying and exploiting new trafficking routes in response.”

    The findings, published Monday in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, show that drug traffickers routinely find ways around routes and means of transportation that are blocked by law enforcement efforts and as a result have expanded their area of use.

    In 1996, cocaine trafficking networks spread across 2 million square miles of land. By 2017, that had expanded to 7 million square miles.

    The results may suggest that new methods are needed to effectively counter drug trafficking. In 2014, the Global Commission on Drug Policy recommended decriminalizing all drugs and diverting resources from punitive measures into harm reduction strategies.

    “Policy shifts towards harm reduction, ending criminalization of people who use drugs, proportionality of sentences and alternatives to incarceration have been successfully defended over the past decades by a growing number of countries on the basis of the legal latitude allowed under the U.N. treaties,” wrote former President of Brazil and Global Commission on Drug Policy chairman Fernando Henrique Cardoso. “Further exploration of flexible interpretations of the drug treaties is an important objective, but ultimately the global drug control regime must be reformed to permit responsible legal regulation.”

    Dr. Magliocca and team’s model used the admittedly limited information on drug trafficking routes, volume, and timing to simulate and predict the decision-making process of cocaine smugglers and how their networks adapt to government anti-drug strategies. The results show that current strategies are only causing these networks to spread out, making the same law enforcement efforts more difficult and costly over time.

    “The adaptive responses of narco-traffickers within the transit zone, particularly spatial adjustments, must be understood if we are to move beyond reactive counterdrug interdiction strategies,” Magliocca concluded. His team and others will now be able to move on to exploring alternative methods to counter this growing problem.

     

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Britney Spears Checks Into Mental Health Facility

    Britney Spears Checks Into Mental Health Facility

    “Her dad being sick has taken a toll on her,” a source close to the pop star revealed.

    Pop icon Britney Spears is checking herself into what she’s calling a facility for “all-encompassing wellness treatment” after a health scare that nearly took her father from her.

    Early this January, Spears composed an emotional tweet announcing that she would not be able to perform her new show, Britney: Domination, because her dad, Jamie Spears, “was hospitalized and nearly died.” Jamie suffered a colon rupture and has undergone multiple surgeries to repair the damage.

    Domination was going to be Spears’ second Las Vegas residency show, during which she would have made $507,000 for each performance, according to Variety — it would have made her the highest paid act in town. The residency is now on indefinite hold after the star dropped everything to spend this time with her family and help take care of her ill father.

    After three months, Spears has decided to take some time to take care of herself. According to a source who spoke to People, her dad is still not doing well and because the two are so close, the stress has taken a lot out of her. However, fans don’t need to worry.

    “Her dad being sick has taken a toll on her,” the source said. “He nearly died and actually had another surgery a few weeks ago. He’s not doing well. They’re so close and it has been a lot. There is nothing dramatic going on with her — she just realized she needs to make sure to take time to care for herself.”

    Spears has been an advocate of self-care for some time, and has shown herself to be dedicated to her family above all else multiple times. Last year, her eight-year-old niece had a frightening accident on her ATV that left the girl unconscious for two days. Spears herself saw her niece, Maddie, crash the vehicle into a pond and sink underwater almost instantly. The entire family present attempted to rescue Maddie without success, but thankfully emergency services were on the scene in two minutes and were able to get her out.

    Thankfully, Maddie was able to make a full recovery without any evident neurological damage.

    Britney Spears is also a mother herself and has recently earned praise for being a dedicated mom who appears to truly care about her kids above all else. In 2016, she published a love letter to her two boys, Jayden and Preston, in TIME

    “You are my masterpieces,” she wrote. “From the day I saw the most precious eyes, I believed in miracles to the core. Such a gift God has given me, exploring in your beautiful worlds every day. I pray as a mother I teach you strength and passion to carry through the struggles in the world. Most battles will always be won on your knees. I pray you find your dreams.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Michigan Man In Recovery To Walk 280 Miles For A Good Cause

    Michigan Man In Recovery To Walk 280 Miles For A Good Cause

    Mike Hamp wants to show people that they don’t need to rely on substances in order to live a full life. 

    A Michigan man plans to walk 280 miles this August as a way of bringing attention to mental health and substance use disorder. 

    Fox 17 reports that Mike Hamp, the founder of nonprofit Values Not Feelings Organization, is dubbing the journey “A Walk For Thought” and plans to walk roughly 25 miles daily. He will begin in his hometown, Hastings, Michigan, and finish in St. Ignace, Michigan. 

    Hamp has personal experience with substance use disorder, as he struggled with it in high school after numerous surgeries on his shoulder. 

    “Addiction for me started back in high school, I was 16 years old when I had four shoulder surgeries and got hooked on opioids,” Hamp said, according to Wood TV 8. “It wasn’t easy you know, overdoses, almost losing my life and losing marriages and my kids. I realized what I was doing was probably going to take my life.” 

    Hamp says that over the next 16 years, dialing in on nutrition and exercise helped him overcome his struggles. And when an injury kept him from being able to go to the gym, he turned to walking. 

    “The funk, the darkness, the depression, it hit like tenfold and got so intense that I really didn’t know what to really do,” he said, according to Fox 17. “I just started walking; I had to get outside of the house.”

    “I feel more clear here, I feel like I can think, like it’s not chaos as much when I’m out here doing this,” he added.

    Hamp started his nonprofit in hopes of using his own experiences to show others that it is possible to overcome obstacles. 

    “Treating our bodies with respect mentally and physically plays a crucial role in the overall function of our being,” Hamp writes on his website. “Exercise, proper nutrition, proper life and thinking habits, positive thoughts and positive self talk… This is when we begin to find ‘Our Path.’”

    As he prepares for the walk in August, Hamp says his intention is to show people that they don’t need to rely on substances in order to live a full life. 

    “I’m going to show the people that are really battling that you can really do this without turning to that stuff without literally killing yourself as you’re trying to live,” Hamp said.

    More information on A Walk For Thought, as well as sponsorship opportunities, can be found at www.valuesnotfeelings.org

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • NIDA Director Nora Volkow Talks Marijuana Research, Kratom

    NIDA Director Nora Volkow Talks Marijuana Research, Kratom

    Volkow testified before Congress about the difficulties of researching Schedule I drugs like marijuana.  

    Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), said during congressional testimony this week that designating a drug with Schedule I status can inhibit much-needed research. 

    “Indeed, the moment that a drug gets a Schedule I, which is done in order to protect the public so that they don’t get exposed to it, it makes research much harder,” Nora Volkow said, according to Marijuana Moment. “This is because [researchers] actually have to through a registration process that is actually lengthy and cumbersome.”

    Schedule I status is reserved for drugs that have no accepted medical use and are highly addictive. It includes heroin, but also marijuana. Other dangerous drugs, like cocaine and methamphetamine, are placed in the less restrictive Schedule 2 status.

    Many people would like to see marijuana reclassified, or unclassified all together. 

    Although marijuana is accepted for medical use in the majority of the country, it is “very difficult” for researchers to study the drug, because of its Schedule I status. Even in states where cannabis is legal for medical or recreational purposes, researchers and institutions can risk losing their federal funding if they study it without going through the federal process.

    This leaves many questions about the safety of products from marijuana to CBD, Volkow said. 

    The federal research process for marijuana includes lengthy delays because the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) limits the number of permits allowed for studying marijuana, and the amount of cannabis that can be grown for research purposes. Despite promising to issue more permits, the DEA has not yet significantly increased the ability of researchers to study marijuana

    Volkow also spoke about whether the herb kratom should receive Schedule I status. She said that doing so would “make it very difficult for our researchers to get ahold of the pharmacological compound itself.”

    Rep. Mark Pocan (D-WI) suggested that the benefits of scheduling kratom (like restricting public use) might be outweighed by the negative consequence of limiting research.

    “There seems to be—all the problems we’re trying to untangle right now around cannabis, marijuana specifically, because of Schedule I, I’d hate to see us put another drug there and then have to try to work backwards,” he said. “If we’re not there already, it allows you to continue to do the research.”

    NIDA, the DEA and the FDA are all working on a process to streamline drug research, looking for a “path that will allow researchers to work with Schedule I drugs in a safe way, but without actually expediting that process,” according to Volkow.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • New Photo Exhibit Shows "99 Faces" Of People With Mental Illness

    New Photo Exhibit Shows "99 Faces" Of People With Mental Illness

    “We have champions in all walks of life. I was like, where are the champions of schizophrenia and bipolar?” said the exhibit’s creator.

    An art exhibit in New Hampshire is aiming to break down the stigma around mental illness by displaying 99 life-sized portraits of people who have been touched by mental illness—33 with bipolar disorder, 33 with schizophrenia, and 33 family members.

    The photographs, part of an exhibit called “99 Faces,” were taken by Boston-based artist Lynda Michaud Cutrell, according to The Valley News. They are on display at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon, New Hampshire’s largest hospital, from April to September.

    Cutrell wanted to give people with mental illness a chance to advocate for themselves and their loved ones. 

    “We have champions in all walks of life,” she said. “I was like, where are the champions of schizophrenia and bipolar?”

    Cutrell said that people who see the person behind a diagnosis are more likely to support that person, and less likely to ostracize or “other” them. When attitudes toward mental illness change, “it’s usually because you meet a person,” she said. 

    Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center provides psychiatric services and hosts support groups for people with mental illness and their family members. Marianne Barthel, arts program director at the hospital, said that the exhibit can give hope to patients and to the people who come to the hospital for support groups related to mental illness. 

    “It was really in an effort to de-stigmatize mental health and help give inspiration to those living with mental illness that there are others out there like them who are living successful lives with jobs and families,” Barthel told NHPR. “It really breaks down barriers when you can have a discussion about a serious or personal issue by looking at art.” 

    Dartmouth’s Director of Psychiatry, Alan Green, had similar thoughts. “We hope this exhibit will help people understand (that). As a society, we need to realize that this is part of our responsibility,” he said. 

    Cutrell was inspired by a family member who is grappling with mental illness. She connected with many of the portraits’ subjects through the National Alliance on Mental Illness. 

    “Once I found one family member, I realized there were other family members,” she said. 

    Most people she spoke to were excited to be involved with the project. 

    She said, “I think how open people became when I gave them this space to be part of something important. It was kind of like a new social value.”

    In addition to highlighting her subjects with mental illness, the exhibit makes a nod to the genetic components of the diseases by displaying an artistic representation of a DNA strand from a person with schizophrenia. 

    “Whoever it would be, there are some genes that contribute,” Cutrell said. 

    View the original article at thefix.com