Category: Addiction News

  • Scientists Dosed Artificial Brain With Meth For New Study

    Scientists Dosed Artificial Brain With Meth For New Study

    Scientists chose to use meth on the brain replica because much is still unknown about the the drug and its effects on the body.

    It’s no secret that certain drugs are bad for your brain. However, scientists at Harvard’s Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering can now tell you exactly how bad meth is for you, after dosing an artificial brain with the drug and watching the results.

    To do this, researchers used organ chips, computer chips lined with living human cells that can be used to test how human organs function and react to substances.

    In this case, the researchers were focused on the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This filter normally allows some substances to pass into the brain, while keeping other potentially harmful substances out. Using drugs, including meth, can alter the BBB, making it easier for toxins to reach the brain, according to Motherboard

    To show this and study exactly how it works, researchers dosed a brain chip mimicking the function of the BBB with meth

    “Just like in the brains of people who choose to smoke meth, the BBB chips started to leak,” Kit Parker, professor of Bioengineering and Applied Physics, told Digital Trends. “That’s exactly what happens when you smoke meth—and why you shouldn’t.” 

    Ben Maoz, one of three lead study authors from the Wyss Institute, said that the team chose meth because it is known to be particularly harmful to the brain. 

    “Our primary reason for choosing this drug is that it is one of the most addictive drugs responsible for thousands of deaths,” Maoz said to Motherboard via email. “Given this tragic statistic, it is surprising that much is still unknown. Therefore, we sought to use this novel system to unveil the metabolic effect of meth on the different parts of the [neurovascular unit].”

    Researchers found that about 10% of the dose of meth went through the BBB, similar to what happens when people smoke meth. Researchers were then able to examine how parts of the brain communicate, giving them insight that they wouldn’t be able to glean without the organ chips. 

    “The novelty relating to organ chips is that they enable us to carry out what is essentially a ‘synthetic biology’ approach at the cell, tissue, and organ level,” said Donald Ingber, director of the Wyss Institute.

    “In this study, we could use this synthetic approach to break down a complex organ—in this case, the human brain—into individual sub-compartments of the brain microvasculature and normally tightly intertwined neuronal networks. Because we can separate out each compartment and control ‘ins and outs,’ while analyzing them with state-of-the-art analytical technologies, we were able to gain insights into how cells within these different compartments communicate with each other.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Safe Injection Sites Get Green Light From California Lawmakers

    Safe Injection Sites Get Green Light From California Lawmakers

    “I am committed to opening one of these sites here in San Francisco, no matter what it takes, because the status quo is not acceptable,” said Mayor London Breed.

    Last week, California lawmakers green-lit a bill that would allow safe injection sites in San Francisco as part of a three-year pilot program. 

    The forward-thinking measure, authored by Assemblywoman Susan Talamantes Eggman and state Senator Scott Wiener, has already enjoyed support from local advocates and lawmakers.  

    “I am committed to opening one of these sites here in San Francisco, no matter what it takes, because the status quo is not acceptable,” Mayor London Breed said Monday

    Eggman voiced similar support for the proposed program. “Should we keep trying what has failed for decades,” she said in a statement, “or give San Francisco the choice to try something that we know saves lives, reduces disease, and saves money?”

    The city’s Director of Health Barbara Garcia estimated that San Francisco has more than 22,000 people using IV drugs. 

    Last year, a slightly broader version of the bill stalled in the state Senate. That iteration of the would-be law would have authorized six counties—Alameda, Humboldt, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Joaquin—to participate in the harm reduction program.

    The current version applies only to San Francisco:

    “This bill would, until January 1, 2022, authorize the City and County of San Francisco to approve entities to operate overdose prevention programs for adults that satisfies specified requirements,” the bill reads, “including, among other things, a hygienic space supervised by health care professionals, as defined, where people who use drugs can consume preobtained drugs, sterile consumption supplies, and access to referrals to substance use disorder treatment.”

    The revised version also retools the language, calling it an overdose prevention program instead of a safer drug consumption program. Whatever it’s called, greenlighting the program would not skirt federal drug laws and it’s not clear how the federal government would respond to such a program were it put into effect.

    “People are injecting drugs whether or not we intervene,” Wiener said, according to the San Francisco Examiner. “Safe injection sites provide people with an opportunity to inject in a clean, safe environment, with healthcare personnel available to prevent overdoses, and with an opportunity to offer people addiction, healthcare, housing, and other services.”

    Now, the bill is waiting for a vote in the state Assembly. The last time around, the lower chamber approved the bill 41-33, according to Curbed

    If the measure sails through the Assembly this time around, it’ll still need a signature from Gov. Jerry Brown before it becomes law, potentially taking effect at the start of next year.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Woman Reportedly Caught With 1.5 Million Lethal Doses Of Fentanyl

    Woman Reportedly Caught With 1.5 Million Lethal Doses Of Fentanyl

    A woman traveling from Los Angeles to New York City was reportedly caught with five pounds of fentanyl in a suitcase.

    Authorities in Kansas City arrested a woman at a bus station who was traveling across the country, from Los Angeles to New York, carrying five pounds of fentanyl—reportedly enough of the drug to cause 1.5 million lethal overdoses.

    Kansas City Police noticed 33-year-old Evelyn C. Sanchez was “intently watching” detectives as they searched through the luggage on the bus.

    When asked, Sanchez told authorities she was heading to New York for “maybe a week,” but the story fell apart when officers reportedly noticed she had not packed a lot of clothing in her luggage.

    Following her questioning, K-9 units sniffed inside the bus and indicated a suitcase near Sanchez’s seat on the bus. When the other bus passengers did not claim the suitcase as theirs, police asked Sanchez and she admitted it was hers before allowing officers to search it.

    Authorities noted that she seemed “very nervous.”

    When asked, Sanchez told police she had “drugs,” according to court records. She did not seem to know what exactly she had, “but it’s a lot.”

    Officers checked inside and did indeed find a lot of drugs—over five pounds of fentanyl, “capable of killing thousands of people,” according to Kansas City Police Chief Rick Smith.

    Local authorities cooperated with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in the investigation. The DEA estimates the amount of fentanyl could kill several orders of magnitude more people than Smith’s estimates, claiming the operation took “1.5 million lethal doses from the streets.”

    There’s no telling where the fentanyl was ultimately heading yet, but it was almost guaranteed to help drive up the number of overdose deaths in the United States and further exacerbate the impact of the opioid crisis.

    Of 72,000 overdose deaths in 2017, 50,000 of those were opioid-related—30,000 of which were from fentanyl or related synthetic opioids.

    The drug is even getting to people who don’t want them—of 907 samples of drugs sold as heroin in Vancouver, Canada, 822 contained fentanyl.

    The U.S. Attorney’s office says Sanchez is in federal custody and awaiting a court date to be scheduled.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Actor Noah Centineo: Sobriety Is A "Really Beautiful Experience"

    Actor Noah Centineo: Sobriety Is A "Really Beautiful Experience"

    “When I got totally clean, I was able to take responsibility for all my laziness, or my incompetence or not being super honest with myself.”

    Actor Noah Centineo is just 22 years old, but he’s already extolling the virtues of recovery.

    “I’m completely sober,” he says in a video circulating the internet, in which he appears to be interacting with fans on Instagram Live. “I’ve been totally clean since May 8th of this year, on the day before my 21st birthday.”

    Centineo, who appears in the film To All the Boys I’ve Loved Before—released this month on Netflix—shared that he’d been “partying quite a bit” since he was 17 prior to his decision to cut out drugs and alcohol from his life.

    “I was like, wow, maybe I should take a break. So I stopped doing all that,” he said. “And I found that a lot of problems that I was having in my life slowly—they didn’t go away—they just became way more apparent to me.”

    The “teen” heartthrob, who also appears as Camila Cabello’s love interest in her music video for “Havana,” quit cigarettes, cannabis, alcohol, and even got off his anxiety medication. He said that for him, sobriety offered a sense of clarity that he hadn’t had before.

    “I could identify my problems and, more so, what’s causing my problems,” he said. “It was always me. When I got totally clean, I was able to take responsibility for all my laziness, or my incompetence or not being super honest with myself. So that was a really beautiful experience for me, and it still is.”

    From his experience, he learned that a clear mind can help people who are struggling with something within. “If you’re going through some really tough stuff, my advice to you is to get completely clean,” he suggested. “If you drink, stop drinking. If you smoke, stop smoking. Just try it for like two months.”

    He related back to his own recovery. “I made some poor decisions and hurt some people that I really loved, and I was like… do I really want to keep doing things that hurt people that I deeply care about? The answer is no, not at all.”

    He continued, “And if I could stop that, if I make decisions when I’m drunk that I would never make when I’m sober, why would I drink? Especially if those decisions and actions and choices are hurting people?”

    Instead, the health-conscious actor suggested replacing drugs and alcohol with healthy habits. “I replaced all my habits with working out, yoga, eating better, and spending time alone,” he said.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Steve-O Discusses Bam Margera's Recent Relapse

    Steve-O Discusses Bam Margera's Recent Relapse

    Margera was allegedly seven months sober prior to cracking open a beer following a traumatizing mugging, but Steve-O doesn’t buy it.

    Jackass alum, Steve-O, sat down for an interview with TooFab where he weighed in on a recent Instagram post by former Jackass co-star, Bam Margera.

    In a recent post, Margera shared that he had been robbed of $500 during a taxi ride from the airport to Cartagena, Colombia. He then cracks open a bottle of Club Colombia beer with one hand, though the latter part seems to have been removed.

    Bam’s act was significant as it marked the end of seven months of sobriety, which came hard won after being charged with a DUI in January and being sent to rehab by the courts.

    However, Steve-O seems to believe that Margera had already broken his sobriety prior to the robbery. “I guess. I don’t know that that’s the case, but perhaps,” Steve-O said in regards to the alleged seven-month timeframe.

    Steve-O was at first hesitant to expand on what he meant by the statement, but ended up explaining himself.

    “I mean, I don’t know. And I don’t want him to [feel like] I’m attacking him or calling him out, I just think that there were signs that, if he hadn’t already drank, it was evident that he was going to,” Steve-O explained. “The signs were there. I think if you’re a sober alcoholic that you kind of can tell.”

    Steve-O seemed to believe Margera wasn’t ready for sobriety.

    “When people are on the path, sort of doing the things that sober people do, it’s evident,” he exanded. “It’s evident that he’s not been ready or willing to do the simple things that sober people do that make our lives really great. It’s sad, and I wish that I could somehow force him to want to do these things and get healthy and have a great life, but it doesn’t work that way. You can’t push people into it.”

    Speaking with 10 years of sobriety, Steve-O said that even if Margera resorted to drinking because of the robbery, it’s still a poor decision.

    “Let’s say he did get drunk because of being robbed—we call that the philosophy of a man who having a headache hits himself in the head with a hammer so that he cannot feel the ache,” Steve-O explained. “Way to go. Now you got two problems.”

    Margera has long struggled with alcoholism. He recently tried to get healthy by taking a long trip and isolating himself, but ended up falling off the wagon.

    “I think the catalyst was when I stepped on a scale after a fucking drinking bender and I was 230 pounds. So I flew myself to Estonia, to the middle of the fucking woods in a log cabin for six months. I was on a full-blown Rocky Balboa mission to hike and bike and get myself in shape just to be able to skate,” Margera said.

    However, in January Margera got the DUI that landed him in rehab.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Ben Affleck Heads Back To Rehab

    Ben Affleck Heads Back To Rehab

    Days after Affleck entered rehab, news broke that he and actress Jennifer Garner reached a settlement in their divorce.

    Justice League star Ben Affleck headed back to rehab last week in his ongoing battle with alcoholism, as he continues “working incredibly hard” to stay sober.

    “Addiction is not something that goes away,” a source close the actor told People. “Every day is a battle for recovering addicts, they are fighting for their sobriety and to lead healthy, balanced lives every day.”

    Over the past year, the Los Angeles-based actor had been in and out of rehab and spotted visiting various outpatient treatment centers. 

    “He has been attending countless meetings, has continued to work with sober coaches and does his best to follow through with the things that will help him maintain his health,” the source told People.

    It’s been a rough time for the Argo director; just days after he entered rehab, news broke that Affleck and his ex-wife Jennifer Garner reached a settlement in their divorce.

    The couple separated three years ago, and Garner filed for divorce last spring, according to Us Weekly. On Wednesday, she stepped in and drove Affleck to treatment, according to reports.

    Earlier this month, Affleck and Saturday Night Live producer Lindsay Shookus broke off their relationship, a move one source close to the couple attributed to Affleck’s downward spiral. 

    “It was very hard for her to break up with Ben, but she knew he wasn’t getting better and that it was time for her to step aside,” a source told People. “She was trying to stay as close to him as possible so that he would stay on the right path, but ultimately it just wasn’t possible. She knew she had to let him hit bottom.” 

    Affleck’s path to sobriety started in 2001, when Charlie Sheen drove him to a 30-day rehab program. Last spring, he went to treatment again, and later posted about it on Facebook.

    “I want to live life to the fullest and be the best father I can be,” he wrote. “I want my kids to know there is no shame in getting help when you need it, and to be a source of strength for anyone out there who needs help but is afraid to take the first step.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Pawn Stars: The Opioid Edition

    Pawn Stars: The Opioid Edition

    If you are at risk for overdose or use needles to shoot up drugs, come see Brandi and she’ll take care of you – no frills, no questions, no judgment.

    On a cold November morning in 2015, Brandi Tanner and her husband stopped to pick up their 10-year-old niece from her grandmother’s house.

    “Grandma’s sleeping funny,” said the little girl when they came to the door. She wasn’t dressed for school, as she usually would be at this time of morning. Concerned, Tanner and her husband stepped into the house and headed for his mother’s bedroom. They knocked on the door, but no one answered. Glancing at each other with wide eyes, they swung open the door. Grandma had rolled off the bed and her body was wedged between the dresser and the nightstand. She wasn’t breathing.

    “I didn’t really have time to process that she was dead,” says Tanner. “The only thing I could think was ‘Damn, I need to call people. I need get the family out of the house so the police can take pictures.’”

    Tanner’s mother-in-law had died of an opioid overdose, an increasingly common cause of death in Vance County, North Carolina. Tanner herself had previously struggled with dependence on opioids and though the years she’d seen the prevalence of addiction rise in her community.

    “It was so hard to see my husband lose his mother,” she says. “I wanted to do something to help him and other people, but I didn’t know what to do.”

    About a month after her mother-in-law’s death, Tanner was working at a pawn shop where she had been employed for several years. It was right before closing and she was tired. Every day people came into the shop to sell items in order to buy opioids. And it seemed like every week she received news of someone else who had lost a family member. She had just started to shut down the register when a tall stranger strode into the shop.

    “There were other employees in the store but he headed straight for me like he knew I was the one who needed him,” Tanner recalls. “He walked up and asked if I wanted to help save lives from overdose. I was like, hell yeah. Where do I sign up?”

    The tall stranger was Loftin Wilson, an outreach worker with the North Carolina Harm Reduction Coalition, a statewide nonprofit that works to reduce death and disease among people impacted by drugs. That year, the organization had received a federal grant to prevent overdose death in Vance County in partnership with the Granville-Vance District Health Department. Over the past few years, the two agencies have worked closely to increase access to harm reduction services and medication-assisted treatment in Vance County.

    Vance is a rural community of fewer than 50,000 people. Driving through, one can’t help but notice large, pillared villas adjacent to dilapidated trailer parks, a scene that amidst acres of yellowing tobacco fields is reminiscent of plantations and slave quarters. In Vance County, a quarter of the population lives below the poverty line and addiction has flourished. From 2008-2013 Vance had the highest rate of heroin overdose deaths in the state: 4.9 residents per 100,000 compared to the state average of 1.0 per 100,000 (NC Injury Violence Prevention Surveillance Data). But those were sunnier days. By 2016, the heroin overdose rate for Vance County had jumped to 11.2 per 100,000. In 2017, based on provisional data, it was 24.2 per 100,000 (NC Office of Medical Examiners) and 2018 is already shaping up to be the deadliest year yet.

    The chance meeting between Wilson and Tanner at the pawn shop proved to be pivotal to outreach efforts in Vance County. Wilson had years of overdose prevention experience in a neighboring county, Durham, but Tanner knew her community and everyone in it. The two teamed up and began reaching out to people in need. Driving around in Wilson’s rattling pick-up, they visited the homes of people at risk for opioid overdose to distribute naloxone kits.

    The following summer, the North Carolina General Assembly legalized syringe exchange programs, and Wilson and Tanner began delivering sterile injection supplies along with naloxone. By 2018, a grant from the Aetna Foundation to combat opioid overdose had enabled them to purchase a van in which to transport supplies and to expand outreach work in Vance County.

    In July 2018 I visited Tanner at the pawn shop, where she still works. Thanks to Tanner’s efforts, the pawn shop has become a de facto site for syringe exchange and overdose prevention. Walking into the shop, the first thing I notice is that Tanner packs a glock on her right hip. It’s necessary these days in Vance County, which has seen a remarkable rise in drug-related gang violence this year. In March 2018, nine people were shot over a span of two weeks in Henderson, a small town of 15,000 residents. In May, four more people were killed in less than a week, prompting Henderson Mayor Eddie Ellington to make a formal plea to the state for resources. One of the murders occurred at a hotel a stone’s throw from the pawn shop.

    The danger doesn’t seem to faze Tanner. She weaves through displays of jewelry, rifles, and old DVDs as customers drop in to buy and sell. It’s a respectable stream of business for a Monday afternoon. Tanner handles the customers with ease, teasing them in a thick southern twang, inquiring after their kids and families, and discussing the murders, which more than one person brings up unprompted. She calls everyone “baby” and is the kind of person who will buy gift cards and toiletries just so she can slip them unnoticed into a customer’s bag if she knows the individual is down on her luck.

    Later in the afternoon, a young female enters the shop. She and Tanner nod at each other without exchanging words. Tanner finishes up a transaction with a customer and slips out the back door. She is gone for a couple of minutes, then reappears alone. This, I come to find, is what overdose prevention looks like in Vance County.

    “I used to hand out [overdose prevention supplies] from inside the shop, but people were embarrassed to come in and be seen taking them,” explains Tanner. “Now people just text me to let me know they are coming. Sometimes they come in the shop and other times I just leave my truck open out back and they get the supplies and leave.”

    Henderson is the kind of town where everyone knows everyone’s business. News travels fast and so do rumors. Even though almost everyone has someone in their family using opioids, stigma still runs deep, so Tanner doesn’t advertise the exchange. Word travels by mouth: If you are at risk for overdose or use needles to shoot up drugs, come see Brandi and she’ll take care of you – no frills, no questions, no judgment. She sees a couple participants a day on weekdays and nearly a dozen every Friday and Saturday. A couple times a week she drives her truck to visit people who don’t have transportation, just to make sure they are taken care of too.

    I ask Tanner to take me to her truck where she keeps the supplies, and she obliges, leading me behind the store to a dusty parking lot where her SUV is stuffed with naloxone, syringes, and other sterile injection equipment. I pepper her with questions as she moves the boxes around to show me what’s inside.

    Tanner looks younger than her 35 years, but acts much older. Over the next half hour she recounts a life of homelessness, addiction, incarceration, losing friend after friend to opioid overdose, and finding her mother-in-law’s body three years ago. She relates the stories as though we were discussing the weather, completely emotionless, but still, you can tell it hurts.

    “I try not to think about it,” she says with a wave of her hand when asked how she handles the trauma of losing so many people. Later, she admits that some nights she sits at home and writes down her feelings, then tears up the thoughts and throws them away.

    “It’s hard not to get attached to people if you see them every week,” she acknowledges. “But I do the work because I want to help my town and my people. This is the place where my kids are growing up.”

    We go back inside and I take a last look around the store. The blue-screened computers and racks of DVDs create the feeling that you’ve gone back in time, yet in some ways this pawn shop is the most forward-thinking entity in Vance County. Here, people received tools to save lives even before they were legal.

    Before leaving Vance’s open fields to return to the city, I ask Tanner if she has a final message for people at risk for opioid overdose. For a moment, her voice hardens.

    “I know what it feels like to not have anybody give a shit if you are here or not,” she says. Then her tone softens. “But I want people to know they are not alone. There are people out there who care and can help.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Legal Sports Betting in West Virginia Raises Concerns Among Advocates

    Legal Sports Betting in West Virginia Raises Concerns Among Advocates

    “Gambling addiction is a bigger issue than people realize in this state,” said one recovery advocate.

    The March 2018 passage of a sports betting bill in West Virginia has many residents and lawmakers excited over the prospect of a 10% tax on gross gaming revenue, but for recovery advocates across the state, the bill has escalated concerns about the dangers of gambling dependency.

    A feature in The Dominion Post, a commercial daily newspaper in Morgantown, West Virginia, highlighted concerns from mental health advocates and educators, who want the public to understand that gambling dependency carries a set of risks like any other addictive behavior, and can lead to financial and personal problems.

    The feature also detailed various forms of assistance, including a West Virginia-based helpline and support groups, as tools for those struggling with gambling dependency.

    The West Virginia Sports Lottery Wagering Act was fast-tracked through the state House and Senate and passed on March 9, 2018 without the signature of Governor Jim Justice, who eschewed public calls to veto the bill.

    The passage of the bill allows the state’s five gaming facilities to provide access to sports betting; the facilities paid $100,000 each for the right to allow betting, and according to Legal Sports Report, were expected to generate at least $5 million in total first-year tax revenue.

    The measure, which was actively opposed by the National Basketball Association and Major League Baseball, made West Virginia the sixth state in the nation to pass a sports betting bill, after Nevada, Delaware, Mississippi, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island.

    For health and dependency advocates, the passage is also cause for alarm. “Gambling addiction is a bigger issue than people realize in this state,” said Sheila Morgan, director of communications and marketing for the Gamblers Help Network of West Virginia, to The Dominion Post.

    The network, which was established in 2000, provides no-cost assistance to those who believe that their gambling may have reached problematic levels. Network agents assess callers and can schedule a free appointment with a dependency counselor; future appointments are at cost, but those with financial hardships can be covered by the Help Network itself.

    The Dominion Post noted that the network has received more than 2,000 calls alone from Monongalia County, where the newspaper is located.

    Network clients are also encouraged to find and attend support group meetings, which have shown promise in providing help to those with gambling dependency.

    “The treatment of choice for addiction is group therapy,” said Robert Edmundson, clinical social worker and associate professor at West Virginia University. “Only in groups can you really be with other people who you can relate with and identify with.”

    Mental health professionals like Edmundson take a close look at an individual’s behavior when assessing the possibility of a gambling problem.

    “People will often gamble money they don’t have,” he noted. “The cornerstone and behavior that crosses all addiction is loss of control. You’re no longer in charge, it is.”

    Moran said that the Gamblers Help Network is currently focusing its efforts on reaching young people and, in particular, college students, for which gambling can be an issue.

    Earlier this year, LendEDU surveyed 886 Americans that can legally bet and are above the age of 21. The main focus of this survey was to determine the impact legalized sports wagering has on bettors. You can view the full report here: https://lendedu.com/blog/money-behind-legal-sports-betting/

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Colleges Improve Efforts To Accommodate Students In Recovery

    Colleges Improve Efforts To Accommodate Students In Recovery

    Around 300 schools offer recovery support services in the US.

    As the demand rises for student recovery services, some colleges are making a real effort to provide a sober-friendly environment for students who choose to abstain from drugs and alcohol.

    “Students shouldn’t have to choose between their recovery and their education,” said Alexandre Laudet, a researcher at the National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.

    Roughly 20% of college students meet the criteria for alcohol use disorder, according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Illicit drug use is rising as well, according to 2016 data.

    According to the Association of Recovery in Higher Education, some 300 schools offer recovery support services in the US.

    Some features of college recovery programs include addiction counseling, support groups, community check-ins, on-campus 12-step meetings, and service work opportunities, Yes Magazine reports.

    Substance-free social activities are a popular feature of these programs; ensuring that sober students don’t miss out on the fun.

    Some colleges offer sober bowling, canoeing, laser tag, hiking, movies. The University of Houston’s recovery program includes a mountain climbing trip, and the University of Oregon organizes sober watch parties for sports fans.

    These programs will often have applicants sign a code of conduct, promising to “abstain from all substances, adhere to safe behaviors, and hold other members of the community accountable,” according to Yes.

    The results of a survey published in the Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment showed the many positive outcomes of college recovery programs—including low relapse rates, higher-than-average GPAs, and a higher likelihood that students will stay in school and graduate.

    According to the survey, up to 95% of participating students were able to sustain their sobriety while attending school.

    “It was the life preserver I needed when I was drowning. I feel like I’m supported there,” said one engineering student at the University of Michigan. “There are people who would do anything to help me and know how to help me. It’s a safe space for us no matter what’s happening in our lives.”

    One college recovery program of note is the one at Rutgers University in New Jersey. Its recovery housing program was established in 1988, one of the first of its kind. It is among the more established college recovery programs in the country, alongside Texas Tech and Augsburg University.

    The state of New Jersey has gone farther to promote recovery support in higher education; in 2015 the state legislature passed a law requiring four-year public colleges and universities to provide recovery housing.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Are Opioid Prescription Regulations Actually Working?

    Are Opioid Prescription Regulations Actually Working?

    New studies explored whether medical professionals are adhering to stricter opioid prescribing rules and regulations.

    While rules and regulations are often made in the interest of public safety, that doesn’t mean they are always followed hard and fast. 

    Such is the case with certain rules regarding opioid prescriptions, according to the Boston Globe. The paper states that according to the results of two studies published Wednesday (August 22) in the journal JAMA Surgery, “such well-intentioned efforts sometimes don’t have the desired effect.”

    The first study concluded that after one rule made it more difficult to refill the painkiller hydrocodone, surgeons began prescribing more of the medication right after surgery instead. 

    Meanwhile, the second study examined a regulation which required surgeons to check a database before prescribing opioids, the idea being that the database would alert them to patients at risk of opioid misuse.

    However, the study found that the procedure took up surgeons’ time but did not affect their prescribing practices in one New Hampshire hospital. 

    According to the Globe, both the studies were limited in terms of geographic area and only studying surgeon’s prescribing behaviors.

    Dr. Michael Barnett, a Harvard health-services researcher who studies opioid prescribing, tells the Globe that the results point to a bigger problem.

    “Clinician behavior is harder to predict, when you put these kinds of limits on it, than we’d like to think,” he said. “Regardless of the law you put in place, physicians are going to respond to what patients need… We need to ask a harder question: How do we influence health care decisions?”

    Prescribing practices have been under scrutiny for a number of years. In 2014, the Globe states, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) changed hydrocodone from a Schedule III to a Schedule II drug, meaning patients would not be able to refill it over the phone.

    After that went into effect, researchers at the University of Michigan chose to study the effects on post-surgery prescribing. They looked at prescriptions for 21,955 patients who had had elective surgery in 75 Michigan hospitals from 2012 to 2015. Study authors found that prescription refills decreased, but the number of pills a patient left the hospital with increased.

    According to study author Dr. Michael Englesbe, the idea seemed to be that if doctors gave patients more prescriptions, they would be more likely to have the necessary pain relief and not seek more medication.

    However, Englesbe says, previous research indicates that “the number of pills you give someone has no relationship to their likelihood of calling for a refill. The more pills you give a patient, the more they take, and they don’t rate their pain care any better. It’s counterintuitive.”

    View the original article at thefix.com