Category: Addiction News

  • Nation's First-Ever Execution Using Fentanyl Halted

    Nation's First-Ever Execution Using Fentanyl Halted

    A New Jersey drug company filed a lawsuit claiming the state had tricked a drug distributor into selling one of the drugs to be used in the execution. 

    What could have been the nation’s first-ever execution using fentanyl was called off Wednesday, after a New Jersey-based drug company filed suit over the planned use of one of its drugs in the Nevada death house.

    After months of begging for death and waiving appeals, double murderer Scott Dozier was scheduled to die by lethal injection using an untested three-drug cocktail in what would have been the state’s first execution in more than a decade. 

    “I think it’s awesome. I mean, it’s killing people all over the place,” he told VICE News before his unwanted last-minute reprieve. “You guys get pharmaceutical grade fentanyl and just bang me up man.”

    But the courts intervened, after drugmaker Alvogen accused the state of using “subterfuge” to secure one of the drugs in spite of the company’s insistence that it didn’t want its product used in “botched” executions.

    It appears to be the first time a pharmaceutical company has successfully stopped an execution, experts told the Associated Press

    The challenge comes as death penalty states across the nation have struggled in finding ways to carry out their most severe punishment, sometimes switching methods or drugs as pharmaceutical companies become increasingly reluctant to see their drugs used in executions. 

    The current Nevada execution protocol—newly implemented after previous drug stocks expired—includes the controversial sedative midazolam, the opioid fentanyl and the paralytic cisatracurium. Midazolam has been linked to allegedly botched executions in Ohio, Arkansas, Alabama and elsewhere.

    In Tuesday’s lawsuit, Alvogen said the state had tricked drug distributor Cardinal Health into selling them midazolam by having it sent to a pharmacy in Las Vegas instead of to the prison, according to CBS News.

    “While Alvogen takes no position on the death penalty itself,” the company wrote in court filings, “Alvogen’s products were developed to save and improve patients’ lives and their use in executions is fundamentally contrary to this purpose.”

    A state solicitor general pushed back against the lawsuit, saying Nevada didn’t do anything wrong and regularly has its drugs shipped to Las Vegas. 

    This wasn’t the first controversy Nevada faced over its execution drugs. Last year, Pfizer asked the state to return any drugs it planned using to kill prisoners—but prison officials refused. And this year, another pharmaceutical company voiced objections to the use of its drugs in lethal injections, though they didn’t take the step of filing a legal claim. 

    Dozier’s death sentence stems from a 2002 slaying when he lured 22-year-old Jeremiah Miller to the Las Vegas strip in order to rob him of $12,000 that he planned to buy ephedrine with, one of the ingredients needed for making meth. After shooting Miller in the head, police say Dozier let him bleed out in a bathtub before dismembering him, stuffing his torso and some limbs into a suitcase, then tossing it in a dumpster. 

    Afterward, Dozier’s friends started coming forward with tips about the case. One even told police he’d spotted a body holding its own head inside Dozier’s hotel room. A jailhouse snitch alleged that he’d helped Dozier bury a man in the middle of the Arizona desert in 2001—and he led investigators to a dismembered body. Dozier was convicted in the Copper State case before he was transferred back to Nevada to stand trial for the would-be meth-maker’s slaying.

    While in jail for the Arizona murder—one in which he still maintains his innocence—Dozier tried killing himself by overdosing on antidepressants, which landed him in a coma for two weeks.

    “I’m not looking for mercy,” he told the Marshall Project. “Nevada said stop behaving this way or we will kill you, and I kept behaving that way.”

    So, in 2016, he penned a letter to the judge, waiving his appeals and begging for execution. So-called “volunteers” are a death row rarity, and Dozier’s gregarious pursuit of death attracted national attention. 

    Now, it’s not clear when he might face another death date, though a Clark County judge this week scheduled a hearing for September.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • How I Won My Own Battle With Tech Burnout

    How I Won My Own Battle With Tech Burnout

    How I Won My Own Battle With Tech Burnout

    Throughout my career, I’ve always worked with technology. Specifically, I’ve had a very close relationship with social media and publishing – essentially a career with a very high likelihood of experiencing information overload. I never used to think it was that bad – I used to read books very easily, be able to concentrate, and generally not get distracted. But advanced phone handsets, combined with a new form of mobile-only social media and always-on email changed all that.

    At the end of 2017, I left full time employment for freelancing and to see what that might hold. I’d done it before in 2013, but this time around with a much closer relationship with technology, and already being fairly shot from the last couple of months of work, I struggled to get the concentration necessary to give it a proper go. I procrastinated in the mornings, meaning working days would have to drag into the evening. In my working day, my attention flitted between serious work and social media. I couldn’t read a book, and even more bizarrely, I even began to struggle with listening to audiobooks. My sleeping was not in good shape either.

    It was difficult to get anything entrepreneurial off the ground, and after several somewhat circular conversations and incidents of me staring at a computer screen without action, I knew something was wrong. I was burnt out. I told various clients of the fact that I was experiencing tech burnout and decided it was time for action. I couldn’t pretend I could continue at a rate of 50% productivity or worse. So towards the end of March I decided to make a plan to deal with my tech burnout and get back on track.

    I took myself away

    I could have easily gone to a beach for a week. While that might have helped, I’m not sure holidaying solo would have made me beat my constant phone reaching so I did something out of my comfort zone – I volunteered for a charity in France. There were several benefits to this: I met some new people and there was a sense of camaraderie and togetherness that I’d been missing in my freelance life.

    I also had no reason to look at a screen for any real length of time, as I was cut off from any potential of actually meeting who I might have been talking to. I got to sit on the ferry for a few hours and didn’t think about work or technology for three or so days, so experienced something of a digital detox. Another aspect was the contrast between a physical job (I worked in a kitchen and woodyard) against staring at a computer screen all day. This meant I went to bed physically tired and slept well, without my mind whirring or other distractions.

    I deleted some apps

    Being in France for some reason gave me a ruthless streak when it came to technology. I was away, in a different place and mindset, and I thought to myself, why do I need to be in this Whatsapp group, where we always chat but never really meet? Did I really need an Instagram account? I thought I didn’t and eliminating these things would aid my attention span. So I just did it, didn’t regret it, and overall I think it did help. I got a few messages from friends in the group asking why I’d left. No big deal, I replied, just want a bit of a break from Whatsapp.

    I also installed the Facebook News Eradicator on all of my computers, and installed a plugin called Block Site. Top of my list to be banned? Without a doubt for freelancers it’s LinkedIn. In all my experience of social media, I don’t think there’s a bigger time waster than LinkedIn’s feed of meaningless work based fables, success parade of people getting new jobs and largely hot air points of view. It gives the illusion of being useful to freelancers for networking, but in fact is just largely a time sap. I suggest avoiding it in the working day.

    I stopped drinking for a bit

    I’ve always liked a drink, but if you hit it too hard at the weekends (or indeed in the week) your body and mind is going to be in a constant game of catch-up throughout the week and you’re only really going to sharpen up by Wednesday. Even having a couple of glasses a night will wear you down if you do it regularly enough. Completely dropping alcohol for two weeks was a very fruitful exercise.

    I started sleeping far better than previously, and I felt a lot sharper and productive. I couldn’t necessarily keep it up after this short window – and I did start getting a little bored sometimes – but it was worthwhile in getting me out of a rut. If you want to go a bit further than a couple of weeks, then I recommend taking a look at One Year, No Beer.

    I did something to overcome tech burnout that gave me a goal

    In 2016 I’d done a half marathon, and it was agony. With some trepidation I decided to sign up to another one and train properly this time. I started in early April and had about eight weeks to build up, and incrementally I ran a bit further each week.

    On the actual day, I beat my previous time by nearly twenty minutes and felt quite amazed at how far I’d come. I suppose the main thing was that I knew what being unprepared felt like, so I really went for it. Running in the Spring is really very pleasant. I looked forward to the longer runs on Tuesday evening and Saturday morning. A goal doesn’t have to be physical, of course, but it does need to be challenging. I enjoyed the challenge of running longer and longer distances and then beating my personal best.

    I pursued creative endeavour

    I hadn’t taken up art since school, and felt it was something of a lost talent, so I started doing drawing and painted a mural in my flat. I’d also taken a couple of digital art classes. There is no other activity I know of that stops time like painting. It makes me almost entirely forget about the outside world and feel entirely focused on what I’m doing. Granted, it didn’t help me recover from tech burnout on its own, because I didn’t do it for long enough, but I certainly thought it contributed.

    I’m not sure any one of these pursuits on its own would have been enough to give me a full recovery from tech burnout. While they all happened at similar times, they didn’t all overlap. But my own experiences say that making these changes, all added up over a couple of months, brought me my concentration back.

    View the original article at itstimetologoff.com

  • FDA: Limiting Opioids Won't Curb Crisis, Responsible Prescribing Will

    FDA: Limiting Opioids Won't Curb Crisis, Responsible Prescribing Will

    The FDA commissioner issued a statement addressing the stigma aimed at pain patients and the need for providers to take a patient-centric approach.

    Strict opioid prescribing regulations are harming some chronic pain patients, according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Scott Gottlieb.

    On Monday, July 9, the FDA released a statement about its Patient-Focused Drug Development Meeting, during which Gottlieb brought up the struggles some patients face because of strict opioid prescribing laws. 

    According to PatientEngagementHIT, there are some instances in which patients, such as those those facing “metastatic cancer pain management and chronic migraine management,” are best fit for a long-term opioid prescription.

    “Tragically, we know that for some patients, loss of quality of life due to crushing pain has resulted in increased thoughts of or actual suicide,” Gottlieb said in the statement. “This is unacceptable. Reflecting this, even as we seek to curb overprescribing of opioids, we also must make sure that patients with a true medical need for these drugs can access these therapies.”

    While Gottlieb acknowledges that prescribing regulations are necessary in order to fight the opioid crisis, he also says those strategies are negatively affecting patients who rely on the medications for pain management.

    Gottlieb and his colleagues have learned through patient workgroups that patients in need of pain management say they feel stigmatized and have a difficult time building healthy relationships with care providers.

    According to Gottlieb, simply banning opioids or increasing the difficulty of obtaining a prescription is not the solution to the issue. He says instead, better education needs to be available to providers and opioid prescribing should take a “patient-centric” approach, taking patient “preferences, needs, and patient education approaches” into account.

    “Balancing the need to maintain access with the mandate to aggressively confront the addiction crisis starts with good medical management,” Gottlieb said in the statement. “All patients in pain should benefit from the skillful and appropriate care of their pain. It’s also critical that we take this same aggressive approach to changing the culture of medicine around treating pain… Patients in pain deserve thoughtful, careful and tailored approaches to the treatment of their medical conditions.”

    The statement also outlines steps the FDA has taken to push responsible prescribing methods. For example, the FDA released a blueprint for drug manufacturers focusing on how they can educate prescribers. Additionally, the FDA is working with medical professionals to develop resources for clinicians.

    “We need to be mindful of this history, learn from it and make sure that we act aggressively to confront new trends that may continue to fuel the current crisis or lead to a new epidemic of addiction,” Gottlieb explained.

    The FDA also stated that combating the opioid crisis should not involve limiting or banning opioids, but instead has to do with better education about practices.

    “Our goal is to support more rational prescribing practices, as well as identify and encourage development of new treatment options that don’t have the addictive features of opioids,” Gottlieb said in the statement. “In this way, we’ll help ensure that we’re not unnecessarily putting patients as risk of addiction by overprescribing opioids, while also maintaining appropriate access to care for patients with serious pain. In pursuing these goals, we must make sure that patients inform our work.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • News Groups Demand Opioid Distribution Data Be Made Public

    News Groups Demand Opioid Distribution Data Be Made Public

    Media outlets want access to the info to support their coverage of the opioid epidemic and increase public accountability by manufacturers.

    Some of the nation’s top news organizations, including the Washington Post, are demanding that the federal government release information about the sale and distribution of controlled substances by pharmaceutical distributors and manufacturers.

    The information, which is part of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) federal opioid distribution database, was turned over as potential evidence in the hundreds of lawsuits filed against pharmaceutical companies for their alleged role in the national opioid crisis.

    The media outlets want access to the information to support their coverage of the opioid epidemic and increase public accountability by manufacturers.

    As the Associated Press reported, the government consented to submit opioid distribution data culled from 2006 to 2014 from its registry to these lawsuits, but with the requirement that it only be used for legal and law enforcement purposes.  

    But on July 9, 2018, lawyers for the Washington Post and HD Media, which owns West Virginia’s Charleston Gazette-Mail, filed a request in a Cleveland federal court for release of the records. The Associate Press, along with other news groups, has also requested access to the information.

    “Where releasing records would merely bring embarrassment or adverse publicity to a corporation or a government agency, the records must be disclosed,” wrote Post lawyer Karen Lofton in a court filing on July 9. “In this case, disclosure of the distribution data would cause no conceivable harm to patients or other innocent individuals. If anything, their interests would be advanced by the public accountability that would be demanded in the wake of such disclosures.”

    Pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors are opposed to a public release of the information, as is the government, which argued in a court filing in June that making public the database information would have a negative impact on not only the companies’ distribution methods, but also criminal investigations and state public record laws.

    But lawyers countered by pointing to a 2016 article by the Gazette-Mail that revealed that drug companies made available more than 700 million pills to West Virginia residents between 2007 and 2012, a period in which more than 1,700 individuals in the state died from opioid overdoses.

    The Gazette-Mail obtained the information from drug shipping sales records sent by the DEA to West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrissey’s office and made public by a West Virginia district judge.

    The lawyers presented the decision to release the information and the story that resulted as a prime example of why the national distribution data should be made public.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • A-Bombs & Bruno Mars: DEA Releases 2018 Drug Slang Guidebook

    A-Bombs & Bruno Mars: DEA Releases 2018 Drug Slang Guidebook

    The unclassified guidebook is intended to help law enforcement personnel navigate the lingo used to refer to drugs.

    High Times has noted, with no small degree of amusement, that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), has issued the 2018 edition of its handbook “Slang Terms and Code Words: A Reference for Law Enforcement Personnel,” which presents both new and evergreen terms for drugs and related issues, including sales, measurements and geographical locations.

    According to the National Drug Early Warning System, a research group funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the unclassified guidebook is intended to assist law enforcement personnel in navigating the myriad of slang terms used to refer to drugs.

    The 2018 edition is laid out in a manner similar to the 2017 guidebook, which presented long-standing terms with newer ones in italics, but adds a cross-referenced alphabetical list, which boosts the page count to 125—several times larger than the seven-page 2017 edition.

    According to the High Times report, marijuana has the largest single entry in the listing, incorporating both widely known terms like “pot” and “reefer” with more obscure and enduring terminology like “cheeba,” “dank” and “Acapulco Gold.”

    Among the 2018 additions are “A-bomb,” which is used to describe marijuana mixed with heroin; “manteca” (a relatively venerable term with Afro-Cuban heritage reaching back to the 1940s) to; “green crack” and “greenhouse,” and “bionic,” which is marijuana mixed with PCP.

    Several strains of marijuana also make the list, including Tangie OG—spelled Tangy OG in the guide—Girl Scout Cookies and Train Wreck.

    Synthetic cannabinoids also enjoy a diverse lexicon, ranging from “kush” and “spice” to what the guide labels as newer brand names like “Bombay Blue” and “Yucatan Fire,” while marijuana concentrates/hash oil—a new listing for 2017—are a similar mix of established nomenclature (“dabs”) and terms well known in marijuana culture and less so among law enforcement (“rosin,” “bubble hash”).

    Cocaine and heroin both sport their own substantial lists, with “chicanitas,” “comida dulce” and “puma” among the former’s new terms (though the DEA has apparently never heard of the pungent “Booger Sugar” prior to this list) and “chocolate shake,” “churro negro” and “huera” currently trending, so to speak, for heroin.

    “Goofballs”—a Beat Generation term used to describe heroin mixed with methamphetamine—also appears to have been revived for the 2018 list.

    Substances like steroids (“Arnolds,” “gym candy”), PCP (“Ashy Larry”), mescaline (“love flip,” when mixed with ecstasy) and GBH (“Bruno Mars”) each merit a listing, as do measurements—one kilogram has apparently been referred to as a “can of paint” or “pillow”—and the cities of Los Angeles (Los Shorts) and New York (Towers or Up Top).

    A lengthy list of miscellaneous terms for very specific activities is also included, (i.e., Coordinates of Maritime Rendezvous Sites and Smuggling Route are “Las Dirrecciones”). The guidebook concludes with a massive alphabetical list for easier reference.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Prescription Opioid Use And Its Connection To The Criminal Justice System

    Prescription Opioid Use And Its Connection To The Criminal Justice System

    A new study examined the link between people with a history of prescription opioid use and their involvement with the criminal justice system. 

    Individuals with a history of opioid use are up to 13 times more likely to be involved in some manner with law enforcement or justice system officials, including arrest, parole or probation.

    Those are the conclusions suggested by a new study that explored what NPR described as the “intersection of the criminal justice system and the ongoing opioid epidemic.”

    Data from more than 78,000 respondents to a national survey on drug use found that prescription opioid users were more likely to have some involvement with the criminal justice system than those with no history of opioid use; opioid users were also more likely to suffer from chronic health issues and have higher susceptibility to overdose upon release from the prison system.

    The study authors also suggested that greater access to alternatives to incarceration or treatment within the prison system could have a significant impact on lowering these rates.

    The study, conducted by researchers from New York University, the University of Colorado School of Medicine and Kaiser Permanente’s Institute for Health Research, among other institutions, examined information culled by the National Survey on Drug and Use and Health from 78,976 respondents—all U.S. residents between the ages of 18 and 64—including substance use, socioeconomic status and health.

    Involvement with the criminal justice system was defined by three criteria: whether the respondent had been recently arrested, released on parole or placed on probation.

    The data suggested that only 3% of the general population with no history of opioid use—prescription or other forms, like heroin—fell into those three categories.

    However, 20% of respondents who said that they had a dependency on prescription opioids and 40% of those who reported using heroin had some level of involvement with the criminal justice system.

    The data also revealed that individuals reporting opioid use or dependency were more likely to have some form of health issue, whether a mental illness or chronic health conditions like asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    Using this information, the researchers opined that the criminal justice system needed greater involvement in providing treatment for individuals with opioid dependency.

    They noted that many prison systems do not offer medication-assisted treatment (MAT), which has been regarded as the most effective means of treating opioid issues by several studies.

    Individuals in the criminal justice system who do not receive some form of treatment are more likely to experience a lower tolerance to opioids and in turn, a greater chance of overdose upon release, according to 2012 research conducted with former inmates.

    Study lead author Tyler Winkelman, a clinician-investigator at Hennepin Healthcare in Minneapolis, also suggested that placing individuals in treatment facilities instead of jails may prove more effective in breaking the cycle of dependency and incarceration. “We need a response that will ideally prevent people from entering the criminal justice system,” he noted.

    The NPR coverage cited a 2016 study, which reviewed rates of death by overdose among inmates exiting the Rhode Island Department of Corrections after it began a medication-assisted treatment program for its prison population. The study suggested that overdose deaths dropped by nearly 61% among that demographic—an “unheard of” drop in mortality rates, according to study author Josiah Rich, a professor of medicine and epidemiology at Brown University.

    “At this point of the epidemic, we can’t afford to not put people on treatment,” he added.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Artie Lange: Howard Stern "Did Not Understand Addiction"

    Artie Lange: Howard Stern "Did Not Understand Addiction"

    The comedian opened up about addiction, alcoholism and his relationship with former boss Howard Stern on an episode of the Dopey Podcast.

    Artie Lange, best known for his gig as the “everyman” sidekick on The Howard Stern Show, recently opened up about how addiction destroyed his relationship with the legendary shock jock.

    Lange’s struggle with substance abuse has been lengthy and highly publicized. Over the years, the troubled comedian has routinely bottomed out while in the spotlight, ranging from canceled stand-up appearances to his suicide attempt in 2010.

    He’s also had his police mugshot taken a number of times during his career, including three arrests in 2017 alone. Still, perhaps the most infamous fallout from Lange’s demons remains his firing from Stern at the end of 2009—a blow that clearly casts a long shadow across Lange’s career. 

    Guesting on the Dopey Podcast, Lange revealed just how unmanageable his life had become in 2009 thanks to cocaine, heroin, pills and booze. Despite seeing the root of his problems, Lange’s behavior ended his otherwise wildly popular run on the radio show.

    Even worse than his addled on-air appearances, Lange suggested, was the uncomfortable position he had put Stern in.

    “Howard did not understand addiction. He gave me the best job ever and he is a genius,” he affirmed on the podcast. “I was on the show for over eight years, but towards the end I was a complete addict.”

    Lange likened his relationship with Stern to “a son-and-dad kind of thing,” which potentially made Stern’s decision to fire the comedian more complicated.

    Lange also disclosed that he was earning $4 million a year from The Howard Stern Show, in addition to a variety of other opportunities, such as a starring role in the 2006 comedy Beer League.  

    Shortly after being let go from Stern, Lange’s drug problems and depression worsened. In 2010, he attempted suicide. And while Lange eventually recovered from the incident, it’s obvious that he hasn’t entirely gotten over being fired from the highly-rated program.

    In recent months, Lange has even taken to blasting his former boss on social media, threatening to post Stern’s private phone number online. Interestingly, as Lange continues to escalate the feud, he doesn’t fault Stern when it comes to comprehending the true depths of his addiction.

    “He didn’t know the extent of it. There’s no way he could’ve,” he told Uproxx. Lange added that even though Stern couldn’t grasp just how far gone the comedian was, he tried to get Lange the help he so desperately needed.

    Stern even connected him with a therapist, put him into a treatment center, and encouraged him to take all the time he needed to find sobriety.

    During the podcast interview, though, Lange indicated that Stern’s efforts were as generous as they were futile. Lange was straightforward and serious about the reality of his addictions, admitting that he might soon relapse and never find long-term sobriety.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • How One Rural Community Is Fighting to Save Lives from Drug Overdose

    How One Rural Community Is Fighting to Save Lives from Drug Overdose

    “I don’t want another parent to pick out a casket. I don’t want another grandparent to have to look a grandchild in the eye and say ‘your momma is gone.’”

    The Driftwood Motel on Oak Island, North Carolina, has seen better days. All around it, pastel-colored vacation homes with kitschy names like After Dune Delight reel in tourists with promises of beachfront sunsets and shaded hammocks by the pier. Though the Driftwood Motel is also painted in cheerful pastels, the paint is flaking off in dry strips and littering the ground next to cigarette butts and busted beer bottles. Rhonda C. lives on the bottom floor of the Driftwood with her bed, couch and kitchen furniture crammed into a room with dark sheets that cover the windows. She is one of the motel’s many long-term residents – people drawn in by the $100 a week price tag who end up staying far longer than they had planned. A gray-haired, matronly woman, Rhonda looks after the other residents, especially the young ones who drift in and out in various stages of inebriation. She hadn’t been able to offer them much, until she met Margaret Bordeaux.

    Margaret is a petite, African American woman, quiet and unassuming until you get to know her fiery side. As an outreach worker for the North Carolina Harm Reduction Coalition, Margaret runs a mobile harm reduction unit in Brunswick County, a sparsely populated rural community hugging North Carolina’s Southeast coast. Brunswick is also one of the counties hardest hit by drug-related deaths in the state. At least once a week Margaret drives its lonely roads, seeking out places like the Driftwood Motel that collect people who have lost every other home. Thanks to a grant from the Aetna Foundation to combat the opioid epidemic, Margaret has a van stocked with supplies to help reduce drug-related death and disease. She gives out naloxone (a medicine that reverses overdose from opioids such as heroin, fentanyl, and prescription painkillers), syringes, and other resources, and she teaches people how to prevent, recognize and respond to an overdose.

    “I make friends and develop relationships in Brunswick County,” says Margaret. “Many of the people I’ve met here thought that naloxone and clean syringes were magical things only available in [cities]. No one has been coming out here to offer these services until now.”

    Some people are wary when Margaret first pulls up because they have been treated poorly by health care workers and aren’t accustomed to a warm, non-judgmental person offering them free services. But after a few visits, Margaret wins them over.

    “My whole life I have rooted for the underdog and the underserved,” says Margaret. “I want to care for people that society doesn’t care for. People use superficial reasons to ignore each other and I want to remove those reasons and say, hey, there is a person here.”

    Kathy Williams is one of the people whose lives Margaret has touched. A middle-aged, Caucasian woman with a defiant personality, Kathy’s backstory is the stuff of nightmares. She raised two kids as a single mom, Josh and Kirby. As an adult, Josh married a wonderful woman and had two children. Kirby struggled with drug use, and whenever she hit a rough spot, Josh and his wife would take her in and help her get back on her feet. But in 2011, Josh’s car was t-boned by a school bus. He, his wife, and both their young children died in the crash. The loss hit Kirby hard. Her drug use escalated and five years later, she too died of a drug overdose.

    Kathy tells this story completely dry-eyed. It’s as though she has endured so much pain that nothing can faze her anymore. These days she is raising her 14-year-old grandson, Kirby’s child, and also caring for her own aging parents. She is also one of the founding members of B.A.C.K. O.F.F., an organization of Brunswick County families who are fed up with losing their loved ones to drugs. What started as a support group in March 2017 has morphed into an organization with a mission to educate people about the realities of drug use and to help save lives.

    “A mother is not supposed to bury her child,” says Kathy. “I don’t want another parent to pick out a casket. I don’t want another grandparent to have to look a grandchild in the eye and say ‘your momma is gone.’”

    B.A.C.K. O.F.F., which stands for Bringing Addiction Crisis Knowledge, Offering Families Focus, makes and distributes overdose prevention kits containing naloxone to families with a loved one who uses opioids. They also spread awareness about North Carolina’s 911 Good Samaritan law, which protects people from prosecution if they seek medical assistance for an overdose. B.A.C.K. O.F.F. members provide community, resources and support for families impacted by drugs and offer space for honest talk about drug use. No denial, no sugarcoating, no pithy slogans about just saying no. Real talk from real families caught in the same struggle. But not everyone is willing to speak up.

    Elsewhere in Brunswick County, Alex Murillo has been trying to convince Hispanic parents who have lost child to drug poisoning to get involved in B.A.C.K. O.F.F. It hasn’t been easy.

    “Many Hispanics here deny that drug use is happening in their families,” says Alex, who recently lost his 19-year-old nephew to overdose. “If a parent loses a child to overdose, they say they died in their sleep. No one wants to talk about it.”

    A tall, dimpled man with a perpetual smile, Alex’s cheerful demeanor hides a tragic history. Alex is originally from Mexico. When he was brutally raped at 12 years old, his parents threw him out of the house, claiming he deserved to be raped because he “acted gay.” At 15 years old, Alex married a girl, but the marriage made him so miserable that he decided to come to the United States where he hoped to be able to express himself more freely. At the border he was apprehended by a human trafficking cartel and forced into sex slavery.

    “They forced me to take drugs. They beat me and pimped me out,” he says. “I was so shocked. I didn’t think things like that happened in the U.S.”

    Alex eventually escaped. He tried to join a church community but was turned away after admitting he was gay. He attempted suicide, but his brother found him passed out from a bottle of sleeping pills and took him to the hospital. When Alex woke days later, his attitude on life had changed.

    “I was surprised to be alive,” he says. “But I realized that I was still here for a reason and I decided to dedicate my life to helping other people.”

    Today Alex owns a small Hispanic tienda in Brunswick County where he offers help to anyone who comes to his doorstep, whether they are seeking food, advice, or help paying rent. Every year he hosts a multicultural festival in his store parking lot, though other Brunswick County residents have threatened to shut it down because they are unhappy with the area’s growing diversity. He is also happily married to his husband, who works in the store and supports Alex’s outreach efforts. Alex hopes to become more involved in educating the Hispanic community about drugs.

    “We can’t just ignore this problem. The drugs are in our schools. They are everywhere,” says Alex. “We need to do more outreach to the Hispanic community to teach them how to talk about drugs with their kids. They can’t just tell kids not to do drugs. Kids see their friends doing it and they want to try too. We need to have honest conversations as a community.”

    Margaret, Kathy and Alex may be an unlikely team, but together they are working to bring resources and hope to a county that has suffered devastating loss. Little by little, their efforts are making a difference. Margaret has helped people enter drug treatment programs and reconnect with family members where ties had been severed. Alex is making headway on opening up conversations about drugs in the Hispanic community. B.A.C.K. O.F.F. provides Kathy with an outlet to teach families how to help their loved ones who use drugs.

    “I used to look at a person who uses drugs as an addict, but now I look at them as someone’s brother, son or family member,” says Kathy. “I feel that if we had had these tools like naloxone, overdose education, and a support group years ago, my daughter might still be alive today.”

    At a small Mexican diner where we meet for lunch, I ask Kathy what her message is to people in rural communities impacted by drugs. For a moment, she is quiet. Finally she says:

    “I want people to know they are not alone. You might think you are alone, but there are so many of us going through the same thing. We can hold each other up.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • How Mindfulness Can Help Us Beat the Attention Economy

    How Mindfulness Can Help Us Beat the Attention Economy

    How Mindfulness Can Help Us Beat the Attention Economy

    In 2007, history was made. Steve Jobs unveiled the very first iPhone, complete with touchscreen and internet capabilities. And at the same time, a new commodity became more important than ever. And no, we’re not talking about cryptocurrency. The smartphone revolution accelerated a phenomenon that is known today as the attention economy.

    What is the attention economy?

    The attention economy is an approach to marketing and advertising that acknowledges how we must compete for a consumer’s attention to encourage them to buy or an engage with a product. It is not new, only accelerated as our technical prowess and the digital distractions around us have increased. In fact, in Designing Organisations for an Information Rich World in 1969, political scientist Herbert A. Simon summarised the link between an overload of information and our attention spans as:

    “…in an information-rich world, the wealth of information means a dearth of something else: a scarcity of whatever it is that information consumes. What information consumes is rather obvious: it consumes the attention of its recipients.”

    Smartphone or Slot Machine?

    As multiple digital distractions in the form of social notifications, emails, texts and app alerts chip away at our attention spans, the brains driving Silicon Valley must think of new ways to keep us hooked. This is because despite our belief that multitasking is both positive and possible, humans can only efficiently focus on one task at a time. This is also confirmed by Simon who states, “Human beings, like contemporary computers, are essentially serial devices. They can attend to only one thing at a time.”

    In the race to win our attention, tech companies design new tricks to encourage us to develop habits and crave ‘variable rewards’. One example is the act of swiping down to refresh social feeds to reveal new messages and posts – much like a slot machine. Another is the act of receiving likes and feeling positive about yourself or socially accepted. Or, not receiving them and constantly craving this ‘good’ feeling.

    Beating the Attention Economy with Mindfulness

    There has been recent talk of a smartphone dystopia forming among some previous employees of Silicon Valley. This includes those who helped engineer the very features that we find so addictive. For example, former Google employee Tristan Harris is famously quoted saying, “All of our minds can be hijacked. Our choices are not as free as we think they are”. He now advocates change in tech companies to protect minds from “nefarious manipulation”.


    Crucially, he highlights how we view technology from one-side: “When using technology, we often focus optimistically on all the things it does for us”. He reminds us that when we check our devices it is rarely an act of consciousness. So, what’s the answer as a consumer? We will ultimately continue buying smartphones, engage socially and professionally online and download as many apps as our storage allows for. Perhaps, the question then becomes how do we lessen the chances of our minds being hijacked? We can choose to use mindfulness to make more conscious decisions around tech time. We can actively try to understand when the addictive tendencies of our always-on culture are having a detrimental effect on our health and happiness. An engagement with mindfulness takes us from passive, ever-scrolling smartphone zombies to knowing when we need to switch off.

    Mindful.org summarises mindfulness as “the basic human ability to be fully present, aware of where we are and what we’re doing, and not overly reactive or overwhelmed by what’s going on around us.” So, the next time you reach for your phone, ask yourself if you are making a conscious decision or taking a turn on the slot machine. After spending time scrolling on your social feeds, reflect on how you feel – are you experiencing FOMO? Are you comparing yourself to others you see online? What does your breathing feel like? If the results are surprising, it might be time for a digital detox.

    View the original article at itstimetologoff.com

  • Non-Profit Launches Foster Care Program For Kids Affected By Opioid Crisis

    Non-Profit Launches Foster Care Program For Kids Affected By Opioid Crisis

    The Georgia-based program is “designed to help children from newborns to the age of 21 years find a loving home.”

    A Georgia nonprofit called Christian City Children’s Village has plans to begin its own foster care system due to the alarming number of children being left parentless at the hands of the opioid crisis.

    According to a media release on the organization’s website, foster care needs in the state have increased 100% in the past five years, bringing the total number of children to more than 15,000. 

    In February, Christian City introduced the Crossroads Foster Care & Adoption Program, which provides “private and public foster care, foster-to-adoption and public adoption” for children within a 50-mile radius of Union City, Georgia.

    “We wanted to respond to this issue by increasing the number of loving homes available to children in foster care and that is when we decided to launch the Crossroads program,” Len Romano, President & CEO of Christian City, said in the release.

    The program serves newborns to age 21 and provides training, home studies, support and access to the Christian City thrift store for families that are interested in adoption or foster care.

    According to the website, the program is “designed to find and equip wonderful families for children in need of a loving home… Permanency is the ultimate goal for each child through either reunification with the child’s birth family or adoption.”

    “We offer a crisis program for the foster child and adoptive parents. If a caregiver reports to us the child is under distress when acclimating to their new environment, we bring the child back onto the Christian City Children’s Village campus for 48 hours. Here, we give the child the attention and any skills they may need to help them reintegrate into their new home,” Michaela Guthrie, Program Executive for the Crossroads Foster Care and Adoption Program, said in the media release.

    Beginning July 1, Christian City started a contract with the state of Georgia to assist the Georgia Division of Family and Children Services (DFCS) in placing children in appropriate foster or adoptive homes.

    In other words, CBS46 states, children from the DFCS can be referred to the Crossroads Foster Care & Adoption Program. 

    “A lot of children who come into the foster care system have faced various types of trauma, whether it be abuse or neglect,” Guthrie told CBS46. “So, we really want to make sure that the families that will be taking care of them from this point in time and maybe a forever home.”

    View the original article at thefix.com