Category: Addiction News

  • Are Health Insurers Driving The Opioid Crisis?

    Are Health Insurers Driving The Opioid Crisis?

    While the brunt of the negative attention has focused on drug suppliers and prescribers, experts are now examining the role that insurers have played in the epidemic.

    Health insurers could be stoking the opioid epidemic, according to a new study published Friday in the journal JAMA Network Open.

    “Our findings suggest that both public and private insurers, at least unwittingly, have contributed importantly to the epidemic,” said study senior author Dr. G. Caleb Alexander, an associate professor in the Bloomberg School’s Department of Epidemiology.

    That’s based on a 2017 analysis of 15 Medicaid plans, 15 Medicare plans and 20 private insurers, which revealed that many aren’t applying evidence-based “utilization management” rules that could cut down on opioid overuse.

    “Opioids are just one tool in the pain management tool box, and unfortunately, many of the plans that we examined didn’t have well-developed policies in place to limit their overuse,” Alexander said. 

    The study comes even as a long-term uptick in opioid-related deaths has pushed dozens of states, counties, and cities to launch lawsuits against drug companies and distributors that make and provide the addictive prescription painkillers fueling the overdose crisis. 

    For the most part, the brunt of the negative attention has focused on drug suppliers and prescribers rather than on insurers, but the new findings by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health probes what roles insurance plans could play in the epidemic.

    The researchers identified specific utilization management tools that insurers may not be relying on enough, such as restricting the quantity of drugs doctors can prescribe, requiring prior authorization or mandating that providers begin with less risky drug alternatives. 

    Quantity limits are commonly used for opioids—but those limits might still be higher than they should be, the researchers found. Generally, insurers capped scripts at a 30-day supply instead of the shorter limit recommended by the CDC

    Across all the plans studied in Medicare, Medicaid and commercial insurers, doctors typically weren’t required to start with less addictive alternatives like over-the-counter NSAIDs before doling out more powerful opioids.

    A median of just 9% of the covered opioids in Medicaid plans required doctors to start with something less risky first, the researchers found. For commercial plans, the median number was around 4%. Medicare plans typically had almost no so-called “step therapy” requirement. 

    The majority of opioid prescriptions didn’t require prior authorization, which is when the prescriber has to call the insurer for approval before writing the prescription. Some insurers, however, have begun putting such policies in place for patients with chronic, non-cancer pain. 

    “Insurers can either be part of the problem, or part of the solution,” Alexander said. “The good news is that an increasing number of health plans are recognizing their contribution to the epidemic and developing new policies to address it. The bad news is that we have a very long way to go.”

    The analysis comes on the heels of a 2017 deep-dive by the New York Times and ProPublica, which found that many insurers limited access to less addictive —but more expensive—alternatives. 

    “This is not a hypothetical problem,” Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Maryland), later wrote in a letter to insurance companies. “In my home state of Maryland, 550 people died of an overdose in the first three months of 2017 alone. Synthetic opioids like fentanyl are driving up the epidemic’s death toll, but prescription opioids contribute significantly to this crisis by fostering addiction and causing fatal overdoses.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Selma Blair Celebrates Two Years Of Sobriety

    Selma Blair Celebrates Two Years Of Sobriety

    “I prayed for a miracle at my lowest points. I am a living miracle. Thank you,” the actress wrote in an Instagram post.

    Actress Selma Blair had two reasons to celebrate this week: her 46th birthday as well as her second year of sobriety.

    Blair, who has starred in films including Hellboy and Legally Blonde, took to Instagram to announce her achievement.

    “2 years sober. 2 years feeling everything and nothing. 2 years of extreme gratitude and humility and grace,” she wrote in her post, which included a photograph of herself with a birthday cake. “I thank the lord and my friends. Thank you for the most special birthday week @fran.anania #amypines #arthursaintbleick.”

    Just last month, Blair admitted to having struggled with alcoholism, anxiety, and depression, but has been winning in her struggles as of late.

    “I prayed for a miracle at my lowest points. I am a living miracle. Thank you. Thank you. #birthdaygirl #almost46 #summersolstice #grace,” she wrote in her post.

    Blair hasn’t hid her struggles with depression and anxiety from fans. In a throwback post she wrote in May, she reflected on her career in Hollywood, including the highs and the lows.

    “For better or for worse. I want to have hope again. I want to thank you all for believing in me. I want to find the right work for me. And for me as a mom and as a woman who has come so far in personal ways,” she wrote in her May post. “I want to make us all proud. 21 years later. #heartonsleeve Opens a New Window. It’s a random Tuesday. Maybe miracles will happen.”

    The Cruel Intentions star once had a meltdown on an airplane flight, allegedly brought on by mixing medications with alcohol.

    “I made a big mistake yesterday,” said Blair after the incident. “After a lovely trip with my son and his dad, I mixed alcohol with medication, and that caused me to black out and led me to say and do things that I deeply regret.”

    A few months after the incident, Blair gained some new perspective on the incident.

    “Hopefully everyone on the plane is doing fine now too, because it was very destructive,” she said on The Talk. “I am someone who should never drink, and I rarely do, and I don’t drink anymore, but I was going through something. I had a glass of wine and someone gave me a pill that I thought was something that I’d taken before… it was something completely different… and I had a total psychotic blackout.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Korn's Jonathan Davis Talks Addiction: "Benzos Are The Devil"

    Korn's Jonathan Davis Talks Addiction: "Benzos Are The Devil"

    “I’ve dealt with anxiety for a long-ass time. I got prescribed Xanax, benzodiazepine, a long time ago. Benzos are the f—ing devil. They’re horrible drugs.”

    Jonathan Davis, the frontman of the metal band Korn, puts his struggles with drugs and anxiety front and center in a song on his debut solo album, Black Labyrinth.

    In a new interview with Forbes, he spoke frankly about how attempting to treat his anxiety with drugs like Xanax led him to a dark place.

    “I’ve dealt with anxiety for a long-ass time. I got prescribed Xanax, benzodiazepine, a long time ago. Benzos are the f—ing devil. They’re horrible drugs,” he explained. “They feel good at the moment and are a quick fix to get you out of a panic attack, but they’re not designed to be taken long-term—especially Xanax.”

    His song on the album, “Medicate,” is about kicking the benzo dependency he developed.

    “I started taking it for anxiety. I’d take a piece in the morning and a piece at night, then go to bed. You start to build up a resistance,” he recounted. “Two years later and I was trying to kick it. The song is about me dealing with common regrets, that I need this pill to be happy or stay sane.”

    Getting off it was difficult—and dangerous.

    “I started off taking 0.25 milligrams of it, and eventually I got up to 2 milligrams, that’s one bar a day. And eventually I got up to two bars a day later down the road,” he told Forbes. “But the first time I kicked it, I was doing a bar a day, and I slowly weaned down. Which, you cannot function. And if you don’t do it correctly, if you just stop cold turkey off of it, you can go into seizures and die.”

    Nowadays, Davis is living completely sober, and getting high in a different way—sensory deprivation at the center of the Ganzfield experiment.

    “It’s a drug-free hallucination,” Davis says. “You’re staring into your subconscious. To me, it proved that there’s something different out there than what we’ve been taught about God. You see colors and shapes. It’s like you’re staring at the inside of your brain.”

    He also calms himself down with video games, music, and spending time with his children. His band seems to have caught the clean-living bug, too.

    “We just all independently faced our demons. There’s not really any drinking going on in the band anymore,” Davis explained. “It happens, every band that’s been doing it this long. Eventually you need to stop, or you’re gonna die. Everybody got through it their own way.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Is It Time To Ditch The Dating Apps?

    Is It Time To Ditch The Dating Apps?

    Is It Time To Ditch The Dating Apps?

    There was a time, somewhere near 2012, where mobile dating apps like Tinder represented something of a revolution. There were three problems in the online dating market; stigma, accessibility and  unrestricted messaging. The first two meant that many people wouldn’t even sign up in the first place, the last one meant that those who did were quickly driven away. If you were a man, you might have to send hundreds of messages a day to get just one response. If you were a woman, you could be met with an overwhelming deluge of unwanted messages.

    Mobile datings apps set out to solve these problems. They were easy to set up, it was an essentially free product and you had to actually match with someone before you could message. And so the three biggest problems with web-based online dating were eliminated in a stroke. Tinder was introduced to west coast college sororities and fraternities, and it soon spread rapidly. Within two years of its initial release there were 1 billion swipes on the app, producing twelve million matches and the average user was spending ninety minutes on it every day.

    Tinder’s Golden Age

    Around the same time, smartphones got a whole lot better, and 4G connectivity meant you could swipe wherever you fancied. I remember spending entire evenings with my late twenty-something housemates, all of us in need of a partner, swiping away on our phones together – occasionally celebrating when the chime of a match came in.

    Did it actually lead to dates? Yes, certainly. Around 2014 I remember using the app and meeting matches whom I wouldn’t have normally have been able to meet (or more likely charm) through my normal method of heading to bars and nightclubs in London. A few fizzled out quickly. Some were early examples of ‘ghosting‘- the practice of going silent rather than letting the other partner know you don’t want meet up again – but I moved on, because you could always meet someone else quite quickly with Tinder.

    Over a few years a couple blossomed into relationships. I have to say that as it goes, Tinder worked, and not primarily for the ‘hook-up’ culture it’s been renowned for. A few of my friends got into long term relationships from it.

    Behaviour Change

    But somewhere along this journey something began to change. It might just have been something to do with getting a little older – people get busier, want something more serious, and other things associated with more responsibility in your early 30s. But people’s behaviour when using dating apps just seemed to get a lot worse.

    I would regularly go through the process of having interesting and pleasant chats with people, arranging a drink, only for them to disappear when it came to the final arrangements. After a while, ghosting became the norm. It seemed like far more people were happy to adopt behaviour that had been seen as harsh just a couple of years before.

    Why was this? It’s difficult to know for certain, but I have a few hunches. The rosy early days of online dating – where people were giddily using the apps to actually meet people – seem to have passed. Singletons now accept dating apps as part of life, and one that can present a limitless range of prospective partners. But actually meeting up seems to be the exception, not the rule.

    So Many Options… So Little Time

    Added to this is a kind of dating fatigue; people have been on just enough bad dates to make them think that being nice is a waste of time. The lack of a real-world connection with matches means they can easily be cut off without feeling guilty. No point wasting ten minutes getting into a debate as to why it’s not working, or why you don’t want to meet up – just cut them loose or block them. If they are just one of many you are messaging then there are no emotional strings attached.

    This leads to a kind of catch-22 of a situation. People might converse with as many matches as they can, only for those matches to do exactly the same. Because all people are always aspiring to meet those they are most attracted to, people are prepared to drop conversations in an instant if they think they can meet someone they are just a bit more attracted to. Dating apps have given people so many options, that they’ve made people just too ‘busy’ to actually meet all the other people that they converse with.

    And with the whole process of app dating comes a massive time sap of distraction and attention, that is hard to match within anything in real life. Maybe it’s time to put the phone down and think of some alternatives?

    View the original article at itstimetologoff.com

  • Will Apple and Google really fix our internet addiction?

    Will Apple and Google really fix our internet addiction?

    Will Apple and Google really fix our internet addiction?

    Digital detox hit the news this week, with Apple the somewhat unlikely creators of a new feature that might help users monitor and spend less time on the very devices they produce. This comes just a few weeks after Google announced similar functionality, and potentially demonstrates a change in attitude from the two tech giants in the way they approach the issue of tech and internet addiction. Is this a step away from the stance that technology can and should be used to help with anything and everything in life, towards a more balanced outlook where we accept that we can in fact have too much of a good thing?

    Apple’s unveiling at their recent conference was of their new app Screen Time. According to the Apple website, it will “help customers understand and take control of the time they spend interacting with their iOS devices.” Specifically, the Screen Time app will include detailed activity reports, and allow users to set limits for the amount of time they spend on the various apps they use.

    Google’s equivalent offering is ‘Digital Wellbeing’ and on the surface, it seems very similar to Screen Time. The way in which usage data is presented and displayed is almost identical with user-friendly dashboards that let you get a detailed view on where you’re spending your time.

    Perhaps the biggest difference in the two apps is the forcefulness in approach they take to the internet addiction issue if a user does indeed go over their allocated app time. In the Beta version of Screen Time, Apple’s app merely sends you a notification that you can choose to ignore. On the other hand, Google’s Beta app seems to temporarily blur out the phone screen; something that can only be overcome with a hard app reset.

    Google have also created a hub for their Digital Wellbeing proposition, where they say; “We’re creating tools and features that help people better understand their tech usage, focus on what matters most, disconnect when needed, and create healthy habits for the whole family.” The focus on family is driven home throughout the new hub page, and its in this approach where the app could really play a beneficial part in digital detoxing. One feature Family Link allows parents to manage the device usage of their kids, and even helps you find what Google describe as ‘nutritious content’. Google WiFi will let you schedule internet breaks, or block inappropriate content more intelligently.

    In the launch of Screen Time Apple also put emphasis on the benefits the new app could have for parents: “Parents can access their child’s Activity Report right from their own iOS devices to understand where their child spends their time and can manage and set App Limits for them.” The benefits of this approach could in fact offer a non-intrusive way for parents to keep their children’s screen usage in check and consequently improve family life.

    Perhaps the question which needs to be raised is whether fighting tech with more tech is really the answer? The curious ironies of these spate of announcements have certainly raised a few eyebrows, and a cynic could argue that tech companies are simply leaping on the digital detox trend as a way of retaining users, countering internet addiction fears and increasing hardware sales. However, the fact that tech giants are taking any position on the internet addiction issue has to be positive one. After all, it’s no secret that there are increasing concerns that products that Apple and Google release are having a negative effect on their users’ mental wellbeing.

    So two of the world’s tech giants are starting to have a look at the world they have created and tackle a problem in the only way they know how. These features may not be the answer to the world’s over connected issues, but they are undoubtedly a (small) step in the right direction. If two of the biggest tech companies in the world are thinking about digital detox, then this might just make a few others focus on it too.

    View the original article at itstimetologoff.com

  • How Social Media Outrage Is Turning Us All Into Keyboard Warriors

    How Social Media Outrage Is Turning Us All Into Keyboard Warriors

    How Social Media Outrage Is Turning Us All Into Keyboard Warriors

    Go to the Facebook page of any newspaper and browse the comments of a few posts. It won’t be a pretty sight. It won’t take long to find complaints about how the quality of journalism is going down, that the article is wrong, or that the poster just doesn’t like the person or people being covered. But a step down from this litany of low-level complaints is something much uglier – a steady stream of outrage.

    Emotion is a big driver for online content sharing. People mostly share things online because they’ve stirred something up in them, and the main attribute of an emotional driver is that it must be high-arousal. To some degree that explains why we share things we find funny, like Grumpy Cat, or awesome, like an article about an amazing scientific discovery.

    Humour and awe are high arousal emotions that are usually positive. But positive emotions do not necessarily travel any better than negativity, and a key emotion on the negative side of the spectrum is outrage. Indeed, a 2013 study by Beihang University found that outrage was more likely to be shared on Chinese social network Weibo than positive high-arousal emotions.

    Why Outrage is Easier Online

    The more impersonal aspects of social media make expressing outrage all the easier. Offline, expressions of outrage are often constrained by the proximity from the wrong doer. If you are alone on a street in London and see someone urinating against a wall, there is considerable risk in either calling them out publicly there and then or recording their actions for later public shaming.

    Proximity on social media is removed – the outrage can be expressed from anywhere, at any time after the wrong doing, so there is little risk. In real life, the shamer will quickly be able to see if the shamed is sorry from their reaction, which may halt further expressions of outrage.

    But proximity is absent from someone’s online profile, someone can only respond when they log back in, and even then, their feelings about their behaviour are only likely to be expressed impersonally to a crowd. Additionally, because people can join the weight of an online ‘movement’ or mob, they can easily hide amongst an echo chamber of similar voices.

    Discussion Becomes Impossible

    Amongst the heavy weight of moral outrage, discussion is nearly impossible. Emotionally-driven and simplified expression drives facts to the point of irrelevance, making debate incredibly circular. It inevitably descends through predictable stages of irritability, distraction, anxiety of the impending reply, with a common outcome of outrage.

    This is particularly the case if one side of the argument does not properly understand the subject of the discussion and refuses to acknowledge a different point of view. This descent into a hole of increasing extremity has been coined as Godwin’s law, ‘As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.’

    What solutions can be offered in avoiding the whirlpool into outrage? When there’s strong emotion apparent in an online debate, it’s generally better not to get involved. Put your phone down, log off, try and listen to the world around you. Social media can be useful for relationship-building and connectivity – “How are you?” / “What are you up to?” / “Would you like to meet up?” but when you try and debate a contentious point online it will almost certainly go around in circles, wasting your time, attention and emotional energy.

    View the original article at itstimetologoff.com

  • 11 Ways to Guarantee Your Family’s Digital Wellbeing

    11 Ways to Guarantee Your Family’s Digital Wellbeing

    11 Ways to Guarantee Your Family’s Digital Wellbeing

    There’s been a lot written about the importance of digital wellbeing and digital health recently, much of it focused on software tools. But what can parents do by themselves if they want to cut down on family tech time and guarantee digital wellbeing at home? It can be hard to your control tech time as a family, and plenty of us are guilty of slumping down in front of a screen and binge watching box sets on Netflix to unwind (while the kids are on YouTube) – just because it’s easy.

    But using screens for leisure and play time, after a day on screens at school, is having an effect on our children’s mental and physical wellbeing. Technology is a necessary part of our lives – for both children and parents – but it’s important for us to try and bring balance to our technology habits and ensure that we’re taking the time to engage with our children in analogue activities and family time.

    So how can you cut down on your family tech time and build your digital wellbeing? There are plenty of tips to help your kids cut down on device time, but we’ve got 11 ways to help both you and your children log off – as a family – when you need to.

    #1 Be aware of your own habits

    Although it may not seem like they are, your kids are very aware of how much time you spend on screens. With 27% of UK children saying that their parents have double standards about technology, you can’t expect your kids to cut back on their screen time when you’re not following the rules you set.

    #2 Create digital wellbeing rules together

    Both your and your children will be more likely to follow any no-tech rules if they had a say in creating them in the first place. Write up some sensible rules together, as a family. Typically these are things like; no phones during meals, no TVs in the bedroom, phones down after 9pm at night etc.

    #3 Encourage socialising

    Make sure you keep an eye out for activities that encourage your children to be social in person. This can be anything from clubs and sports, to just spending time together as a family chatting about their week. If you can’t convince your kid to spend time with you, suggest activities that are related to their interests or which involve other kids.

    #4 Exercise

    During the rebellious teen years, many children will drop out of school or college sports programmes. However, they may be more inclined to carry on with a sport or fitness activity if you let them decide what they want to do. During this exercise time, they’re less likely to use devices, and you can spend more quality time with them while they practice, e.g. go for a run together, ride your bikes into town.

    #5 Discuss plans face-to-face

    When it comes to establishing family plans for the day, week or month, discuss your plans with the whole family face-to-face rather than reaching for a device. Almost 2 out of 5 UK kids say that their parents communicate with them via messaging apps, email and social media whilst still under the same roof!

    Instead of automatically diving into your family WhatsApp group, you’ll stimulate conversation and cut back on boredom, as well as discover what your family actually wants to do.

    #6 Encourage no-tech role models

    Ed Sheeran, Essana O’Neill and Eddie Redmayne are three high profile celebrities that have been very vocal about how they’ve stepped away from technology. Encourage your kids to look up to them and talk about why they might have decided to cut back on screen time.

    #7 Focus on the positives

    Try and avoid negative words when discussing reducing tech time with your children. Focus instead on positive outcomes, for example ‘family time’ (unless they’re teenagers, in which case that will make them cringe.)

    #8 Ensure that you’re busy

    The devil makes work for idle hands, so make sure yours are busy all the time. Suggest you all carry a book with you (we know, retro, huh?) so that you’re not tempted to mindlessly scroll through your phone when you’re on your morning commutes.

    #9 Don’t go cold turkey

    Make gradual changes to your children’s lives. If you try and take away all tech in one go, you’re more likely to encounter resistance to your plan. Instead, try cutting down on a couple of hours per device at a time.

    #10 Keep screens out of their bedrooms

    Keeping screens out of your kids rooms is a sure fire way to get them downstairs at least – which is when you spring the trap that you’ve got a family activity planned, or just grab them for a chat.

    #11 Stand your ground

    When you first introduce these tips and techniques, it’s inevitable you’ll encounter some arguments. But it’s by standing your ground and being consistent that your kids will remember who’s in charge, you, not their devices!

    View the original article at itstimetologoff.com

    Living in Hampshire and experiencing issues with addiction and/or mental health?

    Rehab 4 Addiction works closely with rehabilitation centres and outpatient clinics throughout the United Kingdom and the admissions team match a patients’ addiction with an appropriately placed rehabilitation centre.

  • What is Nomophobia?

    What is Nomophobia?

    What is Nomophobia?

    Those who are ‘nomophobic’, are arguably those who need a digital detox the most! People that suffer from an overwhelming, crippling, anxiety when their phone has died or has no signal would definitely benefit from some time away from the devices that we all hardly ever go without.

    The term literally means ‘no-mobile-phone-phobia’. As we revealed in an earlier article, research commissioned by Royal Mail and carried out by YouGov in 2008, found that 53% of Brits felt anxious when they “lose their mobile phone, run out of battery or credit, or have no network coverage”. Ten years on, multiple studies have proved that this number is now likely to be significantly higher.

    Given the original purpose of mobile phones, you might think that those suffering from nomophobia would fear missing out on calls and texts the most, but one study by Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking found that the anxiety was actually related to other aspects of using their smartphones. Our phones have essentially become extensions of ourselves; smartphone use is all about the ultra-easy access to content that has become so important to our day-to-day lives, whether this is personal photos saved on the device, or access to friends’ lives and updates through social apps.

    And that’s perhaps a better way to understand nomophobia: the anxiety of being without the phone is not about missing the device itself, but about losing the gateway to the aspect of our lives that the phone connects us to. Our phones offer us a form of escapism, and not having this option to ‘escape’ understandably makes some phone users anxious.

    Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking believe the number of people suffering from nomophobia will only increase as technology becomes more personalised, and as we become more and more reliant upon it. And with children growing up today who haven’t had any other experience but 24:7 access to the online world at the click of a button and a few swipes, it’s easy to see how the number of people suffering from separation anxiety when away from their phones will only go up.

    A 2015 study by American organisation Pew Research Center found yet more compelling evidence for the existence of nomophobia, especially around the theory that smartphones have become an extension of the self. They found young adults heavily rely now on their mobile phones for job seeking, educational content and health information and that 44% of smartphone owners had a problem doing something they needed to do when they didn’t have their phone with them – the biggest proportion of this being around getting directions. So it’s easy to see why they found that 46% of Americans said they believed that they just “couldn’t live without their phones”, and even easier to see how this over-reliance could lead to feelings of nomophobia.

    But it’s not just academics and researchers who have identified the spread of nomophobia. As we’ve written recently, even the Big Tech companies Apple and Google, are trying to do their bit to help users who are overly-dependent on their devices – seemingly as a means to help their customers before they experience serious anxiety themselves. And to be fair to the tech giants, tackling the problem before it becomes a big issue, is a useful way to go.

    As always, we recommend taking a step back from using your your phone for absolutely everything you need to do in your life. If something can be done easily face to face or without a digital device, then try it. This approach is the premise of our 30 day digital detox: our 5:2 digital diet where you don’t use your phone two days a week can also help. If you find yourself exploding when you can’t find your phone, with mounting anxiety when your battery is running low, or just can’t stop checking your work emails when away from the office, then you might just be suffering from nomophobia. A digital detox is the best way to get nip any addiction in the bud, and take control again. 

    View the original article at itstimetologoff.com

  • Addiction Breathing and Meditation Techniques: An INTERVIEW with Nathaniel V. Dust

    Addiction Breathing and Meditation Techniques: An INTERVIEW with Nathaniel V. Dust

    Breath is Life

    When you think of it, the one action that involves us with the universe is our breath. We breathe in. We breathe out. However, breathing is not restricted to the physical action of taking in air. It can become a conscious means of communication with…well, with our Higher Power.

    So, if you’re in recovery…how might conscious breathing really help you?

    We’ve been introduced to a man who’s been looking that question square in the face. His name is Nathaniel Hodder-Shipp, a.k.a. Nathaniel V. Dust; he’s been practicing mind-body awareness for years. In fact, Nathaniel has used a number of techniques – with a special focus on breathwork – to help thousands of people process trauma, disarm negative thought patterns, and maintain healthy and happy relationships with themselves and loved ones.

    Read on for more on his work using breathing techniques, dreams, and tarot cards (tarot cards?!) as tools in your addiction recovery. FYI, his websites are breathworklosangeles.com and breathworkforrecovery.com  Then, feel free to ask Nathaniel your burning questions at the end of the article in the comments section. We love to hear from our readers…so please write in!

    ADDICTION BLOG: What’s the most frequent request that you receive from someone seeking healing from substance use disorder?

    NATHANIEL V. DUST: Most clients I encounter just want to feel good in their bodies. It’s not always framed that way, but most requests come down to that.

    People who struggle with substance use disorders use drugs and alcohol to find relief. Maybe at first it started out as some fun, or just feeling good in general, but trauma and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) change the way the brain and nervous system develop, so people seek out the comfort of drugs and alcohol for the ways they help them regulate their nervous systems, numb the pain they’re in, and offer feelings of goodness, which they previously may not have been able to experience as deeply as folks without trauma.

    People who use drugs and alcohol to find relief like that struggle to just feel okay. People want a tangible experience quickly, i.e. instant gratification, just like they were previously able to achieve with drugs and alcohol. Fortunately, breathwork creates relief in just a short amount of time.

    ADDICTION BLOG: Of the modalities you practice, in your experience, which is if the most effective for coping with/ dealing with addiction?

    NATHANIEL V. DUST: Breathwork is certainly the quickest and most profound. What I really love about breathwork is that people feel something happen right away. I don’t often encounter clients who don’t have an experience while practicing breathwork.

    Because addiction is rooted in trauma, adverse childhood experiences, and a dysregulated nervous system, breathwork helps people deal with the core issues surrounding their addictions. Once a person can deal with the trauma and adverse childhood experiences, and learn to regulate their nervous system, it’s a game changer. Things that once triggered them to the point of needing to reach out for a drug or a drink don’t have as much power over them. There’s freedom in that.

    Studies show the efficacy of voluntary regulated breathing practices and how they can help people learn to diminish the trauma responses locked in their bodies. Breathwork helps people reduce the amount of time they spend in a triggered place. Trauma doesn’t just go away, but you can reduce the time spent in reaction and offer relief without having to pick up their substance of choice.

    ADDICTION BLOG: What is Breathwork? 

    NATHANIEL V. DUST: Breathwork is a general term describing breathing techniques.

    The practice I utilize is a two-stage breathing technique done through the mouth while lying down on your back. This practice has its roots in India, as with many breathing techniques, and has been made accessible by my mentor and teacher David Elliott. This technique allows a person to quiet their mind long enough for them to experience what it’s like to be in their body. We’re also helping them regulate their nervous system, which is the foundation of many trauma modalities.

    During a breathwork session, people are able to drop the defense mechanisms that have kept emotions buried and suppressed for years. Once the defensive construct is lowered, people can access the emotions that have unconsciously driven destructive behavior patterns. Plus, they often walk out of a session feeling a sense of euphoria and relief, which are biggies when dealing with SUDs.

    ADDICTION BLOG: How can Breathwork help people with addictions? For example, how effective is breath therapy for dealing with cravings, drugs or other? How does it work?

    NATHANIEL V. DUST: The wonderful thing about using breathwork is that a person can change their experience in a matter of moments. I often tell clients they’ll find relief more quickly with breathing than it would take them to have their plug deliver drugs.

    If a person is in a tough spot, they always have access to their breath. They don’t need anything special. To be able to change the way they’re feeling in less than 15 minutes is a priceless tool.

    There are many medications that can help dampen the effects of the sympathetic nervous system, but none of them correct the underactivity of the parasympathetic nervous system. This allows a person to reduce their anxiety and free themselves from emotional reactivity, which often pulls them back into cycles of recidivism.

    ADDICTION BLOG: How long does the treatment with Breathwork last?

    NATHANIEL V. DUST: It depends. I work a lot in treatment centers, so a group can be anywhere from 45 minutes to 90 minutes. I like to breathe for at least 35 minutes. It can seem like a lifetime, but with the right playlist, it goes by pretty quickly.

    ADDICTION BLOG: Can people diagnosed with addiction practice Breathwork by themselves, or will they always need guidance? 

    NATHANIEL V. DUST: Once they learn the technique, they can practice it at home. I recommend people develop a daily practice of at least 10 minutes. Then they can come do a tune-up with a practitioner from time to time or come to our weekly donation-based support group every Tuesday evening in Los Angeles, called The Recovery Circle.

    We run these support groups so people of all backgrounds and income levels can access the powerful healing afforded by breathwork. We welcome anyone seeking recovery of any kind; recovery from trauma, substance use disorders, PTSD, or mental illness.

    ADDICTION BLOG: Many people may be fearful of clairvoyance…How might someone exploring spirituality in addiction recovery understand the work of reading tarot cards?

    NATHANIEL V. DUST: I usually frame it as a way for people to identify obstacles preventing them from attaining what they truly want in the world. I don’t tell the future, I help people create it.

    It’s viewed as a woo-woo modality but in the right hands, it’s anything but. We take a look at what may be contributing to a person’s unhappiness or locking them in destructive patterns. If a person comes in, say, looking to have questions answered about a relationship they’re in, we pull some cards and they’ll tell us a story about what’s going on, and identify possible solutions. The tarot is not about fortune telling, it’s about cocreation.

    ADDICTION BLOG: How can someone identify and develop a similar gift of healing like those you’ve discovered?

    NATHANIEL V. DUST: I feel most people have these skills already, its just a matter of practice, practice, practice. Each one of us is inherently intuitive, but through conscious practice, we can develop the kind of relationship with their intuition that can change everything for them.

    Meditation is an important facet to developing intuition, so I recommend people start there. Breathwork is an active meditation that allows a person to access and feel their own energy, which is the basis of intuition. Once you can learn to identify what’s yours versus what’s everyone else’s, you’re well on your way to developing your intuition.

    View the original article at

  • Not upgrading your phone is the cure to your Smartphone Addiction

    Not upgrading your phone is the cure to your Smartphone Addiction

    Not upgrading your phone is the cure to your Smartphone Addiction

    I’m finishing my two year contract of handset payments this month. No big deal – thousands of other people do this all the time of course. But this time, for me, it’s different.

    It’s actually the first time I’ve ever entered a two year smartphone handset contract and made it all the way through.

    Towards the end of my previous deal, my phone began to run out of battery if it wasn’t charged every hour. With me being an addict, and my then girlfriend guilt tripping me if I didn’t text back after a few minutes, I daren’t send it off for repair.

    I remember the day of buying a new handset early as a huge relief. I lay on the sofa and stroked at it like it was my precious. Phew, I was connected again. No more separation anxiety from an inanimate object. Ironically, the romantic relationship didn’t last long anyway, but the one with my smartphone went the distance.

    If anything, these last years owning one of the smartest phones on the market has just taught me that such connectivity isn’t just unnecessary – it’s actually bad for you. After the honeymoon period, I felt constantly frazzled due to my proximity to an endless suck of news, dating apps and social media. I was spiralling into smartphone addiction.

    For intermittent periods of my contract, I wanted to go completely  cold turkey or just start using a dumb brick again. I actually thought about posting my smartphone to other people so I couldn’t use it. A lot of people who spend a lot of time on smartphones aren’t really conscious of just how much time they spend on their device. But I became aware – I wanted to stop, cut it off entirely, but couldn’t.

    But now I don’t really have to make such an apparently radical decision. My contract is up – I’m no longer paying for a handset. My phone screen is cracked, the battery will more than likely fade in the standard fare of planned obsolescence. Within a few months, it will be as good as useless. I think I may just have found a cure to my smartphone addiction.

    Will I be bothered? Nope. I can easily take a dumber phone. If there was such thing as a phone that just did Whatsapp, then I would buy it immediately (please tell me if there is in the comments). It’s strange that no one seems to have come up with such an invention yet. Bizarrely, the revamped Nokia 3310 was released with Twitter, but no Whatsapp. So you can read @RealDonaldTrump’s inane tweets, just not contact your friends.

    I’ve never really been one for the most advanced handset. I’ve rarely seen the point. Okay camera, reasonable connectivity, being able to actually make some calls and message people are the priorities. I can do without social media and a plethora of whirring, clicking, distracting apps that just want to consume your attention.

    Do you really need all this stuff right now? Do you really need to take selfies everywhere? Do you really need to Snapchat your life? I don’t. I’m quite comfortable slowing down when my smartphone loses its life and watching as my smartphone addiction lessens its grip. I’m pretty sure I’ll be a lot more productive.

    View the original article at itstimetologoff.com