Category: Addiction News

  • Am I Still in AA If I'm Not Going to Meetings?

    Am I Still in AA If I'm Not Going to Meetings?

    After years in recovery, certain aspects of the program may no longer be useful while others are. That doesn’t mean you have to completely shut the door.

    Hi, I’m Helaina, my sobriety date is November 12th, 2011, and right now, I’m in the grey when it comes to “the program.”

    Here’s what that means.

    A lot is being written lately about leaving 12-step programs. The alternative, of course, being staying in 12-step programs. For some people, the decision likely is clear. Maybe you’ve realized you do need more meetings, sponsorship, step-work, and fellowship for your own betterment. Great! Do it. Or you definitely need to leave everything you associate with AA behind, because it really is just not for you, and it’s not helpful. Great! Do it.

    If you have some solid recovery time, you may be somewhere in the middle, in a place where certain aspects of the program are likely no longer useful or necessary, while others are. If you’re not giving the program the same all-or-nothing you always have before, you may be feeling pressure to stay and change your behavior, get back to your former state of enthusiasm and action. Others may be giving you subtle or not-so-subtle suggestions to leave, especially if you can’t fake it til you make it anymore and you’re clearly over it.

    Finding the Grey Area in 12-Step Programs

    The groupthink can be intimidating, but you may not even have to make the decision to stay or go.

    Ironically, we spend a lot of time un-learning that kind of black and white thinking in recovery, opting instead to find peace of mind by living in the grey.

    In the grey, we can recognize that what we need and what works for us within the 12-step models can change, and that’s normal. As humans, we’re in a constant state of evolution, which is why we don’t spend our entire lives in Kindergarten (hopefully).

    For me, part of becoming a sober woman in recovery has been learning to trust that I know what’s right for me, and what works for me, while blocking out the opinions of everyone else; namely, the scare tactics, the fear of judgment, and the people who think they know what’s best for everyone. That isn’t easy.

    For a while, I kept going to meetings because I was afraid that I’d disappoint someone, maybe a sponsor, if I didn’t. I went because I didn’t want people to think I was a “bad AA.” Or I worried that people would think that I must have relapsed if I stopped going. There is a confusing contradiction in the program about how one size doesn’t fit all and everything is just a suggestion, but also that you’re headed for a miserable death if you reduce or stop going to meetings. So meetings weren’t really a useful part of my toolkit anymore, but I still carried them around until they almost became a burden instead of a cushion. But without the meetings—or with only occasional meetings—am I still in AA?

    Over time, as they say, we find a bridge back to life, and thinking in black and white is the very thing that can freeze you up while trying to walk across your bridge. So, I walk across my bridge “in the grey.”

    In the grey, you don’t have to pressure yourself to make a decision or overthink whether you’re “really” doing well. If you feel like you’re doing well, you’re probably doing well. It’s not a trap. If you haven’t spoken to your sponsor in a few months, or if you don’t have one, or if you don’t go to meetings…have you “left” AA? More grey matter coming up: you don’t have to decide to cut off everything and everyone, or do all or nothing when it comes to the program.

    Healing and Trusting Myself

    I’ve done a ton of hard work—including 12-step work —that has changed my life and allowed me to remedy what drove me to drink in the first place. I have this great life because of those early years of incredibly hard work, diligence, taking all of those suggestions as seriously as possible and doing step work over and over again, and therapy, and all the good things we do to create meaningful change in our lives.

    I finally trust that I know what’s best for myself, and I know that I always get to change my mind. It’s taken me almost half a decade to feel comfortable knowing that I don’t need to drag myself to meetings just to be a “good AA.” I don’t need the same level of therapy for PTSD with the same frequency as I did ten years ago. What I need to stay sober, physically and emotionally, has also changed over time.

    Deep down, I think that if we’re honest with ourselves at any stage in our recovery, we all know what we need to do in order to not drink—and furthermore, to be good people, kind people, honest people, considerate, thoughtful, loyal.

    Whatever your values are, identify what you need to do to keep them close and act accordingly.

    Going to a certain number of meetings, making coffee, talking to a sponsor every day is not necessarily the answer for everyone, even if it is the answer for many. I respect that the same way I hope people will respect the rest of us walking our own path with the tools we need.

    As the book says, what we learn becomes a natural working part of the mind, and so what we did during our first three years may not be what we need to do after six years, and we can trust our own thinking again. When I feel that maybe my thinking is murky here and there, I usually know to reach out to bounce those thoughts off someone else.

    But the idea of knowing yourself well enough to change your program-related behavior is not preached nearly as often warnings against it.

    Sweeping Generalizations as Scare Tactics in AA

    “I thought, ‘I got this’ and then I relapsed.”

    Or “I stopped going to meetings, and I relapsed.”

    Of course, there’s also the F word: “I forgot that I was an alcoholic and couldn’t drink normally. “

    It is important to honor people’s experiences, but it becomes dangerous when we assume that all alcoholics everywhere need to do the same thing or they risk the same fate. Using that kind of sweeping generalization as a scare tactic can be enough to cause someone to want to reject the program altogether and leave or keep doing something that just isn’t right for them anymore and stay against their better judgement.

    Relapse is not part of my story (common belief is that if I don’t say “yet” I’m also doing something dangerous, so I’m sticking that word in the grey area of these parenthesis), but I’d be willing to bet that folks who have relapsed didn’t “forget” anything. They probably didn’t forget that their drinking had serious consequences the way that one forgets to turn the light off in the kitchen or take out the trash before leaving for vacation.

    They likely made conscious choices to engage in some unhealthy behaviors again, despite knowing what they knew about themselves; what they forgot was to put into practice all the things they’d learned in the program along the way.

    For me, forgetting my inner struggles would be like forgetting that I’m a woman, or that I’m a human, or that I need to eat and sleep. I’m well aware. I’m also not walking around saying, “Darn, I’m an alcoholic!” or “I am a womannnn!” every day.

    To an extent, there is actually a level of “forgetting” that feels great. I rarely think about drinking or smoking weed. I don’t think every day about how I can’t drink. I just don’t drink anymore.

    I know that if I become complacent, I may not get to keep it all, so it’s up to me to do what I need to do in order not to get to that place. Doing something to keep up the new life we’ve created is a great idea, but for me that something isn’t to keep me from forgetting that I’m an alcoholic, but rather to keep me from forgetting what I’ve learned, how far I’ve come, and what I did to get to where I am now.

    Social support in some form is such a crucial part of any kind of recovery, but you can decide what that looks like. I’ve made amazing friends in sobriety and as sober women, we understand each other and connect on a deep level that creates a special bond and provides a unique support system. And when you have just one alcoholic talking to another, as they say, you have a meeting.

    Self-Empowerment in Recovery

    We have to give ourselves permission to feel confident that after a certain period of time, having put in the years of work, we can start to know what’s best for ourselves. That breathing room is nice. Enjoy it.

    I also know that in a year, or in five years, something in me might change again, and it may feel right to go to meetings again. I’m not digging my heels in. I’ll be grateful they’re there, because despite all of the personalities and the disappointments and frustrations that we don’t like finding “in the rooms,” it’s still a beautiful place that is home to a program that works for a lot of people. It’s something we can always count on.

    Luckily, the world of wellness has opened up. Principles and concepts that were once exclusive to 12-step are now everywhere, in books, on podcasts, on Instagram and elsewhere. Reminders to keep our side of the street clean, take things one day at a time, think about our personal boundaries, speak (and text, and email) kindly and honestly, pause before acting, meditate, forgive, practice self-care, volunteer, focus on putting good into the world and not just taking from it, are everywhere.

    We learn that to keep it, we have to give it away and for me, that’s still true. Ironically, I spent years raising my hand to offer myself as a sponsor in meetings, I gave out my number, I spoke to newcomers, and I even served as “sponsorship chair.” Yet, I never had a sponsee. Instead, I’ve carried the message through personal interactions and to people who message me after reading something I wrote. I tried carrying the message and helping other alcoholics “the traditional” way for years, and didn’t get the chance to do it that way, so I figured out the ways in which I can.

    If you don’t know where you stand around that line in the sand that separates “leaving” or “staying” then lay your blanket down, sprawl out across it, and forget about the line altogether.

    How has your 12-step participation changed over time? Do you believe people can reduce their involvement and still be okay? Sound off in the comments.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Woman Accused Of Running Multimillion-Dollar Black Market Pot Operation

    Woman Accused Of Running Multimillion-Dollar Black Market Pot Operation

    The Massachusetts resident was charged with conspiring to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana.

    Recreational marijuana may be legal in Massachusetts, but black market operations will not be tolerated in the state, judging by the experience of one woman who is now facing federal drug-trafficking charges for allegedly operating a black market pot service. 

    Milton resident Deana Martin was charged with conspiring to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana, according to a press release by the U.S. State Attorney General’s Office. Martin allegedly operated a black market business between 2015 and 2018 that had about 25 employees and grossed more than $14 million from 2016 to 2018. 

    The company, Northern Herb, claimed to be a medical marijuana company, but did not check that clients had medical marijuana licenses. It was not clear whether Northern Herb was a licensed medical marijuana provider in the state. The company operated online, selling marijuana, pre-rolled joints and marijuana-infused edibles that were delivered to clients. 

    In addition to operating outside the medical marijuana field, the company got into trouble for leaving packages unattended at homes and in apartment hallways. This would allow the drugs to potentially be picked up by someone other than the person who had ordered them. 

    Martin apparently planned to incentivize her employees for selling a certain amount of marijuana each month. 

    “One such incentivized tier, for instance, would be for selling more than 10 pounds of marijuana per month,” the Attorney General’s Office said. 

    Despite the fact that cannabis became legal in Massachusetts in 2017, Martin was not interested in joining the legal market. In Massachusetts, marijuana is taxed at 17% and local governments can add an additional tax on top of that. In an email discussing tax rates for legal cannabis businesses, Martin wrote, “Zero taxes is still better.”

    Although she didn’t file taxes for the businesses, Martin claimed an income of $80,000 a month during the time that she was operating Northern Herb. She used the money to pay down her mortgage, which was about $300,000, and to purchase a Porsche, court documents said. 

    She did not pay any taxes for the business, or provide employees with proper tax documentation, the Attorney General’s Office said. In fact, she laundered the money that came through the business and hid it in accounts that were not in her name, the Attorney General’s Office said. 

    If Martin is convicted of the federal charges, she faces a mandatory minimum sentence of five years, and up to 40 years in prison. She could also be fined up to $5 million. 

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Massachusetts Mental Health Court Serves As Alternative To Jail Time

    Massachusetts Mental Health Court Serves As Alternative To Jail Time

    The Recovery with Justice program was established by a local judge who believes jail is not always the answer.

    Nearly one-fifth of prisoners have been diagnosed with a mental health disorder. This fact has pushed one Massachusetts judge to take action. 

    Kathleen Coffey, a judge in the West Roxbury neighborhood of Boston, Massachusetts, is hoping to change the way these individuals receive treatment through a program called Recovery with Justice.  

    Coffey, who serves as the Specialty Courts Director for the Boston Municipal Court, created the program hoping to help those with mental health and other developmental disorders with an alternative to jail time. 

    “Many people end up in the criminal justice system because other systems have failed them and the social safety net has failed them,” Coffey told Boston 25 News. “Often times, mental illness has not been flagged, or has not been identified as a contributing factor.” 

    According to the mental health court’s official webpage, the program “is a specialized court session that helps defendants maintain stability, achieve recovery and avoid incarceration by providing intensive social services and mental health treatment.”

    Those in the program must take part in community-based treatment for at least three months and will be reviewed by a court team. In each case, a probation officer works alongside a mental health clinician to identify the needs of each individual. Based on those needs, a specific plan is created. This plan may include treatment referrals and opportunities for housing, education and employment. 

    The recipient of one such plan, Mario Torres, tells Boston 25 News that he has been in and out of jail for a total of 20 to 25 years throughout his life. He says that going to mental health court is a way of talking through his struggles, almost like therapy. 

    “Judge Coffey is pretty understanding about my addiction,” Torres said. “I had a drug problem in my past… constantly into trouble and getting arrested.” 

    “I look back and I have thrown my life out the window,” he added.

    Torres hopes that being a part of Recovery with Justice will help him get his life on track for good.

    “I want to be a productive member to society,” Torres said.

    Throughout Massachusetts, Boston 25 News reports, there are currently seven mental health courts. At the one in West Roxbury, more than 200 people have been admitted.

    “We are keeping good people out of jail and within the community, recognizing that is what the court system is supposed to do,” Coffey said. “We are supposed to be here to help people.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Sackler Family Says Opioid Lawsuit Is "Misleading"

    Sackler Family Says Opioid Lawsuit Is "Misleading"

    The family’s lawyers have filed motions to dismiss the complaint filed against them by the Massachusetts Attorney General.

    Members of the billionaire Sackler family say that public outrage over their alleged role in the opioid epidemic—as the owners of OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma—is all a big misunderstanding. 

    According to lawsuits filed across the country, including one in Massachusetts, members of the Sackler family played an active role in pushing opioid painkillers marketed by Purdue Pharma, despite knowing about the addiction risks.

    As the national opioid crisis worsened, the company even considered selling addiction medication to further profit off of opioid addiction, the lawsuits allege. 

    However, a statement made by the family’s attorneys this week said that prosecutors and the press are cherry-picking information to make the family look bad, according to WGBH Boston

    “We are confident the court will look past the inflammatory media coverage generated by the misleading complaint and apply the law fairly by dismissing all of these claims,” the statement read. 

    The Sacklers are one of the richest families in the U.S. and are major donors to museums, colleges and other institutions. However, the family has been subject to more scrutiny as the lawsuits against them pile up.

    In February, activists staged a “die-in” at the Guggenheim Museum in New York City to highlight the role of the Sacklers in promoting addictive opioids. The family had donated extensively to the museum. More recently, a donation to the UK’s National Portrait Gallery was mutually cancelled because of public outcry. 

    “It has become evident that recent reporting of allegations made against Sackler family members may cause this new donation to deflect the National Portrait Gallery from its important work,” a spokesperson for the Sackler Trust told NPR. “The allegations against family members are vigorously denied.”

    Those allegations include that family members, particularly former Purdue Pharma President and Chairman Richard Sackler, were actively involved with marketing OxyContin in misleading ways even when they knew the risk of addiction to the pills was high. The Massachusetts lawsuit alleges that Sackler even visited doctors to help push OxyContin, something that the family denies. 

    Richard Sackler also reportedly made a comment in 1996 about OxyContin’s launch being “followed by a blizzard of prescriptions that will bury the competition.”

    This week, attorneys for the family said that the statement was taken out of context, and that Sackler was actually referring to a snow blizzard that had made him late for the event. 

    The statement goes on to say that the lawsuit “mischaracterizes and selectively quotes from the hundreds of documents it cites to create the false impression” that the family “micromanaged every aspect of Purdue’s marketing strategy.” Rather, the family was not that closely involved with the operations of Purdue, the statement said. 

    However, the Sackler family (not just Purdue) was ordered to pay $75 million over five years as part of a settlement with the state of Oklahoma last week. After that, New York added the family to its ongoing lawsuit against Purdue. 

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Sweden Rethinks Zero Tolerance Drug Policy as Cocaine Use Rises

    Sweden Rethinks Zero Tolerance Drug Policy as Cocaine Use Rises

    Swedish authorities are trying to learn what factors are contributing to the rising rates of use (and overdose), including the way they police.

    Officials in Sweden are rethinking their policies as cocaine use, and overdoses, continue to rise despite their hard-line stance on drugs.

    According to SVT, Sweden’s national public news broadcasting service, the drug has only grown stronger, more common, and cheaper in the last few years.

    Police and customs have seized 300% more cocaine since 2012. Swedish customs reports seizing as much as 485 kg of the stuff. Cocaine was also found to be the cause of death in 20 cases last year, a massive increase from a few years ago with just one reported case.

    While such numbers may seem small in relation to other countries, such a significant spike has caused concern in Sweden and a scramble to find out why.

    “Cocaine has increased at least four-fold. This indicates that usage has increased,” said Robert Kronstrand, of the Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine. “Blood samples have improved, which may explain more positive tests, but that’s not the reason for the sharp increase.”

    Even the police agree that better testing doesn’t account for the sharp rise in cocaine cases. They’ve seen a significant shift in who is dying, and where: past cocaine deaths were associated with social gatherings, but almost all 2018 deaths were at home.

    Sweden’s drug policy is being called into question as it is among one of the most hard-line policies in Europe. Police have the authority to urine test anyone they suspect of using drugs, and pretty much no distinction is made between hard and soft drugs. The policy’s aim was to squash all use of drugs.

    “Prohibiting both personal use and the possession and sale of drugs in Sweden makes it harder for ‘open drug scenes’ to arise, i.e. places where drugs are used and sold more or less openly. This is an important element in systematically reducing access to drugs and preventing people from using drugs,” the policy reads.

    In a grim sense, the policy succeeded, leading people to use and die in their own homes. It’s a policy that has come under criticism by the United Nations.

    Sweden’s laws stand in stark contrast to its neighbor Norway, which is moving towards the decriminalization of all drugs. The intention is to “stop punishing people who struggle, but instead give them help and treatment,” said Nicolas Wilkinson of Norway’s Socialist Labour Party. The end goal is to divert the handling of drug cases away from the justice system to the health care system.

    In Sweden, multiple parties in parliament have banded together to take on the problem. This isn’t the first time Sweden has swiftly responded to substance abuse issues, having restricted the sale of hand sanitizer in 2016 after a rash of teenagers showed up in emergency rooms from drinking the alcogels.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Overcoming Adversity in Recovery

    Overcoming Adversity in Recovery

    Recently, I was asked to be a keynote speaker at a conference in Austin, Texas.  My topic? How to overcome adversity.

    As an attorney who suddenly found herself serving a four-year prison sentence for a first-time DUI, I had to employ various tactics in order to adapt to my new reality and stay mentally sane.  Here’s what worked for me after my drinking caused me to lose almost everything, including my freedom:

    Positive Self-Talk

    When I first received my sentence, I couldn’t even fathom what it meant.  There was no way, in my mind, that I’d be able to survive four whole years in a medium-security state prison.  But I took it day by day, with each one getting easier as I fell into a routine.  I constantly gave myself pep talks to combat anxiety and depression, and refused to let myself dwell in feelings of negativity.  By being my own personal cheerleader, I was able to overcome a hardship that I had originally believed was impossible.

    Cliche Phrases

    It sounds cheesy, but I gravitated toward cliché sayings, like “This too shall pass” and “If God brings you to it, He’ll see you through it,” because they helped give me self-confidence and strength in times when I needed them most.  I also found inspiration in stories of people who’d been in similar situations.  Those who’d been incarcerated, got out and went on with their lives motivated me beyond belief – because if they could do it, I reasoned, so could I.

    My Support System

    A big reason I got behind the wheel that fateful night is that I bottled up all of my emotions and hid behind a façade that everything was fine.  I had been in extreme emotional turmoil, yet no one around me knew, and it had been eating me up inside.  Once I was in prison, however, I vowed not to repeat the same mistake and clung to the support of my friends and family.  Through their letters, phone calls, visits and unconditional love, I was able to find the inner strength that was needed to overcome the challenges I faced behind bars.

    Faith

    Even though it didn’t feel like it at times, I knew deep-down that there would be brighter days ahead.  I held onto this belief, and it helped me get through the moments when I was really down and seriously considering giving up.

    Ultimately, none of us is immune from hardship, and we all need help getting through tough times.  Even though every challenge is unique to the individual facing it, the pointers above can help a person tackle adversity head-on and overcome its obstacles.

    View the original article at recovery.org

  • 5 Ways to Set Boundaries in the New Year

    5 Ways to Set Boundaries in the New Year

    New Years Resolutions and Recovery

    The new year can be challenging, especially when we’re sober. We can’t check out with a glass of wine or a few cans of beer. We are here and present for all of those uncomfortable feelings that arise when we’re with our families, friends, or just out and about.

    Sometimes all it takes is one comment to trigger a whole host of negativity: shame, lack of self-worth, self-consciousness, etc.

    It took a long time to realize that I had control over how I felt in these situations and how I responded to them. The revelation came as a complete surprise. I remember asking my first sponsor in an utterly perplexed way, “You mean I can say I don’t want to talk about my weight?!”

    While it isn’t easy at first, setting boundaries can make you feel a whole lot more empowered in the long run. And your emotional well-being is crucial to a sustainable recovery.

    Here are some key ways you can set boundaries:

    1: Don’t be afraid to use the word “no”.

    Sometimes you’ll feel the need for alone time, and that’s okay! You shouldn’t feel unable to be honest about how you feel. For example, if you are tired but your mom wants you to visit because an aunt is visiting from out of town and she wants to everyone to get together, it is okay to respect your need for rest and decline her offer.

    2: Understand that how people react to your boundaries isn’t your problem.

    You are only responsible for you. If someone is upset about a boundary you’ve set, that is their issue to address. No means no. No doesn’t mean let’s negotiate or let me back down to make you feel better. Boundaries only work when they are applied consistently.

    3: Take some time to consider your needs.

    If a friend or loved one asks you to do something but you’re already feeling overwhelmed, it is okay to say that you’ll get back to them. “I’m unsure if I can do that right now. Let me get back to you by ___” is a perfectly acceptable response.

    4: Changing your mind.

    Even if you have previously agreed to attend or even host an event or party, it is okay to change your mind if you don’t feel well or are exhausted. You don’t have to explain yourself other than to say you’re not feeling up to it and that you’ll either need to take a raincheck or cancel altogether. Those who love and respect you will honor your needs. You may even find that they’re thankful for a night in.

    5: It is okay to leave.

    I always have an exit strategy for parties. Whether it’s telling the host that you have to leave after dinner or deciding to say your goodbyes early, know that it is okay to leave the party when it feels right for you to go. I always used to feel obliged to stay to the bitter end, but eventually I realized that I was in control of how long I stayed!

    Above all, it’s important to stick with the boundaries you set. There will be plenty of reasons to abandon them along the way, but they’re about putting yourself and your recovery first and foremost in your life.

    View the original article at recovery.org

  • The Power of Art as Therapy

    The Power of Art as Therapy

    A few weeks ago I hosted a social gathering for women in recovery, and we had a local artist lead us through an art journaling workshop. As a writer and lover of all things creative, I was excited to spend a few hours expressing myself in a new way. I didn’t expect to leave having ignited a new flame of creativity!

    The goal of Keely Rademacher, the artist who coached us, is to encourage healing through creative expression. I have to admit that initially I thought she was going to have us collect clippings from magazines to make a vision board, but I couldn’t have been further from the truth.

    The Process of Using Art in Recovery

    Keely led us through the process of art journaling. An art journal is simply a visual record of thoughts, ideas, or emotions we’re feeling. You can use just about any media: crayons, watercolors, images, materials, and even words—anything goes! As a lover of words and journaling, this opened up a range of possibility for me. But even for those who’ve never thought of themselves or artists or even creative can benefit from the power of art journaling.

    The first thing to do is let go of expectations. This isn’t something you have to show others on Instagram (unless you want to), and it isn’t being evaluated by anyone. It is just for you, so let your creative expression flow. The whole idea is that you have a new way to express yourself.

    Of course, having a teacher helped! Keely suggested to us to that we could create a wheel of time, a snapshot of what 24 hours looks like in any given day. I couldn’t have written what I painted; it was like it came from another area of my brain. But it prompted an hour-long discussion with my therapist the following week!

    My Experience with Art Therapy

    I painted thoughts, beliefs, and feelings that I wasn’t conscious of. Many of my paintings revolved around the resistance I feel to sleeping, the desire to stay up longer than I should. I colored that feeling gray. I realized that I am not sleeping when I need to and that I could listen to my body’s cues that I need to rest more. I also created a snapshot of time in the evening that I know holds great possibility but during which I let myself get too drained by work and end up letting it pass me by. I saw that the colors I used throughout the day were a representation of my heating up (experiencing mounting stress). By the afternoon, I was coloring in red.

    Had I not had this experience, I may not have opened a window that gave me a fresh insight into my mind. I was so blown away by the experience that I immediately ordered an art kit online so that I could begin incorporating art journaling into my morning routine. I’ve already filled 10 pages! Is there anything stopping you from creating? Why not give it a try? The power of art as therapy may surprise you.

    View the original article at recovery.org

  • The Power of Writing as a Means of Recovery Processing

    The Power of Writing as a Means of Recovery Processing

    Being able to express myself freely through the written word is the greatest gift borne out of my recovery.

    If you had told me seven years ago that I’d be a full-time freelance writer living in Portland, Oregon, I would have said you were crazy. Back then I was circling my rock bottom, feeling like the world was about to end. I had nothing to live for and zero hope for the future.

    Three months later when I got sober, my life invariably got a whole lot better—mostly because I’d stopped slowly killing myself by drinking four bottles of wine and smoking two packs of cigarettes every day. It wasn’t easy, though. I remember feeling so completely lost. I felt this out-of-body experience: Who am I? Why am I here? What is this place?

    The Writing Advice I Received Inspired My Recovery

    Not knowing which direction my life was going and feeling alienated from my body and who I was, my first sponsor suggested I pick up my pen and begin journaling. I had no clue what to write or where to start. She gave me a few prompts:

    • Start by writing your plan for the day.
    • List some feelings.
    • Review your day each evening.
    • List 3 things you’re grateful for.
    • Write 5 things you’ve done right.

    The last suggestion had me flummoxed. “What have I done right?” I asked. At the time, “doing something right” was a strange concept to me. But my therapist was trying to help me begin a practice of developing self-esteem. I started by acknowledging simple facts: I’d cared for myself that day by showing up, had fed myself, and kept myself from drinking. And those all meant that I had performed great acts of self-love. I was beginning to see that I was doing something right each day.

    How Daily Writing Changed My Outlook on Recovery

    Perhaps most profoundly, though, writing was the catalyst to connect my physical body and my mind. Before I started writing, I felt like I was drowning in an ocean of emotions I’d tried desperately to numb. Through writing, I opened up. I took a good look inside, and I was able to start unpacking what made me tick.young man with Psychological Withdrawals

    Before long, my daily entries were pages long. I couldn’t stop writing. It was as if someone had opened up the well of feelings and traumatic experiences I’d been repressing. Through writing, I started processing the things that pained me and woke me up at night. I also became aware of my inquisitive and creative nature and began exploring what interested me.

    I started to look forward to the ritual of writing each day. I’d make a cup of tea and sit at my desk in the early hours with a pen and paper, connecting to my innermost thoughts. Its gifts were endless, but the one I’ve enjoyed the most is the sense of peace that comes over me when I write. Even if I feel my words come out in a flurry, before long I feel grounded and in the present moment—even if just for a few minutes.

    Writing has been my most powerful tool in maintaining my recovery.

    View the original article at recovery.org

  • Recovery and Probation: Should a Relapse Earn Jail Time? 

    Recovery and Probation: Should a Relapse Earn Jail Time? 

    If a person relapses while on probation, should they be sent to jail? A top Massachusetts court tackled this issue last month, unanimously ruling that, yes, a judge can send defendants to jail if they relapse and break the “remain drug-free” condition of probation bestowed on them.   

    The case at issue involved defendant Julie Eldred, now 30, who had been convicted of larceny for stealing jewelry to support her heroin habit.  She was given a year’s probation by a trial judge back in August 2016 and faced up to a 30-month sentence if she violated any of her probation’s conditions.

    Two of these conditions were to begin outpatient treatment and remain drug-free. Though Eldred enrolled in a program and began taking Suboxone to treat her withdrawal symptoms, she tested positive for fentanyl 11 days into her probation. The judge ordered her to go to inpatient treatment, but no placement could immediately be found.

    Prison as an Alternative to Treatment

    As a result, “The judge was faced with either releasing the defendant and risking that she would suffer an overdose and die, or holding her in custody until a placement at an inpatient treatment facility became available,” Justice Lowy wrote in his decision.

    Eldred ended up spending 10 days in a medium-security prison while she waited for an open bed at a treatment facility. Suboxone was never prescribed while she went through withdrawal.   

    Though the prosecution and defense believed the justices had the opportunity to debate the nature of addiction itself, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court declined to take a stance on the issue.  Instead, they questioned the timing of the appeal, stating that Eldred should have raised the issue when her probation condition was first imposed, when it could have been fully argued before a trial judge.   

    Still, the defense felt the decision was a “massive blow” and that it missed an opportunity to incorporate mainstream medical opinion about addiction – namely, that it is a chronic, relapsing brain disease that compromises an individual’s ability to abstain.  Lisa Newman-Polk, one of Eldred’s lawyers, said through its decision, the court had “rubber-stamped the status quo, dysfunctional way in which our criminal justice system treats people suffering from addiction.” 

    Criminalization is Not The Answer

    As someone who’s been in the prison system and lived amongst hundreds of women struggling with addictions, I agree.  Incarceration is focused primarily on punishment, rather than rehabilitation, and is a dysfunctional solution to dealing with addicted individuals. All it does is force abstinence for a period of time, not address the root cause of the behavior that causes these people to use in the first place. As a result, many go right back to the same environment, the same group of friends and the same drugs the minute after they’re released. It doesn’t matter if harsher punishments are imposed upon someone to not use — the lure of addiction is so much stronger.   

    In short, criminalization is not the answer for those struggling with addictions, and there have to be better alternatives than sticking them behind bars.   

    Additional Reading: Your Loved One is Gone: How to Handle the People Left Behind

    Image Source: iStock

    View the original article at recovery.org