Tag: backlash

  • Misleading Post About Contaminated Meth Receives Backlash

    Misleading Post About Contaminated Meth Receives Backlash

    Local officials say the Facebook post, which was later deleted, was made in bad judgment.

    Officials in Pennsylvania say that a Facebook post by a constable offering to test meth for influenza was misleading and irresponsible. 

    “If you have recently purchased meth in Northampton, Monroe, Lehigh or Bucks Counties, it may be contaminated with the Influenza Virus. . . . Please bring all of it to your local Police Department and they will test it for free,” said the post, which was credited to Wilson Borough State Constable’s Office, according to The Morning Call. “If you’re not comfortable driving to your local Police Department, You can contact my Office and an officer or deputy will be glad to come to you and test your Meth in the privacy of your home.”

    Wilson Constable Fred Schoenenberger posted the message, which was later deleted. In Pennsylvania, constables are elected or appointed and make their money through fees for serving warrant and subpoenas and transporting prisoners. They aren’t associated with area police departments, which was part of the problem with Schoenenberger’s post, said Joshua Fulmer, a lawyer for the Northampton County Constables Association.

    “When you see this page it comes off as like something from a police department, but that’s not what it is,” he said. 

    The area’s district attorney said that the post was made in bad judgment: “I read it and it made no sense to me,” he said. 

    In recent years, police departments around the country have posted Facebook messages offering to test meth and other drugs for safety. In fact, Schoenenberger took the idea from an Illinois sheriff’s office that posted the same message on New Year’s Eve.

    The tactic is a tongue-in-cheek response to the drug epidemic, and — some might argue — a way to try and trick people into bringing their drugs to police. However, critics say that the approach falls flat and can lead to misunderstandings and mistrust.

    “The field doesn’t need misguided information or misguided attempts to change what is going on,” said Timothy Munsch, who works as executive director of the Lehigh Valley Drug and Alcohol Intake Unit.

    Although Schoenenberger deleted the post, he called it “a success” and said a few people even reached out to him for help with their substance use disorders. In a later post he stood by his actions. 

    “While this intended ‘humor’ may have offended some it certainly opened some real dialogue about how serious this issue is. We received many messages for help, and asking if this was real. The post is real and the help is real if you want it and ask for it.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Elon Musk's Apparent Pot-Smoking Sparks Backlash

    Elon Musk's Apparent Pot-Smoking Sparks Backlash

    An ex-Tesla employee who was reportedly fired after testing positive for THC says seeing Musk smoke pot was “like a slap in the face.”

    In a rambling two-hour conversation on The Joe Rogan Experience podcast, Tesla founder Elon Musk apparently toked a spliff during the live show, a move that fed concerns about his increasingly erratic behavior.

    The long-winded chat between the business magnate and the comedian covered everything from robots to web presence, but it was a short exchange about cannabis near the end of the show that drew the most attention. 

    “Is that a joint, or is it a cigar?” Musk asked when Rogan pulled out the ganja. “It’s marijuana inside of tobacco,” the host replied, before asking if Musk had ever tried it.

    “Yeah, I think I tried one once,” he said. Rogan seemed skeptical, and asked if stockholders prevented him from toking.

    “I mean, it’s legal right?” Musk asked. “It’s totally legal,” Rogan said. (The show tapes in California.) 

    To some, the move may have seemed hypocritical, since Tesla drug tests at least some of its employees, according to Market Watch.

    Crystal Guardado, a former Tesla employee, told Bloomberg News that she was fired from the company after testing positive for THC.

    “It was just like a slap in the face to me and my son,” she said. “Elon Musk is just smoking it out in the open, knowing that he uses his very vague drug policy as a way to fire people that are a threat to him.”

    But even if he didn’t have to pass a drug test, there seems to have been some consequences for the CEO. 

    One day after the show, Tesla stock went down 9%, closing at 6%, according to Vox. This may not have been just about the on-air pot use, though, as the company generally suffered a trying week. 

    That same day, two top executives announced their departures, continuing the string of turnovers. Also on Friday, reports began surfacing that the Air Force had begun looking into the alleged post use

    Earlier this year, Musk sparked speculation about his love for cannabis when he tweeted about taking the company private at $420 a share. Not long after, though, he specifically shot down the idea of cannabis use and dismissed any efforts to read into the number.

    “It seemed like better karma at $420 than at $419,” he told the New York Times. “But I was not on weed, to be clear. Weed is not helpful for productivity. There’s a reason for the word ‘stoned.’ You just sit there like a stone on weed.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Anheuser Busch Pulls Out Of Federal Drinking Moderation Study

    Anheuser Busch Pulls Out Of Federal Drinking Moderation Study

    The alcohol company was set to contribute $15.4 million over a 10-year period for the study.

    One major backer of a $100 million federal study related to alcohol consumption has pulled out due to surrounding controversy. 

    According to the New York Times, Anheuser-Busch InBev, a Belgian-Brazilian brewing company, was to be one of five alcohol companies financially backing the study, which plans to examine the health benefits of consuming one daily drink. 

    But on Friday, June 8, Anheuser-Busch InBev announced it would be withdrawing funding due to controversy around the study and the sponsorship. The company stated that the controversy would “undermine the study’s credibility,” according to the Times.

    The announcement came via a letter to Dr. Maria C. Freire, who serves as the president and executive director of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health.

    According to the Times, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health is “a nongovernmental entity that is authorized to raise money from the private sector for NIH (National Institutes of Health) initiatives and manages the institutes’ public-private partnerships.”

    In May, the NIH discontinued enrollment for the study due to reports that officials and scientists from the NIH met with alcohol companies to seek out funding and gave the impression that the study outcome would support moderate drinking habits. 

    Nearly 25% of the funding for the study had been contributed by Anheuser-Busch InBev, the Times reports. Of the $66 million in funding, the company was contributing $15.4 million in payments over a 10-year period, beginning three years ago.  

    Andrés Peñate, global vice president for regulatory and public policy for Anheuser-Busch InBev, stated in the letter that the company had initially decided to fund the study “because we believed it would yield valuable, science-based insights into the health effects of moderate drinking.”

    He continued, “We had no role in the design or execution of this research; stringent firewalls were put in place with the Foundation for National Institutes of Health to safeguard the objectivity and independence of the science.”

    The letter concluded, “Unfortunately, recent questions raised around the study could undermine its lasting credibility, which is why we have decided to end our funding.”

    The study is expected to examine the potential effects of moderate drinking such as reducing risk of heart disease, diabetes and cognitive impairment. It is seeking out participation from 7,800 men and women with a high risk of heart disease.

    During the study, half the group will be asked to not drink alcohol and the other half will be asked to have a single drink every day of the week. Participants would be followed for an average of six years. 

    View the original article at thefix.com