Tag: covid-19

  • Screens in the Time of Covid-19

    Screens in the Time of Covid-19

    More than at any time in the recent past, now is the time to think about ensuring a healthy balance with technology. Fear is continuing to grow during the spread with the infectiousness of Covid-19 and we’re all facing a long period of social distancing. The two constants facing us are more screen time and Covid-19, we’re going to be spending a lot more time on them. Here are some Do’s and Don’ts for how to survive the next few months.

    Do get together, apart

    As we become separated from our friends and family it can be easy to feel isolated. Many of us won’t be able to visit our older relatives and friends for quite a while. But social distancing and self-isolation don’t have to be the end of social contact! Teach your older relatives how to use video chatting on their devices and set up joint meal times so that you can eat together, apart. You can even watch TV together on Netflix Party.

    Do use WhatsApp for group communication

    Across the country, community groups are using WhatsApp as a way to mobilise neighbourhood groups and identify those who need help, and those can provide it. Not everyone has a friend or relative nearby who can walk the dog or pick up the shopping, but many of us are healthy and infection-free and at home with nothing to do – so we can fill the gaps. Perhaps we can use this time to build stronger communities? Wouldn’t that be a positive outcome from this crisis?

    Do share accurate information (and support)

    WHO, your government and country-specific local health bodies, are sharing information daily about the spread of the virus, how to spot symptoms and how each country is slowing it. These is information it would be useful to share, as well as posts and actions which lift morale (such as the national applause for UK NHS workers planned for the 26th of March).

    Do be productive

    Whether through continuing to work or by picking up an interest  – such as learning a new language on Duolingo – we can all get something positive out of this time. It can seem like we are living in a dystopian world, and if we’re not essential workers we might feel we can’t do anything positive. But by keeping the economy moving and ourselves busy at home we’re helping in the best way we can.

    Don’t spread #FakeNews

    There are unfortunately plenty of people exploiting fear at the moment by touting fake ideas and products. This is even more dangerous because we’re dealing with a pandemic, not a regional flu outbreak. Don’t follow advice that doesn’t come from reputable sources, and don’t spread it any further.

    Don’t spend hours on screens

    It would be easy just to watch all the TV on Netflix or spend hours on Insta’s ‘Explore’ page. But by the end of any dive down the Internet rabbit-hole you won’t be feeling better, just worn out with sore eyes. Limit mindless passive screen use so that you can pace yourself. You have enough time to re-watch all of Game of Thrones, twice, don’t worry.

    Don’t increase your anxiety

    If all of your social media and screen time is geared towards news updates on Covid-19 you’ll never have any respite. Try to follow some uplifting, positive accounts, like ours, and mute or unfollow endless bad news if it’s stressing you out. Keep an eye on your mood and keep yourself calm.

    Don’t give in to the tiny tyrant in your pocket

    The most important message is that you are in control. You decide when to rest, play and work now all the usual boundaries are removed. Think carefully about how to use and plan your time and don’t let your smartphone control how you spend time social distancing.

    Stay safe, we’re all in this together and we’re going to be posting more positive and practical content to help over the next few weeks.

    View the original article at itstimetologoff.com

  • As The Coronavirus Spreads, Americans Lose Ground Against Other Health Threats

    As the world struggles to control Coronavirus (COVID-19,) U.S. health officials are refighting battles they thought they had won, such as halting measles outbreaks, reducing deaths from heart disease and protecting young people from tobacco.

    For much of the 20th century, medical progress seemed limitless.

    Antibiotics revolutionized the care of infections. Vaccines turned deadly childhood diseases into distant memories. Americans lived longer, healthier lives than their parents.

    Yet today, some of the greatest success stories in public health are unraveling.

    Even as the world struggles to control a mysterious new viral illness known as COVID-19, U.S. health officials are refighting battles they thought they had won, such as halting measles outbreaks, reducing deaths from heart disease and protecting young people from tobacco. These hard-fought victories are at risk as parents avoid vaccinating children, obesity rates climb, and vaping spreads like wildfire among teens.

    Things looked promising for American health in 2014, when life expectancy hit 78.9 years. Then, life expectancy declined for three straight years — the longest sustained drop since the Spanish flu of 1918, which killed about 675,000 Americans and 50 million people worldwide, said Dr. Steven Woolf, a professor of family medicine and population health at Virginia Commonwealth University.

    Although life expectancy inched up slightly in 2018, it hasn’t yet regained the lost ground, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    “These trends show we’re going backwards,” said Dr. Sadiya Khan, an assistant professor of cardiology and epidemiology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

    While the reasons for the backsliding are complex, many public health problems could have been avoided, experts say, through stronger action by federal regulators and more attention to prevention.

    “We’ve had an overwhelming investment in doctors and medicine,” said Dr. Sandro Galea, dean of the Boston University School of Public Health. “We need to invest in prevention — safe housing, good schools, living wages, clean air and water.”

    The country has split into two states of health, often living side by side, but with vastly different life expectancies. Americans in the fittest neighborhoods are living longer and better — hoping to live to 100 and beyond — while residents of the sickest communities are dying from preventable causes decades earlier, which pulls down life expectancy overall.

    Superbugs — resistant to even the strongest antibiotics — threaten to turn back the clock on the treatment of infectious diseases. Resistance occurs when bacteria and fungi evolve in ways that let them survive and flourish, in spite of treatment with the best available drugs. Each year, resistant organisms cause more than 2.8 million infections and kill more than 35,000 people in the U.S.

    With deadly new types of bacteria and fungi ever emerging, Dr. Robert Redfield, the CDC director, said the world has entered a “post-antibiotic era.” Half of all new gonorrhea infections, for example, are resistant to at least one type of antibiotic, and the CDC warns that “little now stands between us and untreatable gonorrhea.”

    That news comes as the CDC also reports a record number of combined cases of gonorrhea, syphilis and chlamydia, which were once so easily treated that they seemed like minor threats compared with HIV.

    The United States has seen a resurgence of congenital syphilis, a scourge of the 19th century, which increases the risk of miscarriage, permanent disabilities and infant death. Although women and babies can be protected with early prenatal care, 1,306 newborns were born with congenital syphilis in 2018 and 94 of them died, according to the CDC.

    Those numbers illustrate the “failure of American public health,” said Dr. Cornelius “Neil” Clancy, a spokesperson for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. “It should be a global embarrassment.”

    The proliferation of resistant microbes has been fueled by overuse, by doctors who write unnecessary prescriptions as well as farmers who give the drugs to livestock, said Dr. William Schaffner, a professor of preventive medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee.

    Although new medications are urgently needed, drug companies are reluctant to develop antibiotics because of the financial risk, said Clancy, noting that two developers of antibiotics recently went out of business. The federal government needs to do more to make sure patients have access to effective treatments, he said. “The antibiotic market is on life support,” Clancy said. “That shows the real perversion in how the health care system is set up.”

    A Slow Decline

    A closer look at the data shows that American health was beginning to suffer 30 years ago. Increases in life expectancy slowed as manufacturing jobs moved overseas and factory towns deteriorated, Woolf said.

    By the 1990s, life expectancy in the United States was falling behind that of other developed countries.

    The obesity epidemic, which began in the 1980s, is taking a toll on Americans in midlife, leading to diabetes and other chronic illnesses that deprive them of decades of life. Although novel drugs for cancer and other serious diseases give some patients additional months or even years, Khan said, “the gains we’re making at the tail end of life cannot make up for what’s happening in midlife.”

    Progress against overall heart disease has stalled since 2010. Deaths from heart failure — which can be caused by high blood pressure and blocked arteries around the heart — are rising among middle-aged people. Deaths from high blood pressure, which can lead to kidney failure, also have increased since 1999.

    “It’s not that we don’t have good blood pressure drugs,” Khan said. “But those drugs don’t do any good if people don’t have access to them.”

    Addicting A New Generation

    While the United States never declared victory over alcohol or drug addiction, the country has made enormous progress against tobacco. Just a few years ago, anti-smoking activists were optimistic enough to talk about the “tobacco endgame.”

    Today, vaping has largely replaced smoking among teens, said Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Although cigarette use among high school students fell from 36% in 1997 to 5.8% today, studies show 31% of seniors used electronic cigarettes in the previous month.

    FDA officials say they’ve taken “vigorous enforcement actions aimed at ensuring e-cigarettes and other tobacco products aren’t being marketed or sold to kids.” But Myers said FDA officials were slow to recognize the threat to children.

    With more than 5 million teens using e-cigarettes, Myers said, “more kids are addicted to nicotine today than at any time in the past 20 years. If that trend isn’t reversed rapidly and dynamically, it threatens to undermine 40 years of progress.”

    Ignoring Science

    Where children live has long determined their risk of infectious disease. Around the world, children in the poorest countries often lack access to lifesaving vaccines.

    Yet in the United States — where a federal program provides free vaccines — some of the lowest vaccination rates are in affluent communities, where some parents disregard the medical evidence that vaccinating kids is safe.

    Studies show that vaccination rates are drastically lower in some private schools and “holistic kindergartens” than in public schools.

    It could be argued that vaccines have been a victim of their own success.

    Before the development of a vaccine in the 1960s, measles infected an estimated 4 million Americans a year, hospitalizing 48,000, causing brain inflammation in about 1,000 and killing 500, according to the CDC.

    By 2000, measles cases had fallen to 86, and the United States declared that year that it had eliminated the routine spread of measles.

    “Now, mothers say, ‘I don’t see any measles. Why do we have to keep vaccinating?’” Schaffner said. “When you don’t fear the disease, it becomes very hard to value the vaccine.”

    Last year, a measles outbreak in New York communities with low vaccination rates spread to almost 1,300 people — the most in 25 years — and nearly cost the country its measles elimination status. “Measles is still out there,” Schaffner said. “It is our obligation to understand how fragile our victory is.”

    Health-Wealth Disparities

    To be sure, some aspects of American health are getting better.

    Cancer death rates have fallen 27% in the past 25 years, according to the American Cancer Society. The teen birth rate is at an all-time low; teen pregnancy rates have dropped by half since 1991, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. And HIV, which was once a death sentence, can now be controlled with a single daily pill. With treatment, people with HIV can live into old age.

    “It’s important to highlight the enormous successes,” Redfield said. “We’re on the verge of ending the HIV epidemic in the U.S. in the next 10 years.”

    Yet the health gap has grown wider in recent years. Life expectancy in some regions of the country grew by four years from 2001 to 2014, while it shrank by two years in others, according to a 2016 study in JAMA.

    The gap in life expectancy is strongly linked to income: The richest 1% of American men live 15 years longer than the poorest 1%; the richest women live 10 years longer than the poorest, according to the JAMA study.

    “We’re not going to erase that difference by telling people to eat right and exercise,” said Dr. Richard Besser, CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and former acting director of the CDC. “Personal choices are part of it. But the choices people make depend on the choices they’re given. For far too many people, their choices are extremely limited.”

    The infant mortality rate of black babies is twice as high as that of white newborns, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. Babies born to well-educated, middle-class black mothers are more likely to die before their 1st birthday than babies born to poor white mothers with less than a high school education, according to a report from the Brookings Institution.

    In trying to improve American health, policymakers in recent years have focused largely on expanding access to medical care and encouraging healthy lifestyles. Today, many advocate taking a broader approach, calling for systemic change to lift families out of the poverty that erodes mental and physical health.

    “So many of the changes in life expectancy are related to changes in opportunity,” Besser said. “Economic opportunity and health go hand in hand.”

    Several policies have been shown to improve health.

    Children who receive early childhood education, for example, have lower rates of obesity, child abuse and neglect, youth violence and emergency department visits, according to the CDC.

    And earned income tax credits — which provide refunds to lower-income people — have been credited with keeping more families and children above the poverty line than any other federal, state or local program, according to the CDC. Among families who receive these tax credits, mothers have better mental health and babies have lower rates of infant mortality and weigh more at birth, a sign of health.

    Improving a person’s environment has the potential to help them far more than writing a prescription, said John Auerbach, president and CEO of the nonprofit Trust for America’s Health.

    “If we think we can treat our way out of this, we will never solve the problem,” Auerbach said. “We need to look upstream at the underlying causes of poor health.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Smartphones and Coronavirus

    The links between smartphones and Coronavirus

    We’ve been advised to wash our hands more frequently in the current coronavirus outbreak, but should we be looking at keeping our smartphones cleaner too?

    Coronavirus is spreading, and fast. Since it first infected humans in late 2019 there have been thousands of cases and hundreds of deaths. In our globalised world, it is easy for a very contagious virus, like Covid-19, to spread so it’s useful to know what practical steps we can take to keep ourselves safe. Our phones are our digital companions, they come with us everywhere and can host germs of all kinds. Here are three simple steps to help you reduce the potential coronavirus risks from your smartphone:

    1. Clean your phone regularly

    Several studies have shown that our phones are dirtier than our toilet seats and potentially host more germs. When was the last time you cleaned your phone? Not a quick wipe to clean the screen, but actually cleaning it with a dedicated surface cleaner? Our phones are hotbeds of germs. In taking a phone call you’re putting that bacteria on your face, and by not washing your hands before you snack you’re putting those bacteria in your mouth. We suggest cleaning your phone regularly, at least once a day, in order to stay free of those germs which you pick up in everyday life and which then stay on your phone, even after you wash your hands.

    Experts have suggested that alcohol wipes, rather than soap and water, are the most effective way to keep your smartphones clean.

    2. Don’t put your phone down

    This might sound like contradictory advice coming from Time To Log Off! But we’re not suggesting you stay on your phone – we’re suggesting you don’t put your phone down on a surface in a public place. Don’t place it on a table in a coffee shop or bar for example, because you don’t know who’s been there before. The World Health Organisation does not yet know how long Covid-19 can survive on surfaces but they assume a few hours to a few days.

    smartphones and coronavirus

    3. Be careful what you believe online

    Once again, fake news has raised its ugly head around an international incident. Since the outbreak of coronavirus, there has been a deluge of inaccurate information online including lists of various quack ‘cures’. Our advice is to only trust reputable, verified, news sources such as the BBC, or WHO for your news and information about how to avoid catching coronavirus, as well as what might happen to you if you did.

    There’s a more significant connection between smartphones and coronavirus than you might think. Our phones are our constant companions so they can potentially even impact our health in terms of catching viruses not just impact on our sleep. Keep yourself safe by following our tips, and hopefully, it will help us all to develop more hygienic habits along the way too.

    View the original article at itstimetologoff.com

  • What really works to keep coronavirus away? 4 questions answered by a public health professional

    While hand-washing is preferred, hand sanitizers with at least a 60% alcohol concentration can be an effective alternative to always using soap and water, but only if your hands are not visibly soiled.

    Editor’s note: The World Health Organization has declared that COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus, has a higher fatality rate than the flu. As of March 4, 2020, nine deaths have been reported in the U.S. Brian Labus, a professor of public health, provides essential safety information for you, from disinfectants to storing food and supplies.

    1. What can I do to prevent becoming infected?

    When people are sick with a respiratory disease like COVID-19, they cough or sneeze particles into the air. If someone is coughing near you, the virus could easily land on your eyes, nose or mouth. These particles travel only about six feet and fall out of the air rather quickly. However, they do land on surfaces that you touch all the time, such as railings, doorknobs, elevator buttons or subway poles. The average person also touches their face 23 times per hour, and about half of these touches are to the mouth, eyes, and nose, which are the mucosal surfaces that the COVID-19 virus infects.

    We public health professionals can’t stress this enough: Proper hand-washing is the best thing you can do to protect yourself from a number of diseases including COVID-19. While hand-washing is preferred, hand sanitizers with at least a 60% alcohol concentration can be an effective alternative to always using soap and water, but only if your hands are not visibly soiled.

    The best way to wash your hands.

    2. Wouldn’t it be easier just to clean surfaces?

    Not really. Public health experts don’t fully understand the role these surfaces play in the transmission of disease, and you could still be infected by a virus that landed directly on you. We also don’t know how long the coronavirus that causes COVID-19 can survive on hard surfaces, although other coronaviruses can survive for up to nine days on hard surfaces like stair railings.

    Frequent cleaning could remove the virus if a surface has been contaminated by a sick person, such as when someone in your household is sick. In these situations, it is important to use a disinfectant that is thought to be effective against the COVID-19 virus. Although specific products have not yet been tested against COVID-19 coronavirus, there are many products that are effective against the general family of coronaviruses. Cleaning recommendations using “natural” products like vinegar are popular on social media, but there is no evidence that they are effective against coronavirus.

    You also have to use these products properly in accordance with the directions, and that typically means keeping the surface wet with the product for a period of time, often several minutes. Simply wiping the surface down with a product is usually not enough to kill the virus.

    In short, it isn’t possible to properly clean every surface you touch throughout your day, so hand-washing is still your best defense against COVID-19.

    3. What about wearing masks?

    While people have turned to masks as protection against COVID-19, masks often provide nothing more than a false sense of security to the wearer. The masks that were widely available at pharmacies, big-box stores and home improvement stores – until a worried public bought them all – work well at filtering out large particles like dust. The problem is that the particles that carry the COVID-19 virus are small and easily move right through dust masks and surgical masks. These masks may provide some protection to other people if you wear one while you are sick – like coughing into a tissue – but they will do little to protect you from other sick people.

    N95 masks, which filter out 95% of the small, virus-containing particles, are worn in health care settings to protect doctors and nurses from exposure to respiratory diseases. These masks provide protection only if they are worn properly. They require special testing to ensure that they provide a seal around your face and that air doesn’t leak in the sides, defeating the purpose of the mask. People wearing the mask also must take special steps when removing the mask to ensure that they are not contaminating themselves with the viral particles that the mask filtered out. If you don’t wear the mask properly, don’t remove it properly or put it in your pocket and reuse it later, even the best mask won’t do you any good.

    4. Should I stockpile food and supplies?

    As a general preparedness step, you should have a three-day supply of food and water in case of emergencies. This helps protect from disruptions to the water supply or during power outages.

    While this is great general preparation advice, it doesn’t help you during a disease outbreak. There is no reason to expect COVID-19 to cause the same damage to our infrastructure that we Americans would see after an earthquake, hurricane or tornado, so you shouldn’t plan for it in the same way. While you don’t want to run out of toilet paper, there is no reason to buy 50 packages.

    A Wuhan-type quarantine is extremely unlikely, as a quarantine won’t stop the spread of a disease that has been found all over the world. The types of disruptions that you should plan for are small disruptions in your day-to-day life. You should have a plan in case you or a family member gets sick and you can’t leave the house for a few days. This includes stocking up on basic things you need to take care of yourself, like food and medicines.

    If you do get sick, the last thing you are going to want to do is run to the grocery store, where you would expose other people to your illness. You shouldn’t wait until you are out of an important medication before requesting a refill just in case your pharmacy closes for a couple days because all their employees are sick. You also should plan for how to handle issues like temporary school or day care closures. You don’t need to prepare anything extreme; a little common-sense preparation will go a long way to make your life easier if you or your loved ones become sick.

    [Deep knowledge, daily.Sign up for The Conversation’s newsletter.]

    Brian Labus, Assistant Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.