Author: The Fix

  • What The "Painless Woman" Can Teach Us About Anxiety, Pain

    What The "Painless Woman" Can Teach Us About Anxiety, Pain

    A woman with a rare insensitivity to pain may be able to help researchers develop new drugs to treat pain and anxiety.

    Jo Cameron experiences less pain, less anxiety and less depression than most people—but for the first 65 years of her life, she had no idea she was so unique. 

    “I was just a happy soul who didn’t realize there was anything different about me,” Cameron said, according to ABC News.

    It wasn’t until Cameron was in the hospital for a normally very painful surgery that doctors realized she had a much higher than normal pain tolerance. After learning more about her life that has been almost entirely free from pain, researchers began studying Cameron. The results were recently published in the British Journal of Anaesthesia.

    Researchers found that Cameron has mutations in her DNA that affect her body’s cannabinoid system, and thus how she experiences pain. Cameron has low levels of the enzyme FAAH (fatty-acid amide hydrolase), which breaks down anandamide, a cannabinoid neurotransmitter, Colin Klein explained in The Conversation

    “Since Cameron doesn’t break down anandamide, it accumulates in her blood,” Klein writes, pointing out that animal studies show that elevated anandamide decreases pain and anxiety. “So she not only feels less pain, she also feels less anxiety about the pain she does feel.”

    This is consistent with what researchers found. 

    “[Cameron] also reported never panicking, not even in dangerous or fearful situations, such as in a recent road traffic accident,” they wrote. 

    Cameron’s condition isn’t without negative side effects—she often is forgetful, and she doesn’t have pain to alert her when something is wrong with her body. “It would be nice to have warning when something’s wrong,” she said. 

    Researcher James Cox said that cases like Cameron’s can help the medical community better understand pain, anxiety, and how they interact. “People with rare insensitivity to pain can be valuable to medical research as we learn how their genetic mutations impact how they experience pain,” he said. 

    Understanding how FAAH interacts with the cannabinoid system could help researchers develop new drugs. 

    “FAAH is therefore an attractive drug target for treating pain, anxiety, and depression, although recent clinical trials with FAAH inhibitors were unsuccessful,” they wrote.

    Despite that, researcher Devjit Srivastava said that Cameron’s case is very important. 

    “The implications for these findings are immense,” Srivastava said. “The findings point towards a novel painkiller discovery that could potentially offer post-surgical pain relief and also accelerate wound healing. We hope this could help the 330 million patients who undergo surgery globally every year.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Olivia Newton-John Opens Up About Using Cannabis For Cancer Pain

    Olivia Newton-John Opens Up About Using Cannabis For Cancer Pain

    “I use a lot of cannabis in my healing. It helped me incredibly with pain and sleep. Opiates are killing people and cannabis doesn’t,” the prolific entertainer explained.

    Olivia Newton-John, the Australian star of Grease and Xanadu, is known for her bright and positive public persona, even in the face of fighting cancer. Newton-John has had to endure three bouts with it over the last 27 years, including her current fight with stage four breast cancer. She tells Yahoo Lifestyle that one of the key ingredients in fighting the disease is “a lot of cannabis.”

    As the singer explains, “I use a lot of cannabis in my healing. It helped me incredibly with pain and sleep. Opiates are killing people and cannabis doesn’t.”

    Newton-John’s husband, John Easterling, is in the wellness industry, and he grows cannabis in their home. Olivia told People, “He grows the plants and makes them into liquid for me. I take drops maybe four to five times a day.”

    Newton-John hadn’t indulged in cannabis much in her life, and at first she was “a little nervous” about taking it. But she then discovered that it was remarkably beneficial to managing her pain and contributing to her overall wellness. (Her daughter Chloe is also a cannabis farmer.)

    The singer-songwriter was pleasantly surprised to find that cannabis is “an amazing plant, a maligned plant, but it’s helping so many people.”

    Newton-John was first diagnosed with breast cancer in 1992, but she refused to let her diagnosis affect her mental health. “I had to make a decision that no matter what, I was going to be OK,” she explains. “My main decision was, ‘I’m going to get better, and I have a young child to raise.’” (Her autobiography is titled, appropriately enough, Don’t Stop Believin’.)

    In addition to cannabis, Newton-John also prays and meditates as part of her wellness routine. “The first time I had breast cancer in 1992, I had a transcendental meditation teacher come and give me a mantra,” she said. “And Deepak Chopra, who was a friend, gave me a mantra [too].”

    Newton-John also told The Telegraph that her dream is that the medical marijuana laws will change in her native Australia and that “it will be available to all the cancer patients and people going through cancer that causes pain.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Wendy Williams: I'm "Living Proof" That There's Hope For Those With Addiction

    Wendy Williams: I'm "Living Proof" That There's Hope For Those With Addiction

    Williams touched on her own recovery while promoting her new addiction recovery helpline. 

    Talk show host Wendy Williams, whose journey through relapse and recovery made headlines this month, has put out a public service announcement urging those who are in need of addiction treatment services to reach out for help.

    Williams launched the announcement in conjunction with a new helpline through The Hunter Foundation, an organization that she and her husband, Kevin Hunter, began in 2014 to provide recovery resources. The foundation launched the helpline on March 11 to help people connect with treatment. 

    “Hi, I’m Wendy Williams Hunter. My organization, The Hunter Foundation, recently launched a nationwide hotline to offer treatment resources for you if you are a drug addict or substance abuser,” Williams said, according to People.

    When people call into the line, at 1-888-5HUNTER, they are connected with recovery coaches who can help them find treatment resources. 

    Williams explained, “The calls are being answered by specially-trained, certified recovery coaches. They’re very smart. They conduct screenings to determine your needs. The substance abuse will be taken care of. We will provide you with referrals for long- or short-term treatment at facilities all around the world: detox, rehab, sober living and outpatient centers everywhere, nationwide.”

    Williams struggled with cocaine use in the past and was recently hospitalized for drinking. However, she said that her story shows there is hope for everyone battling substance use disorder. 

    “If you’re an addict or a substance abuser, don’t be ashamed—help is here for you or a family member or a loved one. Call. Don’t be ashamed, there is hope. I’m living proof.”

    Since the hotline launched, it has received more than 10,000 calls and connected more than 400 people with treatment services, according to Today

    “10,000 calls in three weeks is remarkable! We’re doing our part by getting the word out,” Williams said. “All it takes is one call to get on the right path. We’re here to help.”

    Williams announced in March that she was living in a sober house and working with a sobriety coach. Her relapse reportedly had to do with her husband’s extramarital affair, although neither Williams nor Hunter has publicly commented on the matter. Hunter said last week that the couple is focusing on their relationship and Williams’ recovery, while also continuing to help others through their foundation. 

    “Wendy and the family are doing fine. We are focused on her health and sobriety, and that is it,” he said. “We are turning the tables on this thing called addiction and turning Wendy’s bout into a positive.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Am I Still in AA If I'm Not Going to Meetings?

    Am I Still in AA If I'm Not Going to Meetings?

    After years in recovery, certain aspects of the program may no longer be useful while others are. That doesn’t mean you have to completely shut the door.

    Hi, I’m Helaina, my sobriety date is November 12th, 2011, and right now, I’m in the grey when it comes to “the program.”

    Here’s what that means.

    A lot is being written lately about leaving 12-step programs. The alternative, of course, being staying in 12-step programs. For some people, the decision likely is clear. Maybe you’ve realized you do need more meetings, sponsorship, step-work, and fellowship for your own betterment. Great! Do it. Or you definitely need to leave everything you associate with AA behind, because it really is just not for you, and it’s not helpful. Great! Do it.

    If you have some solid recovery time, you may be somewhere in the middle, in a place where certain aspects of the program are likely no longer useful or necessary, while others are. If you’re not giving the program the same all-or-nothing you always have before, you may be feeling pressure to stay and change your behavior, get back to your former state of enthusiasm and action. Others may be giving you subtle or not-so-subtle suggestions to leave, especially if you can’t fake it til you make it anymore and you’re clearly over it.

    Finding the Grey Area in 12-Step Programs

    The groupthink can be intimidating, but you may not even have to make the decision to stay or go.

    Ironically, we spend a lot of time un-learning that kind of black and white thinking in recovery, opting instead to find peace of mind by living in the grey.

    In the grey, we can recognize that what we need and what works for us within the 12-step models can change, and that’s normal. As humans, we’re in a constant state of evolution, which is why we don’t spend our entire lives in Kindergarten (hopefully).

    For me, part of becoming a sober woman in recovery has been learning to trust that I know what’s right for me, and what works for me, while blocking out the opinions of everyone else; namely, the scare tactics, the fear of judgment, and the people who think they know what’s best for everyone. That isn’t easy.

    For a while, I kept going to meetings because I was afraid that I’d disappoint someone, maybe a sponsor, if I didn’t. I went because I didn’t want people to think I was a “bad AA.” Or I worried that people would think that I must have relapsed if I stopped going. There is a confusing contradiction in the program about how one size doesn’t fit all and everything is just a suggestion, but also that you’re headed for a miserable death if you reduce or stop going to meetings. So meetings weren’t really a useful part of my toolkit anymore, but I still carried them around until they almost became a burden instead of a cushion. But without the meetings—or with only occasional meetings—am I still in AA?

    Over time, as they say, we find a bridge back to life, and thinking in black and white is the very thing that can freeze you up while trying to walk across your bridge. So, I walk across my bridge “in the grey.”

    In the grey, you don’t have to pressure yourself to make a decision or overthink whether you’re “really” doing well. If you feel like you’re doing well, you’re probably doing well. It’s not a trap. If you haven’t spoken to your sponsor in a few months, or if you don’t have one, or if you don’t go to meetings…have you “left” AA? More grey matter coming up: you don’t have to decide to cut off everything and everyone, or do all or nothing when it comes to the program.

    Healing and Trusting Myself

    I’ve done a ton of hard work—including 12-step work —that has changed my life and allowed me to remedy what drove me to drink in the first place. I have this great life because of those early years of incredibly hard work, diligence, taking all of those suggestions as seriously as possible and doing step work over and over again, and therapy, and all the good things we do to create meaningful change in our lives.

    I finally trust that I know what’s best for myself, and I know that I always get to change my mind. It’s taken me almost half a decade to feel comfortable knowing that I don’t need to drag myself to meetings just to be a “good AA.” I don’t need the same level of therapy for PTSD with the same frequency as I did ten years ago. What I need to stay sober, physically and emotionally, has also changed over time.

    Deep down, I think that if we’re honest with ourselves at any stage in our recovery, we all know what we need to do in order to not drink—and furthermore, to be good people, kind people, honest people, considerate, thoughtful, loyal.

    Whatever your values are, identify what you need to do to keep them close and act accordingly.

    Going to a certain number of meetings, making coffee, talking to a sponsor every day is not necessarily the answer for everyone, even if it is the answer for many. I respect that the same way I hope people will respect the rest of us walking our own path with the tools we need.

    As the book says, what we learn becomes a natural working part of the mind, and so what we did during our first three years may not be what we need to do after six years, and we can trust our own thinking again. When I feel that maybe my thinking is murky here and there, I usually know to reach out to bounce those thoughts off someone else.

    But the idea of knowing yourself well enough to change your program-related behavior is not preached nearly as often warnings against it.

    Sweeping Generalizations as Scare Tactics in AA

    “I thought, ‘I got this’ and then I relapsed.”

    Or “I stopped going to meetings, and I relapsed.”

    Of course, there’s also the F word: “I forgot that I was an alcoholic and couldn’t drink normally. “

    It is important to honor people’s experiences, but it becomes dangerous when we assume that all alcoholics everywhere need to do the same thing or they risk the same fate. Using that kind of sweeping generalization as a scare tactic can be enough to cause someone to want to reject the program altogether and leave or keep doing something that just isn’t right for them anymore and stay against their better judgement.

    Relapse is not part of my story (common belief is that if I don’t say “yet” I’m also doing something dangerous, so I’m sticking that word in the grey area of these parenthesis), but I’d be willing to bet that folks who have relapsed didn’t “forget” anything. They probably didn’t forget that their drinking had serious consequences the way that one forgets to turn the light off in the kitchen or take out the trash before leaving for vacation.

    They likely made conscious choices to engage in some unhealthy behaviors again, despite knowing what they knew about themselves; what they forgot was to put into practice all the things they’d learned in the program along the way.

    For me, forgetting my inner struggles would be like forgetting that I’m a woman, or that I’m a human, or that I need to eat and sleep. I’m well aware. I’m also not walking around saying, “Darn, I’m an alcoholic!” or “I am a womannnn!” every day.

    To an extent, there is actually a level of “forgetting” that feels great. I rarely think about drinking or smoking weed. I don’t think every day about how I can’t drink. I just don’t drink anymore.

    I know that if I become complacent, I may not get to keep it all, so it’s up to me to do what I need to do in order not to get to that place. Doing something to keep up the new life we’ve created is a great idea, but for me that something isn’t to keep me from forgetting that I’m an alcoholic, but rather to keep me from forgetting what I’ve learned, how far I’ve come, and what I did to get to where I am now.

    Social support in some form is such a crucial part of any kind of recovery, but you can decide what that looks like. I’ve made amazing friends in sobriety and as sober women, we understand each other and connect on a deep level that creates a special bond and provides a unique support system. And when you have just one alcoholic talking to another, as they say, you have a meeting.

    Self-Empowerment in Recovery

    We have to give ourselves permission to feel confident that after a certain period of time, having put in the years of work, we can start to know what’s best for ourselves. That breathing room is nice. Enjoy it.

    I also know that in a year, or in five years, something in me might change again, and it may feel right to go to meetings again. I’m not digging my heels in. I’ll be grateful they’re there, because despite all of the personalities and the disappointments and frustrations that we don’t like finding “in the rooms,” it’s still a beautiful place that is home to a program that works for a lot of people. It’s something we can always count on.

    Luckily, the world of wellness has opened up. Principles and concepts that were once exclusive to 12-step are now everywhere, in books, on podcasts, on Instagram and elsewhere. Reminders to keep our side of the street clean, take things one day at a time, think about our personal boundaries, speak (and text, and email) kindly and honestly, pause before acting, meditate, forgive, practice self-care, volunteer, focus on putting good into the world and not just taking from it, are everywhere.

    We learn that to keep it, we have to give it away and for me, that’s still true. Ironically, I spent years raising my hand to offer myself as a sponsor in meetings, I gave out my number, I spoke to newcomers, and I even served as “sponsorship chair.” Yet, I never had a sponsee. Instead, I’ve carried the message through personal interactions and to people who message me after reading something I wrote. I tried carrying the message and helping other alcoholics “the traditional” way for years, and didn’t get the chance to do it that way, so I figured out the ways in which I can.

    If you don’t know where you stand around that line in the sand that separates “leaving” or “staying” then lay your blanket down, sprawl out across it, and forget about the line altogether.

    How has your 12-step participation changed over time? Do you believe people can reduce their involvement and still be okay? Sound off in the comments.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Woman Accused Of Running Multimillion-Dollar Black Market Pot Operation

    Woman Accused Of Running Multimillion-Dollar Black Market Pot Operation

    The Massachusetts resident was charged with conspiring to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana.

    Recreational marijuana may be legal in Massachusetts, but black market operations will not be tolerated in the state, judging by the experience of one woman who is now facing federal drug-trafficking charges for allegedly operating a black market pot service. 

    Milton resident Deana Martin was charged with conspiring to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana, according to a press release by the U.S. State Attorney General’s Office. Martin allegedly operated a black market business between 2015 and 2018 that had about 25 employees and grossed more than $14 million from 2016 to 2018. 

    The company, Northern Herb, claimed to be a medical marijuana company, but did not check that clients had medical marijuana licenses. It was not clear whether Northern Herb was a licensed medical marijuana provider in the state. The company operated online, selling marijuana, pre-rolled joints and marijuana-infused edibles that were delivered to clients. 

    In addition to operating outside the medical marijuana field, the company got into trouble for leaving packages unattended at homes and in apartment hallways. This would allow the drugs to potentially be picked up by someone other than the person who had ordered them. 

    Martin apparently planned to incentivize her employees for selling a certain amount of marijuana each month. 

    “One such incentivized tier, for instance, would be for selling more than 10 pounds of marijuana per month,” the Attorney General’s Office said. 

    Despite the fact that cannabis became legal in Massachusetts in 2017, Martin was not interested in joining the legal market. In Massachusetts, marijuana is taxed at 17% and local governments can add an additional tax on top of that. In an email discussing tax rates for legal cannabis businesses, Martin wrote, “Zero taxes is still better.”

    Although she didn’t file taxes for the businesses, Martin claimed an income of $80,000 a month during the time that she was operating Northern Herb. She used the money to pay down her mortgage, which was about $300,000, and to purchase a Porsche, court documents said. 

    She did not pay any taxes for the business, or provide employees with proper tax documentation, the Attorney General’s Office said. In fact, she laundered the money that came through the business and hid it in accounts that were not in her name, the Attorney General’s Office said. 

    If Martin is convicted of the federal charges, she faces a mandatory minimum sentence of five years, and up to 40 years in prison. She could also be fined up to $5 million. 

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Massachusetts Mental Health Court Serves As Alternative To Jail Time

    Massachusetts Mental Health Court Serves As Alternative To Jail Time

    The Recovery with Justice program was established by a local judge who believes jail is not always the answer.

    Nearly one-fifth of prisoners have been diagnosed with a mental health disorder. This fact has pushed one Massachusetts judge to take action. 

    Kathleen Coffey, a judge in the West Roxbury neighborhood of Boston, Massachusetts, is hoping to change the way these individuals receive treatment through a program called Recovery with Justice.  

    Coffey, who serves as the Specialty Courts Director for the Boston Municipal Court, created the program hoping to help those with mental health and other developmental disorders with an alternative to jail time. 

    “Many people end up in the criminal justice system because other systems have failed them and the social safety net has failed them,” Coffey told Boston 25 News. “Often times, mental illness has not been flagged, or has not been identified as a contributing factor.” 

    According to the mental health court’s official webpage, the program “is a specialized court session that helps defendants maintain stability, achieve recovery and avoid incarceration by providing intensive social services and mental health treatment.”

    Those in the program must take part in community-based treatment for at least three months and will be reviewed by a court team. In each case, a probation officer works alongside a mental health clinician to identify the needs of each individual. Based on those needs, a specific plan is created. This plan may include treatment referrals and opportunities for housing, education and employment. 

    The recipient of one such plan, Mario Torres, tells Boston 25 News that he has been in and out of jail for a total of 20 to 25 years throughout his life. He says that going to mental health court is a way of talking through his struggles, almost like therapy. 

    “Judge Coffey is pretty understanding about my addiction,” Torres said. “I had a drug problem in my past… constantly into trouble and getting arrested.” 

    “I look back and I have thrown my life out the window,” he added.

    Torres hopes that being a part of Recovery with Justice will help him get his life on track for good.

    “I want to be a productive member to society,” Torres said.

    Throughout Massachusetts, Boston 25 News reports, there are currently seven mental health courts. At the one in West Roxbury, more than 200 people have been admitted.

    “We are keeping good people out of jail and within the community, recognizing that is what the court system is supposed to do,” Coffey said. “We are supposed to be here to help people.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Sackler Family Says Opioid Lawsuit Is "Misleading"

    Sackler Family Says Opioid Lawsuit Is "Misleading"

    The family’s lawyers have filed motions to dismiss the complaint filed against them by the Massachusetts Attorney General.

    Members of the billionaire Sackler family say that public outrage over their alleged role in the opioid epidemic—as the owners of OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma—is all a big misunderstanding. 

    According to lawsuits filed across the country, including one in Massachusetts, members of the Sackler family played an active role in pushing opioid painkillers marketed by Purdue Pharma, despite knowing about the addiction risks.

    As the national opioid crisis worsened, the company even considered selling addiction medication to further profit off of opioid addiction, the lawsuits allege. 

    However, a statement made by the family’s attorneys this week said that prosecutors and the press are cherry-picking information to make the family look bad, according to WGBH Boston

    “We are confident the court will look past the inflammatory media coverage generated by the misleading complaint and apply the law fairly by dismissing all of these claims,” the statement read. 

    The Sacklers are one of the richest families in the U.S. and are major donors to museums, colleges and other institutions. However, the family has been subject to more scrutiny as the lawsuits against them pile up.

    In February, activists staged a “die-in” at the Guggenheim Museum in New York City to highlight the role of the Sacklers in promoting addictive opioids. The family had donated extensively to the museum. More recently, a donation to the UK’s National Portrait Gallery was mutually cancelled because of public outcry. 

    “It has become evident that recent reporting of allegations made against Sackler family members may cause this new donation to deflect the National Portrait Gallery from its important work,” a spokesperson for the Sackler Trust told NPR. “The allegations against family members are vigorously denied.”

    Those allegations include that family members, particularly former Purdue Pharma President and Chairman Richard Sackler, were actively involved with marketing OxyContin in misleading ways even when they knew the risk of addiction to the pills was high. The Massachusetts lawsuit alleges that Sackler even visited doctors to help push OxyContin, something that the family denies. 

    Richard Sackler also reportedly made a comment in 1996 about OxyContin’s launch being “followed by a blizzard of prescriptions that will bury the competition.”

    This week, attorneys for the family said that the statement was taken out of context, and that Sackler was actually referring to a snow blizzard that had made him late for the event. 

    The statement goes on to say that the lawsuit “mischaracterizes and selectively quotes from the hundreds of documents it cites to create the false impression” that the family “micromanaged every aspect of Purdue’s marketing strategy.” Rather, the family was not that closely involved with the operations of Purdue, the statement said. 

    However, the Sackler family (not just Purdue) was ordered to pay $75 million over five years as part of a settlement with the state of Oklahoma last week. After that, New York added the family to its ongoing lawsuit against Purdue. 

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Sweden Rethinks Zero Tolerance Drug Policy as Cocaine Use Rises

    Sweden Rethinks Zero Tolerance Drug Policy as Cocaine Use Rises

    Swedish authorities are trying to learn what factors are contributing to the rising rates of use (and overdose), including the way they police.

    Officials in Sweden are rethinking their policies as cocaine use, and overdoses, continue to rise despite their hard-line stance on drugs.

    According to SVT, Sweden’s national public news broadcasting service, the drug has only grown stronger, more common, and cheaper in the last few years.

    Police and customs have seized 300% more cocaine since 2012. Swedish customs reports seizing as much as 485 kg of the stuff. Cocaine was also found to be the cause of death in 20 cases last year, a massive increase from a few years ago with just one reported case.

    While such numbers may seem small in relation to other countries, such a significant spike has caused concern in Sweden and a scramble to find out why.

    “Cocaine has increased at least four-fold. This indicates that usage has increased,” said Robert Kronstrand, of the Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine. “Blood samples have improved, which may explain more positive tests, but that’s not the reason for the sharp increase.”

    Even the police agree that better testing doesn’t account for the sharp rise in cocaine cases. They’ve seen a significant shift in who is dying, and where: past cocaine deaths were associated with social gatherings, but almost all 2018 deaths were at home.

    Sweden’s drug policy is being called into question as it is among one of the most hard-line policies in Europe. Police have the authority to urine test anyone they suspect of using drugs, and pretty much no distinction is made between hard and soft drugs. The policy’s aim was to squash all use of drugs.

    “Prohibiting both personal use and the possession and sale of drugs in Sweden makes it harder for ‘open drug scenes’ to arise, i.e. places where drugs are used and sold more or less openly. This is an important element in systematically reducing access to drugs and preventing people from using drugs,” the policy reads.

    In a grim sense, the policy succeeded, leading people to use and die in their own homes. It’s a policy that has come under criticism by the United Nations.

    Sweden’s laws stand in stark contrast to its neighbor Norway, which is moving towards the decriminalization of all drugs. The intention is to “stop punishing people who struggle, but instead give them help and treatment,” said Nicolas Wilkinson of Norway’s Socialist Labour Party. The end goal is to divert the handling of drug cases away from the justice system to the health care system.

    In Sweden, multiple parties in parliament have banded together to take on the problem. This isn’t the first time Sweden has swiftly responded to substance abuse issues, having restricted the sale of hand sanitizer in 2016 after a rash of teenagers showed up in emergency rooms from drinking the alcogels.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • FDA To Investigate Whether Vaping Causes Seizures

    FDA To Investigate Whether Vaping Causes Seizures

    The FDA will investigate cases of seizures possibly related to vaping—but no links have been made yet.

    The Food and Drug Administration announced Wednesday that it will be looking into 35 individual cases of people having seizures after vaping between 2010 and 2019.

    Most of these cases have happened to young adults or underage kids, and the FDA is concerned about the implications, according to CNBC.

    “While 35 cases may not seem like much compared to the total number of people using e-cigarettes, we are nonetheless concerned by these reported cases,” said FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb and Principal Deputy Commissioner Amy Abernethy.

    Vaping with e-cigarettes has grown in popularity, sparking concern among health experts who stress that even without the additives found in normal cigarettes, nicotine can still have negative health effects that get worse the younger the user is.

    It’s currently unclear whether the seizures in these 35 cases were caused by vaping, but these alarming and potentially dangerous neurological events can be caused by nicotine poisoning.

    “We’re sharing this early information with the public because as a public health agency, it’s our job to communicate about potential safety concerns associated with the products we regulate that are under scientific investigation by the agency,” Gottlieb and Abernethy said in their joint statement.

    Last December, U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams officially declared e-cigarette use among young people to be a national epidemic. E-cigarettes are often marketed as being safe alternatives to regular cigarettes and surveys have found that young people believe the hype.

    Vaping is no less addictive than combustible smoking, and according to an article in Yale Medicine, studies are finding that “vaping increases the risk a teen will smoke regular cigarettes later.”

    Health experts are also concerned about the high concentration of nicotine in each e-cigarette “pod”—the replaceable cartridges that contain the liquid form of the drug—compared to a combustible cigarette. Some of these pods contain higher concentrations than others, and some, called “pod mods,” are made from nicotine salts that have an even higher concentration of nicotine than the traditional e-cigarette pod.

    According to the Surgeon General Advisory on e-cigarettes, they can also contain heavy metals, chemical flavorants linked to lung disease, and “volatile organic compounds.” The FDA has had difficulty keeping up with the rapid development of the vaping industry, meaning that users may be unknowingly inhaling unsafe materials.

    The National Institute on Drug Abuse also found that a full two-thirds of teens who vape believe that their e-cigarettes only contain flavoring. Only 13.2% knew that they were inhaling nicotine.

    Still, the FDA acknowledges that there are many other factors that could have led to the seizures, including other drugs taken and prior histories of seizures. 

    “We want to be clear that we don’t yet know if there’s a direct relationship between the use of e-cigarettes and a risk of seizure,” they said.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Prince Harry: Fortnite Is Addictive & Irresponsible

    Prince Harry: Fortnite Is Addictive & Irresponsible

    The royal soon-to-be parent feels the video game has an alarmingly strong grip on kids these days… and perhaps should be banned.

    Prince Harry spoke out against Fortnite, one of the most popular video games among kids today, during a talk with mental health experts in London. He even floated the idea that the game itself should be banned.

    “That game shouldn’t be allowed. Where is the benefit of having it in your household?” he pondered. “It’s created to addict, an addiction to keep you in front of a computer for as long as possible. It’s so irresponsible.”

    He added that not taking immediate action would be a mistake.

    “It’s like waiting for the damage to be done and kids turning up on your doorsteps and families being broken down,” Prince Harry said.

    He feels sympathy for the parents dealing with something they might not understand.

    “Parents have got their hands up – they don’t know what to do about it,” he remarked. “It’s like waiting for the damage to be done.”

    Fortnite, developed by North Carolina-based company Epic Games, boasts 45 million players worldwide. Players battle each other on a large map, battle-royale style.

    The game itself is free but players can purchase costumes and dances for their characters, reportedly earning Epic more than $300 million a month.

    Prince Harry’s concern doesn’t grow from nothing. Some doctors are reportedly seeing a link between excessive gaming and the health of their young patients. Additionally, about 200 divorce cases in the UK from January to September of 2018 mentioned excessive gaming, including Fortnite, as a cause.

    Fans and some experts are not convinced. Andrew Reid, a Scottish university researcher, says that calling games like Fortnite “addictive” needlessly stigmatizes all players and that there are positive social aspects to going online. E-sports director Sujoy Roy says believes panicked parents should take responsibility instead of pointing fingers.

    “Fortnite isn’t the first hit game to have had a bad press and it won’t be the last. It’s really popular with younger gamers and, of course, parents should keep a close eye on what their kids are playing and doing online,” said Roy. “But, like many games, Fortnite is a really fun and sociable way to spend free time and, like everything, should be enjoyed responsibly.”

    Prince Harry’s criticisms didn’t stop at video gaming. He also blasted social media for being “more addictive than drugs and alcohol.”

    View the original article at thefix.com