Category: Addiction News

  • Benzo Death Rates Among Women Skyrocket

    Benzo Death Rates Among Women Skyrocket

    A new report also shows the number of benzodiazepine prescriptions has sharply risen over an 18-year timeframe.

    New statistics suggest that the overdose death rates involving the prescription drugs known as benzodiazepines have risen dramatically over the past decade, and approach statistics for heroin – and synthetic opioid-related overdose deaths.

    A report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that between 1999 and 2017, the number of women between the ages of 30 and 64 who died from an drug overdose involving benzodiazepines – a family of drugs used for anxiety – rose 830% during that time period.

    The CDC also found that prescriptions for benzodiazepines rose by 67% during the approximate same time period.

    Benzodiazepines, which include such medications as Xanax, Valium and Klonopin, can prove effective in treating conditions like anxiety or insomnia if taken on an intermittent basis over a period of a few weeks. But with long-term use, they also carry an increased risk for overdose if taken with opioids.

    Their ability to calm or sedate the user through an increase in the neurotransmitter GABA in the brain, which can be dangerous if taken with drugs that slow breathing like opioids or even alcohol. The National Institute on Drug Abuse reported in 2018 that 30% of opioid-related overdoses also involved benzodiazepines.

    The overall impact of benzodiazepine on overdose mortality rates paints a more alarming picture when observed over the time period covered in the CDC’s report. According to their research, overdose deaths involving benzodiazepines among women in the aforementioned target age group rose from 0.54 per 100,000 in 1997 to 5.02 per 100,000 in 2017 – a jump of 830%. 

    The number of benzodiazepine prescriptions also saw a startling increase during the study time frame, rising from 8.1 million adults in the United States who filled a prescription for the medication in 1996 to 13.5 million in 2013.

    Prescriptions began to drop or level off after 2013, but overdose deaths maintained their steady climb: in 2016 alone, there were 10,685 overdose deaths attributed to the drug, while in 1999, the US total as just 1,135.

    Commentary in the February 2018 edition of the New England Journal of Medicine suggested that education about the dangers of the drug and alternatives should be paired with national efforts to fight the opioid crisis.

    Informing doctors and patients alike about their dangers, and the effectiveness of alternative treatments for anxiety and insomnia, could help to bring the numbers reported by the CDC down.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Shia LaBeouf's New Movie Highlights Father's Heroin Addiction Struggle

    Shia LaBeouf's New Movie Highlights Father's Heroin Addiction Struggle

    LaBeouf wrote the screenplay for the semi-autobiographical film while in rehab.

    Shia LaBeouf’s latest film, Honey Boy, premiered at the Sundance Film Festival on January 25 to tell the world the story of the actor’s odd and tumultuous childhood that led to his struggle with addiction and mental illness.

    LaBeouf is known for his strange performance art as well as his acting and has been the subject of quite a bit of controversy during his long career.

    The boy who began as the star of the children’s TV show Even Stevens grew into the man who was twice arrested for disorderly conduct and conducted a performance piece in which he sat with a paper bag over his head and cried for six days.

    LaBeouf has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and has sought treatment for alcoholism, plus was ordered to attend an anger management program after going on a drunken tirade against the police who were arresting him for his second time.

    Honey Boy is a semi-autobiographical film that shows the verbal and emotional abuse which may have led to the actor’s PTSD. Fittingly, the actor wrote the script while he was in rehab in 2018, according to The Wrap

    LaBeouf himself plays James Lort, a clear representation of his real-life father, Jeffrey LaBeouf. James, like Jeffrey, is a Vietnam veteran and convicted sex offender with alcoholism who “pushed his son around while stumbling through a series of poor decisions,” according to film critic Eric Kohn of IndieWire.

    Meanwhile, Lucas Hedges plays a 20-something version of LaBeouf as his life quickly spirals out of control, culminating in a drunken car crash that lands him in jail and then rehab. While in therapy, he flashes back to the representation of LaBeouf’s childhood.

    Financial troubles result in a divorce between the representation of LaBeouf’s parents, ending in LaBeouf (“Otis”) living with his mother in a run-down motel and a world without warmth made worse by his “affection-averse” deadbeat dad.

    LaBeouf himself has opened up about his troubled past and his family’s history of substance abuse before.

    “When you’re 10 years old and watch your father going through heroin withdrawals, you grow up real fast,” he said in an interview with The Orange County Register. “You become the parent in the relationship. But I must give [Jeffrey LaBeouf] credit because he always told me that he didn’t want me to be like him.”

    The film’s director, Alma Har’el, told The Wrap that LaBeouf has “done the bravest thing anyone could do” by depicting his own father and called Honey Boy an “artistic exorcism” for all involved.

    “Obviously we all went through a lot of deep feelings while making the film, but nothing was too much. Everything was accepted. Whenever the demons came, we danced with them.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Does Everything Actually Happen for a Reason?

    Does Everything Actually Happen for a Reason?

    “Everything happens for a reason” conflicts with AA principles: it misleads recovering alcoholics into thinking they are special—that they are somehow more worthy of salvation than the addict or alcoholic who perished.

    “Because genocide.”

    That was me, in my typically understated fashion, explaining to a newly recovering alcoholic why he shouldn’t heed the single silliest phrase permeating the rooms of Alcoholics Anonymous: “Everything happens for a reason.”

    In my seven-plus years attending AA meetings, I’ve come to know and loathe my share of cliché recoveryisms. For example, to me, “Let go and let God” overshoots otherwise sound advice against trying to control everything into a place of irresponsible complacence. “If you spot it, you got it” blames an observer simply for noticing wrong behavior or thinking, while “All of us only have today” weighs equally the experience, strength and hope of a wise old-timer and a wild-eyed newcomer. We don’t all just have today—we have all the days before it.

    And it is baffling why the Our Father—a prayer praising a conventional paternalistic, heaven-dwelling religious deity—still closes many meetings, as it directly contradicts the organization’s stated non-alignment with any sect or denomination, per its Preamble.

    So yes, AA phraseology has its share of eye-rolling headscratchers. But none are as cringe-worthy and counterproductive as the concept that every single thing that transpires in life does so as part of a grand, predestined scheme.

    In an everyday setting, “Everything happens for a reason” can be brushed aside easily enough. Outside the realm of recovery, it becomes little more than a difference of opinion; your churchgoing aunt believes God is in heaven treating us like marionettes, while you prefer a puppeteer-free existence. To each his own.

    However, AA’s penchant for preordainment is particularly problematic, due to the specific forum in which it is propagated. In a recovery setting, the notion that all occurrences— good, bad or indifferent—are part of some predetermined master plan is a double-edged sword that does a disservice to all involved, believer and nonbeliever alike.

    Unreasonable Expectations

    Let’s start with those in my column: recovering alcoholics who, though they may embrace a spiritual higher power—a rhythm of the Universe, let’s say, don’t ascribe to a god that directly intervenes in our lives. If you wonder why athletes thank the Lord after a big win, you’re in my boat. Call it the “God doesn’t score goals” perspective. 

    When people who don’t believe in an interventionist deity are told to see the hands of God in everything, there is no common ground. Many of us, myself included, were stone-cold atheists upon entering AA; some of us, myself not included, still are. A healthy agnosticism is the best many of us can muster while—and this point is crucial—retaining a recovery-capable level of self-honesty. Few stay sober by lying to themselves about something as mission-critical as spirituality.

    Upon entering AA, we were assured by both literature and longstanding members that our spiritual skepticism was fine, as long as we were willing to put faith in some sort of higher power. Many of us took Step 2 with the group itself in that role and, in Step 3, turned our will over to… well… something as best we could without the whole endeavor feeling so forced that it forced us out the door.

    And then… “Everything happens for a reason”? That’s a bridge too far­—and one apt to collapse carrying newcomers who are left feeling betrayed by the agreed upon rules of repeated spiritual engagement. It also leads to inferiority complexes, when these newcomers compare themselves to AA members who seem to take God’s Great Chess Game of Life at face value.

    Replacing that collapsed bridge is a wall. There’s no kind way to say this: Many people who don’t believe everything happens for a reason find those who do simultaneously pretentious and unsophisticated—an oxymoronic mélange of know-it-all-ism and naiveté. When I hear someone in AA insist upon God’s almighty plan, it makes me respect what they say next significantly less.

    And no, comment thread, that isn’t my arrogance—it’s the phrase’s. “Everything happens for a reason” is a condescendingly cocksure nonstarter that cleaves members off from each other. Worse, it does so completely unnecessarily, since its veracity is entirely irrelevant to the greater principles and practices of AA’s primary purpose: recovery from alcoholism and addiction.

    How many newcomers, I often wonder, have gone back out and died because they didn’t realize “Everything happens for a reason” is by no means AA dogma, but rather AA dog… something else. Even one is too many.

    And if the true believers can’t stop saying it for nonbelievers, maybe they can stop saying it for themselves. Here’s why.

    No Good Reason

    In Alcoholics Anonymous, “Everything happens for a reason” conflicts directly with the program’s principles. It does so by misleading recovering alcoholics into thinking they are special—that they are somehow more worthy of salvation than the addict or alcoholic who perished. The result is a sort of unintentional hubris that flies in the face of sobriety-bolstering ego deflation.

    By implication, declaring yourself selectively saved by an all-intervening God acknowledges that this same deity let others perish. He took Prince, Amy Winehouse and Philip Seymour Hoffman, but left… you? Forgive me if I find that conceited.

    On a macro level, I also find it insulting. This Calvinistic approach to human existence means God assents to tsunamis, earthquakes, war crimes. If you sincerely believe that God greenlighted the Holocaust, I simply don’t have much to say to you. Again, this notion of intra-organizational separation is all caused by a concept completely unnecessary to that organization.

    Unfortunately, a major obstacle in all this is utter obliviousness. From where I’m sitting, the vast majority of those who espouse, ad nauseam, that “Everything happens for a reason” do so from custom rather than castigation. By and large, religion—or, rather, a sophomoric interpretation of religion—has weaned them to believe they are somehow saved, chosen or otherwise privileged. There is an entrenchment to this flawed view of eminence that makes it as intractable as it is unpalatable.

    In this manner, “Everything happens for a reason” is an unreasonable phrase often repeated for no good reason other than a “sure, why not” reluctance to challenge outdated thinking. It’s one of those grandfathered-in phrases that should be retired, along with the uber-sexist “To Wives” chapter in the AA Big Book.

    In late 2011, as a 32-year-old just drying out off a DUI and with a wife halfway out the door, AA’s preordainment problem nearly made me explore other sobriety options. This would have been a mistake, considering how well-suited the literature, the 12 steps and the fellowship turned out to be for my recovery.

    It is in line with this concern—attracting and retaining newcomers—that a concerted effort should be made to retire “Everything happens for a reason” from the rooms of AA. And I for one believe that doing so depends entirely on our efforts, not God’s plan.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Are Drug-Related Crime Rates Lower In Affluent Neighborhoods?

    Are Drug-Related Crime Rates Lower In Affluent Neighborhoods?

    A new study suggests that the socioeconomic makeup of a neighborhood may not affect the rate of drug-related crimes or criminal offenses.

    New research suggests that the socioeconomic makeup of a neighborhood does not appear to have any effect on the level of drug-related crime in that area.

    An analysis of crime and census data of a suburban area with an average annual income of $74,000 found that residential stability did not reduce the level of narcotics trafficking or high-level criminal offenses that, according to the study authors, often accompany such activity.

    The authors also suggested that focusing police activity on a single area might dispel crime in that location, but it would also displace dealers and related criminals to other regions, thus increasing crime rates regardless of income or ownership.

    The study, written by Christopher Contreras, a doctoral candidate in the Department of Criminology, Law & Society at the University of California Irvine (UCI), and John R. Hipp, a professor in UCI’s Departments of Criminology, Law & Society and Urban Planning and Public Policy, was published in Justice Quarterly.

    To conduct their research, the pair reviewed crime and census data culled from a heavily suburban area in Florida’s Miami-Dade County between 2010 and 2014. The neighborhood had an average annual income of $74,000 and a home ownership rate of 72.5%.

    According to studies of drug dependency and abuse trends in the region during that time period, heroin-related deaths had increased sharply between 2011 and 2012 in Miami-Dade. Statistics also showed that laws designed to close “pill mills” and to limit the amount of controlled Schedule II medication that physicians could prescribe, caused a slight reduction in the number of prescription opioid-related deaths in Miami-Dade.

    However, four opioids—oxycodone, morphine, hydrocodone and methadone—were responsible for a slightly higher margin of deaths (32%) in 2013 than 2012.

    Upon reviewing the crime and census data, the study authors determined that “residential stability and high socioeconomic status do not necessarily buffer neighborhood blocks against an increase in robberies and burglaries,” as Contreras noted. “Communities with narcotics trafficking bring in serious, high-rate offenders, whose activities spill over into other neighborhoods.”

    According to the study authors, a contributing factor may also be due to changes in how drug trafficking takes place. Technology allows dealers to move more freely and conduct business in public places rather than isolated areas or street corners. When police pressure is applied to these scenarios, dealers can simply relocate and continue business. “Drug activity is displaced to somewhere else, along with higher crime,” noted Contreras.

    Keeping drug-related crime out of residential neighborhoods will require stronger law enforcement, according to study co-author John Hipp. But policymakers also need to “address the growing demand for opioids,” he added.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Positive Drug Tests At Work Continue To Rise

    Positive Drug Tests At Work Continue To Rise

    Marijuana is the substance most often detected in workplace drug screenings, according to a new study.

    More and more employees are testing positive for drugs in workplace screenings, an increase that is concerning for some employers and safety specialists. 

    According to a study by Quest Diagnostics, positive drugs tests have increased significantly in a two-year period between 2015 and 2017. Marijuana is the substance most often detected in workplace drug screenings, and analysis found that it was detected 33% more often in 2017 than in 2015. That jump may be expected, as more states make cannabis legal for recreational and medicinal use. 

    However, it’s alarming that the industry with the most significant increase was transportation and warehousing. In this industry, people often operate heavy machinery, and being intoxicated could put them at risk for accidents, human resources expert Rob Wilson, president of Employco USA, told WXYZ Detroit

    “Test results showed that there was a double-digit jump of marijuana use in transportation and warehouse fields, which could be very problematic as operating heavy machinery while under the influence of marijuana could be very dangerous indeed,” he said.

    Despite the fact that more states are legalizing cannabis, employees could still put their jobs at risk by using it. Whether or not medical use of cannabis is protected is the subject of many legal battles, but Wilson said that employers can treat cannabis like other legal substances: employees can use them, but not at work. 

    “While it is against the law to discriminate against someone simply because they have a medical marijuana card, as this could be seen as discrimination against someone with a disability, you can still require sobriety among your employees and treat marijuana the same way you would alcohol or prescription drugs like Vicodin. Whether an employee is driving heavy machinery or approving loans, you need your workers to be clear-headed and capable of performing at a high level,” he said. 

    However, this can complicate drug testing because the tests usually just show whether a substance is in someone’s system, without indicating the level, which is needed to know whether someone is currently under the influence of marijuana

    In addition, employers could face pushback for testing employees, Wilson said. 

    “Your ability to monitor drug use among your employees is going to depend on whether or not you are a unionized or private workplace,” he explained. “While you have the right to expect and require sobriety from workers on the job, it can become a bit tricky when you suspect drug use and want to act on your fears.”

    In addition to marijuana, more people also tested positive for cocaine and amphetamines, suggesting that the rise in positive tests can’t be wholly explained by cannabis legalization. 

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Charging Heroin Dealers With Homicide A Common Practice In Pennsylvania

    Charging Heroin Dealers With Homicide A Common Practice In Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania leads the nation with more than 500 drug-induced homicide charges filed.

    In Lancaster County, deep in the heart of Amish country, authorities have gone after more drug-induced homicide charges than any other place in the nation, according to figures from Mission LISA, a data aggregation project.

    Last year alone, prosecutors in the southeast Pennsylvania county filed roughly 60 such charges, more than the 37 in nearby Bucks County or the 35 in York County. Four of the most prosecution-prone counties were in the Keystone State, which led the nation with more than 500 drug-induced homicide charges filed.

    It’s a controversial practice, often condemned by harm reduction advocates. But Lancaster County District Attorney Craig Stedman swears the charge—levied against dealers who sell fatal doses of the drug—is working. 

    “I don’t think this is a magic bullet that’s going to end the opioid crisis, but is it part of the solution?” he told WITF. “I’m absolutely convinced it is, and there’s just something about being held accountable.”

    By way of example, Stedman highlighted an interaction with one man accused of selling drugs. “One guy in particular, they arrest him, he’s a long-time heroin dealer, and he was arrested for cocaine. They said, what are you doing? You’re a long-time heroin dealer. And he said, look, message received. I’m not catching a body in Lancaster County.” 

    But advocates decry the practice, as Drug Policy Alliance attorney Lindsay LaSalle explained to the PA Post in 2018.

    “We see this kind of flip,” she said, “where you have the compassion for the person who used but you want to throw the hammer at the person who sold. And this is an absolutely false dichotomy. The distinction between user and seller is often patently false.”

    The high numbers in Lancaster County come amid a long-term increase in drug-related homicide charges, according to the Mission LISA data.

    Going all the way back to 1975, the organization’s data set accounts for 2,741 drug-induced homicide charges—but the figures show a sharp uptick starting around 2010. In that year, there were 67 such charges filed across the nation; by 2015 that figure rose to 300.

    In 2016, it peaked at just over 660, though since then has fallen to under 400.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Teen Drug Use: Warning Signs All Parents Should Know

    Teen Drug Use: Warning Signs All Parents Should Know

    Being a parent in today’s world presents challenges that were unheard of in generations past.  One of the reasons parents must be extra-vigilant today is the possibility of their teen abusing drugs or alcohol. Also, parents are conflicted about how to avoid crossing the thin line between being watchful without seeming intrusive or overprotective.  With that in mind, we offer a watchlist of signs and symptoms of teen drug use that all parents should know.

    In your quest to protect your child, keep in mind that the longer you wait to intervene, the worse their drug use will become and permanent damage to their health can occur.  It’s also essential that your child knows that you will continue loving and supporting him or her during this difficult time.

    Watchlist: Signs and Symptoms of Teen Drug Use

    Many parents have seen some of these signs and symptoms of drug use by their child.  But, they mistakenly assume that the bad moods or secretive behavior are just part of being a teen.  Talk to your teen and find ways to help them cope with these painful emotions.  If the behavior continues, it’s possible that drugs or alcohol are involved.

    Here are some of the common signs and symptoms of teen drug use to watch for:

    • Failing grades, tardiness, absences
    • A new group of friends
    • Staying out later than usual
    • Isolation or secretive behavior
    • Changes in clothing style
    • Drug paraphernalia
    • Always needing extra money
    • Using air fresheners, incense, or perfume to hide odors
    • Evidence of using eye drops repeatedly
    • Increased use of mouthwash or breath mints
    • Evidence of inhalant abuse
    • Missing prescription drugs, especially painkillers

    Of course, you don’t want to jump to conclusions or appear to be judgmental, but these signs are a good indication of drug use in most cases.

    What Should You Do First?

    If A decline that your teen is experimenting with drugs or alcohol, your first step is to consult a medical professional for a drug screening.  The test will be able to determine whether your child is using substances or having other problems such as depression. The drug-screening process can include a blood or urine test in addition to consultation between your teen and the medical professional.

    What are the Dangers of Teen Drug Use?

    Eventually, casual drug or alcohol use can escalate into chronic, compulsive use that will lead to addiction.  One of the most significant dangers of teen drug use is the chance of permanent damage to their undeveloped brain.  The damage can manifest in many ways such as poor memory, trouble concentrating, diminished cognitive ability, and inability to function optimally in school or at work.

    More health effects that a teen can suffer from these commonly abused drugs:

    • Opioids – High risk of respiratory distress and risk of death from overdose.
    • Cocaine – Possibility of liver and heart failure.
    • Methamphetamine – Risk of psychotic behavior.
    • Marijuana – Impaired memory, learning problems, psychosis, hallucinations.
    • Inhalants – Risk of damage to the lungs, heart, liver, and kidneys.
    • Ecstasy – Risk of dehydration, heart failure, liver damage.
    • Alcohol – Binge drinking can cause blackouts, overdose, death.

    In addition to the above dangers, teen drug use can include the following negative consequences:

    • Dependence or addiction and increased risk of drug use later in life.
    • Drug use by teens is associated with poor judgment in personal and social interactions.
    • Drug abuse can increase mental health disorders such as anxiety or depression.
    • High risk of unsafe sex, promiscuity, STDs, and unplanned pregnancy
    • Decline in academic performance, failing grades, drop-outs.
    • Risk of driving while impaired, automobile accidents, injuries, death.

    Unfortunately, most teens believe they can try a substance once and quit when they’re ready.  But, if they continue hanging with the same crowd of drug users, it’s not likely that they will quit.  

    Finding Solutions for Your Teen’s Drug Use

    When a teen is abusing drugs, several factors are involved that led the child in this direction.  Simply disposing of the drugs or keeping your teen grounded is not enough. The underlying reasons for their drug use must be addressed or they will continue seeking addictive substances.

    Overall, the best approach to addressing all aspects of drug abuse or addiction is inpatient treatment.  Look for a program that offers such methodologies as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Life Skills Training, Anger Management, Moral Reconation Therapy, Mindfulness Therapy, Communication Skills, Nutritional Guidance, and Group and Individual Counseling.  With this approach to addiction treatment, patients learn to develop healthier, more effective methods for dealing with daily life.

    If you would like more information about teen drug use, please contact us at Best Drug Rehabilitation today. This phone call is your first step in helping your teen sober up and reach their full potential in life.  We will be happy to recommend a treatment program that is right for your child’s needs.

    Resources:

    newsinhealth.nih.gov – Biology of Addiction

    mayoclinic.org – Tween and Teen Health

    View the original article at bestdrugrehabilitation.com

  • Being "Sober Curious" Helps Some Explore Relationship With Alcohol

    Being "Sober Curious" Helps Some Explore Relationship With Alcohol

    “Being sober curious is about ­questioning every impulse or expectation to drink and using the answers to inform whether or not you actually drink,” says the author who coined the term.

    Make room, Dry January—there’s another sobriety exploration method in town. 

    In recent months, the term “sober curious” has become more prominent. Rather than abstaining completely from alcohol, those who are sober curious may choose to take a break from drinking and give some thought to their relationship with alcohol. 

    The concept, according to Time, was coined by Ruby Warrington and is the title of her new book as well. 

    In the book, Warrington explores the idea of reexamining one’s relationship with alcohol. Time reports that while Warrington never struggled with substance use disorder, she did use alcohol to be more at ease in social situations and to cope with or cover her feelings. 

    “Being sober curious is about ­questioning every impulse or expectation to drink and using the answers to inform whether or not you actually drink,” Warrington tells Cosmopolitan

    While Warrington doesn’t necessarily press the idea that alcohol should be cut out of one’s life forever, she does think there are benefits to stepping back from it. She says, according to Time, that rather than squeeze out confidence from alcohol, it can come from healthier methods, like positive affirmations and power poses. 

    In addition to helping her mentally, Warrington tells Cosmopolitan that cutting down alcohol helped her feel better physically. “My anxiety levels were lower. I woke up fresh. I had so much more energy,” she said.

    In the book, Warrington also addresses the idea of FOMA, or “fear of missing alcohol.” She provides some advice to get around this fear, such as taking part in new hobbies or ditching dinner plans and going out for brunch instead. 

    Psychotherapist Alison Stone tells Bustle that being “sober curious” isn’t restrictive and allows people to make decisions based on their feelings. 

    “Identifying as sober curious prevents us from falling into a black and white way of thinking, feeling, and behaving,” she said. “It can help us better understand our relationship with alcohol, too—when do we drink more than we intended to? Are we drinking because we want to, or because we feel we need to? Having curiosity opens up the possibilities to better understand ourselves and our motives for doing things.”

    Stone adds that when something in one’s life is restricted or completely off limits, it may just make that person want it more. In that way, being sober curious is beneficial. “That is partially due to the psychological impact of making an extreme decision—there are often parts of us that want to do the exact opposite of that decision,” Stone stated. 

    But while being sober curious may work for some, others may need to stick to complete abstinence from alcohol. 

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Are Rehab Centers Equipped With Meds To Treat Opioid Use Disorder?

    Are Rehab Centers Equipped With Meds To Treat Opioid Use Disorder?

    In spite of the availability of opioid addiction medications, many treatment centers have continued to rely only on abstinence programs and talk therapy. 

    A study published in the January issue of Health Affairs found that only 36% of addiction treatment centers in the U.S. carry any of the medications approved for the treatment of opioid addiction. Not only that, but only 6% carry all three: buprenorphine, naltrexone, and methadone.

    As the opioid crisis has exploded in the U.S. and abroad, cities are scrambling to combat spiking overdose deaths and the massive costs associated with the epidemic. In addition to law enforcement and education campaigns, increasing funds have been allocated to the development of medication that can treat opioid addiction.

    For many years, methadone was the only option for those who needed more than abstinence, therapy, and rehabilitation programs to combat their powerful and relentless disease. Buprenorphine and naltrexone arrived on the scene in 1981 and 1984, respectively, and have shown promising results.

    In spite of the availability of these drugs for decades, many addiction treatment centers have continued to rely only on abstinence programs and talk therapy. The study, led by Johns Hopkins School of Public Health Professor Ramin Mojtabai, looked at 10,000 outpatient facilities in the U.S. via surveys collected between 2007 and 2016.

    In 2007, only 20% of the centers offered even one of the medications, so at least some progress is being made in this respect. 

    “Medication treatment (MT) is one of the few evidence-based strategies proposed to combat the current opioid epidemic,” reads the study abstract. “The findings highlight the persistent unmet need for MT nationally and the role of expansion of health insurance in the dissemination of these treatments.”

    Image Source: NIDA

    Lindsey Vuolo, associate director of health law and policy at the Center on Addiction, assured U.S. News & World Report that these medications work.

    “Overall, approximately 50 percent of patients who receive medications for opioid addiction are successfully treated, while less than 10 percent of patients are successfully treated without these medications,” she said. At the same time, only 10 to 20% of people with substance use disorders seek any treatment at all.

    Though Dr. Mojtabai feels that increased attention to the opioid crisis may continue the trend toward more treatment centers offering addiction-combating medications, Vuolo notes that most of the facilities offering these drugs are concentrated in wealthy urban and suburban areas, and is generally more pessimistic.

    “The number of people receiving treatment has not changed significantly, even in light of the unrelenting opioid epidemic,” said Vuolo. “I don’t think research will show significant changes between 2016 and 2019 on a national scale.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Backstreet Boy AJ McLean Discusses Addiction, Sobriety

    Backstreet Boy AJ McLean Discusses Addiction, Sobriety

    “To be 41 and still be sitting here talking to you is a miracle within itself.”

    Boy band legends Backstreet Boys are back with a new album, DNA, a new tour in support of it, and a Grammy nomination for the single “Don’t Go Breaking My Heart.”

    As the band looks back on their career, AJ McLean is also looking back on the substance abuse they’ve suffered in the past.

    As he told NPR, “I just turned 41. To be 41 and still be sitting here talking to you is a miracle within itself. With drugs and alcohol and all these things that I’ve had to overcome will forever be a daily struggle.”

    McLean has been open with the public about his struggles for years, adding, “We’ve always prided ourselves on just being honest with our fans and being honest with each other. That is probably one of the biggest reasons why we’ve been together for almost 26 years. We’re family, we’ve seen the highs and lows with each other…We’ve literally lived lives together – good, bad or indifferent.”

    McLean has taken trips to rehab in 2001, 2002 and 2011 for depression and alcoholism, and he admitted to relapsing in 2018. As he told People, “It’s no secret that this is a disease, and that it’s a daily struggle…It will win if you don’t take care of yourself.”

    McLean also renewed his fight to stay sober after the overdose death of rapper Mac Miller last year. “With what recently happened with Mac Miller, people need to really understand how serious addiction is. It’s a huge killer and you’ve just got to surround yourself with the right people, go to your meetings and get a sponsor. It’s a marathon, not a race.”

    Like many who’ve struggled with addiction, McLean’s family has also been a big saving grace for him in his recovery. “They’re my everything,” he told Entertainment Tonight. “Them and my wife. So, I would never in a million years want to let them see me drunk or high or dead or in jail. I want to talk both my girls down the aisle…when they’re 35!”

    McLean also posted on Instagram that he’s going to be cutting down on social media, which he says can be “overconsuming.” Again, family has been McLean’s focus, not allowing “social media [to] control me and my time – my valuable time with my kids especially.”

    View the original article at thefix.com