Category: Addiction News

  • Parents Grapple With Cutting Off Children With Addiction

    Parents Grapple With Cutting Off Children With Addiction

    “It’s easy to pay for court costs and to bail them out of every situation. It takes a very long time to gain the strength, courage, and faith to say no,” said one parent.

    Parents often spend hefty amounts of money trying to help their children get sober, sometimes to the detriment of their own financial health, according to a new feature in Time magazine which focuses on the financial implications of substance use disorder. 

    “[Parents] are faced with this dilemma: Do I help them get out of this in the short term, or do I let them experience the natural consequences of their behaviors?” said Kenneth Leonard, director of the Clinical and Research Institute on Addictions at the University of Buffalo. “You don’t want to do anything that will ruin their lives, but on the other hand, you want them to learn from experience. Nobody wants their child to suffer, short term or long term.”

    Diane Buxton, of Indiana, estimates that she spent more than $70,000 on eight stints in rehab, counselors and other approaches to try to help her son who was addicted to opioids. “I was going to save him,” she said. 

    Eventually, she realized that all her spending was fruitless. 

    “I remember walking through my living room one day and seeing my 130-pound son, who was supposed to be 160 pounds, sitting on the couch with needle marks in his arm,” she said. “And I heard this voice saying ‘You’re loving him to death.’”

    Buxton told her son he needed to leave: check into rehab or crash with friends. Now six years sober, her son tells her that tough love helped save his life. “If I had not given him that choice, he’d be dead or in prison,” she said. 

    Katie Donovan, of Michigan, said that she spent about $200,000 supporting her daughter through addiction—but her story did not end with a happy ending. “I was interrupting my whole life, constantly, on a daily basis, to take care of her,” Donovan said. “I didn’t realize that I had become a part of it. I was addicted to her.”

    Donovan started small in setting boundaries with her daughter, first refusing to buy her new clothes or take her to appointments. She says her daughter still struggles with addiction—with intermittent periods of sobriety—but that her own life is a lot less chaotic now. 

    “It’s easy to buy a car. It’s easy to pay for court costs and to bail them out of every situation,” she said. “It takes a very long time to gain the strength, courage, and faith to say no. I believe in loving with boundaries. She knows that, emotionally, I accept where she’s at. Am I going to give her money? No.”

    Ipek Aykol, a therapist in Newport Beach, California who specializes in addiction counseling, says it’s important for families to establish financial boundaries. “Families come to treatment with very unhealthy boundaries,” Aykol said. “If you’re giving your child money, and your child is spending that money on drugs, it’s not serving them.”

    Fred Leamnson, of Virginia, who blogs about personal finance, said he spent more than six figures supporting his son through heroin addiction. Now, he wants to give others permission to just say no. 

    “The best advice I can offer is advice we didn’t follow—protect yourself and your finances at all costs!”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Lil Xan On Mac Miller's Death, His Own Sobriety: "I'm Not Completely Clean Yet"

    Lil Xan On Mac Miller's Death, His Own Sobriety: "I'm Not Completely Clean Yet"

    “You relapse. You don’t want to. You get clean again. And you relapse. It’s a process. You need treatment, and sometimes, that doesn’t even help.”

    Hip-hop artist Lil Xan spoke candidly about the overdose death of his idol, rapper Mac Miller, and his own struggles with substance use, including a recent relapse.

    In a conversation with TMZ on Nov. 5, Lil Xan (born Diego Leanos) said that while he wasn’t surprised that fentanyl played a role in his fellow artist’s demise, he remains devastated by the news.

    “It’s always fentanyl,” Leanos told TMZ in regard to Miller’s death on Sept. 7, 2018. He said that the synthetic opioid was among the primary reasons that he stopped dealing pills prior to his music career.

    “I was selling Xanax before I was a rapper, you know, when it was real,” he said. “And the minute it got to fentanyl, I was like, ‘I’m not going to sell this.’ My friends were taking it, they were puking. I was like, ‘I can’t… I’m out of the game.’”

    In regard to Miller’s death, Leanos told TMZ, “There’s been so many people [who died from fentanyl overdose], but in particular, Mac hurt the most, because it definitely changed my everything.”

    Leanos had been left so devastated by Miller’s death that in September, he considered retiring from music after fulfilling his recording contract. “When your hero dies, f—k that s—t,” he declared during a podcast interview. “I don’t want to make music no more.” 

    Most recently, Leanos has been recording a tribute album to Miller called Be Safe, which is reportedly due in December. He canceled a quintet of live appearances to focus his energy on completing the project, but added that he was also working on his sobriety.

    “I’m not completely clean yet,” he told TMZ. “I’m off Xanax, but narcos I’m still trying to wean off. ” 

    Leanos said that following his recent relapse, he sequestered himself in a forest and “detached from the world” to regain his sobriety. In regard to the relapse, he said, “Any addict would understand that s—t happens. You relapse. You don’t want to. You get clean again. And you relapse. It’s a process. You need treatment, and sometimes, that doesn’t even help.”

    Change, said Leanos, can only come when the individual wants it. “It has to come from within,” he said. “I’ve gone through periods of like, six months. And now it’s because of me. It’s because I want to be clean.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Why Some Pharmacies Still Fail To Carry Naloxone

    Why Some Pharmacies Still Fail To Carry Naloxone

    Though many states have passed laws to expand naloxone access, some pharmacies have been too slow to get onboard with carrying the life-saving medication.

    According to new research, expanding access to naloxone still has room for improvement.

    Two new studies that surveyed pharmacies in California and Texas suggest that access to the opioid overdose “antidote” is still not optimal, despite the passage of laws across the U.S to expand naloxone access.

    Both California and Texas have passed laws that allow pharmacists to dispense naloxone without a prescription. But some pharmacies are still not on board with the new policies.

    “There is still significant room for improvement with regards to making this potentially lifesaving medication available to patents who need it,” said one researcher.

    Just 23.5% of retail pharmacies in California were dispensing naloxone sans prescription two years after the new policy was established. Dr. Talia Puzantian and Dr. James Gasper, who co-authored the research, say this may be due to a lack of training, stigma about substance use, and time, according to Family Practice News.

    In Texas, 83.7% of pharmacies surveyed said they would dispense naloxone without a prescription, while 76.4% said they currently stocked naloxone.

    The benefit of increasing access to naloxone—not only to first responders and medical providers, but the public—is to save lives, says Texas study lead Kirk Evoy of the University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy and University Health System in San Antonio.

    “Being able to administer naloxone immediately, while waiting for emergency medical services to arrive, greatly increases the chances of survival and reduces the risk of long-term negative health consequences, because the body cannot last long without oxygen,” Evoy said.

    Improving access to naloxone is just one way to lessen the death toll of the opioid crisis.

    The total number of drug overdose deaths in 2017 is projected to exceed 72,000, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

    “I do not know how many of these people overdosed alone,” says Dr. Seth Landefeld of the University of Alabama at Birmingham in an editorial accompanying the research. “But ready availability of naloxone would undoubtedly have saved many lives.”

    While all 50 states and the District of Columbia have enacted some form of a naloxone access law, all but Nebraska allows for a pharmacist to dispense the drug without a prescription, according to PDAPS (Prescription Drug Abuse Policy System).

    Other naloxone access laws include providing immunity from criminal or civil liability for prescribers, pharmacists, and laypeople for dispensing or administering the drug.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Medical Marijuana Advocate’s Death Sentence Sparks Outcry

    Medical Marijuana Advocate’s Death Sentence Sparks Outcry

    Medical marijuana advocate Muhammad Lukman is one among about 900 other people on death row in Malaysia for drug offenses.

    Malaysia may be on a path toward drug policy reform.

    The Southeast Asian country has some of the harshest drug laws in the world. According to the BBC, cultivating a single cannabis plant can land you in prison for life, while possessing more than 7 ounces “is almost certain to result in a death sentence.”

    But recently, Malaysians have been more vocal in protesting these laws. Twenty-nine-year-old Muhammad Lukman was convicted of trafficking in cannabis and sentenced to death by hanging on August 30. This has prompted a public outcry.

    According to his lawyer, Farhan Maaruf, Lukman testified that he only sold cannabis oil to help ill patients. If they could not afford it, he would provide it for free.

    Lukman’s case has captured the attention of Malaysians. A Change.org petition to free Lukman has garnered more than 70,000 signatures as of Nov. 14.

    Prime Minister Mahathir bin Mohamad said in September that Lukman’s sentence should be reviewed, according to Reuters. MP Nurul Izzah Anwar declared the case a “miscarriage of justice,” and said at the time that she would urge the attorney general to reconsider Lukman’s case.

    Change might be coming. In October, the prime minister’s administration announced that it would abolish the death penalty completely. But “suspects convicted for drug trafficking, like Lukman, could however still face jail for decades or life,” the BBC reported.

    Lukman is one among about 900 other people on death row in Malaysia for drug offenses. Others include Mohammed Zaireen bin Zainal, the founder of the Malaysian Marijuana Education Movement. He is waiting for a final appeal.

    A medical marijuana patient and advocate named Yuki is hoping Lukman’s case will spark a shift in Malaysia’s drug laws.

    Yuki, 41, has been using marijuana to help ease chronic, debilitating pain from hypokalaemia (low blood potassium) since she was 29 years old.

    She’s now at the forefront of the campaign to reform Malaysia’s drug laws. “If you are desperate, you are sick, you will do anything. We go online, we search about it, we find out about it. The government doesn’t want to give it to us but we will still find it,” she said.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Gary Busey Reflects On Cocaine Addiction, Becoming Sober

    Gary Busey Reflects On Cocaine Addiction, Becoming Sober

    Busey says he stopped using cocaine on May 3, 1995, and has been sober ever since.

    In addition to his busy and prolific career as an actor, Gary Busey has earned a reputation for philosophical aphorisms that he calls “Buseyisms” – words of wisdom drawn from the letters of a word that he said reveal a new definition in its “deeper, dimensional meaning.”

    The Academy Award nominee has compiled many of these life lessons in a new book, Buseyisms: Gary Busey’s Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth (itself a Buseyism, which stands for “Bible”). In addition to a wealth of Buseyisms, the new book also details the actor’s battle with cocaine addiction, which nearly ended his life before he gained clarity through a spiritual outlook.

    In a conversation with NBC News Digital’s Think page, Busey recalled how he became addicted to cocaine shortly after earning an Oscar nomination for his performance in The Buddy Holly Story.

    “A fellow who looked like a Beverly Hills cowboy showed up at my door,” he recalled. “He told me that he was going to be my manager, and he had a gift for me. It was a blue box from Tiffany’s and, in the box, was a rock of cocaine as big as a 50-cent piece, and thick, with my initials in it.”

    The dealer told Busey that the drug would help him be “more creative,” and as Busey recalled, “I got hooked bad.” His drug use led to an overdose, followed by an unpleasant realization: “What have I been doing? I’ve been dancing with the devil in a circle that’s very tight, and the devil always leads the dance.”

    According to Busey, he stopped using cocaine on May 3, 1995, and has been sober ever since.

    To summarize his 25 years of sobriety, Busey has an aphorism: “F-R-E-E-D-O-M stands for ‘facing real exciting energy, developing out of miracles.” Busey expounded on the notion by adding, “The best freedom you can have is knowing you’re a miracle. So, be yourself, and live in the harmony of what God gave you to be when you were born. Think on that; feel that about yourself. And you won’t need to abuse substances or alcohol or needles or pills.”

    Busey remains sanguine about the challenges of chasing sobriety. He freely admitted that those who follow his advice and give up their substance of choice may actually come to hate him for such a suggestion. “But that’s okay,” he noted. “Hate is an emotion that comes with growth.” But the payoff, he said, is worth the effort. “Everything you’ve done in your life, even though some of it was hard, is good, because you go through it to get better. And that’s why we’re on earth.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Support for President Trump is Not Sober

    Support for President Trump is Not Sober

    We would not accept from our sponsees things that President Trump does, without remorse, on a daily basis.

    If you go to 12-step meetings and you’re a MAGA person, here’s something fun to try. Pick a public statement of President Trump’s — one that isn’t explicitly political, as we wouldn’t want politics to sully the rooms — and share it with the group. Don’t cheat by picking something bland, choose a real Trumpian one. Call a woman “horseface,” maybe, or say of Mexicans, “They’re rapists.” Or if you want to bring up rape, raise your hand and tell your fellow addicts that women who don’t report rapes to the police are lying.

    Yes, yes, Alcoholics Anonymous is a non-partisan, non-political organization that, to quote the famous preamble, “does not wish to engage in any controversy, [and] neither endorses nor opposes any causes.” That’s great, for what it is — AA as an organization isn’t about to make grand proclamations about the issues. But nothing you shared with the group, hopefully not your home group, was really “political.” You just put forth your point of view, like the President does on Twitter every day. How do you feel? How is the room looking at you? Are you ashamed?

    it’s a cop-out to believe that the AA program has nothing to say about anything deemed “political.” Whatever your feelings on taxes or immigration, there’s no question that Trump doesn’t represent sober (in the 12-step sense) values. And it’s actually far worse: Trump, in his embrace and encouragement of resentment and ego, has made himself into a symbol of self-centeredness, a totem of negativity. His morals are about as far removed from sobriety as morals get, and he’s actively bringing down his followers with him. You cannot support this man and call yourself sober. Dry, maybe. Not sober.

    Calm down. This is not as limiting as it first sounds. Because Trump is unique, and support for his presidency is also a unique kind of support, there’s not much overlap with pure partisan issues when it comes to what is and isn’t “sober” as we 12-step adherents understand the word. I’m not here to tell people how to advocate for low taxes, reduce regulations, build a wall on the southern border, or that they need to repent and get right with the spirit of Bill W. I’m of the libertarian/anarchist bent, so if AA is a program for leftists, I better go check out LifeRing. I’m talking about Donald Trump as a man, what he stands for, and what emotional reactions he encourages (and in turn benefits from) in those who support him.

    If you get past the simplistic idea that AA is “non-partisan,” none of this should be too surprising. Trump’s whole life has been about his own gratification at the expense of the world, like mine was when I would guzzle vodka for days on end. In his 2005 book How to Get Rich, he explained: “Show me someone with no ego and I’ll show you a big loser.” (I can’t imagine he would think too highly of the idea that “Twelve Steps deflate ego.”) His supporters like this about Trump — that he is unabashedly self-seeking, proudly vain, constantly boastful, and in a way, I get that. It’s fun, and forbidden, but it certainly isn’t how we hope to model ourselves, or for that matter guide our sponsees; but as entertainment? There’s a certain magnetism.

    The bigger problem with President (no longer entertainer) Trump, for those of us who wish to live sober lives, is that he has embraced the role of playing on and promoting resentment, the thing the Big Book says “destroys more alcoholics than anything else.” His public persona, tweets, and political strategy have all become inseparable from his desire to inflame the ugliest sides of human emotion, the sides that we recovering alcoholics try to manage with grace and magnanimity. He tells his followers, both implicitly and outright: allow yourselves to be bitter; indulge your righteous anger; lash out and never apologize. If anything can conclusively be called “un-sober,” it is the celebration of resentment, and that is what the #MAGA movement stands for.

    Trump’s infamous and above-quoted take on Mexicans — “They’re rapists” — is nothing more or less than a naked appeal to the very sort of shit we sober folks try to avoid rolling around in — and this was in his campaign announcement speech! Since then, Trump has expanded this resentment narrative, directing the bitterness of his followers laser-like toward Muslims, immigrants, and women. He dubbed the midterms the “caravan election,” explicitly and unapologetically stoking fear and hate for a group of impoverished people who may or may not arrive at our border in 6 to 8 weeks.

    Look, you can feel any way you want about the legalistic issue of who should and shouldn’t be allowed in America. But sober people who give in to the caravan fear-mongering, or who play into the resentment culture Trump fosters, are trashing whatever spiritual development the 12 steps have helped them achieve. Is one president worth that?

    Maybe Trump does things like this for political expediency more than a desire to single out groups of people — I’m not the therapist he clearly needs — but the effect is to inflame and encourage resentment. This was certainly the result of his declaration that “very fine people” were part of the Charlottesville white supremacist march, and his prolonged foray into claiming that Barack Obama wasn’t born in America. Racism is resentment purified and focused. If we can’t call racist dog-whistling contrary to AA thinking, I’m not sure AA thinking is good for much of anything.

    We would not accept from our sponsees things that President Trump does, without remorse, on a daily basis. “Progress, not perfection,” goes the sobriety cliché. Trump luxuriates in his lack of progress. He infamously refuses to apologize — or even express some contrition — for his worst comments. With two years of the presidency under his belt, he took great joy in mocking (in public, at a massive rally) a woman who at the very least sincerely believed herself to be a sexual assault survivor. The day after an election he claimed to be happy about, he mocked members of his own party who lost — it’s hard to think of a less gracious way of behaving. As addicts we make mistakes, but we recognize that to live an honest life we need to evaluate those mistakes and learn from them. Trump just doesn’t give a shit about this, and in his role as the most powerful person in the world, he’s uniquely able to beam this way of thinking directly into the psyches of his followers. He is kryptonite to sobriety.

    There is a difference between making mistakes and acting selfishly and egotistically — something we all do, and something that George W. Bush and Barack Obama did often — and basing your entire public life around encouraging others to indulge in what Step Six calls “self-righteous anger,” of the sort that “brings a comfortable feeling of superiority.” The 12 steps take as a given that we have a higher nature that our addiction obscures. How can we then express admiration or support for someone who proudly parades his lack of that higher nature, and asks others to follow his lead?

    Some readers might be puzzled as to how Trump’s rhetoric could appeal to allegedly spiritually aware people, and while it seems odd, but it isn’t. All things considered, if Trump’s public persona is attractive to these AAs — or even if they fail to see the damage his verbal assaults inflict on the psyches of individuals and the nation as a whole — they are simply not sober. They have egocentrically taken back their will at a massive cost to those around them. They are dry, maybe, but they are not sober. And as we all know, the rooms of Alcoholics Anonymous are filled with people of various levels of spiritual sobriety.

    I don’t think so-called “normies” like Trump (and yes, it is weird to think of him as normal) should be held to the standards we hold ourselves to as recovering addicts. But at the same time, we recovering addicts are supposed to recognize the problems with a celebration of ego, selfishness, and most importantly, proud and unapologetic resentment. We wallowed in that for years, and it landed us in the rooms of Alcoholics Anonymous where we ostensibly hoped to redirect our energies to our better natures. Let’s practice what we preach in sobriety. Let’s earn the respect of our sober peers, our sponsors and sponsees, and the people who around us who remember us at our worst.

    There are members of the groups Trump singles out in AA rooms across the country. There are transgender people — the administration’s recent target — in the LGBT meetings I attend here in New York. There are Mexicans recovering from alcohol addiction, including undocumented ones. They don’t have the option of leaving their “politics” at the church basement door. Under this administration, neither do we.

    Trump himself has infamously never had a drink. Maybe that’s the biggest lesson here — we don’t need to be actively drunk to be spiritually wasted.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Why People With Internet Addiction React Worse When Wifi Fails

    Why People With Internet Addiction React Worse When Wifi Fails

    Researchers explored the reaction to digital technology failure in people with internet addiction for a recent study.

    When the Wifi loses its connectivity, or the movie we’re streaming buffers endlessly—when the digital technology by which we have come to expect as part of our daily lives fails, our response to this interruption can take a variety of forms, from mild annoyance to more extreme or “maladaptive” reactions, including anger, panic and depression.

    What determines our response, according to a new study, may be dependent on our psychological makeup. Researchers found that participants who expressed a “maladaptive” response to digital technology failure also showed signs of extroversion, neuroticism, internet addiction and a pervasive “fear of missing out” (FOMO).

    Understanding what provokes these responses may help provide better support for such individuals, researchers suggest.

    In the study—published in the November edition of Heliyon—researchers from De Montfort University in Leicester, England engaged 630 participants, all between the ages of 18 and 68, in an online questionnaire that examined their responses to digital technology failure.

    Participants self-reported how they responded such incidents, as well as their attitudes towards “fear of missing out” and internet addiction. The study authors also measured responses in regard to the BIG-5 personality traits: conscientiousness, extraversion-introversion, agreeableness, openness and neuroticism.

    The researchers found that those participants whose responses indicated extroversion and neuroticism, and who expressed positive responses towards FOMO or symptoms of internet addiction also exhibited more signs of a maladaptive response towards digital technology failure. They also noted a correlation between age and level of response: specifically, as Science Daily noted, as age increased, a person’s level of frustration decreased.

    A frustrated response to technological failure is normal, according to study co-author Dr. Lee Hadlington. “[It’s] one of the things we all experience on a daily basis, so it seemed to be a logical step in our research.”

    But with technology playing a more significant role in our lives with each new development, our dependency on those devices to make our lives function also grows.

    “When they don’t work, we tend to just go a little bit ‘crazy’ or just switch off and stop doing things altogether,” Hadlington noted.

    Determining what provokes extreme responses in certain individuals may help make their lives more manageable.

    “If we can understand what leads individuals to react in certain ways, and why these differences occur, we can hopefully make sure that when digital technology does fail, people are better supported and there are relevant signposts for them to follow to get help,” said Hadlington. “Extreme reactions only make things worse.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Homeless Shelter Will Start Requiring Sobriety

    Homeless Shelter Will Start Requiring Sobriety

    Under the new policy anyone who appears intoxicated or has alcohol on their breath will not be allowed in.

    A Montana homeless shelter will begin turning away people who are using drugs and/or alcohol, reversing its previous policy and highlighting the issues that homeless people with substance use disorder face as they try to find shelter during the winter months. 

    According to The Billings Gazette, the Montana Rescue Mission in downtown Billings will no longer allow people who have been using drugs and/or alcohol to stay inside during “code blue” night, when it is particularly cold or snowy and people on the street could be at risk.

    Previously, the Mission would accept anyone who wasn’t very drunk — it had a policy of refusing people with a blood alcohol level higher than 0.2. Under the new policy anyone who appears intoxicated or has alcohol on their breath will not be allowed in. 

    “The only change we’ve made is we expect to them to be sober,” said Perry Roberts, executive director of the mission. “We just decided [on the change] in order to maintain peace.”

    Individuals who are turned away will be referred to the nearby the Community Crisis Center, a facility that only has room for 45 people and has already begun filling up on cold nights this year. 

    “It really does create a capacity issue,” said MarCee Neary, the Crisis Center’s program director. 

    The Montana Rescue Mission provides two separate long-term shelters: one for men and one for women and children, in addition to the code blue openings. Participants in those programs are required to be sober, and Roberts said that having people around who are abusing drugs or alcohol could be triggering for them and compromise the progress that they have made while at the shelter.

    “Our purpose, our mission is we’re trying to transform lives,” he said.   

    In addition, Roberts pointed out that the staff at the shelter are not able to provide the support that intoxicated people might need.

    “We don’t have medically trained staff,” he said. “We don’t have a professional security guard.”

    The conversation around the policy change at the Mission reflects a wider discussion about providing shelter to people with substance use disorder. According to the Office of National Drug Control Policy, about two-thirds of people who are chronically homeless have a primary substance use disorder. Shelters often have different requirements for their residents, from total sobriety to not using drugs or alcohol on campus. There are also some wet shelters that let homeless people drink. 

    In 2015, a Connecticut homeless shelter opted to close down rather than accept people who were using drugs or alcohol, according to NPR.

    “The organization lacks the staff and funding to supervise active alcohol- and drug-abusers overnight, Stafford said, and there are concerns about the safety of the two people — a staff member and a volunteer — who manage the place each night,” the shelter said at the time. 

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • "Six Gifts" Film Follows Athletes In Different Stages Of Recovery

    "Six Gifts" Film Follows Athletes In Different Stages Of Recovery

    “The movie is meant to inspire people currently suffering from addiction and those who are unable to find that missing piece to the puzzle to help finally get them sober.” 

    A new film celebrates six stories of recovery, sparking a movement to inspire and motivate the addiction/recovery community.

    6 Gifts, directed by Nick Tribuno, follows six athletes from all walks of life and shares their failures and triumphs in battling addiction—Ben Gravy (surfing), Scott French (snowboarding), Rebecca Selig (skiing), Chris Vargo (endurance athlete), Monica Lebansky (yoga) and Melody Schofield (crossfit).

    According to the official website of Sober and Stoked, the movement which funded and produced 6 Gifts, the film is now available to rent or to purchase on Blu Ray. Sober and Stoked co-founders Scott French and Eugene Stiltner raised $6,000 to produce the film with the help of a crowdfunding campaign.

    “The movie is meant to inspire people currently suffering from addiction and those who are unable to find that missing piece to the puzzle to help finally get them sober,” according to the official website. “It is also meant for people who are already sober and feel like they need something else to get them motivated and out enjoying life, so they don’t fall back into previous traps and pitfalls.”

    Both Stiltner and French, who are both originally from the Fairfax, Virginia area, have about 11 years of sobriety.

    “Over a decade of doing drugs and drinking every day had taken a toll on me,” said French on the Sober and Stoked website. “I had acquired 4 DUIs over 10 years, had many drunk-in-public offenses, and many violation of probations.”

    A series of failed relationships compounded his drug use. “Cocaine slowly turned into meth and crack, and then OxyContin and heroin.”

    Ultimately, French surrendered himself at the courthouse and pleaded guilty to his charges. Going to jail was his chance at redemption. “I remember smiling, this was my chance. I was given an opportunity to forcibly be away from drugs and alcohol. I could transform my life, incarceration is the only way I’ll get sober.”

    After enduring a “vicious” detox and attending AA meetings in jail, French put his energy into fitness, marathons and snowboarding.

    His friend and co-founder Eugene Stiltner stopped drinking after a “culmination of almost 8 years of reckless, out-of-control drinking, depression, trouble with the law, and a desire to no longer go on,” he said.

    Stiltner was pulled over by police and arrested while driving home after a night of drinking until last call. “When I got out the next morning, my parents and a family friend who had been sober for many years sat me down for an intervention,” he said.

    Now that the film is complete, Sober and Stoked is focusing on launching a pilot program throughout Maryland and Delaware in 2019.

    The pilot program will host “gear drives” to support the athletic or artistic pursuits of people in recovery.

    “The concept of a gear drive is similar to a clothing drive,” Stiltner told The Fix via email. “People can clean out their basements and garages and bring in lightly used/new outdoor gear and art/music supplies, so the halfway houses we partner with can have healthy activities for people in the houses to do.”

    6 Gifts is available to rent or to purchase on Blu Ray.

    To schedule a screening of 6 Gifts in your community, contact wearesoberandstoked@gmail.com, or purchase a community screening kit available on their website.

    You can also reach out to Sober and Stoked via social media.

    Watch the trailer here.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Demi Lovato’s Life After Rehab

    Demi Lovato’s Life After Rehab

    From sober homes to 12-step meetings, the pop star reportedly has a strong post-rehab support system.

    After spending 90 days in an in-patient facility, singer Demi Lovato is adjusting to life after her overdose, utilizing a sober living facility and relying heavily on her ex-boyfriend Wilmer Valderrama for support. 

    TMZ reported that Valderrama regularly visited Lovato throughout her stay in rehab and has been talking with her and visiting since she returned to Los Angeles last week. The pair dated for six years before splitting up in 2016. 

    In 2015 when Lovato was celebrating three years of sobriety, she said that Valderrama had been instrumental to her recovery. 

    “I really wouldn’t be alive today without him,” she said, according to the Los Angeles Times

    “He’s loved me the way I never thought I deserved to be loved and with this day marking my 3rd year sober… After sharing my ups, putting up with my downs and supporting my recovery… he still never takes credit and I want the world to know how incredible his soul is,” Lovato wrote at the time. 

    The pair hasn’t been spotted in public, but sources told TMZ that they’ve been talking regularly since Lovato has been home. However, it’s not clear whether their interactions are romantic, especially since Lovato was spotted last week with clothing designer Henry Levy, laughing and holding hands.  

    TMZ also reports that Lovato is splitting her time between a private house and a sober home, where she has access to on-going sobriety support including counselors. She spends three days a week at that house, and spends the remainder of the week at home, easing in to everyday activities like going to the gym. Sources also reported that Lovato is regularly attending 12-step meetings. 

    In addition to the support that Lovato gets at the sober home and from attending meetings, she has a sober coach who is constantly by her side to help her get through the days, TMZ reported. 

    Lovato, who overdosed on pills laced with fentanyl in July, posted on social media after the incident. 

    “I have always been transparent about my journey with addiction,” she wrote. “What I’ve learned is that this illness is not something that disappears or fades with time. It is something I must continue to overcome and have not done yet.”  

    She had been silent on social media since then. However, on Tuesday she posted a picture of herself at the ballot box, saying “I am so grateful to be home in time to vote! One vote can make a difference, so make sure your voice is heard! Now go out and vote.”

    View the original article at thefix.com