Category: Addiction News

  • Pink Talks Mental Health, Anxiety With Carson Daly

    Pink Talks Mental Health, Anxiety With Carson Daly

    “I have anxiety. I overthink everything, but what I do is I keep the right people around me, and I go to therapy,” the singer revealed.

    Last Friday (April 26), Pink made a strong return with her new album Hurts 2B Human.

    For Pink, it’s a fitting album title. While promoting her new work, the singer discussed mental health and anxiety on The Today Show.

    At one point in the interview, Carson Daly, who has battled anxiety himself, brought up the subject of mental health of young people “who are really struggling, and they’ve been struggling silently.”

    “I’m hopeful that the taboo of it is all going away, because more and more people are talking about it,” Pink said. “I think talking about it is the most important thing. I know that anxiety is the number one thing that kids now are going through.”

    As the singer continued, “For my generation I feel like it was depression and suicide and suicide is super-prevalent still, but now it’s like it comes from a place of anxiety. And I get that, I fully understand that, and I’ve been depressed. I have anxiety. I overthink everything, but what I do is I keep the right people around me, and I go to therapy.” (Pink and her husband, Carey Hart, have been in counseling together for 17 years, and she credits this for keeping her marriage together.)

    In battling anxiety and depression, Pink also recommended keeping a journal. Through it, she’s “exorcised so many demons from just putting it to paper.”

    The title track of her album “Hurts 2B Human” is a collaboration between Pink and singer-songwriter Khalid. She told Entertainment Weekly, “When this song happened, it hit a string in me that just resonates. I feel like in 2019 if you’re present and not totally escaping your feelings and you’re looking around at what’s going on in the world, it hurts… I think it’s a really hopeful song.”

    The song “Happy” also deals with Pink’s views on body image and self-esteem. She found the song “a release. I’ve always been a person who likes to shake hands with the elephant in the room. I don’t feel like I’m any different than anybody else but maybe I’m just able to talk about it. I believe in therapy and I think music is therapy.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Apple Takes Down Smartphone Addiction Apps, Puts Up Their Own

    Apple Takes Down Smartphone Addiction Apps, Puts Up Their Own

    Apps meant to help users limit screen time for themselves or their kids are having permissions revoked, or removed entirely.

    Developers of screen addiction-fighting apps say that Apple has been squeezing them out. The company behind the iPhone has been revoking permissions from some of these apps and outright removing others.

    The crackdown comes after Apple released its own screen time-reducing feature, and some don’t think this is a coincidence.

    According to app developers, Apple has been forcing them to remove usage-tracking features, even those intended for parents to limit how much time or what kinds of apps their children can access on their own devices.

    Fred Stutzman, chief executive at Freedom, sees this as a conflict of interest considering Apple’s own usage-limiting features are not as aggressive or convenient as what apps like Freedom provided.

    “Their incentives aren’t really aligned for helping people solve their problem,” Stutzman said. “Can you really trust that Apple wants people to spend less time on their phones?”

    Freedom had 770,000 downloads from the App Store before it was removed in August. Whether users want or depend on the apps doesn’t seem to matter to Apple, considering they removed OurPact, the most popular parental control app with more than 3 million downloads.

    “They yanked us out of the blue with no warning,” said Amir Moussavian, OurPact’s chief executive. “They are systematically killing the industry.” 

    Apple CEO Tim Cook touted their suite of screen time-related features at a conference this month, saying they intend to fight smartphone addiction. “We don’t want people using their phones all the time,” Cook said. “This has never been an objective for us.”

    Representatives say that the timing is purely coincidence.

    “We treat all apps the same, including those that compete with our own services,” said Apple spokesperson Tammy Levine. “Our incentive is to have a vibrant app ecosystem that provides consumers access to as many quality apps as possible.”

    The app developers aren’t buying it. Popular parental control apps Kidslox and Qustodio are taking it up to the European Union’s competition office.

    Two of Apple’s big shareholders urged the company to personally take responsibility for the “toxic” effects of excessive smartphone use early last year—though they probably didn’t mean it like this. 

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Doctor-Turned-Sober Home Owner Describes Descent Into Addiction

    Doctor-Turned-Sober Home Owner Describes Descent Into Addiction

    The former small town West Virginia doctor described how his own addiction and poor prescribing habits changed his life forever.

    Dr. Lou Ortenzio popped his first opioid pain pills in 1988, long before most Americans knew what an opioid was. 

    Over the next 15 years, the small town doctor in West Virginia saw more and more patients asking for powerful painkillers, while he himself became more addicted.

    Whereas older generations in Appalachia had lived with ailments and pain, never wanting to seem “complainy,” in the 1990s Ortenzio began to see a shift in patient perspective. 

    “The new generation that came in the 1980s, those kids began to have the expectation that life should be pain-free,” he told The Atlantic. “If you went to your physician and you didn’t come away with a prescription, you did not have a successful visit.”

    Between 1995 and 2005 the number of pharmaceutical sales reps nearly tripled and Ortenzio began to have more and more sales reps knocking on his door pushing the latest painkillers. 

    “It went from a dozen [salesmen] a week to a dozen a day,” he said. “If you wrote a lot of scrips, you were high on their call list. You would be marketed to several times a day by the same company with different reps.”

    Throughout the late 90s and early 2000s Ortenzio found himself writing more and more prescriptions. As he became known as a doctor who would easily prescribe pills, more patients sought him out.

    At the same time he was taking more pills, even asking a friend to fill prescriptions for him. When he tried to quit he would experience symptoms of withdrawal, which gave him understanding for the predicament that many of his patients found themselves in. 

    He said, “I couldn’t be away from my supply.”

    In 2004, after his wife divorced him, Ortenzio got sober following a religious experience. Other doctors turned to The Physician Health Program, run by the West Virginia State Medical Association, which has helped more than 230 doctors in West Virginia get sober.

    Yet Ortenzio’s sobriety wasn’t the end of opioids ruining his life. Soon after he stopped using, federal agents raided his office, and in 2006 Ortenzio pleaded guilty to fraudulent prescribing. He paid $200,000 in restitution, lost his medical license, and had to complete 1,000 hours of community service while under supervised release for five years. 

    Once a promising physician, Ortenzio was 53 and delivering pizzas, but he was at peace. After years of volunteering with a recovery center, Ortenzio opened a sober living home, which now serves six men, with plans to expand by opening another center for women.

    Although he will never be able to practice medicine again, Ortenzio is happy where he is today, sustaining his own recovery and helping other people get sober. 

    “I made pizza deliveries where I used to make house calls,” he said. “I delivered pizzas to people who were former patients. They felt very uncomfortable, felt sorry for me. It didn’t bother me. I was in a much better place.” 

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Cavaliers’ J.R. Smith Bans Alcohol From His House

    Cavaliers’ J.R. Smith Bans Alcohol From His House

    The famously hard-partying NBA player surprised fans with his social media announcement.

    J.R. Smith of the Cleveland Cavaliers announced that alcohol is no longer allowed in his house on an Instagram post. The announcement might come as a surprise to many fans as Smith has something of a reputation for partying hard. 

    After a 2016 Cavalier title run, a shirtless drinking binge earned Smith an unofficial title as the NBA’s Hennessy god.

    Snapping a photo of emptied liquor bottles atop what is presumably his home bar for his post, he set some new ground rules for anyone visiting his abode:

    “To all who decides to step foot in my house from here on out!!!! IT WILL BE 0 ALCOHOL AT MY HOUSE! You want to drink take that shit back where you came! But in MY HOUSE! NO MORE ALCOHOL! #Thanks! Don’t speak about it BE ABOUT IT!”

    Smith’s decision to turn a new leaf may stem from the fact that he just finished the worst season he’s had in his 15-year career. His time with the Cavaliers is ending, so team management is looking for potential trade partners. Some speculate Smith’s new no-booze rule is a move to show he’s focused on basketball and athletics, not partying and Hennessy.

    The NBA has taken steps to encourage mental wellness with their initiative called Mind Health. In May of last year, the league produced a 30-second TV spot to be broadcast during the NBA playoffs.

    “Everyone walks around with something that you can’t see,” Love says in the PSA. “The best thing I did was to come out and say, ‘Hey look, I need some help.’”

    Besides outreach urging viewers to communicate openly about their mental health, the NBA also released guided meditation videos called Headspace that helps athletes take care of their head space before competition. The Cleveland Cavaliers own Kevin Love revealed that he works with Mind Health because he’s suffered from panic attacks himself.

    “If you’re suffering silently like I was, then you know how it can feel like nobody really gets it,” Love wrote. “Partly, I want to do it for me, but mostly, I want to do it because people don’t talk about mental health enough. And men and boys are probably the farthest behind.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Virtual Reality Could Be Used To Treat Stubborn Depression Symptoms

    Virtual Reality Could Be Used To Treat Stubborn Depression Symptoms

    One research team is on a mission to treat one of the most difficult and overlooked parts of depression to treat using virtual reality.

    Researchers are currently testing virtual reality programs on depression patients with the idea that going through positive experiences, even virtually, and focusing on the positive aspects of the experience could effectively treat anhedonia.

    This symptom, characterized by a lack of interest in anything and an inability to feel pleasure, is one of the most difficult parts of depression to treat and is often overlooked, according to University of California psychiatry researcher Michelle Craske.

    “Most treatments, up until now, have done an OK job at reducing negative [symptoms of depression], but a very poor job at helping patients become more positive,” said Craske to STAT.

    Using virtual reality, Crask and her colleagues guide patients through dives into coral reefs and tours through Venice, instructing them to report every pleasurable detail. This approach, called positive affect therapy, trains patients to pay more attention to what makes them feel good and hopefully amplifies feelings of pleasure and joy.

    Thanks to the development of virtual reality technology, it’s possible to bring all kinds of incredible experiences into one office or into people’s homes. Patients can return to their favorite experiences and explore what makes them happy without spending a ton of money.

    “Mental health and the environment are inseparable,” said University of Oxford psychologist Dr. Daniel Freeman. “The brilliant thing about virtual reality is that you can provide simulations in the environment and have people repeatedly go into them.”

    Research on this therapy is still in preliminary stages, but the early results of Craske’s work look promising. In fact, Craske’s team is looking to work with virtual reality companies specifically to develop a program that adapts to patient mood indicators.

    “If, for example, a patient smiles at a VR character who waves and says hello, that character might walk over and strike up a friendly conversation.”

    Virtual reality is currently being tested for possible application in all steps of mental health treatment, including the earliest ones.

    According to an article in WIRED earlier this year, researchers are exploring whether this new technology could be used to better diagnose mental and neurological conditions such as depression, PTSD, and Alzheimer’s.

    “With some psychiatric disorders, for example OCD or panic disorder, patients usually experience their symptoms in their personal environment or in crowded places, and not in the clinician’s room,” said University of Amsterdam’s Department of Psychiatry researcher Dr. Martine van Bennekom. “With VR it is possible to immerse patients in an exterior environment while the clinician can observe symptoms and interview the patients about these symptoms and underlying thoughts.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Scared Straight: How My Fear in Early Sobriety Evolved Into Lifesaving Discipline

    Scared Straight: How My Fear in Early Sobriety Evolved Into Lifesaving Discipline

    I was free from myself. And this freedom was a direct result of being completely mortified at having put myself in such a precarious, powerless position. It was the most honest fear I’d ever felt – and the healthiest.

    The date was October 12, 2011. It was my second morning of sobriety, the first that I’d woken up in my bed rather than jail. Two days earlier I’d sideswiped a cab, blind drunk, and kept going. Cops frown upon that.

    For some time, I’d been building toward a last straw scenario – a no-doubter dealbreaker to finally cost me my marriage and (yet another) job. The dead silence with which my spouse departed for work that day spoke volumes, and God knew how I’d keep my suburbs-based job without a license to drive there.

    As it turned out, I still have both – the wife and the job – today, seven-plus years into recovery. And what I’ve realized is that the unprecedented fear I felt that fall morning was key to sparking my long-term sobriety.

    Recently in this space, I wrote a piece about how, for all its faults, AA groupthink can help newcomers develop much-needed discipline, as it encourages a standardized structure recommended for recovery. Meeting, sponsor, stepwork, repeat.

    But for me and for many, there was also a second, more self-sufficient catalyst to recovery: fear. Fear that you’ve already done enough to be doomed; or if you haven’t, you can’t stop yourself from making it worse still; fear to do anything at all because you’ve proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that you can’t trust yourself to do anything, at all. Fear not only of consequences, but of self.

    Sometimes it truly is darkest before the dawn. This seemingly debilitating state can, ironically, lead to lifesaving discipline of a sort we alcoholics and addicts had thought far beyond our grasp.

    Freedom in Fear

    Despite the divorce/firing 1-2 combo I felt certain was coming, that second sober morning I felt free – and not just because I was no longer behind bars.

    Rather, my freedom was twofold. First, what’s done had been done and I couldn’t undo it. So although I was scared shitless of how my marriage and career could both abruptly end, I was free from worrying about whether I’d do something to warrant those outcomes. Been there, drank that.

    More importantly, I was free from myself. And this freedom was a direct result of being completely mortified at having put myself in such a precarious, powerless position. It was the most honest fear I’d ever felt – and in hindsight, the healthiest.

    Starting that day I became deathly afraid of my erratic, addiction-driven actions. All the vows of abstinence inspired by a worsening set of consequences and hangovers had accomplished nothing. The 7am “never agains” had become the 4pm “once agains,” again and again.

    I simply couldn’t trust myself to make decisions, and I knew it. And considering its origin – the brain of a nervous wreck, two-day-sober insane person – my next thought was illogically logical:

    “Then stop making fucking decisions.”

    This, of course, was easier said than done, and in fact sounded suspiciously similar to many former miserably-failed declarations of self-restraint. This time around, the only fresh variable was the agoraphobic, fetal-position-caliber fear permeating my body, with an assist from a stupefying fog familiar to those of us who also suffer from depression.

    I was scared. I was stunned. And I had to be at work in 45 minutes. My uncle gave me a lift. In the car ride over, one thought reverberated in my head:

    “Just get to work, do your job, and come right home.” It was all I could handle that day. It was also the genesis of an invaluable recovery tool: keep it simple.

    From Fear to Powerlessness

    I got to work and back that day, and the next. I managed to walk myself to an AA meeting a half block from home. That weekend I shadowed my miraculously still-there wife like a toddler would his mommy.

    My daily deeds had dwindled to a precious few, and fell into one of two categories: everything I did was either obligatory (work, AA meeting) or subjugated, meaning it was accompanied and determined by someone else (my wife, an in-the-know family member). If that sounds pathetic… well, it is. But it worked.

    This decision-free existence, I’ve come to realize, was a real-world Step 1, whose dual recognitions of powerlessness over inebriating substances and life unmanageability are, I believe, near-universal to recovering alcoholics and addicts regardless their particular method of sobriety.

    What ensued was a lifestyle minimalism in which my days were rigidly pre-planned, and I still had enough of my secret ingredient – fear – to prevent any deviating from this preset course. A typical day looked something like this:

    Wake up, get dressed, coffee, breakfast. Board the first of three buses (New Jersey’s transit system leaves a lot to be desired) for work. Work. Eat lunch – bagged and brought, because the fewer times you walk out of your office, the smaller the chance you’ll walk into a bar.

    Work again. Three buses home. Gym or AA, time and rides permitting.

    During this time I was never on my own in private for more than five minutes if at all possible. Being (amazingly still) married was obviously a key factor here; as someone who spent early sobriety in a self-constructed cage, I still have no idea how anyone gets sober while single – that feat would have meant too much me time to accrue clean time.

    During this period it was crucial that I built a solid sober foundation. For me, that meant making meetings, getting a sponsor, and making an honest start on the 12 steps; I strongly encourage those in other recovery programs to dive into the prescribed action plan for newcomers.

    How to Build a Foundation in Recovery, Quickly

    The point – the universal goal – is building a foundation of recovery as expediently as possible. Because fear, like our once-vivid memories of alcoholism’s harms and humiliations, fades over time. I didn’t realize it, but I was in a race against the clock to develop reliable recovery tools before my stubborn self-will—in the form of the idiotic notion that I was prepared to once again make my own decisions—returned in brute force.

    Luckily, we only need to win early sobriety once. And in this perfect storm of circumstances, I was just scared enough and stiff enough for long enough to eke out a victory. By the time my fear began to waver and wane, I had a few months and a few steps under my belt. I was on my way.

    Inch by inch, the closed door of my life began to creak open. I started to take little excursions by myself, informing my wife precisely where I was going and when I’d return. I dared go out for lunch at work from time to time. I went to the trigger-laden New York City by myself for a doctor’s appointment. And finally I passed the biggest test of all: getting my driver’s license back and, with it, all the potentially disastrous decisions that come with the open road.

    Not surprisingly, none of this success was the result of any grand master plan hatched by a raw, frightened newcomer. This was far more fortune than forethought. Regardless, it’s the results that count – both for me and, I hope, for others just beginning their journey in recovery.

    If you’re reading this as a scared-witless newcomer, take the advice of someone whose experience was accidental but nonetheless useful: Make the decision to stop making decisions. There’s plenty of time to get your life back. Now’s the time to save it.

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Feuding Politicians Challenge Each Other To Drug Tests In 'Pissing Contest'

    Feuding Politicians Challenge Each Other To Drug Tests In 'Pissing Contest'

    An online squabble turned ugly when allegations of drug use were brought up.

    Two U.S. politicians got into an argument in the comments section of a political blog and ended up challenging each other to drug tests in what some are calling a literal pissing contest.

    Bridgeport City Councilman Ernest Newton and Board of Education member Maria Pereira, both Connecticut Democrats, began the argument about budget figures in the comments of the local blog Only in Bridgeport (OIB) before it started turning ugly.

    The internet fight turned to the topic of drugs when Newton took a shot at Pereira’s mental health. “Please remember to take your med”s [sic],” he wrote. Pereira turned the thinly veiled insult around by going after Newton’s history of addiction.

    “Ernie, I promise I will continue to take any and all prescribed medicine,” she replied. “In turn, please ensure you take anything you need that may have to be swallowed, snorted, inhaled, or injected.”

    In 1997, Newton confessed to his fellow legislators in the Connecticut General Assembly that he had been through rehab for his addiction to crack cocaine. The disorder was active in Newton’s life for four years while he served as a Connecticut state congressman.

    In the online argument, Newton hit back by accusing Pereira of overdosing on some kind of medication, landing her in a psychiatric ward. Pereira vehemently denied these claims and issued a challenge.

    “I’ll tell you what, Ernie,” she wrote. “I will gladly pay for both you and I to take a drug test with the understanding the results, whatever they may be, will be released to OIB. I have absolutely nothing to worry about. Will you agree to take a drug test I pay for on the condition the results are released to OIB?”

    Newton did agree, telling her to name the time and place. Pereira named the local AFC Urgent Care as the place for an observed 10-panel urine drug test.

    Both Newton’s and Pereira’s results came back negative.

    The test results did not put an end to the feud, however.

    Pereira accused Newton of faking his results when he posted that they came back negative in the comments rather than submitting a photo of the results to Only in Bridgeport like she had wanted. Newton then questioned why Pereira’s results took longer than his to come back and accused her of foul play. He also accused her of racism, saying that she “wouldn’t have challenged a white person” to a drug test contest and that she’s “just like Donald Trump.”

    The online fight apparently ended on April 15 after citizen commenters began questioning why the two were engaging in an unproductive fight, with one calling it “embarrassing to the city.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Moby on Sobriety: "We Can't Hold On to Crazy, Magical Thinking"

    Moby on Sobriety: "We Can't Hold On to Crazy, Magical Thinking"

    A new memoir by music producer and artist Moby looks back on the highs and lows of his substance use.

    In his new book, Then It Fell Apart, producer/DJ and music artist Moby reflects on his rise to stardom in the early 2000s while struggling with destructive dependencies on alcohol and drugs.

    Moby (born Richard Melville Hall) has been sober for the past 11 years, during which he’s continued to create new music—most recently Long Ambients 2 (2019), his follow-up to 2016’s Long Ambients 1: Calm Sleep—and oversee several ventures outside recording, including a nonprofit vegan restaurant.

    The new book—which picks up where his previous memoir Porcelain (2016) left off—details his attempts “to fix childhood trauma with egregiously bad and clueless adult decisions. Not surprisingly, it didn’t work.”

    That early trauma—which included sexual abuse and his father’s suicide—was only exacerbated by his ascent to fame with albums like 1999’s Play and 2002’s 18. Though his music had made him globally famous, Moby reports in Apart that he was plagued by loneliness and panic attacks, which he began experiencing after using LSD as a teenager.

    “My belief, before I got sober, was that fame was going to fix my feelings of inadequacy,” he told San Francisco’s KQED. When that didn’t work, he turned to drugs, alcohol and sex. “I longed for things to work in that way,” he recalled. “I wanted to be fixed by these unhealthy external things.” But as he discovered, the combination only added to his internal misery.

    In 2002, Moby sought to gain sobriety and insight into the reasons for his personal struggles. He finally stopped using in 2008, and has remained clean since then. Of his journey, Moby said, “Part of sobriety—and a degree of spiritual fitness—is that we can’t in adulthood, hold onto crazy, magical thinking.”

    Then It Fell Apart ends just before Moby became sober; he told KQED that he’s saving that part of his story for a third volume, which will focus less on recovery and more on his pursuit of spiritual integrity. “I’m not a Christian, but my life is geared towards God, understanding God, trying to do God’s will,” he said. “Keeping in mind, I have no idea who or what God is.”

    He’s also learned to enjoy his time just outside the glare of the celebrity spotlight. “It’s really nice to just accept age, accept hair loss, accept diminishing commercial viability,” he explains. “Accepting these things and trying to learn from them is a lot more enjoyable and a lot healthier than angrily fighting entropy.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Unwanted Sexting Linked To Mental Distress

    Unwanted Sexting Linked To Mental Distress

    A new study found that men had more adverse effects when they got unwanted sexts even though women receive more.

    Getting unwanted sexual pictures messaged over texts or dating apps has become so common that it’s joked about and laughed at, but new research shows that receiving unwanted “sexts” can contribute to depression and other mental health effects. 

    The Australian study, published in the journal Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, found that engaging in coerced or non-consensual sexts contributed to youth ages 18-21 feeling worse. 

    “Receiving unwanted sexts, or sexting under coercion, was associated with higher depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms, and lower self-esteem, and these two sexting experiences were independent predictors of psychological distress,” study authors wrote

    Interestingly, the researchers found that men seemed to have more adverse effects when they got unwanted sexts, although females were more likely to receive unwanted messages. 

    “The relationship between these sexting behaviors with poor mental health was moderated by gender, with poorer outcomes for males receiving unwanted sexts,” researchers wrote. “This is contrary to popular belief that females are more adversely impacted than males by sexting activity. However, it is important to note that both genders were adversely affected with regard to depression, anxiety, stress, and self-esteem when sending a sext under coercion.”

    While previous studies have linked all sexting with poorer mental health outcomes, this study was careful to separate consensual sexual exchanges with unwanted or coerced ones. 

    “Our results showed no association between receiving or sending sexts overall,” researchers wrote. 

    Researchers said that their findings about the impact of sexting could have widespread implications. 

    “When receiving or sending unwanted but consensual sexts, respondents reported higher depression, anxiety, and stress, and lower self-esteem,” researchers wrote. “Another significant finding was that receiving unwanted sexts and sending sexts under pressure were independent predictors of poorer mental health. This suggests that they affect mental health in unique ways, and that there is an additive impact for these two sexting phenomena on mental health.”

    They said that unwanted sexting can be a risk factor for intimate violence under certain circumstances. 

    “This finding is important as the nature of this sexting behavior has been likened to intimate partner violence,” they wrote.

    “That is, the findings of our study may shed light on why some researchers conceptualize sexting as simply a normative sexual behavior, while others see it as a potential risk behavior, including for sexual violence. Indeed, our findings indicate that both can be true. Sexting behaviors can range from consensual sexting as a normative behavior exploring one’s sexuality to non-consensual sexting which is associated with negative mental health outcomes and more closely resembles a form of intimate partner violence.”

    View the original article at thefix.com

  • Marijuana Could Disqualify Immigrants From US Citizenship

    Marijuana Could Disqualify Immigrants From US Citizenship

    Any association with marijuana could be considered an issue in establishing “good moral character,” which is a requirement for citizenship.

    Immigrants who are found to have any involvement with marijuana—from possession and distribution, to medical marijuana use, to working in a cannabis company—could bar immigrants from earning citizenship, even in states where marijuana is legal.

    New guidelines issued by U.S. Citizenship and Immigrant Services (USCIS) state that any violation of the Controlled Substances Act could be considered as an undermining factor in establishing “good moral character” (GMC), which is a requirement for citizenship.

    Though medical marijuana is legal in 33 states and the District of Columbia, and recreational marijuana is legal for adults in 10 states and D.C., marijuana remains a Schedule I drug, and as such, remains prohibited by federal law.

    The new guidelines (released on April 19) were issued as clarification for the USCIS Policy Manual about how an arrest for any involvement in marijuana-related activity could upend an immigrant’s efforts towards citizenship.

    USCIS stated in the memo that a “violation of federal controlled substance law, including for marijuana, established by a conviction or admission, is generally a bar to establishing GMC for naturalization even where the conduct would not be a violation of state law.”

    USCIS policy defines good moral character as behavior that “measures up to the standards of average citizens in which the applicant resides.”

    A naturalization officer would determine an applicant’s GMC according to his or her record, statements provided during the application, and oral testimony from an interview.

    Applicants for naturalization who are found to have violated the federal law through “marijuana-related activities” may be considered to lack GMC. Such activities include possession, distribution, cultivation or manufacture of marijuana, regardless of its legal status in a state.

    As CBS News noted, even jobs associated with the cannabis industry or use of medical marijuana could be denoted as a violation.

    “U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is required to adjudicate cases based on federal law,” said USCIS spokesperson Jessica Collins to CBS News. “Individuals who commit federal controlled substance violations face potential immigration consequences under the Immigration and Nationality Act, which applies to all foreign nationals regardless of the state or jurisdiction in which they reside.”

    The exception to this policy is if the violation is a single offense for simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana

    View the original article at thefix.com